:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:通識教育兼任教師教學品質評鑑之研究
書刊名:國立高雄海洋科大學報
作者:林智隆王志敏
作者(外文):Lin, Chih LongWang, Chih Min
出版日期:2005
卷期:20
頁次:頁23-50
主題關鍵詞:教學品質多元逐步迴歸學生評鑑教師Teaching performanceMultiple stepwise regressionStudents' evaluation on teachers' teaching
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:143
  • 點閱點閱:72
本研究之主要目的,在探討國立高雄海洋科技大學學生對通識課程兼任教師教學滿意的程度,並探討其相關因素:學生性別、年級、院系、教學內容、教學課程要求與學教學品質的關係。 為達成上述目的,本研究兼採文獻探討與問卷調查,以國立高雄海洋科技大學二技、四技學生修習九十三學年度下學期通識兼任教師開課課程的班級為研究的對象,以自編之「教學反映意見調查表」為調查工具,並針對10門通識開課班級465位學生進行問卷調查研究,利用統計套裝軟體STATISTICA,以描述分析、f檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關分析、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料分析。根據資料分析結果,獲得以下結論: 一、學生對於兼任通識教師教學的評鑑結果,整體來說有中等以上的滿意程度。 二、就性別、年級、院所而言,對於兼任通識教師教學的評鑑結果,沒有顯著差異。 三、學生對於不同課程評鑑結果與整體的評鑑結果顯示沒有顯著差異。 根據文獻探討及統計分析研究的結果,提出以下的建議提供參考。 一、針對每一位兼任教師建立長期教學檔案,以便有系統的評鑑。 二、為使評鑑結果更具有效性,學校應邀請兼任教師參加校內教學研討,加強與校內的互動,相對的可提供兼任老師教學協助。 三、依評鑑結果舉辦兼任教師訪評座談會,交換教學心得並做評鑑追蹤,以了解兼任教師改善情形,協助教師改進缺點,提昇教學成效。 四、制定一套兼任教師教學管理制度,明定兼任教師權利與義務及可獲得教學之支援。
The purpose for this research is related to the discussions of the students' satisfaction to their general education part-time teachers' teaching in the National Kaohsiung Marine University and the correlation between students' evaluation and teachers' teaching performance. To fulfill the stated purpose, text analysis and questionnaire are applied in this research. The object studied in this research is the 2-year & 4-year technological program general education part-time teachers' teaching classes of the National Kaohsiung Marine University in the second semester in 2005; researching tool is a survey chart written by the author “Opinion Poll for teachings in the National Kaohsiung Marine Uninversity”. The data was collected from the interview with 465 students from the classes of the general education and analyzed with statistic software, STATISTICA, and by statistic approaches as follows: description analysis, f-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's Product-moment Correlation, and Multiple Stepwise Regression. Accroding to the analyses, the results in the research are listed as below: 1. As a whole, students of the National Kaohsiung Marine University show their satisfaction beyond the average at the evaluation for general education part-time teachers' teaching performance. 2. In general, the gender, grades, and respect of majors, the results of students' evaluation on the general education part-time teachers' teaching do not show any discrepancy in different gender and level and on the whole. 3. The result showed in individual evaluation in different curriculum of general education had no obvious difference compared with the whole evaluation. The following suggestions based on the results of text analysis and case study approach are raised for the school reference. 1. Collecting the teaching files for all the general education part-time teachers for long term is helpful to hold evaluations systematically. 2. Based on the results of evaluation, hold meetings for discussion with the general education part-time teachers and follow up the teachers' improvement would help teachers to enhance the effectiveness in teaching. 3. Convening the general education teaching seminar and interchange teaching experience to improve the general education part-time teachers' teaching performance. 4. Set up a management system for the general education part-time teacher in order to establish the teachers' right, obligations and teaching back up.
期刊論文
1.張德勝、朱淑棉(20030600)。師範學院與非師範學院教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度之比較。花蓮師院學報(教育類),16,1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Tollefson, N.、Chen, J. S.、Kleinsasser, A.(1989)。The relationship of students' attitude about effective teaching to students' ratings of effective teaching。Educational and Psychological Measurement,49(3),529-536。  new window
3.Widmeyer, W. N.、Loy, J. W.(1988)。When your hot, your hot ! Warm and cold effects in first impressions of persons and teaching effectiveness。Journal of Educational Psychology,80,118-121。  new window
4.Abrami, P. C.、d'pollonia, S.、Cohen, P. A.(1990)。Validity of student ratings finstruction: What we know and what we do not。Journal of Educational Psychology,82,219-231。  new window
5.Harrison, P. D.、Ryan, J. M.、Moore, P. S.(1996)。College students' self-insight and common implicit theories in ratings of teaching effectiveness。Journal of Educational sychology,88(4),775-582。  new window
6.Stufflebeam, D. L.、Foley, W. J.、Gephart, W. J.、Guba, E. G.、Hammond, L. R.、Cronbach, L. J.(1963)。Course Improvement through valuation。Teachers College Record,64,672。  new window
7.Feldman, K. A.(1989)。Instructional effectiveness of clooege teachers as judges by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, andextemal (neutral) observers。Research in Higher Education,30(2),137-194。  new window
8.彭森明、李虎雄、簡茂發(19980500)。教師基本素質評量制度之建立與評量工具之設計。教育資料與研究,22,30-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Greenwood, G. E.、Ramagli, H. J.(1980)。Alternatives to student ratings of college teaching。Journal of Higher Education,51(6),673-682。  new window
10.羅清水(19990200)。教師專業發展的另一途徑--談教師評鑑制度的建立。研習資訊,16(1),1-10。  延伸查詢new window
11.歐陽教、張德銳(19930300)。教師評鑑模式之研究。教育研究資訊,1(2),90-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.張德勝(1998)。學生評鑑教師教學--以花蓮師範學院為例。八十六學年度師範教育學術研討會,花蓮師範學院舉辦 。國立花蓮師範學院。1-22。  延伸查詢new window
2.張德勝(1999)。教師性別、職位、等級、學生年級對學生評鑑教學結果的影響。八十七學年度師範教育學術研討會。台北:台北市立師範學院。732-772。  延伸查詢new window
3.張德勝(1999)。教師、科目之特性對學生評鑑教師教學之影響--以花蓮師範學院為例。八十七學年度花蓮師範學院學術研討會。花蓮:國立花蓮師範學院。77-118。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張倍禎(2002)。大學教學優良教師評量指標研究--以淡江大學為例(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Shieh, V.(1990)。Using Delphi Technique to Determine the Most Important Characteristics of Effective Teaching at Junior High School Level in Taiwan(博士論文)。University of Cincinnati,Cincinnati, Ohio。  new window
3.陳珮軒(2000)。大學學生評鑑教師教學之研究--以長庚大學管理學院為例(碩士論文)。長庚大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉重新(1987)。臺灣地區九所大學教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」期望之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.傅木龍(1998)。英國中小學教師評鑑制度研究及其對我國之啟示(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.朱敬先(2000)。教育心理學--教學取向。台北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.唐麗英、王春和(2003)。STATISTICA 6.0版與基礎統計分析。台北:儒林圖書。  延伸查詢new window
3.趙民德、謝邦昌(2000)。迴歸分析。台北:曉園出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Stake, R. E.、Worthen, B. P.、Sanders, J. R.(1973)。Educational Evaluation: Theory and Practice。Ohio:Charles A. Jones Co.。  new window
5.Greene, J. E.(1971)。School personnel administration。Pennsylvania:Chilton Book Company。  new window
6.陳順宇(1998)。多變量分析。臺南市:陳順宇發行 臺北市 : 華泰書局總經銷。  延伸查詢new window
7.Miller, R. I.(1974)。Developing programs for faculty evaluation。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publisher。  new window
8.Stufflebeam, Daniel L.、Shinkfield, Anthony J.、黃光雄(1989)。教育評鑑的模式。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
9.秦夢群(1997)。教育行政:理論部分。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Cashin, W. E.(1990)。Student Ratings of Teaching: Recommendations for Use,Manhattan:Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development。,http://ideaedu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Idea_Paper_22.pdf,(ED 339731)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Theall, M.、Franklin, J.(1991)。Student Ratings in the Context Evaluation Systems。Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice。San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Iwanicki, E. F.(1981)。Contract plans: A professional growth-oriented approach to evaluating teacher performance。Handbook of teacher evaluation。Beverly Hills, California:Sage Publications。  new window
3.黃坤錦(1995)。從教師專業論教師評鑑。教育評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE