參考文獻
一、中文部份
丁一顧和張德銳（2006）。臨床視導對國小實習教師教學效能影響之研究。師大學報：教育類，51(2)，219-236。
王美芬（1998）。自然科學教師專業成長與遠距輔導的可行性探討。科學教育研究與發展季刊，11，3-18。
立法院（2002）。師資培育法。91年12月11日，取自立法院法律系統資料庫：http://npl.ly.gov.tw/www/home.jsp?page_url=./law/law2.3.jsp&key_id=54&folder.Name=立法資源
朱苑瑜和葉玉珠（2003）。實習教師信念改變的影響因素之探討。師大學報：教育類，48(1)，41-66。
李倩鈺（2002）。教育實習中實習輔導教師與實習教師師徒關係之探討。國立臺東師範學院教育研究所博士論文，未出版，臺東市。
李源順（2005）。學生教師運用知識庫學習數學教學：理論與實務的連結。科學教育學刊，13(1)，53-70。
李源順和林福來（1998）。校內數學教師專業發展的互動模式。師大學報：科學教育類，43(2)，1-23。
李源順和林福來（2000）。數學教師的專業成長:教學多元化。師大學報：科學教育類，45(1)，1-25。
李源順和林福來（2003）。實習教師的學習：動機、身份與反思互動下的成長。科學教育學刊，11(1)，1-25。
李復芝（2003）。國小自然科教師試行科學價值教學之行動研究—PCDC科學探究與價值澄清法之搭配。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
何曉琪（2005）。我是誰？實習教師身分認同之研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
吳麗君（1999）。新制實習拼圖：一座橋還是一堵牆。輯於國立臺北師範學院承辦八十八學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會論文集，1，初等教育類，99-120。
吳麗君（2003）。實習教師的專業發展－文化的觀點。教育資料集刊，28，109-128。
林芳綺（2007）。六位數學實習教師教學身分內涵及發展的個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學數學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
林凱胤、王國華和蔡維真（2007）。部落格在師資培育課程應用之研究。科學教育學刊，15(4)，461-490。林新發、王秀玲和鄧珮秀（2007）。我國中小學師資培育現況、政策與展望。教育研究與發展期刊，3(1)，57-79。林福來（1997）。教學思維的發展：整合數學教學知識的教材教法（1/3）。臺北市：行政院國家科學委員會。
邱貴發（1996）。情境學習理念與電腦輔助學習－學習理念探討。臺北：師大書苑。
徐式寬（2001）。從實習教師的需求探索教育實習網站之建構。教學科技與媒體，56，65-72。徐新逸（1996）。情境學習在數學教育上的應用。教學科技與媒體，29，13-22。陳明鎮（1997）。國民中學新舊制實習教師教育實習成效評估之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學類研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
陳美玉（1999）。教師專業學習與發展。臺北：師大書苑。
陳美伶（2001）。國一直角座標以價值為中心的教材設計與教學改變之行動研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
陳益興（2006）。95年度師資培育重要政策措施回顧與前瞻。載於95年11月30日教育實習績優三獎頒獎及全國師資培育大學主管聯席會議之「95年度師資培育重要政策措施回顧與前瞻」手冊（pp.1-8），臺北市：教育部。
陳惠邦（1998）。教育行動研究。臺北：師大書苑。
教育部（2000）。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。臺北市：教育部。教育部（2002）。師資培育法。臺北市：教育部。
教育部（2003）。國民教育階段九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市：教育部。
葉兆祺（2000）。國民小學實習教師工作壓力與因應方式之研究。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺中市。許秀玲（2007）。六位數學實習教師教學知識變遷的個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學數學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
曾志華和張靜嚳（2006）。一位高職數學教師的教學專業成長歷程。師大學報：科學教育類，51(2)，55-82。
行動研究方法導論（夏林清、中華民國基層教師協會譯）（1997）。臺北：遠流。（原著出版年：1993年）
高彩珍（2003）。國小特教班實習教師實務知識發展之研究。國立臺東大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺東市。張淑玲和林福來（2001）。一位實習教師的專業社會化歷程。師大學報：科學教育類，46(1, 2)，65-88。
張靜嚳（1995）。問題中心教學在國中發展之經過、效果及可行性之探討。科學教育學刊，3(2)，139-165。張靜嚳（1999）。國中低學習成就班的雙環數學教學。科學教育學刊，7(3)，199-216。張靜嚳（2002）。數學教育改革小史。載於國立彰化師範大學科學教育中心舉辦之「九年一貫數學如何教？實例研討會」手冊，彰化市。
張靜嚳（2004）。回應PCDC之學習環。2004年3月2日，取自彰化師大科學教育研究所網路論壇 http://forum.sciedu.ncue.edu.tw/。
黃昱嘉（2005）。國小實習教師實習困擾之研究。屏東師範學院教育行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
黃凱旻和金鈐（2003）。一個輔導中學數學實習教師教學概念轉變的行動研究。師大學報：科學教育類，48(1)，23-46。
歐用生（1994）。教師即研究者。研習資訊，4，125-136。
歐用生（1999）。行動研究與學校教育革新。1999年行動研究國際學術研討會主題論文集（pp.1-16）。國立臺東師範學院。傅聖國（2002）。輔導教師與實習教師在數學教學上互動歷程之個案研究。國立臺北師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
賓玉玫（1998）。國中國文科實習教師實地經驗之個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
終身學習全書：成人教育總論（楊惠君譯）（2004）。臺北市：商周出版。（原著出版年：1999年）
鄧景文（1998）。國中英語科實習教師實地經驗內涵與角色定位之個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
賴長泰（2003）。國中數學實習教師教學能力成長之詮釋研究。國立高雄師範大學碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
薛梨真（1997）。國小實施新制實習制度的問題與因應。高市文教，59，62-65。
蔡玉玲（2004）。連結數學領域能力指標至基本能力之行動研究－以乘法公式為例。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
蔡玉玲（2006）。如何進行數學探究教學－以PCDC教學模式為例。2006年12月21日，取自http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/tsaiyuhling/article?mid=32&l=f&fid=9
蔡玉玲和張靜嚳（2003）。乘法公式。載於國立彰化師範大學科學教育中心舉辦之「九年一貫國中數學教學模組研討會」手冊（pp. 32-55），彰化市。
蔡玉玲和張靜嚳（2004a）。協助學生發展數學化能力之探究。論文發表於國立彰化師範大學舉辦之「數理教師專業發展學術研討會」研討會，彰化市。
蔡玉玲和張靜嚳（2004b）。以乘法公式為例探討基本能力之提升。論文發表於國立高雄師範大學舉辦之第廿屆中華民國科學教育學術研討會，高雄縣。
蔡玉玲和張靜嚳（2004c）。二次方根。教材發表於國立彰化師範大學科學教育中心舉辦之「九年一貫國中數學教學模組」研討會，彰化市。
蔡佩芬（2002）。將數學價值融入國中數學教學之行動研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
蔡清田（2000）。教育行動研究。臺北：五南。
謝卓君（2004）。我國師資培育法之政策文本分析。教育政策論壇，7(2)，1-28。顏富明（2002）。數學史融入國中課室教學之研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
簡頌沛和吳心楷（2008）。高中實習教師的實務參與及身分變動：情境認知觀點的探討。科學教育學刊，16(2)，215-237。
簡順樑（2002）。落實PCDC於高職數學課室之行動研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
蕭雅慧（2002）。以數學史融入PCDC價值教學之行動研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
譚寧君和熊召弟（1999）。利用網際網路進行國小初任教師數學科教學輔導之探討。科學教育研究與發展，15，49-58。
覺丹英（2002）。國中理化科實習教師教學專業成長與其影響因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學物理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
二、西文部份
Ambrose, R. C., Philipp, R., Chauvot, J., & Clement, L (2003). A web-based survey to assess prospective elementary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and mathematics learning: An alternative to Likert scales. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th PME International Conference, 2, 33-40.
Blanton, M., Westbrook, S.L., & Carter, G. (2005). Using Valsiner’s zone theory to interpret teaching practices in mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 5-33.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research. New York: Allyan & Bacon.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
Burden, P. (1990). Teacher development. In W. R.Houston (ed.) Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Calderhead, J. (1987). The quality of reflection in student teachers’ professional learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 10(3), 269-278.
Calderhead, J. (1988). Learning from introductory school experience. Journal of Education for Teaching, 14(1), 75-83.
Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for life long learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer.
Chang, C. K., & Tsai, Y. L. (2005). An Alternative Approach for the Learning of . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the ICMI, EARCOME3 Conference, Shanghai.
Chapman, O. (1998). Metaphors as a tool in facilitating preservice teacher development in mathematical problem solving. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd PME International Conference, 2, 176-183.
Clements, D. (2002). Linking research and curriculum development. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 599-630). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1998). A constructivist perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U.Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp.158-190). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1989). Young children’s emotional acts while engaged in mathematical problem solving. In D. B. McLeod, & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A new perspective(pp.117-148). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Cohen L., & Manion, L. (1984). Action research. In Bell et al. (Eds.), Conducting Small-Scale Investigations in Educational Management(pp.41-57). London: Open University.
Cooney, T. (2001). Considering the paradoxes, perils, and purposes of conceptualizing teacher development. In F. L. Lin. & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making Sense of Mathematics Teacher Education(pp.9-31). Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
Cooney, T. J., & Wiegel, H. G. (2003). Examining the mathematics in mathematics teacher education. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F.K.S. Leung (Eds.), Second International handbook of mathematics education (pp.795-828). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Corey, S. M. (1953). Action research to improve school practices. Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
Doig, B. (1994). Prospective teachers: Significant events in their mathematics live. In J. P. Ponte & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th PME International Conference, 2, 272-279.
Dolk, M., & den Hertog, J. (2001). Educating the primary school mathematics teacher educator: A case study in the Netherlands. Paper presented at 2001 The Netherlands and Taiwan Conference on Common Sense in Mathematics Education, Department of Mathematics National Taiwan Normal University.
Ebbutt, D. (1985). Issues in action research. In D. Ebbutt & J. Elliott (Eds.). Issues In Teaching for Understanding(pp.161-162). London: Longman.
Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. UK：Open University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: OrientaKonsultit Oy.
Fernandes, D. (1995). Analyzing four preservice teachers’ knowledge and thoughts through their biographical histories. In L. Meira & D. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th PME International Conference, 2, 162-169.
Forman, E. A., & Ansell, E. (2001). The multiple voices of a mathematics classroom community. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 115-142.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fuller F., & Bown. O. (1975). Becoming a teacher in teacher education. ed. K. Ryani chicago: NSSE, P25-52.
Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2003). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Tömer, G. (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics Education? (pp. 39-58). Dordrecht. The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Furlong, J., & Maynard, T. (1995). Mentoring Student Teacher. London: Routledge.
Gates, P. (2001). Mathematics teacher belief systems: Exploring the social foundations. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th PME International Conference, 3, 17-24.
Gattuso, L., & Mailloux, N. (1994). Conceptions about mathematics teaching of preservice elementary and high-school teachers. In J. P. Ponte & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th PME International Conference, 2, 392-399.
Goos, M. (2005). A sociocultural analysis of the development of pre-service and beginning teachers’ pedagogical identities as users of technology. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 35-59.
Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2000). Re-shaping teacher and student roles in technology enriched classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12, 303-320.
Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2003). Perspectives on technology-mediated learning in secondary school mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 73-89.
Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: CD-β Press/ Freudenthal Institute.
Guillaume, A., & Rudney, G. (1993). Student teachers’ growth towards independence: An analysis of their changing concerns. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(1), 65-80.
Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 160-189.
Jaworski, B., & Gellert, U. (2003). Educating new mathematics teachers: integrating theory and practice, and the roles of practicing teachers. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F.K.S. Leung (Eds.), Second International handbook of mathematics education (pp.829-875). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jaworski, B., & Wood, T. (1999). Themes and issues in inservice programmes. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood & S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp.125-147). London: Falmer Press.
Jurdak, M. (1991). Teachers’ conceptions of math education and the foundations of mathematics. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th PME International Conferennce, 2, 221-228.
Katz, L. G. (1972). Developmental stages of pre-school teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 73(1), 50-54.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Kemmis, S., & Wilkinson, M. (1998). Participatory action research and the study of practice. In B. Atweh, S. Kemmis, & P. Weeks (Eds.), Action research in practice(pp.309-319). New York: Routledge.
Lacey, C. (1977). The Socialization of Teachers. London: Methuen.
Lange, J. de (1996). Using and applying mathematics in education. In A. J. Bishop, et al. (Eds.) (1996). International handbook of mathematics education(pp.49-97). Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Stiuated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lerman, S. (2001). A review of research perspectives on mathematics teacher education. In F. L. Lin & T. Cooney (Ed.) (2001). Making sense of mathematics teacher education, Chapter 2 (pp.33-52.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publish.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, London.
Llinares, S. (1996). Improving knowledge, professional growth and monitoring the development of mathematics teachers: A necessary integration of theoretical frameworks. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th PME International Conference, Addenda, 23-31.
Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 429-459). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lomax, P. (1986). Action researchers’ action research: a symposium. British Journal of In-service Education, 13 (1), 42-50.
McClain, K., & Bowers, J. (2000). Supporting preservice teachers’ understanding of place value and multidigit addition and subtraction. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th PME International Conference, 3, 279-286.
McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research. London: Kogan Page.
McLellan, H. (1996). Situated learning: multiple perspectives. In H. McLellan (Eds), Situated learning perspectives (pp.5-17). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.
McNiff, J. (1988). Action research：Principles and practice. London：McMillan Education.
Meredith, A. (1995). Learning to teach: Four salient constructs for trainee mathematics teachers. In L. Meira & D. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th PME International Conference, 3, 304-311.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Relich, J., & Way, J. (1993). Attitudes to teaching mathematics: The development of an attitudes questionnaire. In I. Hirabayashi, N. Nohda, K. Shigematsu, & F.-L. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th PME International Conference, 1, 276-283.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102-119). New York, USA: Macmillan.
Richardson, V. (1997). Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building new understandings (pp.3-14). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
Roddick, C., Becker, J. R., & Pence, B. J. (2000). Capstone courses in problem solving for prospective secondary teachers. Effects on beliefs and teaching practices. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th PME International Conference, 4, 97-104.
Russell, T. (1988). From pre-service teacher education to first year of teaching: A study of theory and practice, in J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers’ professional learning (pp.13-34). London: The Falmer Press.
Santos, V., & Lambdin, D. (1992). Empowering prospective elementary teachers. Through social interaction, reflection, and communication. In W. Geeslin & K. Graham (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th PME International Conference, 2, 282-289.
Schifter, D. (1990). Mathematics process as mathematics content: A course for teachers. In G. Booker, P. Cobb, & T. N. Mendicuti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th PME International Conference, 1, 191-198.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15(2), 4-14.
Somekh, B. (1995). The contribution of action research to development in social endeavors: A position paper on action research methodology. British Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 339-356.
Stephens, M. (2003). Regulating the entry of teachers of mathematics into the profession: challenges, new models, and glimpses into the future. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F.K.S. Leung (Eds.), Second International handbook of mathematics education (pp.767-793). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stonewater, J. K. (1989). Training elementary teachers in problem solving strategies: Impact on their students performance. In G. Vergnaud, J. Rogalski, & M. Artigue (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th PME International Conference, 3, 197-204.
Strauss, A., & Carbin, J. (1994). Grounded Theory methodology: An overview. In: N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.1-18). London: Sage Publications.
Thompson, A. G. (1984). The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(2), 105-127.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.127-146). New York: Macmillan.
Tirosh, D. (1999). Learning to question: A major goal of mathematics teacher education. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd PME International Conference, 4, 265-272.
Tomlinson, P. (1995). Understanding mentoring: Refective strategies for school-based teacher preparation. Buckingham: Open University.
Treffers, A. (1991). Realistic mathematics education in The Netherlands 1980-1990. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Realistic mathematics education in primary school. Utrecht: CD-βPress / Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.
Tsai, Y. L., & Chang, C. K. (2005). The Discussion of the Implementation Result about Alternative Approach of Multiplicative Identities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the ICMI, EARCOME3 Conference, Shanghai.
Tsai, Y. L., & Chang, C. K. (2009). Using combinatorial approach to improve students’ learning of the distributive law and multiplicative identities. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 501-531.
Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s action: A theory of human development. (2nd ed.) New York: John Wiely & Sons.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9-21.
Williams, J. (1996). On becoming a strategic partner with management. Communication World, 13(3), 31-32.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477.