:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學習表現的知識結構評量研究:以「教育統計學」學科知識為例
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:李敦仁余民寧 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Duen R.Yu, Min-ning
出版日期:2007
卷期:3:4
頁次:頁113-148
主題關鍵詞:學科知識知識結構路徑搜尋網路分析Content knowledgeKnowledge structuresPathfinder network analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:389
  • 點閱點閱:101
  本研究目的,旨在利用路徑搜尋網路分析評量選修相關教育統計學的教育學程學生,對教育統計學概念間所形成的知識結構。具體而言,本研究檢視三項問題:(1)學習穩定型和學習異常型兩組學生與教師的知識結構圖為何?(2)學習穩定型和學習異常型兩組學生的知識結構圖與教師知識結構圖相似程度是否有顯著差異?(3)三種相似性指數對學生的學習表現是否有顯著的預測效果?研究結果發現:(1)兩種不同學習類型的學生對於知識結構不僅有「量」的差異,其概念連結亦呈現「質」不同;(2)三種知識結構指數與學習表現具有顯著的正相關;(3)知識結構指數對學習表現具有顯著的預測效果,以PRX指數最具預測力,其解釋變異量為34.20%。最後,本研究亦針對研究結果提出相關建議,以作為未來研究之參考。
The main purpose of this study is to explore how to use the Pathfinder network analysis to assess knowledge structures in Educational Statistics courses taken by students in teacher training programs. Specifically, this paper examines (1) How to present knowledge structures in stable learning students, abnormal learning students, and experienced teachers? (2) In knowledge structure graphs, are the two types of students similar to experienced teachers? and (3) Do the three proximity indices predict learning performances? Research results are as follows: (1) In knowledge structure graphs and three proximity indices, there is a significant difference between two types of students and experienced teachers. (2) The proximity indices are all significantly positively correlated with learning performance. (3) The PRX index is the best predictor of knowledge structure on learning performance, and could explain 34.20% of the variance. Finally, some implications and suggestions are proposed.
期刊論文
1.江淑卿(20000100)。徑路探測法在測量知識結構的效度研究。測驗年刊,47(1),73-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳新豐(20021200)。國小學生知識結構的評量分析--以國小自然學習成就為例。教育與心理研究,25(下),657-680。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Day, E. A.、Arthur, W. Jr.、Gettman, D.(2001)。Knowledge Structures and Acqisition of a Complex Skill。Journal of Applied Psychology,86(5),1022-1033。  new window
4.Larkin, J. H.、McDermott, J.、Simon, D. P.、Simon, H. A.(1980)。Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems。Science,208,1335-1342。  new window
5.Nassaji, Hossein(2002)。Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives。Language Learning Journal,52(2),439-481。  new window
6.Shavelson, R. J.、Stanton, G. C.(1975)。Construct validation: Methodology and application to three measures of cognitive structure。Journal of Educational Measurement,12(2),67-85。  new window
7.謝祥宏、段曉林(20010700)。教學與評量--一種互為鏡像(Mirror Image)關係。科學教育,241,2-13。  延伸查詢new window
8.余民寧(20020800)。學科知識結構之評量研究--以「教育測驗與評量」學科知識為例。教育與心理研究,25(中),341-367。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.林曉芳、余民寧(20011200)。國中生在數學代數概念學習之評量研究--以二元一次方程式為例。教育與心理研究,24(下),303-326。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.涂金堂(20020800)。國小學生數學文字題知識結構之評量。教育與心理研究,25(中),369-399。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Johnson, P. J.、Goldsmith, T. E.、Teague, K. W.(1994)。Locus of the predictive advantage in pathfinder-based representations of classroom knowledge。Journal of Educational Psychology,86(4),617-626。  new window
12.宋德忠、林世華、陳淑芬、張國恩(19981200)。知識結構的測量:徑路搜尋法與概念構圖法的比較。教育心理學報,30(2),123-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Acton, W. H.、Johnson, P. J.、Goldsmith, T. E.(1994)。Structural knowledge assessment: comparison of referent structures。Journal of Educational Psychology,86(2),303-311。  new window
14.Gonzalvo, P.、Cañas, J. J.、Bajo, M. T.(1994)。Structural representations in knowledge acquisition。Journal of Educational Psychology,86,601-616。  new window
15.余民寧、陳嘉成(20011200)。領域知識結構之評量研究--以「垃圾分類處理」領域知識為例。教育與心理研究,24(下),393-419。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.余民寧、林曉芳、蔡佳燕(20011200)。國小學生數學知識結構認知診斷評量之研究。教育與心理研究,24(下),263-301。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.游森期、余民寧(20060300)。知識結構診斷評量與S-P表之關聯性之研究。教育與心理研究,29(1),183-208。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.塗振洋(20011200)。路徑蒐尋網路分析在教學評量上的應用--以國小六年級學童在天文概念上的學習為例。教育與心理研究,24(下),367-391。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.陳嘉甄(20011200)。國小學童自然科知識結構之測量。教育與心理研究,24(下),327-343。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.葉倩亨(2001)。路徑搜尋網路分析應用於大一心理學學習效果評量之研究。教育與心理研究,24(下),421-446。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Azzarello, J.(2007)。Use of the pathfinder scaling algorithm to measure student's structural knowledge of community health nursing。Journal of Nursing Education,46(7),313-318。  new window
22.Boldt, M. N.(2001)。Assessing students' accounting knowledge: A structural approach。Journal of Education for Business,76(5),262-269。  new window
23.Thro, R. P.(1978)。Relationship associative and content structure of physics concepts。Journal of Educational Psychology,70,971-997。  new window
24.William, V. F., Craig, T. N.,、David, P. M.(1997)。Concepts of drugs: Differences in conceptual structure across groups with different levels of drug experience。Addiction,92(7),847-858。  new window
會議論文
1.Knoebel, A., Dearholt, D.,、Schvaneveldt, R.(1988)。Empty nexus graphs。Las Cruces, NM。  new window
學位論文
1.方慧君(2003)。知識結構診斷分析:以四技二專入學考試數學科為例(碩士論文)。雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林曉芳(1999)。數學低成就國中生在代數概念學習之評量研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.江淑卿(1997)。知識結構的重要特性之分析暨促進知識結構教學策略之實驗研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.丁碧莉(2004)。語文知識結構之評量研究-以國小英語科為例,雲林。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hoole, E. R.(2005)。Integrating and evaluating mathematical models of assessing structural knowledge: Comparing associative network methodologies。  new window
圖書
1.Nichols, P. D., Chipman, S. F.,、Brennan, R. L.(1995)。Cognitively diagnostics assessment。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
2.Schank, Roger C.、Abelson, Robert P.(1977)。Scripts, plans, goals and understanding。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Wiggins, Grant P.(1998)。Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
4.Jonassen, D. H.、Beissner, K.、Yacci, M.(1993)。Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
5.鄭昭明(2001)。認知心理學:理論與實踐。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Schvaneveldt, R. W.(1994)。Knowledge network organizing tool (PCKNOT version: 4.3)。Cruces, NM:Interlink Inc。  new window
7.余民寧(2005)。心理與教育統計學。台北市:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Mayer, Richard E.、林清山(1990)。教育心理學:認知取向。臺北市:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.歐滄和(2002)。教育測驗與評量。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bartlett, F. C.(1932)。Remembering: A study in experiment and social psychology。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Dearholt, D. W.,、Schvaneveldt, R. W.(1990)。Properties of pathfinder networks。Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization。Norwood,NJ。  new window
12.Pines, A. L.(1985)。Toward a taxonomy of conceptual relations and the implications for the evaluation of cognitive structures。Cognitive structure and conceptual change。Orlando。  new window
13.Rumelhart, D. E,、Norman, D. A.(1983)。Representation in memory。Handbook of Experimental psychology。New York, NY。  new window
圖書論文
1.Schvaneveldt, R. W.(1990)。Proximities, networks, and schemata。Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。  new window
2.Glaser, Robert(1962)。Psychology and Instructional Technology。Taining Research and education。Pittsburgh, PA:University of Pittsburgh Press。  new window
3.Goldsmith, T. E.、Davenport, D. M.(1990)。Assessing structural similarity of graphs。Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization。Norwood, NJ:Alex。  new window
4.Morton, J.、Bekerian, D.(1986)。Three ways of looking at memory。Advances in cognitive science。Chichester:Ellis Horwood Ltd.。  new window
5.Rumelhart, David E.、Ortony, Andrew(1977)。The representation of knowledge in memory。Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
6.Chi, M. T. H.、Glaser, R.、Rees, E.(1982)。Expertise in problem solving。Advances in the psychology of human intelligence。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
7.Minsky, M. F.(1975)。A framework for representing knowledge。The psychology of computer vision。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE