:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:一位國小校長推動攜手計畫補救教學之行動研究
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:湯維玲 引用關係蔡佩娟
作者(外文):Tang, Wei-lingTsai, Pei-jiuan
出版日期:2013
卷期:16:1
頁次:頁69-92
主題關鍵詞:攜手計畫補救教學行動研究國小教育After school alternative programsRemedial instructionAction researchElementary education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:253
  • 點閱點閱:81
本研究運用行動敘事的書寫方式呈現研究者在領導木瓜國小實施「攜手計畫—課後扶助」的補救教學(remedial instruction)歷程。首先,本研究之目的乃是藉由為期一個學年的教學實踐歷程,透過教師教學實踐,對弱勢學生進行補教教學,培養學生的學習興趣,轉化弱勢學生的學習,進而提升學習成效。本文先從研究者的背景與動機著手,了解「攜手計畫-課後扶助」政策執行現況與問題,從而對補救教學理論深入瞭解。研究對象為木瓜國小參加攜手計畫的學生,研究者透過訪談、文件分析等方式蒐集資料後獲致研究結果,歸納為下述結論:(一)攜手計畫補教教學能引發受輔學生學習動機,使其有較高的學習成就。(二)校長能靈活調整補救教學時數與方式,定期舉辦成果會,建立專業的攜手團隊。根據以上研究結論提出具體建議,作為教育主管機關與學校未來推動攜手計畫之參考。
This study uses narrative ways to present the use of After School Alternative Programs (ASAP) in Papaya Elementary School. In order to promote such programs, a group of tutors has attempted to cultivate the interests of minority disadvantaged students and involve them in learning through the practice of teaching. This study begins by exploring the literature relevant to remedial instruction and disadvantaged students, the content of the ASAP, and the study of learning efficiency. The qualitative research-a series of semi-structured in-depth interviews-was used to obtain data relating to the perception of self, the life and experiences of the students' learning process in relation to remedial instruction, and the factors affecting this process. The interviews and literature review were used as a basis for collecting data for analysis and discussion. Based on the results, this study concludes the following: 1. The ASAP could identify subjected students and promote learning motivation so as to improve learning achievements. 2. The principal could actively adjust the time and methods of remedial instruction and hold seminars on schedule, ultimately establishing an expert team in the process. Concrete proposals are suggested as a result of the research outcomes, enabling principals to offer their teachers formal guidance in remedial instruction. Others for future studies to be conducted by educational administration institutions and schools are also made.
期刊論文
1.孫敏芝(2008)。增進低成就學生學習成效的教學設計。教育研究月刊,172,86-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Mevarech, R.(1985)。The effects of cooperative mastery learning strategies on mathematical achievement。Journal of Educational Research,78(6),372-377。  new window
3.林建平(20100300)。低成就學童的心理特徵與原因之探討。國教新知,57(1),43-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.盧威志(20080700)。「攜手計畫課後扶助」之政策過程與執行評析。學校行政,56,頁140-154。  延伸查詢new window
5.馬素華(1998)。穴位點法簡介。長庚護理,9(3),85-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.鄧敦平(20000200)。補救教學的迷思--談回歸起點的教學。師說,138,36-43。  延伸查詢new window
7.郭為藩(19960400)。推動教育優先區的目標與策略。教育資料文摘,37(4)=219,3-13。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳麗珠(20070900)。論資源分配與教育機會均等之關係:以國民教育為例。教育研究與發展期刊,3(3),33-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.洪儷瑜(20010400)。義務教育階段之弱勢學生的補救教育之調查研究。師大學報. 教育類,46(1),45-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.胡夢鯨(19951200)。臺灣地區城鄉國民小學教育資源分配之比較。國立中正大學學報(社會科學分冊),6(1),1-35。  延伸查詢new window
11.McLaughlin, T. F.、Vacha, E. F.(1992)。The at-risk student: A proposal for action。Journal of instructional psychology,19(1),66-68。  new window
12.Taylor, J. S.、de Lourdes Machado, M.、Peterson, M. W.(2008)。Leadership and strategic management: Keys to institutional priorities and planning。European Journal of Education,43(3),369-386。  new window
13.李安明(19990800)。「為教學而行政」的校長教學領導:理論與實務。教育政策論壇,2(2),158-203。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Slavin, Robert E.(1996)。Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know。Contemporary Educational Psychology,21(1),43-69。  new window
15.張新仁(20010600)。實施補救教學之課程與教學設計。教育學刊,17,85-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.張新仁(2000)。補救教學面面觀。義務教育階段補救教學系統研究與實務研討會,國立高雄師範大學特殊教育中心 。高雄市。13-34。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔡因吉(2002)。一所國民小學校長課程領導行動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.林世元(1997)。合作學習在國小數學低成就學生補救教學實施成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.杜正治(2001)。補救教學的實施。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2010)。教育部辦理攜手計畫課後扶助補助要點。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.M. A. Gunter、T. H. Estes、J. Schwab、賴慧玲(2002)。教學模式。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.顏國樑(2005)。教育法規。高雄:麗文文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Rimm, S.(1995)。Why bright kids get poor grades and what you can do about it。New York:Crown Trade Paperbacks。  new window
6.McEwan, E. K.(1998)。Seven Steps to Effective Instructional Leadership。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
7.Rawls, J.(1981)。A theory of justice。Cambridge, Mass:The Belknap Press of Harvard University。  new window
8.Fullan, M. G.、Stiegelbauer, S.(1991)。The new meaning of educational change。New York。  new window
9.林寶山(1990)。教學論--理論與方法。臺北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭崇趁(20060000)。教育的著力點。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Argyris, C.、Putnam, R.、Smith, D.(1985)。Action science。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
其他
1.立法院(2011)。教育基本法,http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0020045, 20120701。  new window
2.彭富源(2006)。提升學習弱勢學童學習成就之策略與作法--以苗栗縣國民中小學為例,http://woa.mlc.edu.tw/viewitem.jsp?itemid =000000000023324, 20101220。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.何英奇(2001)。學習困難的診斷與補救教學。學習輔導。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE