一、中文部分
尹萍（譯），J. Naisbitt ＆ P. Aburdene著（1990）。2000年大趨勢。臺北：天下文化。
方德隆（2000）。課程統整的模式與實務。高雄師大學報，11期，181-212。
方德隆、卯靜儒、高新建、黃琡慧、葉郁菁、蔡清田、甄曉蘭、顧瑜君（譯），S. M. Drake著（2001）。統整課程的設計。高雄：麗文。王秀雄（1992）。美術批評鑑賞教學的研究。輯於教育部國教司、中教司主辦，學校美感教育國際學術研討會，臺北。
甘陽（譯），E. Cassier著（1997）。人論－人類文化哲學導引。臺北：桂冠。
朱光潛（1987）。談美。臺北：金楓。
余秋雨（1990）。藝術創造工程。臺北：允晨文化。
吳瑪俐（譯），N. Kandinsky著（1995）。藝術與藝術家論。臺北：藝術家。
呂廷和（譯），H. Read著（1975）。透過藝術的教育。臺北：雄獅。
李渝（譯），A. H. Barr著（1998）。現代畫是什麼? 臺北：雄獅。
李醒塵（1996）。西方美學史教程。臺北：淑馨。
邢莉、常寧生（譯），A. D. Efland著（2000）。西方藝術教育史。成都：四川人民出版社。
周珮儀（1994）。艾斯納教育批評理論之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
林曼麗（2000）。臺灣視覺藝術教育研究。臺北：雄獅美術。林逢祺（1999）。美學與教育。輯於歐陽教主編，教育哲學（頁121-143）。高雄：麗文。
施麗薰（譯），Antoine de Saint-Exupery著（1991）。小王子。臺北：漢藝色研。
洪麗珠、談玉儀、李文珊、劉美玲、曾于珍、桂雅文（譯），E. B. Feldman著（1996）。藝術教育的本質。臺北：五觀藝術。
洪懿妍（2001）。世界向美走。天下雜誌，特刊，24-30。
孫嘉妏（2001）。九年一貫藝術與人文學習領域課程統整之研究。國立臺灣師範大學美術研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
高強華（2001）。九年一貫課程統整革新與教師專業成長。中等教育，52(1)，136-148。張世忠（2000）。多元智慧與建構教學之統整及應用。中等教育，51(6)，124-135。郭小平、翟燦（譯），R. Arnheim著（1992）。藝術心理學新論。臺北：臺灣商務。
郭禎祥（1999a）。二十一世紀藝術教育的展望。美育，106期，1-9。
郭禎祥（1999b）。描繪新世紀藝術教育藍圖。美育，110期，1-9。
郭禎祥（2001）。新世紀藝術教育的變動。發表於國立臺灣師範大學美術學系主辦，新世紀藝術教育理論與實務國際學術研討會論文集（頁33-47），臺北。
郭禎祥（譯），E. W. Eisner著（1998）。藝術視覺的教育（二版）。臺北：文景。
陳伯璋（1985）。潛在課程研究。臺北：五南。
陳建伶（2002）。我們的生活周遭有什麼正在改變。論文發表於國立彰化社會教育館主辦，九十一年藝術鑑賞暨創作研習，臺中縣清水鎮。
陳箐繡（2001）。藝術教育課程統整與社區環境脈絡探索。發表於花蓮師院藝術教育研究所主辦「社區、文化與藝術教育國際學術研討會」，花蓮。
彭吉象（1994）。藝術學概論。臺北：淑馨。
黃政傑（1991）。課程設計。臺北：東華。
黃政傑（1993）。課程評鑑。臺北：師大書苑。
黃政傑（2001）。課程統整的理念與做法－專訪教育部高等教育司黃政傑司長。教育研究，85期，8-13。
黃慶明（1991）。知識論（一）懷疑與確定性。鵝湖，16(6)，18-30。黃譯瑩（1998）。實施課程統整的走向和原則。教育資料與研究，25期，12-13。
葉興華（2000）。我國國小推行課程統整之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，臺北。甄曉蘭（2001）。從課程組織的觀點檢討統整課程的設計與實施。課程與教學季刊，4(1)，1-20。甄曉蘭、曾志華（1997）。建構教學理念的興起與應用。國民教育研究學報，3期，179-208。劉文潭（1972）。美學與藝術批評。臺北：環宇。劉昌元（1994）。西方美學導論。臺北：聯經。劉豐榮（1991）。艾斯納藝術教育思想研究。臺北：水牛。劉豐榮（1997）。幼兒藝術表現模式之理論建構與其教育義涵之研究。臺北：水牛。
劉豐榮（2001a）。後現代主義對當前藝術批評教學之啟示。論文發表於國立彰化師大美術系主辦之國際藝術教育學會（InSEA）亞洲地區學術研討會，彰化。
劉豐榮（2001b）。當代藝術教育論題之評析。視覺藝術，4期，59-96。歐用生（2000）。課程改革。臺北：師大書苑。
歐陽教（1999）。教育哲學。高雄：麗文。
滕守堯（譯），R. Arnheim著（1998）。視覺思維。四川：四川人民出版社。
嚴祥鸞（1996）。參與觀察法。輯於胡幼慧主編，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（頁195-222）。臺北：巨流。
二、西文部分
Ackerman, D. B. (1989). Intellectual and practical criteria for successful curriculum interaction. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation (pp.25-38). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. New York: Routledge.
Audi, R. (1995). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Barone, T. (1987). On equality, visibility, and the fine arts program in a black elementary school. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(4), 421-463.
Barone, T. (1990). Using the narrative text as an occasion for conspiracy. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate(pp.305-326). New York: Teachers College Press.
Barone, T. (1993). Acquiring a public voice: Curriculum specialists, critical storytelling, and educational reform. JCT, 10(1), 139-152
Barone, T. (1994). Things of use and things of beauty: The story of the Swain county high school arts program. In E. W. Eisner (Ed.), The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (pp.273-292)(3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Barone, T., & Blumenfeld-Jones, D. S. (1998). Curriculum platforms and moral stories. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum-problems, politics, and possibilities(2nd). N.Y.: State University of New York.
Barone, T., & Eisner, E. (1997). Arts-based educational research. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education(2nd ). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration- Designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Beyer, L. E. (1995). Beyond the formal and the psychological: The arts and social possibility. In W. Kohli (Ed.), Critical conversations in philosophy of education. New York: Routledge.
Broudy, H. S. (1988). Aesthetics and the Curriculum. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses(pp.332-342). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
Bulter-Kisber, L. (1998). Representing qualitative data in poetic form. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420709)
Clandinin, D. J., ＆ Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Darby, J. T., ＆ Catterall, J. S. (1994). The fourth R: The arts and learning. Teachers College Record, 96(2), 299-328.
Davenport, M. (2000). Culture and education: Polishing the lenses. Studies in Art Education, 41(4), 361-375.
Davis, M. (1999). Design’s inherent interdisciplinarity: The arts in integrated curricula. Arts Education Policy Review, 101(1), 8-13.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Van Rees.
Doll, W. E. (1998). Curriculum and concepts of control. In W. F. Pinar （Ed.）, Curriculum: Toward new identities（pp.295-323）. New York: Garland.
Doll, W. E. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Columbia University.
Donmoyer, R. (1993). Art criticism as a guide to student evaluation. Theory into Practice, 32(4), 252-259.
Dotson, M. L. (2000). The theories of action of three prekindergarten teachers: A study in teaching thinking. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(05), 1736. (University Microfilms No. AAT9971538)
Efland, A. D. (1979). Conceptions of teaching in art education. Art Education, 32(4), 21-33.
Efland, A. D. (1995). The spiral and the lattice: Changes in cognitive learning theory with implications for art education. Studies in Art Education, 36(3), 134-153.
Efland, A. D. (2000). The city as metaphor for integrated learning in the arts. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), 276-289.
Efland, A. D., & Freedman, K. & Stuhr, P. （1996）. Postmodern art education: An approach to curriculum. Virginia: National Art Education Association.
Egan, K. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning- ages 8 to 15. London: Routledge.
Eisner, E. W. (1985). Learning and teaching: The ways of knowing. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago.
Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination: On the design of evaluation of school programs(3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Eisner, E. W. (1996). Evaluating the teaching of art. In D. Boughton, E. W. Eisner, & J. Ligtvoet(Eds.), Evaluating and assessing the visual arts in education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Eisner, E. W. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill.
Erickson, M. (1996). Our place in the world. Retrieved April 15, 2002, from Arts EDNet URL: Http://www.artsednet.getty.edu.
Flinders, D. J. (1987). What teachers learn from teaching: Educational criticism of instructional adaptation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University, California.
Flinders, D. J., & Eisner, E. W. (1994). Educational criticism as a form of qualitative inquiry. Research in the Teaching of English, 28(4), 341-390.
Fogarty, R. (1991). Tens ways to integrate curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 61-65.
Garrison, J. (1997). Dewey and eros: Wisdom and desire in the art of teaching. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Glatthorn, A. A., & Foshay, A. W. (1991). Integrated curriculum. In A. Lewy (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum (160-162). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Gough, N. (1998). Reflections and diffractions: Functions of fiction in curriculum inquiry. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum: Toward new identities. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Greene, M. (1991). Texts and margins. Harvard Educational Review, 61(1), 27-39.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. London: The Falmer Press.
Haggerson, N. L. (2000). Expanding curriculum research and understanding. New York: Peter Lang.
Hamblen, K. A. (1993). The emergence of neo-DBAE. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED364459)
Hamilton, D., King, C., MacDonald, B., Jenkins, D., & Parlett, M. (1977). Beyond the numbers game. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Hatch, T. (1994). What’s art got to do with it? Research in the Teaching of English, 28(4), 362-365.
Huebner, D. E. (1975). Curricular language and classroom meanings. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing- the reconceptualists (pp.217-236). California: McCutchan.
Huebner, D. E. (1985). Spirituality and knowing. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching: The ways of knowing. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago.
Hutchens, J., & Pankratz, D. B. (2000). Change in arts education: Transforming Education Through the arts challenge(TETAC). Arts Education Policy Review, 101(4), 5-10.
Hynds, S. (1994). An artful science. Research in the Teaching of English, 28(4), 366-373.
Irwin, R., Rogers, T., & Wan, Y. (1998). Reclamation, reconciliation, and reconstruction: Art practices of contemporary aboriginal artists from Canada, Australia, and Taiwan. Journal of Multicultural and Cross-Cultural Research in Art Education, 16(1), 61-72.
Jackson, P. W. (1966). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Jackson, P. W. (1992). Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialists. In P. W. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of research on curriculum. New York: Macmillan.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Design options for an integrated curriculum. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: design and implementation (pp.13-24). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jacobs, H. H. (1991). Planning for curriculum integration. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 27-28.
Jaeger, R. M. (1997). Complementary methods for research in education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
jagodzinski, j. (1992). Curriculum as felt through six layers of an aesthetically embodied skin: The arch-writing on the body. In W. F. Pinar & W. M. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text (pp.159-183). New York: Teachers College Press.
Kliebard, H. (1975). Reappraisal: The Tyler rationale. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing (pp.70-83). Berkeley, California: McCutchan.
Krug, K. H., & Cohen-Evron, N. (2000). Curriculum integration positions and practices in art education. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), 259-272 .
Macdonald, J. B. (1975). Curriculum theory. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing- the reconceptualists (pp.5-14) Berkeley: McCutchan.
Mann, J. (1975). Curriculum criticism. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing- the reconceptualists (pp.133-148). California: McCutchan.
Mazza, K. A. (1982). Reconceptual inquiry as an alternative mode of curriculum theory and practice: A critical study. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 4(2), 5-89.
McFee, J. K. (1995). Change and the cultural dimensions of art education. In R. W. Neperud (Ed.), Context, content, and community in art education- beyond postmodernism (pp.171-192). New York: Teachers college, Columbia University.
McFee, J. K. (1998). Cultural diversity and the structure and practice of art education. Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
Neperud, R. W. (1995). Context, content, and community in art education: Beyond postmodernism. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Northwest Educational Service District(1989). Restructuring schools: Integrating the curriculum. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED313806)
Parsons, M. J. (1998). Integrated curriculum and our paradigm of cognition in the arts. Studies in Art Education, 39(2), 103-113.
Perkins, D. N. (1991). Educating for insight. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 4-8.
Pinar, W. F. (1975). Curriculum theorizing- the reconceptualists. Berkeley: McCutchan.
Pinar, W. F. (1988). “Whole, bright, deep with understanding.” Issues in qualitative research and autobiographical method. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses(pp.134-153). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P. & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.
Rist, R. C. (1987). Research in the shadows: A critique of “on equality, visibility, and the fine arts program in a black elementary school”. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(4), 447-451
Salina Arts and Humanities Commission (1992). Life in the past lane: An arts/social studies infusion project. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED368605)
Schrag, F. (1992). Conceptions of knowledge. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum(pp.268-301). New York: Macmillan.
Schubert, M. B., & Melnick, S. A. (1997). The arts in curriculum integration. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED424151)
Short, E. C. (1991). Forms of curriculum inquiry. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Siegesmund, R. E. (2000). Reasoned perception: Art education at the end of art. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(11), 4261. (University Microfilms No. AAT9995283)
Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum development in the postmodern era. New York: Garland.
Soltis, J. F. (1990). The ethics of qualitative research. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Stankiewicz, M. A. (2000). Discipline and the future of art education. Studies in Art Education, 41(4), 301-313.
Stuhr, P. L. (1995). Social Reconstructionist multicultural art curriculum design: Using the powwow as an example. In Neperud, R. W. (Ed.), Context, content, and community in art education- beyond postmodernism(pp.193-221) . New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Sumara, D. J., ＆ Davis, B. (1998). Unskinning curriculum. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum: Toward new identities(pp.75-92). New York: Garland.
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. (1990). History of the school curriculum. New York: Macmillan.
Ulbricht, J. (1998). Interdisciplinary art education reconsidered. Art Education, 51(4), 13-17.
Vallance, E. (1981). Focus on students in curriculum knowledge: A critique of curriculum criticism. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED201556)
Vallance, E. (1991). Aesthetic inquiry: Art criticism. In E. C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry(pp.155-172). New York: State University of New York Press.
Walker, D. F. (1971). The process of curriculum development: A naturalistic model. School Review, 80, 51-65.
Willis, G. (1978). Qualitative evaluation. California: McCutchan.