參考文獻
一、中文部分
王子華（2005）。建構網路評量系統發展生物科職前教師評量素養（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
王子華（2008年12月）。發展並應用網路化動態評量系統（GPAM-WATA）改善數位學習效益之研究。第二十四屆科學教育學術研討會發表之論文，彰化縣：國立彰化師範大學。
王子華（2009年12月）。應用網路化動態評量輔助國中數學科教學之效益研究。第二十五屆科學教育學術研討會發表之論文，臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學。
王子華、范雅晴、王國華（2008）。數理科在職教師評量素養培育模式之探究。科學教育學刊，16(1)，25-51。王子華、范雅晴、王國華（2010）。資訊科技增進數理教師的評量素養。載於王國華、吳穎沺、李源順、許銘津、劉明洲（主編），數理教師專業成長專書系列：數理教師運用資訊科技的理論與實務（87-113頁）。彰化縣：新興出版事業有限公司。
王子華、范雅晴、王國華、王瑋龍（2006年12月）。P2R-WATA評量素養培育模式應用於在職教師評量素養之效益評估。第二十二屆科學教育學術研討會發表之論文，臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學。
王子華、蔡寶桂（2014年）。數位化評量應用於補救教學之探討：以新竹縣國小數學學習領域為例。國家文官學院T&D飛訊，201，1-26。取自http://www.nacs.gov.tw/NcsiWebFileDocuments/5a7be1a33fd62975c232f1c1d39eea0b.pdf
朱玉萍（2009）。網路化動態評量對七年級學生在整數與數線單元概念學習成效之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
江文慈（2007）。超越測量─評量典範轉移的探索與啟示。教育實踐與研究，20(1)，173-200。何信權、王子華、范雅晴、王國華（2006年12月）。國中數理科在職教師對參與「P2R-WATA」網路評量素養研習」感受之調查。第二十二屆科學教育學術研討會發表之論文，臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2013）。SPSS與統計應用分析（二版十七刷）。臺北市：五南。
吳毓瑩（2003）。多元評量之解毒與解讀。課程與教學季刊，6(1)，133-154。吳璧純（2013年9月）。從三種評量類型看多元評量的意義。新北市教育，8，20-24。
邱皓政（2013）。量化研究與統計分析SPSS(SPAW)資料分析範例（五版六刷）。臺北市：五南。
林福來（2013）。中學在職教師設計「融入臆測的診斷式概念學習活動序列」之教學力成長模式。數學教育學門專題研究計畫成果討論會手冊，57-84。
洪裕宏（2011）。定義與選擇國民核心素養的理論架構。研習資訊，28(4)，15-24。
范含芸（2011）。應用網路化動態評量促進國小學童整數四則運算概念學習之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
唐淑華（2013）。帶著希望的羽翼飛翔—談補救教學在十二年國教的定位與方向。教育人力與專業發展，30，1-11。
徐偉民（2011）。把數學學習弱勢的孩子帶上來：學校本位國小數學補救教學模組的開發與應用－國小中年級數學補救教學模組的開發與應用。行政院國科會科學委員會專題研究（編號NSC 99-2511-S-153-013）。臺北市：行政院國家科學委員會。
徐偉民、劉曼麗（2015）。國小攜手計畫數學補救教學課程決定與教學實施之探究。當代教育研究季刊，23 (1)，113-147。涂金堂（2011年4月）。從評量的發展趨勢，談教師應關注的評量議題。中小學教師專業發展學術研討會發表之論文，高雄市：國立高雄師範大學。
有效教學的理念與策略（2014年4月25日）。【剪報】。實踐大學教學發展中心家庭研究與兒童發展學系（所）收藏。
張堯卿（2015）。理想與現實的差距－談「關鍵五堂課」。教育評論月刊─主題：關鍵五堂課，4(4)，46-50。
張新仁（2001）。實施補救教學之課程與教學設計。教育學刊，17，85-106。張德銳（2015）。研習不等於教學實踐─關鍵五堂課的評論。教育評論月刊─主題：關鍵五堂課，4(4)，1-4。
教育部（2000年9月30日）。國民中小學九年一貫課程與教學網【網路訊息】。取自https://market.cloud.edu.tw/content/primary/nature/ph_hs/phnet/target/
pointer.htm
教育部（2012年12月24日修正）。教育部補助辦理教師專業發展評鑑實施要點【網路訊息】。取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=
GL000567
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要─總綱。臺北市：教育部。
教育部（2016年3月18日）。提升數學學習領域教師適性教學素養與輔助平臺建置計畫【網路訊息】。取自http://adaptive-instruction.weebly.com/
35336300593177720171.html
教育部電子報（2013年11月21日）。美國公布第一套全國性師資培育標準本位表現評量-edTPA【網路訊息】。取自http://epaper.edu.tw/old/windows.
aspx?windows_sn=14045
黃永和（2012年12月）。有效教學理念與策略。載於張素貞與李俊湖（主編），十二年國民基本教育精進教學的理念與實踐（63-110頁）。臺北市：國立師範大學。
黃惠雯等（譯）（2007）。最新質性方法與研究（原作者：B. F. Carbtree, & W. L. Miller）。臺北縣：韋伯文化。
甄曉蘭（2008）。促進學習的課堂評量─概念分析與實施結果。中等教育，59(1)，92-109。
趙曉美（2015）。補救教學V.S.有效教學。教育評論月刊─主題：關鍵五堂課，4(4)，21-25。
劉向欣（2008）。國小教師評量素養現況之調查研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與應用。臺北市：心理。
蔡辰北、陳靜紋（2013）。淺談差異化教學。教育評論月刊，2 (11)，78-80。
蔡清田（2011）。素養：課程改革的DNA。臺北市：高等教育。蔡清田（2012）。課程發展與設計的關鍵DNA：核心素養。臺北市：五南圖書。
蔡清田（2014）。國民核心素養：十二年國教課程改革的DNA。臺北市：高等教育。蕭妙香（2015）。「必要」與「想要」大不同。理想與現實的差距－談「關鍵五堂課」。教育評論月刊─主題：關鍵五堂課，4(4)，12。
羅舒心（2010）。探究網路化動態評量對不同認知風格國中學生數學學習成效影響之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
辭海編輯委員會（1985）。辭海續編。臺北市：中華書局。
二、英文部分
Abell, S. K., & Siegel, M. A. (2011). Assessment literacy: What science teachers need to know and be able to do? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 205-221). The Netherlands: Springer.
Alkharusi, H. A. (2012). A generalizability approach to the measurement of score reliability of the teacher assessment literacy questionnaire. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(2), 157. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9278-z
Allal, L., & Ducrey, G. P. (2000). Assessment of-or in-the zone of proximal development. Learning and Instruction, 10, 137-152.
American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National teacher Association (AFT, NCME, & NEA)(1990). The standards for teacher competence in the educational assessment of students. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 30-32.
Atkinson, R. C. (1972). Ingredients for a theory of instruction. American Psychologist, 27, 921-931.
Ball, D. L. (1999). Crossing boundaries to examine the mathematics entailed in elementary teaching. In T. Lam (Ed.), Contemporary mathematics (pp.15-36). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Ball, D. L., Bass, H. (2000). Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp.193-224). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2009). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Knowing mathematics for teaching to learners' mathematical futures. Paper prepared based on keynote address at the 43rd Jahrestagung für Didaktik der Mathematik held in Oldenburg, Germany.
Beziat, T. L. R., & Coleman, B. K. (2015). Classroom assessment literacy: Evaluating pre-service teachers. The Researcher, 27(1), 25-30.
Borko, H., Davinroy, K. H., Bliem, C. L., & Cumbo, K. B. (2000) Exploring and supporting teacher change: Two third-grade teachers’ experiences in a mathematics and literacy staff development project. Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 273-306.
Borko, H., Mayfield, V., Marion, S., Flexer, R., & Cumbo, K. (1997). Teachers' developing ideas and practices about mathematics performance assessment: Successes, stumbling blocks, and implications for professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 259-278.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brookhart, S. M. (2001). The standards and classroom assessment research. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED451189)
Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3-12.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Campbell, C., Murphy, J. A., & Holt, J. K. (2002). Psychometric analysis of an assessment literacy instrument: Applicability to preservice teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, OH.
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp.82– 115). New York: Guilford Press.
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1985). Dynamic assessment: One approach and some initial data. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED498566)
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1978). Use of testing-the-limits procedures in the assessment of intellectual capabilities in children with learning difficulties. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 82, 529-564.
Chamberlin, M. T., & Farmer, J. D. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of assessments of their mathematical knowledge in a professional development course. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(6), 435-457.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003).Design Experiments in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343.
Crick, D. R. (2008). Key competencies for education in a european context: Narratives of accountability or care. European Educational Research Journal, 7(3), 311-318.
Dale, E. (1969). The cone of experience, in “audiovisual methods in teaching”. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.
Díaz-Maggioli, G. (2004). Teacher-centered professional development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. California: Corwin Press.
Eckhout, T., Davis, S., Mickelson, k., & Goodburn, A. (2005). A method for providing assessment training to in-service and pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Education Resource Strategies (ERS)( 2013, MAY). A New Vision for Teacher Professional Growth & Support. Retrieved from http://www.erstrategies.
org/cms/files/1800-gates-pgs-white-paper.pdf
Elliott, J. (2003). Dynamic Assessment in Educational Settings: Realising Potential. Educational Review, 55(1), 15-32.
Eyal, L. (2010). The reciprocity between learning-content management system (LCMS) and the assessment of learners in E-learning courses (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Eyal, L. (2012). Digital assessment literacy—the core role of the teacher in a digital environment. Educational Technology & Society,15(2), 37-49.
Fan, Y. C., Wang, T. H., & Wang, K. H. (2011). A Web-based model for developing assessment literacy of secondary in-service teachers. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1727-1740.
Feuerstein, R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The Learning Potential Assessment. Device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Gearhart, M. & Saxe, G. B. (2004). When teachers know what students know: Integrating mathematics assessment. Theory Into Practice, 43(4), 304-313. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4304_9
Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: The Falmer Press.
Glaser, R. (1962). Training research and education. New York: Columbia University Press.
Glaser, R. (1990). Toward new models for assessment. International Journal of Educational Research, 14(5), 475-483.
Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. C. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ learning: a conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 5–36.
Goodlad, J. I. (1979). The scope of the curriculum field. In J. I. Goodlad & Associates (Eds.), Curriculum Inquiry: The Study of Curriculum Practice (pp.17-42). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gottheiner, D. M., & Siegel M. A. (2012). Experienced middle school science teachers’ assessment literacy: Investigating knowledge of students’ conceptions in genetics and ways to shape instruction. The Association for Science Teacher Education, 23, 531–557. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9278z
Grant, T. J., & Kline, K. (2010). The impact of video-based lesson analysis on teacher’s thinking and practice. Teacher Development, 14(1), 69-83.
Jeong, H. (2013). Defining assessment literacy: Is it different for language tester and non-language testers? Language Testing, 30(3), 345-362. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480334
Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategies use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computer Research, 31, 139-161.
Khadijeh, B., & Amir, R. (2015). Importance of teachers’ assessment literacy. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 139-146.
Kilpatrick, J., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Unfinished business: Challenges for mathematics educators in the next decades. In M. J. Burke & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), Learning mathematics for a new century ( pp. 223–236). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Koellner, K., & Jacobs, J. (2014). Distinguishing models of professional development: The case of an adaptive model’s impact on teachers’ knowledge, instruction, and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 17, 1-17.
Koirala, H. P., Davis, M., & Johnson, P. (2008). Development of a performance assessment task and rubric to measure prospective secondary school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and skills. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2) , 127-138.
Lannin, J. K., Webb, M., & Chval, K. Arbaugh, F., Hicks, S., Taylor, C., & Bruton, R. (2013). The development of beginning mathematics teacher pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(6), 403-426.
Lin, F.L. (2003). The performance of Taiwan junior high students on geometric argumentation. Paper present at the international Conference on Science & Mathematics Learning, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
McMillan, J. H. (2000, September 30 ). Fundamental assessment principles for teachers and school administrators[Network information]. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=8
Mertler, C. A. (1999). Assessing student performance: A descriptive study of the classroom assessment practices of Ohio teachers. Education, 120, 285–296.
Mertler, C. A. (2005). Measuring teachers’ knowledge & application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the assessment literacy inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
Mertler, C. A. (2009). Teachers’ assessment knowledge and their perceptions of the impact of classroom assessment professional development. Improving Schools, 12, 101-113. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1365480209105575
Mertler, C. A., & Campbell, C. (2005). Measuring teachers’ knowledge and application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the assessment literacy inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, Montreal, QC, Canada.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2005). Guide to national board certification. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/guide/04port/04_ecgen
_instructions/04_ec_gen.pdf
National Staff Development Council (n.d.). NSDC resolutions. Retrieved from http://www.nsdc.org/connect/about/resolutions.cfm
Newfields, T. (2006). Teacher development and assessment literacy. Paper prepared at authentic communication: Proceedings of the 5th Annual JALT Pan-SIG Conference, Shizuoka, Japan: Tokai University College of Marine Science.
Norton, A., & McCloskey, A.(2011). Prediction assessments: Using video-based predictions to assess prospective teachers’ knowledge of students’ mathematical thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(4), 305–325.
Opfer, V.D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001). Definition and selection of competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundations, DeSeCo. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/41529556.pdf
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101. doi: 10.1207/ S15326985EP3602_4
Paterno, J. (2001). Measuring success: A glossary of assessment terms. In Building cathedrals: Compassion for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://wwwrinongelfire.com/wa2/buildingcathedrals/measuringsuccess.html
Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children：Development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176-186.
Piaget, J. (1971). Genetic epistemology. New York: W. W. Norton Company.
Popham, W. J. (2004). All about accountability / Why assessment illiteracy is professional suicide. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 82-83.
Popham, W. J. (2006). Needed: A dose of assessment literacy. Educational Leadership, 63, 84-85.
Popham, W. J. (2011). Assessment Literacy Overlooked: A Teacher Educator's Confession. The Teacher Educator, 46(4), 265-273.
Puckett, M. B., & Black, J. K. (1994). Authentic assessment of the young child—Celebrating development and learning. New York: Macmillan College Publishing.
Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2007). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 146-159.
Scarino, A. (2013). Language assessment literacy as self-awareness: Understanding the role of interpretation in assessment and in teacher learning. Australia Language Testing, 30(3), 309-327. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/
0265532213480128
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 57, 1-22.
Silver, E. A., & Herbst, P. G. (2007). Theory in mathematics education scholarship. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 39-67). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Sleeter, C. (2014). Toward teacher education research that informs policy. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 146-153. doi:10.3102/0013189X14528752
Steele, M. D. (2013). Exploring the mathematical knowledge for teaching geometry and measurement through the design and use of rich assessment tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(4), 127-138.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). All testing is dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7, 137–170.
Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment Literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72 (7), 534-539.
Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238-245.
Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Are you assessment literate?. The High School Journal, 65, 20-23.
Stiggins, R. J. (2001). The unfulfilled promise of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 5-15.
Stiggins, R. J. (2009). Essential formative assessment competencies for teachers and school leaders. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment. New York: Routledge.
Stiggins, R., & Duke, D. (2008). Effective instructional leadership requires assessment leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(4), 285–291.
Stiggins, R. (2002). Assessmenl crisis: The absence of assessmem for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 58-65.
Ticha, M., & Hospesova, A. (2006). Qualified pedagogical reflection as a way to improve mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 129-156.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, T. H., Wang, K. H., Wang, W. L. & Huang, S. C. (2006, April). P2R-WATA assessment literacy development model: Is it better for Biology pre-service teachers?. Paper presented at the 2006 NARST (National Association for Research in Science Teaching) International Conference. San Francisco, CA.
Wang, T. H., Wang, K. H., & Wang, W. L. (2007, March). Developing a Web-based dynamic assessment module to facilitate student e-Learning effectiveness. Paper presented at CAL'07 (The 2007 Computer Assisted Learning biennial conference). Dublin, Ireland.
Wang, T. H., Wang, K. H., & Huang, S. C. (2008). Designing a web-based assessment environment for improving pre-service teacher assessment literacy. Computers & Education, 51(1), 448-462.
Wang, T. H.(2009, August). Implementation of web-based dynamic assessment for improving students' learning about photosynthesis in an e-learning environment. Paper presented at the 2009 ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) International Conference. Istanbul, Turkey.
Wang, T. H. (2010). Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching and learning strategy for improving students’ e-Learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 54, 1157-1166.
Wang, T. H. (2011a). Developing Web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-Learning environment. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1801-1812.
Wang, T. H. (2011b). Implementation of web-based dynamic assessment in facilitating junior high school students to learn mathematics. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1062-1071.
Wang, T. H. (2011c, September). Using dynamic-assessment-driven e-Learning environment for improving student learning effectiveness. Paper presented at the 2011 ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) International Conference. Lyon, France.
Wang, T. H. (2014). Developing an assessment-centered e-Learning system for improving student learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 73, 189-203.
Zevenbergen, R. (2001). Peer assessment of student constructed posters: Assessment alternatives in preservice mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(2) , 95-113.