:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中校長課程領導對學校效能之影響-以教師領導為中介變項
作者:洪幼齡
作者(外文):Hung Yu-Ling
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:教育政策與行政學系
指導教授:楊振昇
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2018
主題關鍵詞:課程領導教師領導學校效能curriculum leadershipteachers' leadershipschool effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:7
本研究旨在探究國中校長課程領導、教師領導與學校效能關係研究,了解其現況、差異情形、相關、預測力與模式適配度情形。本研究採用問卷調查法,參考國內外相關文獻,建立本研究之理論架構,經專家效度和預試問卷後,形成「校長課程領導、教師領導與學校效能研究調查問卷」,依分層抽樣,將全臺分為北、中、南、東四區,再依學校規模抽取共80所學校,發出1000份問卷,有效問卷706份,有效回收率70.6%,資料採用SPSS與AMOS統計軟體進行統計分析,以平均數和標準差了解變項的現況、以t考驗及單因子變異數分析各變項間的差異情形,以積差相關考驗各變項間的相關情形,以多元線性迴歸探討自變項對依變項之預測力,再以結構方程模式驗証各變項間之適配度情形,依據統計結果,歸納研究發現,並作成以下結論;
國民中學教師知覺校長課程領導、教師領導與學校效能現況屬於中高程度;不同背景變項下的差異情形包括男性教師知覺校長課程領導、教師領導與學校效能較女性教師高;年資低於5年的教師知覺校長進行課程檢核的得分高於5年以上的教師,而年資超過16年以上的教師知覺親師互動得分高於6-15年的教師,教師兼任行政工作知覺校長課程領導、教師領導與學校效能得分高於未兼行政工作之導師或專任教師;校長在該校服務5年以上之教師對於校長課程領導、教師領導與學校效能有較高的知覺。
校長課程領導、教師領導與學校效能互為高度正相關,在預測力方面,校長課程領導中的進行課程檢核對教師領導最具預測力,此外,校長課程領導與教師領導對於學校效能皆有顯著預測力。校長課程領導、教師領導與學校效能之徑路關係模式,整體模型具有良好的適配度,同時,運用結構方程模式之拔靴法發現校長課程領導透過教師領導,對於學校效能具有中介效果。
根據本研究結果,建議教育行政機關強化校長課程領導力、訂定課程檢核機制,推動校長專業學習社群、訂定教師兼任行政工作獎勵機制;建議國中校長善用領導理論新思維,鼓勵教師組織學習社群、擔任課程教學的示範者;建議國中女教師勇於擔任學校各項職務,同時教師們致力班級經營,有助提升學校效能,其餘針對未來研究者則建議可從研究對象、研究方法及研究構面進行後續探討。
This study aimed to investigate the realationship among three variables in a junior high school setting, which were principals’ curriculum leadership, teachers’ leadership, and school effectiveness. Therefore, this research explored into the status quo, the differences, correlation, predictive power, and model fit of these variables. The study methodology of this study was using a survey, which included a questionnaire prepared based on the theoretical framework of this study established on a substantial body of research. The design of the questionnaire was complete after solid tests, such as expert validity test and field pretest. The multi-sampling method was employed for data collection. The junior high schools in Taiwan were divided into four groups: those in the north, in the central area, in the south, and in the east. 80 schools were selected according to school size. A total of 706 valid questionnaires out of the 1000 distributed were recovered. Then, statistical analysis was conducted in SPSS and AMOS. The averages and standard deviations showed the status quo of the variables. The t-test and ANOVA were conducted to assess the potential differences among the variables. The product moment correlation test was carried out to assess the correlation between the variables. The multiple linear regression was employed to assess how well the independent variables may predict the magnitude of the dependent variable. Finally, a structural equation model was utilized to test the fitness of all the variables.
The study findings were as follows:
Principals’ leadership, teachers’ leadership, and school effectiveness were all at the high-intermediate level.
The male teachers showed a higher level of perception of principals’ leadership, teachers’ leadership, and school effectiveness than the female teachers. The teachers with different lengths of service showed different levels of perception of pincipals’ leadership, teachers’ leadership, and school effectiveness. The teachers in administrative positions had a higher level of perception of principals’ leadership, teachers’ leadership, and school effectiveness than those not in such positions. The teachers whose principal had served more than five years in their schools showed a higher level of perception of principals’ leadership, teachers’ leadership, and school effectiveness than those whose principal had not served for five years.
Principals’ curriculum leadership showed a high positive correlation with teachers’ leadership and school effectiveness.
The curriculum review and evaluation, a factor in the principal’s curriculum leadership, was the most powerful one in predicting the magnitude of teachers’ leadership. In addition, both principals’ curriculum leadership and teachers’ leadership had significant predictive power on school effectiveness.
Principals’ curriculum leadership, teachers’ leadership, and school effectiveness showed good fitness in the path model and overall model. In terms of principals’ leadership, teachers’ leadership played a mediating effect on school effectiveness.
Based on the aforementioned results, some recommendations were made for education administration authorities, junior high school principals, junior high school teachers at the end of the paper. Suggestions for future research were also offered.
參考文獻
一、中文部分
丁一顧(2013)。校長專業學習社群實施對校長領導能力影響之研究。臺北市:高等教育。
丁一顧、黃智偉、王佳蕙 (2016)。教學導師教師領導之研究:校長支持作為與影響。教育政策論壇,19(2),65-92。
丁文祺 (2008)。國民中學校長教學領導、教師社群互動、教師專業實踐與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄。
王如哲、王瑞壎 (譯)(2003)。學校效能與品質(原作者:Hoy, W. H. & Miskel, C. G.)。載於林明地(等譯),教育行政學──理論、研究與實際。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。
王秀玲 (2010)。國民中學學習領域召集人課程領導現況之調查研究。中等教育,61(1),34-51。
王淑珍、林雍智(2015)。教師領導的實踐與發展:從教師「同僚性」談起。教育研究月刊,256,70-88。
王博弘、林清達 (2006)。臺灣近二十年來校長領導實徵研究與學校效能關係之探討。花蓮教育大學學報,22,283-306。
王機林 (2010)。論校長在校本課程開發中的角色、素質及職責。新疆教育學院學報,26(1),64-69。
江文吉 (2012)。校長靈性領導、教師領導、學校組織文化與學校效能關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所博士論文,未出版,屏東。
江嘉杰 (2014)。臺灣地區教師領導研究之分析。學校行政,90,1-25。

江嘉杰 (2015)。國民小學教師領導之個案研究-以教學卓越金質獎團隊為例。國立臺南大學教育學系教育經營與管理碩博士班博士論文,未出版,臺南。
余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市:高等教育。
行政院 (2015)。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫。臺北市:行政院。
吳明隆 (2008)。 SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市:五南。
吳明隆、涂金堂 (2016)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市:五南。
吳清山 (1992)。學校效能研究。臺北市:五南。
吳清山 (2010)。校長課程領導vs.教師教學品質。師友月刊,514,8-13。
吳清山、林天佑 (2005)。組織承諾。教育研究月刊,136,159。
吳清山、高家斌 (2009)。臺灣近二十年學校效能研究論文取向分析。教育研究月刊,188,5-26。
吳煒增 (2015)。臺北市國民小學校園空間美學營造、教師領導與學校特色關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系博士論文,未出版,臺北。
吳慧蘭(2016)。新北市國民中學校長教學領導、教師專業社群與教師教學效能關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系博士論文,未出版,臺北。
呂俊宏、陳成宏 (2015)。花蓮縣國民小學校長分布式領導與學校效能之研究。學校行政,95,1-26。
李安明 (1997)。我國國小校長教學領導之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC 86-2413-H-134-006)。
李貞儀 (2011)。國民小學校長變革領導、教師組織信任、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究。國立中正大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,嘉義。
李重毅 (2012)。校長分布式領導、教師專業社群運作與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北。
李瑞娥 (2005)。學校組織學習、組織創新與學校效能的關係。高雄師大學報,18,45-59。

李鴻亮、范信賢、王前龍 (2001)。我國國民小學「學校本位課程」現況之調查研究。課程與教學季刊,4(2),47-68。
周昌柏 (2007)。國小全面品質管理與學校效能之研究。學校行政,48,66-86。
周彥君 (2014)。國民小學教師領導者角色建構與實踐之敘說研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
林和春、楊佩禎 (2016)。國民小學校長課程領導與教師領導關係之研究-以桃園市為例。中等教育,67(4),57-84。
林俊傑 (2011)。國民中學校長多元型模領導、教師領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄。
林恭煌 (2016)。技術型高中校長領導與教師領導及自我效能對學校效能影響之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系博士論文,未出版,彰化。
林新發、黃秋鑾 (2014)。推動校長教學領導以提升教師專業學習社群之策略。臺灣教育論評月刊,3(1),43-62。
林錫恩、范熾文(2018)。校長推動童軍教育的課程領導與實踐。臺灣教育論評月刊,6(3),163-166。
邱皓政 (2002)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市:五南。
洪碧珠、吳明隆 (2005)。國民小學兼任行政教師知覺校長激勵策略與學校組織效能關係之研究。學校行政,35,72-94。
范信賢 (2016)。核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要:導讀《國民核心素養:十二年國教課程改革的DNA》。教育脈動,5,1-7。
孫淑偵、孫國華 (2015)。國民小學教師領導困境初探。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(7),86-89。
秦夢群 (1998)。教育行政-理論部分與實務部分。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群 (2010)。教育領導理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群、吳勁甫 (2011)。國中校長教學領導, 學校知識管理與教師教學效能之多層次分析。教育與心理研究,34(2),1-32。
荘勝利 (2005)。我國中小學校領導的新思維-教師領導。學校行政,40,17-29。
高博銓 (2002)。析論校長的教學領導。中等教育,53(6),66-81。
高新建 (2001)。基本能力的課程與教學轉化。臺北市立師範學院學報,32,237-254。
國家教育研究院(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程發展指引。
張世璿、丁一顧 (2016)。國民小學教師領導核心能力指標建構之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,33(1),1-38。
張本文 (2011)。論教師領導對教師專業發展之影響。學校行政,75,21-36。
張夏銘、李新鄉、陳聖謨、丁文生 (2012)。教師領導與教師專業發展關係之研究-以臺南市國民中學為例。南臺人文社會學報,8,29-55。
張媛甯、阮東明 (2015)。臺南市國民中學校長變革領導與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政,97,22-44。
張韶蘭、黃靖文 (2016a)。以價值共創觀點探討互動行銷與學校效能關係之研究。行銷評論,13(4),451-457。
張韶蘭、黃靖文 (2016b)。國民小學創新經營與學校效能關係之探討-學校行銷之調節效果。教育研究學報,50(1),43-65。
張德銳 (2015)。學習領導在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與實踐。市北教育學刊,52,1-20。
張德銳 (2016)。學校革新的巨大潛能-教師領導。師友月刊,587,33-38。
張慶勳 (2015)。以校長領導轉化為教師領導的思維與第略。教育研究月刊,256,12-24。

教育部 (2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自http://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw。
許惠茹 (2008)。校長領導學校本位課程永續發展經驗之探究。當代教育研究季刊,16(4),71-108。
郭福豫 (2015)。高職校長課程領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系博士論文,未出版,彰化。
郭騰展 (2007)。臺北縣國民小學教師領導與學校文化關係之研究。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文,未出版,新北。
郭騰展 (2007)。學校領導的新典範-教師領導。學校行政,49,150-175。
陳順宇 (2009)。迴歸分析。臺北市:三民。
陳木金、邱馨儀、張維倩、林惠煌 (2013)。以學定教的校長教學領導模式。兩岸三地校長學學術研討會。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
陳木金、吳堂鐘、吳慧蘭 (2016)。學校學習環境指標建構對校長推動教學領導的啟示。學校行政,104,15-38。
陳世聰 (2015)。專業自主的最後一哩路:班級本位教師領導。教育研究月刊,256,25-38。
陳玉玫 (2013)。國民小學校長多元架構領導、教師領導與 學校效能關係之研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所博士論文,未出版,嘉義。
陳弦希 (2001)。國民小學級任教師領導技巧與學生情緒智商關係之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
陳昆仁 (2003)。推動九年一貫課程-校長之領導理念與藝術。學校行政,23,105-116。
陳羿君 (2012)。兩岸大學生對教師教學領導能力認知之比較分析。教育心理學報,43(4),763-782。
陳榮政、張家淇 (2015)。發展一個可行的教師領導模式。教育研究月刊,256,54-69。
陳慧芬、劉芯廷 (2015)。國民小學校長文化領導與學校效能關係之研究。教育理論與實踐學刊,31,63-94。
黃木蘭 (2010)。課程領導與行政領導並行不悖。師友月刊,514,25-29。
黃芳銘(2007)。社會科學統計方法學-結構方程式模型。臺北市:五南。
黃秀霞 (2013)。公立高中校長教學領導、教師社群互動、學校創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。
黃信揚、吳明隆 (2005)。高雄縣市國小校長課程領導行為之研究。學校行政,39,1-16。
黃啟峰 (2014)。高雄市國民小學校長人格特質、課程領導、組織創新與學校效能關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所博士論文,未出版,屏東。
黃淑娟、吳清山 (2016)。校長課程領導推動十二年國民基本教育課程綱要因應策略之研究。學校行政,106,121-140。
黃超陽 (2000)。校長在九年一貫課程中應扮演的角色。師友,393,21-24。
黃嘉雄 (1999)。落實學校本位課程發展的行政領導策略。國民教育,40(1), 29-34。
黃嘉雄 (2001)。課程領導研究領域內涵芻議。載於國立嘉義大學教育學院(主編)。2001 年海峽兩岸小學教育學術研討會論文集(頁 1-28)。高雄市:復文。
黃嘉雄 (2010)。課程評鑑。臺北市:心理。
黃藍琪、賴志峰 (2013)。國民中學教師領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。學校行政,87,30-51。
楊恩慈 (民104年9月25日)。老師,你為什麼不肯擔任行政?【楊恩慈臉書】。取自https://www.facebook.com/hastiayang

楊豪森 (2008)。綜合高中校長課程領導、教師專業承諾與教師教學效能關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系博士論文,未出版,彰化。
楊振昇 (2003)。教學領導與教師專業發展。教育資料集刊,28, 287-318。
楊振昇 (2011)。我國中小學革新之困境與因應策略分析。學校行政,71,1-16。
楊淙富 (2012)。國民小學教師領導、教師專業學習社群與學校效能之研究。國立臺中教育大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺中。
楊瑞珠(2014)。從革新的課程領導談學校體育課程管理。政大體育研究,23,31-42。
楊慶麟、蔡素惠 (2016)。國小校長中西領導模式與學校效能關係之研究:以結構方程式驗證為例。學校行政,106,27-51。
葉連祺 (2004)。鳥瞰教育領導理念之叢林-教育領導理念之初步綜觀。教育研究月刊,124,96-108。
葉連祺 (2014)。國小校長課程領導之實踐課題。學校行政,91,1-32。
葛珍珍、康自立 (2007)。臺灣地區高級職業學校學校效能之探討。大漢學報,22,113-133。
趙志揚 (2002)。學校效能研究。載於張銀富(主編),學校行政─理論與應用(頁 281-323)。臺北:五南。
歐用生 (2000)。學校本位課程改革-爭議與回應。國民教育,40(3),2-9。
蔡宗河 (2008)。國民小學學習領域課程領導之研究。國立新竹教育大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,新竹。
蔡清田 (2014)。十二年國教課程綱要核心要素。師友月刊,566,17-22。
蔡清田 (2016)。「領域/科目核心素養」的課程設計。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(5),142-147。
蔡清田、王霄燕 (2002)。國小校長課程領導實際行動之探究:以一所臺灣南部鄉村小學的安校長為例。課程與教學,5(2),21-35。
蔡進雄 (2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北。
蔡進雄 (2007)。國民中學教師教學領導之建構與發展-以學習領域召集人為例。學校行政,52,20-43。
蔡進雄 (2008)。教學領導與課程領導關係與整合之探析。教育研究月刊,167,93-103。
蔡進雄 (2015)。新世紀的教師領導:專訪前教育部國民及學前教育署署長吳清山。教育研究月刊,256,5-11。
蔡進雄 (2016)。教師領導三層次探析。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(10), 71-76。
蔡慶文、范熾文、林清達 (2006)。國小校長教學領導與教師教學效能之研究。花蓮教育大學學報,23,29-48。
鄭崇趁 (2015)。從「教師學」看「教師領導」的意涵。國民教育,55(4),125-136。
鄭淵全 (2008)。國小校長在校本課程發展的課程領導作為及其相關問題之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,25(1),1-19。
鄭淵全、蔡雅茹 (2012)。國小校長課程領導行為、教師教學信念、教師創新教學行為與國小學童創造力傾向關係之研究。學校行政,78,183-202。
盧中原 (2006)。從學校人力資源管理談學校效能的提昇。學校行政,43,82-95。
蕭雪玲 (2016)。國民中學學校效能指標建構之研究。臺北市立大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺北。
蕭錫錡、楊豪森、陳慕能 (2007)。高職學校本位課程校長課程領導能力研究-以高職校長觀點為例。彰化師大教育學報,12,25-46。
賴協志 (2008)。國民小學校長知識領導、組織學習與學校效能關係之研究。臺北市立教育大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺北。

謝傳崇、陳愛玲 (2015)。國民小學校長學術樂觀與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政,98,1-22。
謝傳崇、許欉龍(2015)。國民中小學校長領導研究之後設分析-以博士論文為例。國立臺南大學教育研究學報,49(2),41~64。
謝傳崇、謝宜君 (2016)。國民小學教師正向領導對學生幸福感影響之研究:以學生學術樂觀為中介變項。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,9(3),29-56。
簡杏娟、賴志峰 (2014)。國民小學教師領導促進專業學習社群建構之個案研究。學校行政,90,172-193。
顏曉湘 (2012)。國民小學校長課程領導、組織學習與學校效能關係之研究。國立嘉義大學教育學系研究所博士論文,未出版,嘉義。
蘇美麗 (2007)。校長課程領導角色理論與實際之應用。國民教育研究學報,18,59-90。
二、英文部分
Aliakbari, M., & Sadeghi, A. (2014). Iranian teachers’ perceptions of teacher leadership practices in schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 576-592.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Barth, R. S. (2006). Foreward. In G. Moller & Pankake, A. (Eds.), Lead with me: A principal’s guide to teacher leadership (pp. vii-viii). Larchmont, NY: Eye onEducation.
Bolden, R. (2008). Distributed leadership. In J. Martarano, & J. Gosling (Eds.), Leadership: The key concepts (pp.42‒45). London: Routledge.

Bell, D., & Ritchie, R. (1999). Towards effective subject leadership in the primary school. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bennett, N., Harvey, J. A., Wise, C., & Woods, P. (2003). Distributed leadership: Summary report. Retrieved from http://ema.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/439
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
Berry, B., Daughtrey, A., & Wieder, A. (2010). Teacher leadership:
Leading the way to effective teaching and learning. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED 509719)
Bezzina, M. (1989). Does our reach exceed our grasp? A case study of school based curriculum development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED366109)
Blau, I., & Presser, O. (2013). E-Leadership of school principals: Increasing school effectiveness by a school data management system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 1000-1011. doi:10.1111/bjet.12088
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Botha, R. J. (2016). Improving south African school effectiveness through distributed leadership: A study of gender. Gender & Behaviour, 142, 6804,6809-6813.
Bradley, L. (1985). Curriculum leadership and development handbook. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Bradley-Levine, J., Mosier, G., & Perkins, T. (2014). Perceptions of teacher leadership within the new tech high school model. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 5(1), 1-17.
Bush, T. (2011). Theories of educational leadership and management (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Cheng, Y. C. (1996). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for development. London: The Flamer.
Clark, I. (2009). An analysis of the relationship between K-5 elementary school teachers' perceptions of principal instructional leadership and their science teaching efficacy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).The University of Minnesota.
Cordianni, A. V., & Wilbur, G. (1987). More effective schooling from research to practice. New Year: Clearinghouse on Urban Education.
Cranston, N. C. (2000). Teachers as leaders: a critical agenda for the new millennium. Asia-Pacific Journal of teacher Education, 28(2), 123-131.
Crowther, F., Kaagan, S., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2002).Developing Teacher Leader: how teacher leadership enhances school success. Thousand Oaks CA: Corwin Press.
Curtis, R. (2013). Finding a new way: Leveraging teacher leadership to meet unprecedented demands. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
Daniels, D. M. (2009). Leadership, learning and school change: the elementary principal’s role in teacher professional development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Capella University, Minnesota.
Dorit, T. (2017). Leadership identity construction practices: The case of successful Israeli school principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(5), 790-805.
Drucker, Peter Ferdinand (2008). The Essencial Drucker: The Best of Sixty Years of Peter Drucker’s Essential Writings on Management. Harperbusiness.


Emira, M. (2010). Leading to decide or deciding to lead? Understanding the relationship between teacher leadership and decision making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(5), 591-612.
Fornell, C. R., & Larcker, F. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-51.
Frost, D., & Durrant. J. (2003). Teacher leadership: Rational, strategy and impact. School Leadership & Management, 23(2), 173-186.
Fullan, M., & Walling, D. R. (Ed.) (1994).Teachers as leaders. Bloomingdale, Indiana, Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Gaski, J. F., & Nevin, J. R. (1985). The differential effects of exercised and unexercised power sources in a marketing channel. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 130-142.
Ghamrawi, N. (2013). Teachers helping teachers: A professional development model that promotes teacher leadership. International Education Sωdies, 6(4), 171-182.
Glatthorn, A. A. (1987). Curriculum renewal. ALX: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Glatthorn, A. A. (1997). The principal as curriculum leadership: Shaping what is taught and tested. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin press.
Glatthorn, A. A. (2000). The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping what is taught and tested (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin press.
Glatthorn, A. A., & Jailall, J. M. (Eds.). (2008). The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping what is taught and tested (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.


Glatthorn, A. A., Boschee, F. A., Whitehead, B. M., & Boschee, B. F. (2012). Curriculum leadership: Strategies for development and implementation (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Greenfield, W. (Ed.) (1987). Instructional leadership: Concepts, issues, and controversies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gross, S. J. (1998). Staying centered: curriculum leadership in a turbulent era. Washington, D. C: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Hall, J. M. (1996). Curriculum leadership as perceived by North Dakota elementary school principals and teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Dakota, Dakota.
Hallinger, P., Murphy, J.,Weil, M., Mesa, R. P., & Mitman, A. (1983). Identifying the specific practices, behaviors for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 67(463), 83-91.
Hamzah, N., Noor, M., & Yusof, H. (2016). Teacher Leadership Concept: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(2), 185-189.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Bershire: Open University Press.
Harris, A., Busher, H., & Wise, C. (2002). Effective training for subject leaders. Journal of In-Service Education, 27(1), 83-94.
Hawthorne, R., & Henderson, J. (2000). Transformative curriculum leadership (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
Howe, E. R. (2006). Exemplary teacher induction: An international review. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 287–297.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2008). Educational administration:Theory, research, and practice (8th Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, G. G. (2001). Education administration: theory, research, and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hunzicker, J. (2013). Attitude has a lot to do with it: Dispositions of emerging teacher leadership. Teacher Development, 17(4), 538–561.
Johnson, J. P., Livingston, M., Schwartz, R. A., & Slate, J. R. (2000). What makes a good elementary school? The Journal of Educational Research, 93(6), 339‒348.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity, Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Katzenmeyer, M. & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Kilinc, A. C. (2014). Examining the relationship between teacher leadership and school climate. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(5), 1729-1742.
Killion, J., Harrison, C., Colton, A., Bryan, C., Delehant, A. & Cooke, D. (2016). A Systemic Approach to Elevating Teacher Leadership. Oxford, OH: Learning Forward.
Lambert, L. (2002). A framework for shared leadership. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 37-40.
Lenz, P. A. (2006). Teacher-school board member trust relationships and their perceived influence on school effectiveness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Duquesne University, Pennsylvania.
Lester, R. I., & Kunich, J. C. (1997). Leadership and management: The quality quadrants. Journal of Leadership Studies, 4, 17-31.
Liljenberg, M. (2016). Teacher leadership modes and practices in a Swedish context – a case study. School Leadership & Management, 30, 21-40.
Little, J. W. (2003). Constructions of teacher leadership in three periods of policy and reform activism. School Leadership and Management, 23(4), 401-419.
Lovett, S., & Andrews, D. (2011). Leadership for learning: What it means for teachers. In T. Townsend & J. MacBeath (Eds.), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 719-739). London, UK: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5 40
Marsh, C. J. (1992). Key concepts for understanding curriculum. London, New York: Falmer Press.
Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2007). Teacher leadership in (in) action: Three case studies of contrasting schools. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 35(1), 111-134.
Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., & Mesa, R. P. (1985). School effectiveness: Checking progress and assumptions and developing a role for state and federal government. Teachers College Record, 86(4), 619.


Newton, P., Riveros, A., & da Costa, J. (2013). The influence of teacher leadership in the career advancement of schoolteachers: A case study. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations, 23(2), 105-117.
Noronha, A. X. (1985). The elementary school principalship in Ontario: A study of the curricular and managerial roles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of New York at Buffalo.
O’Connor, K., & Boles, K. (1992). Assessing the needs of teacher leaders in Massachusetts, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco: CA.
Pavlou, P. A., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 30(1), 115-143.
Panigrahi, M. R. (2014). School effectiveness at primary level of education in relation to classroom teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 7, 51-64.
Romanish, B. (1991). Teacher empowerment:The litmus test of school restructuring. Social Science Record, 28(1), 55-69.
Rutherford, C. (2006). Teacher leadership and organizational structure: The implications of restructured leadership in an Edison school. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 59-76.
Scheerens, J. (2000). Improving school effectiveness. Fundamentals of Educational Planning, 68, 18‒20.
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.

Sigurdardóttir, A. K. (2010). Professional learning community in relation to school effectiveness .Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(5), 395-412.
Smylie, M. A. (1994). Redesigning teachers’ work: Connections to the classroom. In L., Darling Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education, 20, 129-177. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Smylie, M. A., Conley, S., & Marks, H. M. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 162-188). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sorenson, R. D., Goldsmith, L. M., Mendez, Z. Y., & Maxwell, K. T. (2011).The principal’s guide to curriculum leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin press.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001) Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28.
Stewart, S., & Tareilo, J. (2011). Redefining curriculum leadership for principals: Perspectives of Texas administrators. In B. J. ALFORD (Ed.), Blazing new trails: Preparing leaders to improve access and equity in today’s schools (pp. 249-256). Lancaster, PE: ProActive Publications.
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Strong, J. H. (1988). A position in transition? Principal, 67(5), 32-33.
Wallace, M. (2002). Modeling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: Primary school senior management teams in England and Wales. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(2), 163-186.

Wang, F., & Zepeda, S. (2013). A comparative study of two schools: How school cultures interplay the development of teacher leadership in mainland China. Creative Education, 4, 63-68
Wasley, P. A., & Lieberman, A. (Ed) (1992). The changing context of teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
West, O. E. (2008). Supports for ethnically diverse teacher leaders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Diego, San Diego State University and California State University, San Marcos, California.
Whitaker, K. S. (2003). Principal role changes and influence on principal recruitment and selection: An international perspective. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(1), 37-54.
York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255-316.



 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE