臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：「師資培育法」形成的政策範疇影響力機制
書刊名：臺灣社會學
作者：熊瑞梅 引用關係／紀金山 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsung, Ray-may／Chi, Chin-shan
出版日期：2002
卷期：4
頁次：頁199-246
主題關鍵詞：政策範疇；影響力；國家；社會運動；師資培育法；Policy domain；Influence；State；Social movement；Teacher education act of 1994
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(19) 博士論文(4) 專書(3) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:19
  • 共同引用共同引用:192
  • 點閱點閱:109
　　　　　本文嘗試將因家與教改社運組織的角色帶入「師資培育法」形成的政策範疇分析之 中。資料蒐集與分析包括：1.透過質化資 析，勾勒在「師資培育法」形成的各階段中，家制 度、邊陲團體和教改社運組織間關系對法案發展議題的動態影響力機制；2.使用內容分析與 對應分析方法，來呈現政策範疇的影響力結構特質。「師資培育法」形成的三個階段包括：1. 修法議題受社會注意、2.修法進入行政議程、3.立法院審議法案決策。在法案發展的不同階段 中，政治機會環境有著重大的變遷，家教育官僚、教改社運組織及其他關鍵行動者的權力關 係也產生明顯變化，從而影響了行者和議題結構。而在最後政策審議階段，教改團體的組織 化、制度化，以及和民進黨立委結盟的擴張，更產生深刻影響師資培育法案的槓桿效果。對 應析勾勒出「師資培育法」發展過程的制度化特質──影響力結構的折衷原理和政策變遷的 制度化有密切關連。
　　　　　The authors include the roles of social movement and state organization in a policy domain analysis of the Teacher Education Act of 1994. Data collection and analysis included a)indentifying policy influence mechanisms among stae bureaucrats, peripheral groups, and social movement organizations during different stages of policy formation; and b)using content and correspondence analyses to determine the influence structures that were in place during and correspondence analyses to determine the influence structures that were in place during those stages. The construction stages were identified as a)recognizing issues associated with reforming the old act, b)enacting govermmental modification procedures for the old act, and c)making final decisions in the Legislative Yuan. Political opportunities changed dramatically during each stage, as did power relations among state educational bureaucrats, social movement organizations interested in educational reform, and small numbers of additional actors. In the final stage, educational reform coalitions used leverage strategies to join forces with opposition party legislators to create and pass a new Teacher Education Act. The correspondence analyses profile the institutionalized characteristics in the formation of the Teacher Education Ac-close association between the eclectic principle of influence structure and the institutionalization of policy change.
期刊論文
1.Knoke, D.、Pappi, F. U.(1991)。Organizational Action Sets in the U. S. and German Labor Policy Domains。American Sociological Review，56(4)，509-523。  new window
2.Jenkins, J. Craig(1983)。Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements。Annual Review of Sociology，9，527-553。  new window
3.熊瑞梅(20010200)。都市事件行動體系的分析--以臺中市為例。國立臺灣大學社會學刊，29，59-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Bourdieu, Pierre(1987)。What Makes a Social Class? On the Theoretical and Practical Existence of Groups。Berkeley Journal of Sociology，32(1)，1-19。  new window
5.林國明(20010200)。歷史、制度與政策--臺灣醫療保險體系部份負擔與轉診方案的政策轉折。國立臺灣大學社會學刊，29，111-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Strong, D. P.、Walters, B.、Driscoll, B.、Rosenberg, S.(2000)。Leveraging the State: Private Money and the Development of Public Education for Blacks。American Sociological Review，65，658-681。  new window
7.Tilly, C.(1997)。Parliamentarization of Popular Contention in Great Britian, 1758-1834。Theory and Society，26(23)，245-273。  new window
8.Quadagno, J.(1992)。Social Movement and State Transformation: Labor Unions and Racial Conflict in the War on Poverty。American Sociological Review，57，616-634。  new window
9.Orloff, A. S.、Skocpol, T.(1984)。Why Not Equal Protection? Explaining the Politics of Public Social Spending in Britain 1900-1911, and the United States, 1880s-1920s。American Sociological Review，49(4)，726-750。  new window
10.Mohr, J. W.、Duquenne, V.(1997)。The Duality of Culture and Practice: Poverty Relief in New York City, 1888-1917。Theory and Society，26(23)，305-356。  new window
11.Cheng, Tun-jen、Cheng, T.-J.(1993)。Dilemmas and Choices in Educational Policies: The Case of South Korea and Taiwan。Studies in Comparative International Development，27(4)，54-80。  new window
12.Burstein, P.(1991)。Policy Domains: Organization, Culture, and Policy Outcomes。Annual Review of Sociology，17，327-350。  new window
13.張春興(1984)。師範教育的展望：從教師專業教育的必要談師範教育改進的途徑。中國論壇，220，7-20。  延伸查詢new window
14.Link, W. A.(1988)。Privies, Progressivism, and Public Schools: Health Reform and Education in the Rural South, 1909-1920。Journal of Southern History，54，623-642。  new window
15.Breiger, Ronald L.(2000)。A Tool Kit for Practice Theory。Poetics，27(2/3)，91-115。  new window
會議論文
1.陳家倫(2001)。臺灣宗教行動圖像的初步建構。宗教與社會變遷：第三期第五次臺灣社會變遷基本調查之研究分析研討會。臺北：中央研究院社會學研究所。71-92。  延伸查詢new window
2.Burstein, P.、Linton, A.(2001)。The Impact of Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Social Movement Organizations on Public Policy: Some Recent Evidence and Theoretical Concern。沒有紀錄。  new window
3.DiMaggio, Paul J.、Mullen, A.(1993)。Organizing Communities: Models of Collective Action in a National Music Week, 1924。Miami。  new window
研究報告
1.熊瑞梅、東海大學社會學系［計畫執行］(1992)。快速成長的郊區之菁英影響力結構及居民社會資源 (計畫編號：NSC 81-0301-H029-01)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.舒緒緯(1998)。師資培育法制訂過程及其內涵之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.紀金山(1996)。社區爭議事件集體行動體系之結構分析(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.何明修(2000)。民主轉型過程中的國家與民間社會：以台灣的環境運動為例（1986-1998）(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.吳介民(1990)。政體轉型期的社會抗議--台灣1980年代(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Greenacre, Michael J.(1993)。Correspondence Analysis in Practice。Correspondence Analysis in Practice。London, UK：Academic Press。  new window
2.Knoke, D.、Pappi, F. U.、Broadbent, J.、Tsujinaka, Y.(1996)。Comparing Policy Networks: Labor Politics in the U. S., Germany, and Japan。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Laumann, E. O.、Knoke, D.(1987)。Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy. Domains。Madison, Wis：University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
4.Clausen, S. E.(1998)。Applied Correspondence Analysis: An Introduction。Sage Publications。  new window
5.Scott, W. R.、Meyer, J. W.(1994)。Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism。London。  new window
6.Laumann, Edward O.、Pappi, Franz Urban(1976)。Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems。New York：Academic Press。  new window
7.Bourdieu, Pierre(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste。Harvard University Press。  new window
8.薛曉華(1996)。台灣民間教育改革運動：國家與社會的分析。臺北：前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.McCarthy, John D.、Zald, Mayer N.(1973)。The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization。General Learning Corporation。  new window
10.Skocpol, Theda(1992)。Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States。The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
11.黃炳煌(1989)。教育與現代化。臺北：文景書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.Kingdon, John W.(1984)。Agenda, Alternatives, and Public Policies。Little, Brown。  new window
13.Parsons, T.(1961)。An Outline of the Social System。Theories of Society: Foundation of Modern Sociological Theory。New York, NY。  new window
14.Link, W. A.(1986)。A Hard Country and a Lonely Place: Schooling , Society, and Reform in Rural Virginia, 1870-1920。A Hard Country and a Lonely Place: Schooling , Society, and Reform in Rural Virginia, 1870-1920。Chapel Hill, NC。  new window
15.Laumann, E. O.、Knoke, D.(1989)。Policy Networks of the Organizational State: Collective Action in the National Energy and Health Domains。Networks of Power: Organizational Actors at the National, Corporate, and Community Level。New York, NY。  new window
16.Brint, S.(1998)。Schools and Societies。Schools and Societies。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
17.Ayers, E. L.(1992)。The Promise of the new South: Life after Reconstruction。The Promise of the new South: Life after Reconstruction。New York, NY。  new window
18.McAdam, D.、MaCarthy, J. D.、Zald, M. N.(1988)。Social Movement。The Handbook of Sociology。Newbury Park。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brint, Steven、Karabel, Jerome(1991)。Institutional origins and transformations: The case of American community colleges。The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis。Chicago, Illinois：University of Chicago Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：579（臺灣：568，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1430120 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67240530
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上