臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：性別間的教育競爭型態分析
書刊名：教育研究集刊
作者：陳建州 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Jian-jhou
出版日期：2006
卷期：52:4
頁次：頁71-105
主題關鍵詞：性別；教育轉換；教育分流；Gender；Educational transition；Educational tracking
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:493
  • 點閱點閱:42
社會學現有關於教育不平等的研究，較缺乏性別間教育競爭型態與影響機制的論述。基此，本研究整合1990–2001年臺灣社會變遷調查資料，分析教育轉換與教育分流的性別差異演變情形、釐清影響性別間教育機會差異之因素，並分別與不平等最大維持論及不平等有效維持論做比較，區別性別間與社經地位間在教育競爭型態上的差異。 分析結果指出，臺灣的性別間教育不平等程度，在教育轉換與教育分流兩方面的差異之演變，與教育是否擴張較無關係，而是直接受到經濟發展程度與教育發展型態的影響，且性別間與社經地位間的教育競爭型態並不相同。
Most sociological studies concerned with inequities in the educational field have focused on the effect of socio-economic status. By comparison, the impact of gender is discussed much less often. The author together with five cohorts used 1990–2001 “Social Change Survey in Taiwan” data to observe the gender gap in educational transitions and tracking. The maximally maintained inequality (MMI) hypothesis and effectively maintained inequality (EMI) hypothesis were employed to clarify the differences between the effects of gender and of socio-economic status on education. According to the findings, the effects of gender are quite different from those of socio-economic status on education, in terms of both educational transitions (MMI) and tracking (EMI). The gender gap in both educational transitions and tracking declined with increasing economic development over the long run. Furthermore, the configuration of higher education has had a significant impact on the process and pattern of gender equalization.
期刊論文
1.Charles, Maria、Bradley, Karen(2002)。Equal but Separate? A Cross-National Study of Sex Segregation in Higher Education。American Sociological Review，67(4)，573-599。  new window
2.Fujimura-Fanselow, K.(1985)。Women's participation in higher education in Japan。Comparative Education Review，29(4)，471-489。  new window
3.Ayalon, Hanna、Shavit, Yossi(2004)。Educational Reforms and Inequalities in Israel: The MMI Hypothesis Revisited。Sociology of Education，77(2)，103-120。  new window
4.林鶴玲、李香潔(19991200)。臺灣閩、客、外省族群家庭中之性別資源配置。人文及社會科學集刊，11(4)，475-528。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Rudra, Nita(2002)。Globalization and the Decline of the Welfare State in Less-Developed Countries。International Organization，56(2)，411-445。  new window
6.Alderson, Arthur、Francois, Nielsen(1999)。Income Inequality, Development, and Dependence: A Reconsideration。American Sociological Review，64(4)，606-631。  new window
7.徐新逸、黃麗鈴(19991200)。高中生學業成就自我效能與學業成就表現之探討：影響自我效能因素與成就表現相關研究。教育與心理研究，22(下)，267-294。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Raftery, Adrian E.、Hout, Michael(1993)。Maximally maintained inequality: Expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921-75。Sociology of Education，66(1)，41-62。  new window
9.Lareau, Annette(1987)。Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital。Sociology of Education，60(2)，73-85。  new window
10.陳建州、劉正(20010600)。重探學校教育功能--家庭背景因素影響力變化之研究。臺東師院學報，12(上)，115-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Ahluwalia, Montek S.(1976)。Income distribution and development: Some stylized facts。American Economic Review，66(2)，128-135。  new window
12.Stromquist, Nelly P.(1989)。Determinants of Educational Participation and Achievement of Women in the Third World: A Review of the Evidence and a Theoretical Critique。Review of Educational Research，59(2)，143-183。  new window
13.駱明慶(20010600)。教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊，29(2)，117-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.黃毅志(1992)。結構變遷與地位取得之關係：以教育擴充為例。中國社會學刊，16，89-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Useem, E. L.(1992)。Middle schools and math groups: parents' involvement in children's placement。Sociology of Education，65(4)，263-279。  new window
16.謝小芩(19920700)。性別與教育機會--以二所北市國中為例。國家科學委員會研究彙刊（人文及社會科學），2(2)，179-201。  延伸查詢new window
17.孫清山、黃毅志(19960300)。補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。臺灣社會學刊，19，95-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.黃毅志(19900300)。臺灣地區教育機會之不平等性。思與言，28(1)，93-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.謝小芩(19980400)。性別與教育期望。婦女與兩性學刊，9，205-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Lucas, Samuel R.(2001)。Effectively Maintained Inequality: Education Transitions, Track Mobility, and Social Background Effects。American Journal of Sociology，106(6)，1642-1690。  new window
21.馬信行(20000600)。教育與經濟關係之檢定。教育與心理研究，23(上)，25-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.曾天韻(20040600)。臺灣地區出身背景對大學及研究所入學機會影響。教育與心理研究，27(2)，255-281。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳建志(19980600)。族群及家庭背景對學業成績之影響模式--以臺東縣原、漢學童作比較。教育與心理研究，21(上)，85-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.蔡淑鈴(20040600)。高等教育的擴展對教育機會分配的影響。臺灣社會學，7，47-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.陳雅莉(19930600)。城鄉父母對兒童的管教態度與兒童性別、排行、數學學業成就及父親社經地位、母親是否就業之相關研究--以國小六年級兒童為例。傳習，11，頁1-28。  延伸查詢new window
26.Mare, Robert D.(1980)。Social Background and School Continuation Decisions。Journal of the American Statistical Association，75(370)，295-305。  new window
27.Alderson, A. S.(1999)。Explaining Deindustrialization: Globalization, Failure, or Success?。American Sociological Review，64(5)，701-721。  new window
28.Carr, Paul R.、Klassen, Thomas R.(1997)。Different Perceptions of Race in Education: Racial Minority and White Teachers。Canadian Journal of Education，22(1)，67-81。  new window
29.Darling-Hammond, Linda(1998)。Unequal Opportunity: Race and Education。The Brookings Review，16(2)，28-32。  new window
30.Garet, Michael S.、DeLaney, Brian(1988)。Students, Courses, and Stratification。Sociology of Education，61(2)，61-77。  new window
31.Hallinan, Maureen T.(1992)。The Organization of Students for Instruction in Middle School。Sociology of Education，65(2)，114-127。  new window
32.Kerckhoff, A. C.、Fogelman, K.、Manlove, J.(1997)。Staying Ahead: The Middle Class and School Reform in England and Wales。Sociology of Education，70(1)，19-35。  new window
33.Nielson, F.、Alderson, A. S.(1995)。Income Inequality, Development, and Dualism: Result from an Unbalanced Cross-national Panel。American Sociological Review，60(5)，674-701。  new window
34.Nielson, F.、Alderson, A. S.(1997)。The Kuznets Curve and the Great U-turn: Income Inequality in U.S. Counties, 1970 to 1990。American Sociological Review，62(1)，12-33。  new window
35.Ogena, Nimfa B.(2000)。A Quantitative Approach for Examining Female Status and Development Interrelationships: With Application to Pre-Beijing Data from the Philippines。Social Science Diliman，1(2)，131-162。  new window
36.Spade, J. Z.、Columba, L.、Vanfossen, B. E.(1997)。Tracking in Mathematics and Science: Courses and Course-selection Procedures。Sociology of Education，70(2)，108-127。  new window
37.Vaid, D.(2004)。Gendered Inequality in Educational Transitions。Economic and Political Weekly，28，3927-3938。  new window
圖書
1.Matras, Judah(1984)。Social Inequality, Stratification, and Mobility。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
2.Wright, Erik Olin(1997)。Class Counts: Camparative Studies in Class Analysis。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.章英華、薛承泰、黃毅志(1996)。教育分流與社會經濟地位：兼論對技職教育改革的政策意涵。臺北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Shavit, Yossi、Blossfeld, Hans-Peter(1993)。Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries。Westview Press。  new window
5.Hout, M.(2004)。Maximally Maintaines Inequality Revisited: Irish Educational Mobility in Comparative Perspective。Maximally Maintaines Inequality Revisited: Irish Educational Mobility in Comparative Perspective。Berkeley, CA。  new window
6.Ludwig, J.(2004)。Race and Education: The 50th Anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education。Race and Education: The 50th Anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education。Princeton, NJ。  new window
7.Treiman, D. J.、Yamaguchi, K.(1993)。Trends in Educational Attainment in Japan。Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries。Boulder, CO。  new window
其他
1.行政院主計處(2006)。國民所得統計摘要主要指標－按90年價格計算（At 2001 Constant Prices），0。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部統計處(2006)。歷年校數、教師、職員、班級、學生及畢業生數，0。  延伸查詢new window
3.臺北市政府(2000)。臺北市青少年次文化之研究，0。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：808（臺灣：735，外國：73） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1328876 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67128119
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上