臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：初探國中藝術與人文教科書教學和能力指標之校準研究
書刊名：教科書研究
作者：謝政達
作者(外文)：Hsieh, Cheng-ta
出版日期：2010
卷期：3:1
頁次：頁41-71
主題關鍵詞：課程校準；能力指標；藝術與人文領域教科書；Curriculum alignment；Competency indicators；Arts and Humanities textbooks
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:226
  • 點閱點閱:125
本研究以13 位國中藝術教師為研究對象，進行藝術與人文領域 教學、教科書與能力指標的校準程度的問卷調查，並從教師背景與教 科書使用情況分析教科書、教學與能力指標校準程度的相關性，結果 如下：一、從教師背景變項發現除學歷外，性別、年資、科系與課程 校準均有相關。二、教科書使用變項除了版本之外，使用時間、原因、 依賴程度、對教學的重要性，與課程校準均無相關。 建議未來研究者可以針對標準、教學與評量，進一步進行教室教 學觀察與研究，以釐清研究結果的差異為何，以彌補小規模量化研究 之不足，作為未來課程能力指標修訂與教科書編訂的參考依據。
The main purpose of this study is to judge the correlation among current arts and humanities textbooks, instruction, and competency indicators for Grades 1-9 Curriculum Guideline. The data is collected through questionnaires answered by 13 secondary school art teachers. The conclusion can be summarized as follows: Sex, seniority and major of the teachers have a correlation with curriculum alignment. Degree level does not correlate. Time used, reason for use, degree of dependence and importance of instruction don’t correlate with curriculum alignment. Only textbook version correlates. The author suggests that future studies can align content between standards and assessment, and thoroughly compare various versions of art and humanities textbooks, as well as further investigate observation of instruction in classrooms to provide references for revising indicators and editing textbooks.
期刊論文
1.Stern, L.、Roseman, J. E.(2001)。Textbook alignment。The Science Teacher，68 (7)，52-56。  new window
2.Resnick, L. B.、Rothman, R.、Slattery, J. B.、Vranek, J. L.(2003)。Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing。Educational Assessment，9(1/ 2)，1-27。  new window
3.謝政達(20081000)。國小藝術教科書與九年一貫課程能力指標的校準研究。課程與教學，11(4)，109-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Jang, E. E.、Ryan, K. E.(2003)。Bridging gaps among curriculum, teaching and learn-ing, and assessment: Book review。Journal of Curriculum Studies，35(4)，499-512。  new window
5.Neidermeyer, F.、Yelon, S.(1981)。Los Angeles aligns instruction with essential skills。Educational Leadership，38(8)，618-20。  new window
6.譚克平(2004)。一綱多本政策下是否要念多個版本？。飛揚：國民中學學生基本學力測驗專刊，29。  延伸查詢new window
7.呂燕卿(20021000)。九年一貫藝術與人文學習領域之能力指標轉化與實踐--以視覺藝術問題探索與表現之教學示例。國教世紀，202，5-18。  延伸查詢new window
8.賴志峰(20040300)。課程連結理論之探究：課程標準、教學與評量之關係。教育研究集刊，50(1)，63-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.方崇雄、林坤誼、張聖麟(20040400)。生活科技學域能力指標詮釋之研究。教育研究資訊，12(2)，35-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Brent, G.,、DiObilda, N.(1993)。Effects of curriculum alignment versus direct instruc-tion: Effects on stable and mobile urban children。The Journal of Educational Research，86(6)，333-338。  new window
11.English, F. W.,、Steffy, B. E.(1997)。Using film to teach leadership in educational ad-ministration。Educational Administration Quarterly，33 (1)，107-115。  new window
12.Freeman, D. J., Kuhs, T. M., Porter, A. C., Floden, R. E., Schmidt, W. H.,、Schwille, J. R.(1983)。Do textbooks and tests define a nati onal curriculum in elementary school mathematics?。Elementary School Journal，83，501-513。  new window
13.Herman, J. L., Webb, N. M.,、Zuniga, S. A.(2007)。Measurement issues in the align-ment of standards and assessments: A case study。Applied Measurement in Education，20(1)，101–126。  new window
14.Whipple, G. M.(1930)。The selection of textbook。The American School Board Journal，89，51-55。  new window
15.Whipple, G. M.(1930)。The selection of textbook。The American School Board Journal，89，51-55。  new window
16.Freeman, D. J.、Kuhs, T. M.、Porter, A. C.、Floden, R. E.、Schmidt, W. H.、Schwille, J. R.(1983)。Do textbooks and tests define a national curriculum in elementary school mathematics?。Elementary School Journal，83，501-513。  new window
17.Herman, J. L.、Webb, N. M.、Zuniga, S. A.(2007)。Measurement issues in the alignment of standards and assessments: A case study。Applied Measurement in Education，20(1)，101–126。  new window
18.Brent, G.、DiObilda, N.(1993)。Effects of curriculum alignment versus direct instruction: Effects on stable and mobile urban children。The Journal of Educational Research，86(6)，333-338。  new window
19.English, F. W.、Steffy, B. E.(1997)。Using film to teach leadership in educational administration。Educational Administration Quarterly，33 (1)，107-115。  new window
20.Resnick, L. B.、Rothman R.、Slattery, J. B.、Vranek, J. L.(2003)。Benchmarking and alignment of standards and testing。Educational Assessment，9(1/2)，1-27。  new window
會議論文
1.方炳隆(2000)。澳門地區教科書選用制度。教科書往何處去？教科書制度研討會，中華民國教材研究發展學會、國立臺北師範學院主辦 。  延伸查詢new window
2.Liebling, C. R.(1997)。Achieving standards-based curriculum alignment through mindful teaching。Rochester, NY。  new window
研究報告
1.Webb, N. L.(1997)。Criteria for Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education。Washington, DC：Council of Chief State School Officers。  new window
2.Martin M. O. Mullis I. V. S. Gonzales E. J.Gregory K. D. Smith T. A. Chrostowski S. J. Garden R. A.、O’Connor K. M.(2000)。TIMSS 1999 international science re-port: Findings from IEA’s repeat of the third international mathematics and science study at the eighth grade。Chestnut Hill, MA。  new window
3.O'Sullivan C.Y. Reese C.M.、Mazzeo J.(1997)。NAEP 1996 science report card for the nation and the states。Washington, DC。  new window
學位論文
1.Zellmer, M.(1997)。Effect on reading test scores when tarchers are provided information that relates local curriculum documents to the test(博士論文)。Marquette University。  new window
2.Price-Baugh, R.(1997)。Correlation of textbook alignment with student achievement Scores，Texas。  new window
3.Kattner, C.(1998)。The effects of curriculum alignment on the Texas assessment of academic skills scores of selected seventh grade students in Peet junior high school in the Conroe independent school district，Texas。  new window
4.Haggard, D. J.(1986)。Curriculum alignment in North Carolina: Relationships of state mandated tests, textbook, and objectives，Texas。  new window
5.楊馥如(2005)。當代「藝術統整課程」理論與實踐之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳新轉(2004)。九年一貫社會學習領域課程發展：從課程綱要與能力指標出發。臺北市：心理。  延伸查詢new window
2.高新建(2002)。能力指標課程轉化模式（一）：能力指標之分析與教學轉化。社會學習領域課程設計教學策略。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.Ananda, S.(2003)。Rethinking issues of alignment under No Child Left Behind。San Francisco, CA：WestEd。  new window
4.呂燕卿(1994)。國小美勞課程標準修訂與審美領域教學之研究。新竹市：妏晟。  延伸查詢new window
5.侯定凱、Apple, M. W.、Christian-Smith, L. K.(2005)。教科書政治學。上海市：華東師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳翠松譯（譯）、M.J.Smith（原作者）(2004)。社會科學概說：方法論的探索。臺北縣永和市：韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.Crowell, R.,、Tissot, P.(1986)。Curriculum alignment。Elmhurst, IL：North Central Re-gional Educational Laboratory。  new window
8.Squires, D. A.(2009)。Curriculum alignment: research-based strategies for increasing student achievement。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin Press。  new window
9.Kendall, J. S.、Marzano, R. J.(1997)。Content knowledge: A compendium of standards and benchmarks for K-12 education。Alexandria, VA。  new window
10.Squires, D. A.(2005)。Aligning and balancing the standards-based curriculum。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin Press。  new window
11.Bolster, L.(1991)。Exploring mathematics grades 7。Glenview, IL：Scott Foreman。  new window
12.Tomlinson, C. A.、Kaplan, S. N.、S.、Purcell, J.、Leppien, J.、Burns, D.、Strickland, C.(2002)。The parallel curriculum in the classroom: Units for application across the content areas, K-12。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin。  new window
13.English, F. W.、Steffy, B. E.(2001)。Deep Curriculum Alignment: Creating a Level Playing Field for All Children on High-stakes Tests of Accountability。Lanham, MD：Rowman & Littlefield Education。  new window
14.Goodwin, A. L.(1997)。Assessment for equity and inclusion: Embracing all our children。New York：Routledge。  new window
15.Erickson, H. L.(2001)。Stirring the head, heart, and soul: Redefining curriculum and instruction。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin Press。  new window
16.Kendall, J. S.,、Marzano, R. J.(1997)。A comprehensive guide to designing standards-based dustricts, school and classroom。Alexandria, VA：Association for Supervision and Cur-riculum Development Press。  new window
17.吳清山、黃美芳、徐緯平(2002)。教育績效責任研究。臺北：元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.、高子梅、何霖(2006)。策略校準：應用平衡計分卡創造組織最佳綜效。臺北市：臉譜。  延伸查詢new window
19.English, Fenwick W.、Larson, Robert L.(1996)。Curriculum Management for Educational and Social Service Organizations。Springfield, IL：Charles C Thomas Publisher。  new window
20.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
21.Webb, N. L.(1999)。Research monograph no. 18 alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states。Washington, DC：Council of Chief State School Officers。  new window
22.Linn, R. L.、Gronlund, N. E.(2000)。Measurement and assessment in teaching。Merrill/Prentice Hall。  new window
23.陳朝平、黃壬來(1995)。國小美勞科教材教法。台北市：五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
24.Martin, Michael O.、Mullis, Ina V. S.、Gonzalez, Eugenio J.、Gregory, Kelvin D.、Smith, Teresa A.、Chrostowski, Steven J.、Garden, Robert A.、O'Connor, Kathleen M.(2000)。TIMSS 1999: International science report: Findings from IEA's repeat of the third international mathematics and science study at the eighth grade。Chestnut Hill, MA：The International Study Center：Boston College。  new window
25.Howson, G.(1995)。Mathematics textbooks: A comparative study of grade 8 texts。Vancouver：Pacific Educational Press。  new window
26.教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程（第一學習階段）暫行綱要。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
27.English, Fenwick W.(1992)。Deciding What to Teach and Test: Developing, Aligning, and Auditing the Curriculum。Newbury Park, CA：Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
28.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
29.林曼麗(20000000)。臺灣視覺藝術教育研究。臺北：雄獅。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993)。Benchmarks for science literacy。Oxford University Press。  new window
31.Tyler, Ralph Winfred(1949)。Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction。University of Chicago Press。  new window
32.Drake, S. M.、Burns, R. C.(2004)。Meeting Standards Through Integrated Curriculum。Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
33.Wiggins, G. P.、McTighe, J.、Kiernan, Leslie J.、Frost, F.(1998)。Understanding by design。Alexandria, Virginia：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Press。  new window
34.楊孟哲(19990000)。日治時代臺灣美術教育(一八九五~一九二七)。臺北：前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Cohen, S. A.(1994)。Instructional alignment。International encyclopedia of education。Tarrytown, NY。  new window
36.Conley, D. T.(2005)。Proficiency-based admi ssions。Choosing students: Higher education admission tools for the 21st Century。N J。  new window
37.Marshall, J. D.(1991)。State-Level textbook selection reform: Toward the recognition of fundamental control。Textbooks in American society: Politics, policy and pedagogy。Albany, New York。  new window
38.Pehuniak, P.(2004)。Educational assessment in an era of accountability。Measuring up: Assessment issues for teachers, counselors, and administra-tors。Greensboro, NC。  new window
39.Warren, C. C.(1981)。Adopting textbooks。The textbook in American society. Washington。Washington, DC。  new window
40.O'Sullivan, C.Y.、Reese, C.M.、Mazzeo, J.(1997)。NAEP 1996 science report card for the nation and the states。Washington, DC。  new window
41.黃壬來(2002)。全球情勢與臺灣藝術教育的改革。藝術與人文教育。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
42.Pehuniak, P.(2004)。Educational assessment in an era of accountability。Measuring up: Assessment issues for teachers, counselors, and administrators。Greensboro, NC。  new window
43.Cohen, S. A.(1994)。Instructional alignment。International encyclopedia of education: Vol. 5。Tarrytown, NY。  new window
44.Conley, D. T.(2005)。Proficiency-based admissions。Choosing students: Higher education admission tools for the 21st Century。N J。  new window
45.Marshall, J. D.(1991)。State-Level textbook selection reform: Toward the recognition of fundamental control。Textbooks in American society: Politics, policy and pedagogy。Albany, New York。  new window
46.Warren, C. C.(1981)。Adopting textbooks。The textbook in American society。Washington, DC。  new window
其他
1.Case, B. J.，Jorgensen, M. A.，Zucker, S.(2004)。Alignment in educational assessment，http://www.pearsonassessments.com/NR/rdonlyres/C19A3D92-B124-4098-BC2F-0BCD490DCAA2/0/AlignEdAss.pdf， 20100523。  new window
2.Porter, A. C.(2006)。How SEC measures alignment，http://， 20070923。  new window
3.Webb, N. L.(1997)。Determining alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education，http://fac， 20070917。  new window
圖書論文
1.Smith, M. S.、O'Day, J.(1991)。Systemic School Reform。The Politics of Curriculum and Testing: The 1990 Yearbook of the Politics of Education Association。Bristol, PA：Falmer Press。  new window
2.Apple, M. W.(1991)。Regulating the text: The socio-historical roots of state control。Textbooks in American society: Politics, policy, and pedagogy。Albany, New York：State University of New York Press。  new window
3.黃壬來(2002)。全球情勢與臺灣藝術教育的改革。藝術與人文教育。臺北：桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
4.Resnick, Lauren B.、Resnick, Daniel P.(1992)。Assessing the Thinking Curriculum: New Tools for Educational Reform。Changing Assessments: Alternative Views of Aptitude, Achievement and Instruction。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：801（臺灣：801，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67499474
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上