臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：邊緣與跨界：中等師資培育性別教育課程知識／權力關係之女性主義分析
書刊名：臺灣教育社會學研究
作者：楊巧玲 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yang, Chiao-ling
出版日期：2015
卷期：15:2
頁次：頁1-43
主題關鍵詞：性別教育；師資培育；女性主義；學門知識；課程研究；Gender education；Teacher education；Feminism；Disciplinary knowledge；Curriculum studies
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:86
  • 點閱點閱:34
本研究旨在瞭解中等師資培育機構性別教育開課情形，從女性主義觀點探究教育學門與師資培育課程的知識／權力關係。 研究發現，性別教育課程位處邊緣，授課教師性別比例傾斜；授課者多把喚醒個人的性別意識視為課程目標之一，甚至是唯一的目標；儘管「個人即政治」之信念備受重視，教職女性化相關主題較少成為獨立的單元內容；性別概念／理論基礎受到重視，但女性主義／婦女運動付之闕如；單一課程有其侷限，分離論或統整論都反映出學門知識與師資培育課程的權力關係。本研究主張認真看待性別平等的價值，師培機構提供更充分的相關課程，教育學者透過模糊化、斷裂與跨越，鬆動學門界線，致力於師資職前教育性別教育課程目標的發展、核心概念的建構、教材與教法的研發。
This study aims to understand the range of courses offered dealing with gender education in secondary teacher education institutions, and to analyze knowledge/power relations in the field of education and teacher education courses from a feminist perspective. The study finds that gender education is marginalized, and the gender ratio of instructors is extremely unbalanced. The majority of instructors emphasize raising gender consciousness as an important and sometimes even sole objective. Although the belief that “the personal is political” is stressed, issues related to the feminization of teaching are rarely treated independently. Most syllabi deal with concepts fundamental to gender, but very few include units on feminism or women’s movements. Both separationist and integrationist views reflect power relations within disciplinary knowledge and teacher education curricula. This article argues that the value of gender equity should be taken more seriously, and that a more complete range of gender-related courses be offered in teacher education programs. Educational scholars need to loosen disciplinary boundaries, in order to develop curricular objectives, construct core concepts, and develop teaching materials and methods for gender education in teacher education.
期刊論文
1.楊巧玲(20020800)。性別意識、性別議題與九年一貫課程--一個女性主義教育學的凝視。兩性平等教育季刊，19，86-97。  延伸查詢new window
2.Titus, J. J.(1993)。Gender messages in education foundations textbooks。Journal of Teacher Education，44(1)，38-44。  new window
3.陳金燕(20080800)。性別與教育：從《性別平等教育法》談起。研考雙月刊，32(4)=266，79-92。  延伸查詢new window
4.Sanders, J.(2002)。Something is missing from teacher education: Attention to two genders。Phi Delta Kappan，84(3)，241-247。  new window
5.Laird, S.(1988)。Reforming "woman's true profession": A case for "feminist pedagogy" in teacher education。Harvard Educational Review，58(4)，449-464。  new window
6.Zittleman, K.、Sadker, D.(2003)。The unfinished gender revolution。Educational Leadership，60(4)，59-63。  new window
7.游美惠(20010600)。性別意識、教師增能與性別教育的推展。中等教育，52(3)，42-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.楊巧玲(20040600)。插花的女人：臺灣的教育社會學教科用書性別意識之檢視。女學學誌，17，47-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.管中閔、于若蓉(20001000)。「臺灣社會科學引文索引」資料庫的建置概況。人文與社會科學簡訊，3(2)，66-70。  延伸查詢new window
10.Apple, M. W.(1983)。Work, gender, and teaching。Teacher's College Record，84(3)，611-628。  new window
11.Stacey, J.、Thorne, B.(1985)。The missing feminist revolution in sociology。Social Problems，32(4)，301-316。  new window
12.Zittleman, K.、Sadker, D.(2002)。Gender bias in teacher education texts: New (and old) lessons。Journal of Teacher Education，53(2)，168-180。  new window
13.李淑菁(2011)。性別教育的論述角力：教師的詮釋與想像。教育與社會研究，22，39-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.蕭昭君(20021200)。國小師資培育教導的是誰的知識?--初等教育教科書性別內容的初步檢視。教育研究資訊，10(6)，19-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.蕭昭君(20031100)。國小師資培育教導的是誰的知識？--語文教育入門教科書性別內容的初步檢視。女學學誌，16，1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.游美惠(20040600)。性別權力與知識建構：「親職教育」教科書的論述分析。女學學誌，17，1-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.李雪菱(20110600)。教師性別意識與教學困境--反思中小學教師的性別教育課程設計與教學實踐。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，28，133-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.莊明貞(19971100)。從師資培育觀點談兩性教育課程實施的困境與展望。北縣教育，20，24-29。  延伸查詢new window
19.莊明貞(20021200)。九年一貫課程性別議題之知識與權力分析。教育研究資訊，10(6)，1-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.游美惠(20021200)。性別意識、使命感與教師專業成長--以性別平等教育的推動為例。教育研究資訊，10(6)，45-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Martin, J. R.(1982)。Excluding women from the educational realm。Harvard Educational Review，52(2)，133-148。  new window
22.Sadker, M.、Sadker, D.、Hicks, T.(1980)。The one-percent solution? Sexism in teacher education texts。Phi Delta Kappan，61(8)，550-553。  new window
會議論文
1.魏美娟、方文慧(201111)。我國大學性別教育課程實施之研究：質與量的觀察。大專院校的性別課程與教學「高等教育之性別主流化」學術研討會，國立高雄師範大學所舉辦 。高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.熊慎敦(2004)。基層教師性別意識發展與覺醒歷程之研究--以臺北市高中職教師為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳雅玲(2011)。澎湖縣國小教師性別平等意識與教學實踐之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃碧惠(2007)。雲林縣國小教師性別平等意識與性別平等教育研習需求之研究(碩士論文)。明道大學，彰化縣。  延伸查詢new window
4.林昱貞(2001)。性別平等教育的實踐：兩位國中女教師的性別意識與實踐經驗(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(2010)。性別平等教育白皮書。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2011)。中華民國師資統計年報：民國九十九年。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.Blackwell, P.、Applegate, J.、Earley, P.、Tarule, J. M.(2000)。Education reform and teacher education: The missing discourse of gender。American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education。  new window
4.Cosslett, T.、Easton, A.、Summerfield, P.(1996)。Women, power and resistance: An introduction to women's studies。Buckingham, UK：Open University Press。  new window
5.Furlong, J.、Cochran-Smith, M.、Brennan, M.(2009)。Policy and politics in teacher education: International perspectives。London：Routledge。  new window
6.Furlong, J.、Lawn, M.(2011)。Disciplines of education: Their role in the future of education research。London：Routledge。  new window
7.Hesse-Biber, S. N.、Leavy, P.(2007)。Feminist research practice: A primer。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
8.Messer-Davidow, E.、Shumway, D. R.、Sylvan, D. J.(1993)。Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity。Charlottesville, VA：University of Virginia Press。  new window
9.Miles, M. B.、Huberman, A. M.、Saldaña, J.(2014)。Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook。Sage Publications Inc.。  new window
10.楊巧玲(20080000)。學校中的性別政權：學生校園生活與教師工作文化之性別分析。臺北：高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Scott, Joan Wallach(1988)。Gender and the Politics of History。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
12.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。  new window
其他
1.教育部學生事務及特別教育司(2013)。本部訂於102年10月7日、14日及28 日舉行研修性別平等教育法公聽會，http://www.edu.tw/news/detail.aspx?Node=1089&Page=21233&Index=1&wid=6635a4e8-f0de-4957-aa3e-c3b15c6e6ead， 2014/12/10。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Spencer, L.、Ritchie, J.、O'Connor, W.(2003)。Analysis: Practices, Principles and Processes。Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers。London, England：Sage。  new window
2.郭玉霞(1996)。教學專業化。教育導論。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bezucha, R. J.(1985)。Feminist pedagogy as a subversive activity。Gendered subjects: The dynamics of feminist teaching。Boston, MA：Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
4.Harding, S.(2004)。Introduction: Standpoint theory as a political, philosophic, and scientific debate。The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies。New York：Routledge。  new window
5.Hoskin, K. W.(1993)。Education and the genesis of disciplinarity: The unexpected reversal。Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity。University of Virginia Press。  new window
6.Lennon, K.、Whitford, M.(1994)。[Knowing the difference: Feminist perspectives in epistemology] Introduction。Knowing the difference: Feminist perspectives in epistemology。London：Routledge。  new window
7.Klein, J. T.(1993)。Blurring, cracking, and crossing: Permeation and the fracturing of discipline。Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity。Charlottesville：London：University Press of Virginia。  new window
8.Peterson, V. S.(1993)。Disciplining practiced/practices: Gendered states and politics。Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in isciplinarity。Charlottesville：London：University Press of Virginia。  new window
9.Warren, C.(2012)。Interviewing as social interaction。The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
10.Agnew, D.(1989)。'A world of women': An approach to personal and career development for women teachers in primary school。Women teachers: Issues and experiences。Milton Keynes, UK：Open University Press。  new window
11.Alcoff, L.、Potter, E.(1993)。Introduction: When feminisms intersect epistemology。Feminist epistemologies。New York：Routledge。  new window
12.Lather, P.(1994)。The absent presence: Patriarchy, capitalism, and the nature of teacher work。The education reader。New York：Routledge。  new window
13.Maxwell, J.(2002)。Understanding and validity in qualitative research。The qualitative researcher's companion。Sage。  new window
14.Merriam, S. B.(2002)。Assessing and evaluating qualitative research。Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。  new window
15.Spencer, D. A.(1997)。Teaching as women's work。International handbook of teachers and teaching。Dordrecht, the Netherlands：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
16.Harding, S.(1993)。RETHINKING STANDPOINT EPISTEMOLOGY: WHAT IS "STRONG OBJECTIVITY" ?。Feminist epistemologies。New York。  new window
17.Raymond, Janice(1985)。Women's studies: A knowledge of one's own。Gendered subjects: The dynamics of feminist teaching。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：262（臺灣：261，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1498098 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67293484
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上