:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:校長領導研究之統合分析
書刊名:教育研究月刊
作者:陳殷哲張毓慧
作者(外文):Chen, Yin-cheChang, Yu-huei
出版日期:2019
卷期:299
頁次:頁126-143
主題關鍵詞:校長領導統合分析領導行為學校效能Principal leadershipMeta-analysisLeadership behaviorSchool effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:340
  • 點閱點閱:11
校長領導需具備專門知識與技能,將教育理念融入學校組織文化中,展現領導行事作為,以影響組織成員,激發工作團隊士氣,進而提升學校效能。本研究立意篩選臺灣2007至2017年指標性期刊中校長領導量化實證研究24篇,以Rosenthal(1991)統合分析法分析個別效果量r值及論文合併後平均效果量。分析結果顯示,在同質性檢定呈現顯著條件下,個人特質效果值為.48、領導行為效果值為.51及學校效能效果值為.50,屬於中高度之效果量,校長領導對於個人特質、領導行為及學校效能均具有正向之影響。據此,本研究建議校長善用正向溝通、正向氣氛、個人魅力、誠信負責及德行修為的領導特質,於外在行為上展現正向溝通、高倡導、有前瞻願景及建構願景、後效酬賞、德行領導、尊重關懷及道德領導等領導行為,提升教師組織公民行為,俾利增加學校的價值創造以及學校競爭優勢,達到學校組織效能最佳化。
Principal leadership refers to the expertise by which the principal integrates educational philosophies into the school’s organizational culture and provides guidance to faculty. Through their leadership, principals motivate faculty, boost team morale, and enhance school effectiveness. This study examined a purposive sample of 26 quantitative empirical studies on principal leadership that were included in the Taiwan Social Sciences Citation Index between 2007 and 2017. The meta-analysis method introduced in Rosenthal’s (1991) work was applied to examine the studies’ individual effect sizes (r) and mean effect size. The results indicated that with significant homogeneity of variances, the effect sizes were 0.48 for personality traits, 0.51 for leadership behaviors, and 0.50 for school effectiveness. These figures reveal moderate-to-large effect sizes, suggesting that principal leadership is positively correlated with personality traits, leadership behaviors, and school effectiveness. Therefore, principals are advised to apply leadership qualities (e.g., robust communication skills, ability to create positive atmosphere, charisma, integrity, and virtues) and exhibit extrinsic behaviors (e.g., ensuring positive communication, demonstrating high initiating and high consideration, showing foresight and creating visions, providing contingent rewards, engaging in virtuous and moral leadership, and expressing respect and empathy) to encourage organizational citizenship behaviors in faculty, enhance the school’s competitiveness, and optimize its organizational effectiveness.
期刊論文
1.吳勁甫(2012)。國民小學校長領導行為、學校組織文化與組織效能之關係:競值架構的觀點。αβγ量化研究學刊,4(1),69-97。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cohen, Jacob(1992)。Statistical power analysis。Current Directions in Psychological Science,1(3),98-101。  new window
3.Dasborough, Marie T.、Ashkanasy, Neal M.(2002)。Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader-member relationships。The Leadership Quarterly,13(5),615-634。  new window
4.吳清山(20040300)。學校行銷管理的理念與策略。北縣教育,47,23-34。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃怡雯(20070900)。組織溝通在校長領導之應用。學校行政,51,19-34。  延伸查詢new window
6.胡昌亞、鄭瑩妮(20140600)。不當督導研究回顧與前瞻。中華心理學刊,56(2),191-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.洪福源、鄭光燦(20131000)。高中校長轉型領導、學校學業樂觀、教師學業樂觀與學生成績關係之研究。教育研究學報,47(2),47-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.潘慧玲(19990900)。學校效能相關概念的釐析。教育研究資訊,7(5),138-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳清山、林天祐(1998)。公辦民營學校。教育資料與研究,22。  延伸查詢new window
10.王博弘、林清達(20060500)。臺灣近二十年來校長領導實徵研究與學校效能關係之探討。花蓮教育大學學報. 教育類,22,283-306。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Janda, Kenneth F.(1960)。Towards the Explication of the Concept of Leadership in Terms of the Concept of Power。Human Relation,13(4),345-363。  new window
12.謝文貴、黃旭鈞(20160900)。國民小學分布式領導對學校效能影響之研究--以資料導向為中介變項。學校行政,105,63-84。  延伸查詢new window
13.林和春、鄭志達(20151100)。國民小學校長正向特質對領導效能影響之研究:以校長永續卓越領導為中介變項。學校行政,100,24-44。  延伸查詢new window
14.Sundi, K.(2013)。Effect of transformational leadership and transactional leadership on employee performance of Konawe Education department at Southeast Sulawesi province。International Journal of Business and Management Invention,2(12),50-58。  new window
15.蔡進雄(20160600)。國民中小學學務主任對校長負向領導知覺與正負向互動情緒及校長滿意度之研究。教育科學期刊,15(1),57-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.謝傳崇、林和春(20101100)。國民小學候用校長培訓課程對領導效能感影響之研究。學校行政,70,51-68。  延伸查詢new window
17.李安明(20030700)。析論二十世紀末(1985-1995)學校領導理論之發展。教育研究月刊,111,49-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.王娜玲(20090500)。臺北市國小校長領導行為與教師組織公民行為之研究。臺北市立教育大學學報. 教育類,40(1),119-155。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.張奕華、蔡瑞倫(20100100)。國民中學校長科技領導與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政,65,33-53。  延伸查詢new window
20.Barrow, Jeffrey C.(1977)。The variables of leadership: A review and conceptual framework。Academy of Management Review,2(2),231-251。  new window
21.Coleman, J. S.(1968)。The concept of equality of educational opportunity。Harvard Educational Review,38(1),7-22。  new window
學位論文
1.鄧悅玲(2011)。國民小學校長領導風格之研究:整合分析(碩士論文)。中臺科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張珮菁(2012)。組織政治、領導風格與員工心理幸福感關係之研究(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾文政(2002)。國民小學校長證照制度之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.翁明國(2008)。金門縣國民中小學校長遴選問題及其爭議(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡進雄(2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.謝文全(2012)。教育行政學。臺北:高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bolman, L.、Deal, T.(1992)。Reframing organizations。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.Bass, B. M.(1990)。Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications。New York:Free Press。  new window
4.秦夢群(2011)。教育行政理論與模式。臺北市:五南圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Hedges, Larry V.、Olkin, Ingram O.(1985)。Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis。Academic Press, Inc.。  new window
6.吳清山(2013)。教育發展議題研究。臺北市:高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.謝文全(2016)。教育行政學。臺北市:高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Hoy, W. K.、Miskel, C. G.、林明地、王如哲、王瑞壎(2003)。教育行政學:理論、研究與實際。高雄市:麗文。  延伸查詢new window
9.Smith, S. C.、Piele, P. K.(2006)。School leadership: Handbook for excellence in student learning。California:Corwin Press。  new window
10.Rosenthal, R.(1991)。Meta-analysis procedure for social research。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
11.林明地、梁金都(2016)。校長領導與學校集體智慧。高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
12.蔡培村、武文瑛(2004)。領導:理論、實務與研究。高雄市:麗文。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE