:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小教師團體凝聚力與組織效能關係之研究--教師專業發展之中介效果
書刊名:師資培育與教師專業發展期刊
作者:林湘芸黃靖文 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Hsiang-yunHuang, Jing-wen
出版日期:2019
卷期:12:1
頁次:頁83-102
主題關鍵詞:教師專業發展組織效能團體凝聚力Teachers' professional developmentOrganization effectivenessGroup cohesiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:591
  • 點閱點閱:12
教師專業發展是否會影響教師之間的團體凝聚力與學校組織效能,是值得關注的重要議題。本研究目的主要探討國小教師的團體凝聚力、教師專業發展與組織效能之間的關係,以高雄市學年度公布之各級學校統計資料的公立國小教師為研究對象,採用問卷調查的方式蒐集資料,以結構方程模式進行資料分析。本研究結果發現團體凝聚力對於教師專業發展與組織效能有正向且顯著的影響;教師專業發展對組織效能有正向且顯著的影響;本研究進一步論證教師專業發展在團體凝聚力與組織效能之間的關係扮演中介角色。
As it is worthwhile to explore the issue of how teachers' professional development influences group cohesiveness and school organization effectiveness, this study probed into the relationships among group cohesiveness, teachers' professional development, and organization effectiveness in elementary schools. A questionnaire survey was conducted to collect data from a sample of public elementary school teachers based on statistical data published by the Education Bureau of Kaohsiung City Government. The results indicated that group cohesiveness had a positive and significant influence on teachers' professional development and organization effectiveness. Teachers' professional development also had a positive and significant influence on organization effectiveness. This study further demonstrated the mediating effect of teachers' professional development on the relationship between group cohesiveness and organization effectiveness.
期刊論文
1.張媛甯、邱美雲(20100900)。臺南市國民小學教師專業成長與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政,69,63-82。  延伸查詢new window
2.Williams, Deborah J.(2013)。Urban education and professional learning communities。Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin,79(2),31-39。  new window
3.黃建翔、吳清山(20131200)。國民中學教師專業發展、專業承諾與教學效能關係之研究--以TEPS資料庫為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,6(2),117-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.湯梓辰(20100300)。團體動力學在教學行動研究之應用探究。教育研究與發展期刊,6(1),145-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Cota, Albert A.、Longman, R. Stewart、Evans, Charles R.、Dion, Kenneth L.、Kilik, Lindy(1995)。Using and misusing factor analysis to explore group cohesion。Journal of Clinical Psychology,51(2),308-316。  new window
6.秦夢群、莊清寶(20120500)。臺灣國民中小學特色學校創新經營及其學校效能關係之探討。教育政策論壇,15(2)=42,163-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Carron, A. V.、Colman, M. M.、Wheeler, J.、Stevens, D.(2002)。Cohesion and Performance in Sport: A meta-analysis。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,24(2),168-188。  new window
8.張明文、張忠興、游玉英、高曼婷、戴建耘(20160200)。高職電機電子群教師教學信念、教師專業發展與教學效能關係之研究。技術及職業教育學報,6(3),45-65。  延伸查詢new window
9.許育齡(20061200)。教師專業發展團體的團體動力分析--四種初始型態及其發展。新竹教育大學學報,23,75-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.曾榮祥、黃詩媛、常雅珍、余毓琦(20150600)。兒童課後照顧教師運用班級團體動力之困境與可行策略探究。人文社會科學研究,9(2),121-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.蔡吉昌、危永中、吳佳純、曾科魁(20170800)。團體動力與團體凝聚力對童軍教育學習滿意度影響之研究。管理資訊計算,6(特刊1),1-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Alobiedat, A.(2011)。The effectiveness of the school performance, by using the total quality standards within the education district of Al-Petra province, from the perspective of the public schools' principals and teachers。International Education Studies,4(2),31-40。  new window
13.Botha, R. J.、Makoelle, T. M.(2012)。Exploring practices determining school effectiveness: A case study in selected South African secondary schools。International Journal of Education Sciences,4(2),79-90。  new window
14.Carron, A. V.、Brawley, L. R.(2012)。Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues。Small Group Research,43(3),726-743。  new window
15.Chatman, J. A.、Flynn, F. F.(2001)。The influence of demographic composition on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work groups。Academy of Management Journal,44(5),956-974。  new window
16.Lent, R. W.、Schmidt, J.、Schmidt, L.(2006)。Collective efficacy beliefs in student work relation to self-efficacy, cohesion and performance。Journal of Vocational Behavior,68(1),73-84。  new window
17.MacKinnon, David P.、Lockwood, Chondra M.、Hoffman, Jeanne M.、West, Stephen G.、Sheets, Virgil(2002)。A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects。Psychological Methods,7(1),83-104。  new window
18.Chang, J. C.、Yeh, Y. M.、Chen, S. C.、Hsiao, H. C.(2011)。Taiwanese technical education teachers' professional development: An examination of some critical factors。Teaching and Teacher Education,27(1),156-173。  new window
19.Baron, Reuben M.、Kenny, David A.(1986)。The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182。  new window
20.張仁家、葉幼梅(20090800)。專科學校教師工作自主性、組織學習、團體凝聚力與課程與教學創新之關係研究。技術及職業教育學報,3(2),1-21。  延伸查詢new window
21.Fornell, Claes、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error。Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50。  new window
學位論文
1.楊淙富(2012)。國民小學教師領導、教師專業學習社群與學校效能之研究(博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.孫秋雄(2009)。國小校長變革領導行為與教師專業發展關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.戴秀芸(2011)。高中教師團體動力對自我效能影響之研究--以教師專業發展為中介變項(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.潘正德(20120000)。團體動力學。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳清山(2004)。學校效能研究。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Ellis, D. G.、Fisher, B. A.(1994)。Small group decision making: Communication and the group process。NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.邱皓政(2015)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例解析。五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hord, S. M.、Roussin, J. L.、Sommers, W. A.(2010)。Guiding professional learning communities: Inspiration, challenge, surprise, and meaning。Corwin Press。  new window
6.Hoy, W. K.、Miskel, C. G.、Tarter, C. J.(2013)。Educational administration: Theory, research and practice。New York, NY:Random House。  new window
7.Robbins, S. P.(2002)。Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, applications。Upper Saddle River, N.J.:Prentice-Hall。  new window
8.Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Black, William C.、Babin, Barry J.、Anderson, Rolph E.(2010)。Multivariate data Analysis: A Global Perspective。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
9.Yalom, Irvin D.、Leszcz, Molyn(2005)。The theory and practice of group psychotherapy。Basic Books。  new window
圖書論文
1.Sobel, M. E.(1982)。Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models。Sociological methodology。Washington, DC:American Sociological Association。  new window
2.Lewin, K.(1951)。Field theory and learning。Field theory in social science。New York, NY:Harper & Row。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE