臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國小特殊才能資優學生工作承諾及其相關因素之研究
書刊名：特殊教育研究學刊
作者：劉秋燕
作者(外文)：Liu, Chiu-yen
出版日期：1994
卷期：11
頁次：頁151-166
主題關鍵詞：國小；資優學生；工作承諾
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:295
  • 點閱點閱:30
　　　　　本研究主要目的為了解國小五年級特殊才能資優學生的工作承諾，並比較不同社經地位特殊才能資優學生工作承諾的差異，以及探討父母教育態度、教師教育態度及自我觀念等相關因素與特殊才能資優學生工作承諾之關係。 本研究採用問卷調查法，研究對象包括臺北市六所國民小學五年級特殊才能資優學生，共計158名。主要研究工具為「兒童自我態度量表」及研究者自編之「工作承諾量表」、「父母教育態度量表」與「教師教育態度量表」，並調查學生家庭社經地位。施測結果以單因子變異數分析、積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法進行假設考驗。 本研究主要發現如下： 1.國小五年級特殊才能資優學生之工作承諾相當積極。 2.國小五年級特殊才能資優學生之工作承諾，不因社經地位而有差異。 3.音樂資優學生之父母教育態度、自我觀念與工作承諾有顯著的正相關，且父母教育態度和自我觀念兩個變項，可以有效地預測其工作承諾。 4.舞蹈資優學生之父母教育態度、教師教育態度與工作承諾有顯著的正相關，且父母教育態度和教師教育態度兩個變項，可以有效地預測其工作承諾。 5.美術資優學生之父母教育態度、教師教育態度與工作承諾有顯著的正相關，且父母教育態度和自我觀念兩個變項，可以有效地預測其工作承諾。
　　　　　The purposes of this study were: (1) to explore task commitment of music, dance and art talented students at elementary level; (2) to compare the social-economic-status differences of task commitment; (3) to investigate the relationship between personal and environment variables and task commitment. One hundred and fifty-eight 5th graders in music, dance and art talented classes were selected from 6 elementary schools in Taipei area. The research instruments were self-concept inventory, task commitment questionnaire, parent attitude questionnaire, and teacher attitude questionnaire. The data obtained were analyzed by one-way analysis of variable, Pearson correlation, and stepwise multiple regression analysis. The results of this study were as the following: 1. Task commitment of 5th graders music, dance, and art talented is positive. 2. No statistically significant differences were found on social-economic- status among 5th graders music, dance, and art talented students' task commitment. 3. Parent attitude and self-concept were significantly correlated with task commitment of music talented students. Parent attitude and self-concept did significantly predict task commitment of music talented students. 4. Parent attitude and teacher attitude were significantly correlated with task commitment of dance talented students. Parent attitude and teacher attitude did significantly predict task commitment of dance talented students. 5. Parent attitude and teacher attitude were significantly correlated with task commitment of art talented students. Parent attitude and self-concept did significantly predict task commitment of art talented students. In the conclusion, suggestions for task commitment on gifted education and for futher studies were made based on the results and limitations of the study.
期刊論文
1.Nias, J.(1981)。'Commitment' and motivation in primary school teachers。Educational Review，33(3)，181-190。  new window
2.Bloom, B. S.(1982)。The role of gifted and markers in the development of talent。Exceptional Chileren，48，510-522。  new window
3.Clark, G. A.、Zimmerman, E. D.(1988)。Views of self, family background, and school: Interviews with artistically talented students。Gifted Child Quarterly，32(4)，340-346。  new window
4.郭生玉(19750600)。父母期望水準不切實際時對子女成就動機之影響。教育心理學報，8，61-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Renzulli, Joseph S.、Smith, L. H.(1980)。An alternative approach to identifying and programming for gifted and talented students。G/C/T，15，4-11。  new window
6.何英奇(19770600)。成敗經驗對自我評價與抱負水準之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，19，77-162。  延伸查詢new window
7.張月艮(19850300)。不同家庭社經背景國中學生心理特質之比較研究。輔導學報，8，199-227。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳幼妃(19810600)。不同成就動機兒童人格特質及社會適應比較研究。教育學刊，3，320-271。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.汪榮才(19770600)。教師行為與兒童學習的關係。花蓮師專學報，9，1-21。  延伸查詢new window
10.李明生(19730600)。影響才賦優異兒童教育之家庭因素。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，15，129-232。  延伸查詢new window
11.Morrow, P. C.(1983)。Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment。Academy of Management Review，8(3)，486-500。  new window
12.呂勝瑛(19820600)。資優兒童的心理特質之研究。教育與心理研究，5，225-250。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Jarrell, R. H.、Borland, J. H.(1990)。The research base for Renzulli's three-ring conception of giftedness。Journal for the Education of the Gifted，13(4)，288-308。  new window
14.Bulter, R.(1988)。Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance。British Journal of Educational Psychology，58(1)，1-14。  new window
15.宋德忠(1987)。教師如何增進學生的內在動機。教師天地，30，52-54。  延伸查詢new window
16.張蕙君(1987)。資優學生的自我概念與教學。國民教育，27(10)，22-23。  延伸查詢new window
17.Frierson, E. C.(1985)。Upper and lower status gifted children: A study of differences。Exceptional Children，32(2)，83-89。  new window
18.Johnson, L. J.、Lewman, B. S.(1990)。Parent perceptions of the talents of young gifted boys and girls。Journal for the Education of the Gifted，13(2)，176-188。  new window
19.Keasey, C. T.、Winberry, C. S.(1983)。Educational strategies and personality outcomes of gifted and nongifted college students。Gifted Child Quarterly，27(1)，35-41。  new window
20.Patchett, R. F.、Gauthier, Y.(1991)。Parent and teacher perceptions of giftedness and a program for the gifted。B. C. Journal of Special Education，15(1)，25-38。  new window
21.Renzulli, J. S.(1990)。'Torturing data until they confess': An analysis of the analysis of the three-ring conception of giftedness。Journal for the Education of the Gifted，13(4)，309-331。  new window
22.Scott, L. E.(1988)。A comparative study of personality, values and background, characteristics of artistically talent, academically talented, and average 11th and 12th grade。Students Studies in Art Education，29(3)，292-301。  new window
23.Stern, J.(1983)。A new strategy to dissolve a current problem: How to identify giftedness。G-C-T，27，47-51。  new window
24.Summy, J.(1983)。Gifted and talented program development: The teacher as a change-agent。Education，104(1)，44-46。  new window
25.Zimmerman, E. D.、Clark, G. A.(1991)。What we learned about artistically talented students from the Indiana University (IU) summer arts institute: What experiences should we be providing students displaying high artistic ability in the visual arts。Roeper Review，13(2)，63-68。  new window
26.Olszewski, P.、Kulieke, M.、Buescher, T.(1987)。The influence of the family environment on the development of talent: A literature review。Journal for the Education of Gifted，11(1)，6-28。  new window
27.郭生玉(19730600)。國中低成就學生心理特質之分析研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，15，左451-534。  延伸查詢new window
28.孫敏芝(19860600)。教師期望與師生交互作用：一個國小教室的觀察 (摘要)。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，28，443-458。  延伸查詢new window
29.黃國隆(19860500)。中學教師的組織承諾與專業承諾。國立政治大學學報，53，左55-84。  延伸查詢new window
30.蔡順良(19850600)。家庭社經地位､父母管教態度與學校環境對國中學生自我肯定及生活適應之影響研究。教育心理學報，18，239-264。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.郭生玉(19800600)。教師期望與教師行為及學生學習行為關係之分析。教育心理學報，13，133-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Zimmerman, Enid(1992)。Factors influencing the graphic development of a talented young artist。Creativity Research Journal，5(3)，295-311。  new window
學位論文
1.林仁傑(1988)。國中美術資優班學生美術科學習成效之評量研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱經明(1981)。國中學生自我觀念、友伴關係及其影響因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳淑梅(1991)。美術鑑賞教學對高中生美術創作能力影響之實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.Steiner, D. J.(1987)。Giftedness: Correlations among above-average ability, creativity, and task commitment in 12- and 13-year-old males and females(博士論文)。University of Northern Colorado，Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
5.劉春榮(1993)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Williges, M.(1981)。Career Planning。Boston：Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
2.林生傳(1989)。教育社會學。高雄：復文書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.王文科(1992)。國民中學資優班學生次級文化之調查研究。台北市：教育部教育研究委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊韻玲(1993)。國民中小學音樂班畢業學生學習成效之追蹤調查研究。高雄：國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭為藩(1978)。兒童自我態度問卷。台北：中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Cattel, R. B.、Cattel, M. D.、Johns, E.(1984)。Manual and norms for the High School Personality Questionnaire。Champaign, IL：Institute for Personality and Ability Testing。  new window
7.Renzulli, J. S.(1985)。The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive for educational excellence。Creative Learning Press, Inc.。  new window
8.Maslow, Abraham Harold(1970)。Motivation and personality。Harper & Row Publishers。  new window
單篇論文
1.Amabile, T. M.(1983)。Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative Writers(ED240445)。  new window
2.Kowaiski, P.，Stipek, D.，Daniels, D.(1987)。The relationship between teachers' ratings and students' self-reported motivation(ED291493)。  new window
3.Smith, E.(1984)。Identifying and nurturing giftedness in the creative learning environment of Ellerton primary school(EC202009)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Maddi, S.、Kobasa, S.(1981)。Intrinsic motivation and health。Advances in intrinsic motivation and aesthetics。New York：Plenum。  new window
2.Renzulli, J. S.(1986)。The three-ring concepnon of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity。Conception of Giftedness。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：314（臺灣：308，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67442456
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上