:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國體育政策變遷之研究
作者:劉照金 引用關係
作者(外文):Chao-Chin Liu
校院名稱:國立體育學院
系所名稱:體育研究所
指導教授:邱金松
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2005
主題關鍵詞:體育政策政策變遷政策論述組織變遷體育預算physical education and sport policypolicy changepolicy discourseorganization changephysical education and sport budget
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:120
公共政策研究是藉由重大公共議題的討論,以分析政府活動的一種研究途徑,人們依其觀念或原則共識所建構的政策,隨著時間遷移而呈現不同的政策風貌。而我國體育政策的變遷狀況到底又如何?造成我國體育政策變遷的因素是什麼?這些體育政策變遷形式是否有模式可循?有關我國體育政策縱貫性與整合性的研究確實不多,尤其是從體育政策分析過程探討我國體育政策制定的肇因及後果。本研究採取非線性的政策動態概念,在融合有關政策變遷的各種觀點後,從政策體系的理論概念,建立宏觀的分析架構,以作為探索我國體育政策變遷現象的基礎。本研究主要採用文獻分析法,並透過歷史分析及政策分析的途徑,以我國1949至2003年的體育政策論述變遷、體育行政組織變遷及體育預算變遷為分析焦點,探討我國體育政策變遷的現象與過程,並分析我國體育政策目標、政策工具的類型、配置及政策變遷的動因及後果。綜合本研究結果主要發現如下:(一)我國體育政策論述的變遷,以符合當時制度環境與時空系絡取得論述的正當性,並配合執政者的「問題解決」、「政策任務」角色成為主流體育政策,進而透過政策菁英為主的政策網絡建立論述權威,使其在我國體育政策變遷的形成過程中扮演主導的角色;(二)我國體育行政組織變遷過程與政策角色的變遷模式,主要採取符應國家政策模式、組織典範移轉模式、組織功能分化模式、政策工具調整模式等四種模式,以適應其所處的制度環境變遷,並採取調整體育行政之組
I
織核心、邊陲部分或組織功能分化等方式,以適應當時社會需求及工作需要,或以政策工具配置或轉變等模式,造成我國體育行政組織之變遷;(三)我國歷年體育預算的配置隨著國家政策、社會發展階段、競選承諾而有不同的重點配置,以發揮政府對體育政策的控制與調整功能。經由本研究的結果,可作為政府未來擬訂體育政策及建立體育政策指標之參考,並可作為後續相關研究之基礎。
The study of public policy has been concluded from various discussions of important issues in terms of the analytical approaches of the governmental activities. Policies have been constructed upon people’s certain concepts and varied as time moves on; therefore, different policies seem to appear. How will the policy of physical education and sport (PES) in Taiwan alter? What are the influential factors and any particular model to follow? Such full dimensional researches in our PES policy are limited, especially such specific analysis in terms of the cause effect relationship, and the foregoing causes are the motivations of this study. This study adopted the concept of nonlinear policy movement. After having reorganized various theories of policy change, an overall analysis structure was built, based on the theory of policy system, as the foundation of this study in Taiwan’s PES policy change. This study focused on the documentary analysis and approach of history study, policy analysis and case study. The main focuses were on the changes of policy discourse, administrative organization and budget planning of PES from 1949 to 2003. The procedure of Taiwan’s PES policy change was discussed and also certain analysis in the policy goals, policy instrument categories and allocations, and the cause effect relationship of the policy change. The following findings were the results of this study: 1.Taiwan’s PES policy discourse was generated from the institutional environment and space-time context of each individual period of time to achieve the appropriateness
III
along with the dominant government’s “problem solving” and “policy assignment” styles. As the official PES policy role player and the leading character during the procedure of Taiwan’s PES policy change, the main stream of policy discourse was built up within the policy network based on the intention of policy elite. 2.The change procedure of PES policy administration organization and the policy’s role playing model in Taiwan, which adopted the model of cooperate national policy, model of organization paradigm transformation, model of organization function differentiation, and model of policy instrument modulate, that were to adapt the change of institutional environment, and these models were implemented certain adjustment of the organization core and peripheral portion or the organization function differentiation method to satisfy requirements or the society or career. The model of policy instrument modulates or modification might also become the factor to cause some changes in Taiwan’s PES administration structure. 3.The allocations of Taiwan’s PES budget plans from the past years varied according to the government’s regulations, the stage of the society’s developments, and the election commitments. Thus, the government’s control and the ability of adjustment towards the PES policy could be shown. In conclusion, the results of this study could hopefully provide a useful reference for the government’s future plans and construction in the PES policy. Further studies could also be carried out from this project.
Keywords: physical education and sport policy, policy change, policy discourse, organization change, physical education and sport budget
中國國民黨浙江省黨部(1939):國民精神總動員理論與實際。杭州:中國國民黨浙江省黨部。
王文科(1990):教育研究法。台北市:五南。new window
王甫昌(1996):台灣反對運動的共識動員:1979至1989兩次挑戰高峰的比較。台灣政治學刊,1,129-209。
王孟平(1999):政策認知、政策訊息與政策論述--當前爭議性公共政策之實證研究。中山人文社會科學期刊,7(1),73-100。
王浩(2003):政黨輪替對政策變遷之影響--以台北市為例。未出版之碩士論文,桃園縣,元智大學管理研究所。
王振寰(1996):誰統治台灣?轉型中的國家機器與權力結構。臺北巿:巨流。new window
王建台(1993):麥克樂(C. H. McCloy)對中國近代體育的影響(1913-1926)。未出版之碩士論文,桃園縣,國立體育學院體育研究所。
王業立(1998):比較選舉制度(二版)。台北市:五南。new window
王鳳喈(1971):中國教育史。台北市:正中書局。
王靖鑫(2002):我國優秀運動選手獎勵政策--以國光體育獎章為對象。未出版之碩士論文,屏東縣,屏東師範學院體育研究所。
王增明(1988):近代中國體育法規。北京市:中國體育史學會河北分會。
王毅誠(1948):當前我國體育思想之出路。教育通訊,5(2),13。
方孝謙(2003):關係、制度與中國政企研究。中國大陸研究,46(4),1-24。new window
丘昌泰(1994):問題建構與政策分析:方法論的批判與重建。法商學報,30,173-138。
丘昌泰(1999a):從公共政策過程的「中心論」到「邊陲論」:修憲後地方政府角色的變遷與調整。空大行政學報,9,1-26。new window
丘昌泰(1999b):公共政策—當代政策科學理論之研究。台北市:巨流。
丘昌泰(2000):公共政策—基礎編。台北市:巨流。
丘昌泰(2004):公共政策—基礎編(二版)。台北市:巨流。
台北市立體育專科學校(1992):各國體育行政組織系統之比較研究。國民體育季刊,21(1),4-17。
江流水(1990):中國體育發展與獨立的體育民族意識。體育月刊,8月,12-23。
江岷欽(1991):組織理論中的主要議題及爭辯:系統論之後的理論發展。台北市:公共事務與國家發展研討會論文。
江岷欽(1993):組織分析。台北市:五南。
江岷欽(1995):公共組織理論。台北縣:國立空中大學。
江岷欽、林鐘沂(1999):公共組織理論。台北縣:國立空中大學。
司馬琳(1992):預算是財務政策、公共政策、與管理的工具。主計月報,74(3),3-12。
朱志宏(1995):公共政策。台北市:三民。
朱志宏、丘昌泰(1995):政策規劃。台北縣:國立空中大學。
朱有獻(1983):中國近代學制史料(第一輯上冊)。上海市:華東師範大學出版社。
朱家驊(1947):南京市第八屆全市運動會開幕詞。教育通訊,4(7),29。
朱敬一、林全(2003):經濟學的視野(初版)。台北市:聯經。
行政院(1961-2003):中央政府預算書。台北市:行政院。
行政院主計處(2003a):預算法。台北市:行政院主計處公務預算局。
行政院主計處(2003b):中華民國中央政府總預算編製作業手冊:歲出機關別預算科目設置要點。台北市:行政院主計處公務預算局。
行政院主計處(2003c):中央政府總預算。台北市:行政院主計處公務預算局。
行政院經濟建設委員會(2004):中華民國台灣地區歷次中期計畫概要表-歷期中華民國台灣經濟建設中期計畫。2004年12月2日,取自行政院經濟建設委員會網址http://www.cepd.gov.tw/indexset/indexcontent.jsp
行政院體育委員會(1998a):國民體育法。台北市:行政院體育委員會。
行政院體育委員會(1998b):八十八年度各類業務經費補助原則。台北市:行政院體育委員會。
行政院體育委員會(1999a):我國體育政策發展與展望(初稿)。台北市:行政院體育委員會。
行政院體育委員會(1999b):中華民國體育白皮書。台北市:行政院體育委員會。
行政院體育委員會(2001):體育法規彙編。台北市:行政院體育委員會。
行政院體育委員會(2002a):運動產業的推動發展方向。國民體育季刊,31(4),5-7。
行政院體育委員會(2002b):世界各國體能政策之比較研究。台北市:行政院體育委員會。
行政院體育委員會(2004a):關於體委會 > 體委會簡介 > 簡史。2004年10月25日,取自行政院體育委員會網址http://media.justsports.net.tw/spo_demo/about_brief_ introduction.asp?m_3_id=50。
行政院體育委員會(2004b):中程(九十至九十三年度)施政計畫。2004年12月2日,取自行政院經濟建設委員會網址。http://media.justsports.net.tw/spo_demo/about_brief_introduction.asp?m_3_id=54。
司馬琳(1992):預算是財務政策、公共政策、與管理的工具。主計月報,74(3),3-12。
全鍾燮(1994):全球化趨勢下公共行政的新挑戰-行政效率、創新與變遷。人事月刊,18(5),8-12。
任德厚(2002):比較憲法與政府(初版)。台北市:作者自印。
余致力(1998):方案評估在政府預算決策過程中的角色與功能。財稅研究,30(3),23-32。new window
余致力(2002):民意與公共政策─理論探討與實證研究。台北市:五南。new window
余昇澤(1992):組織網絡結構分析—以中鋼中衛體系為例。未出版之碩士論文,高雄巿,中山大學企業管理研究所。
何明修(2002):為何民進黨政府的廢核政策失敗?台灣政治學刊,6,86-136。
李丁讚(1992):日常生活與媒體論述:兩岸關係為例。台灣民主化過程中國家與社會研討會論文集。
李中興(1993):美國財政赤字與經濟景氣之分析。美國月刊,8(9),21-36。
李月香(2000):我國社會福利政策與預算關聯性之研究。未出版之碩士論文,台北縣,國防管理學院資源管理研究所。
李允傑(1997a):政府預算之籌編與政策分析。研考雙月刊,21(5),53-60。
李允傑(1997b):指標管理與公共政策分析--政策指標的建立。公共政策學報,18,133-146。
李允傑(1997c):政府預算考核與政策評估。研考雙月刊,21(1),62-70。
李允傑、丘昌泰(2003):政策執行與評估。台北市:元照出版社。
李明環(1998):政策網絡之研究-以我國醫藥分業政策為個案。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
李建勛(1948):如何使學校教育民主化。教育雜誌,33(9),1。
李國維(2003):體育政策對大型企業贊助運動影響之研究。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
李越南(1986):民生主義現階段體育政策之研究。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,政治作戰學院政治研究所。
東方雜誌(1947):中國國民黨第六屆三中全會宣言,東方雜誌,43(7),72-74。
林水波、王崇斌(1996):公共政策論述的倫理。中國行政評論,6(1),1-26。new window
林水波、莊文忠(1998):政策論述與議程設定。立法院院聞,26(4),9-29。
林水波、王崇斌(1998):政策論述與政策變遷的關聯性。台灣政治學刊,3,245-273。
林水波(1999a):公共政策新論。台北市:智勝文化。
林水波(1999b):組織理論。台北市:智勝文化。
林玉華(1999):政策網絡:政策執行的新典範。行政暨政策學報,1,135-184。new window
林芬(1995):戰後台灣古蹟保存政策變遷歷程之研究(1945-1996)。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立台灣大學政治學研究所。
林岩哲(1977):論美國政府的行政改組。問題與研究,17(3),93-102。new window
林宗毅(2002):從開放系統理論看公營事業民營化之組織變革-以中華電信為例。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系。
林國棟(1997):我國設立部會層級體育行政機構之探討。大專體育,32,1-10。new window
林綺雲(1993):組織變遷與轉型—社會變遷中組織興衰的個案研究。未出版之博士論文,台中縣,私立東海大學社會學研究所。new window
林仲修(2002):台灣政治轉型中國家蛻變之內環境因素分析。未出版之博士論文,台北巿,國立臺灣師範大學三民主義研究所。new window
林國棟(1987):當前我國體育外交之研究。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。new window
林國明(2000):全民健保民營化的政治邏輯。臺大社會工作學刊,2,55-96。new window
林國棟(1997):我國設立部會層級體育行政機構之探討。大專體育,32,1-10。new window
林綺雲(1992):組織的變遷與轉型─社會變遷中組織興衰的個案研究。未出版之博士論文,台中縣,東海大學社會學研究所。new window
林瑩秋(2001):揭露台灣八大錢坑-小型工程補助款大告白。財訊,六月號,171-176。
林寶安(2001):開放新銀行政策的政治經濟分析。載於余致力、郭昱瑩、陳敦源(編),公共政策分析的理論與實務(初版)。台北市:韋伯文化。new window
花梅真(1998):政府遷台後中央體育行政組織之歷史變遷-民國38~86年。未出版之碩士論文,桃園縣,國立體育學院體育研究所。
吳乃德(2000):人的精神理念在歷史變革中的作用─美麗島事件和台灣民主化。台灣政治學刊,4,57-103。new window
吳文忠(1974):體育行政。台北市:正中書局。
吳文忠(1981):中國體育發展史。台北市:三民書局。new window
吳文程(1996):政黨與選舉概論。台北:五南出版社。
吳中書(1999):建構成熟健全的經濟體系。台北巿:中國國民黨中央政策研究工作會。
吳定(1991):公共行政論叢。台北市:天一圖書。
吳定(1994):組織發展:理論與技術。台北市:順達。
吳定(1994):公共政策(全)。台北市:華視文化事業。
吳定(1999a):公共政策辭典。台北市:五南。
吳定(1999b):自政策學習觀點論政府再造之推動。載於銓敘部主編,行政管理論文選輯,13輯,167-189。new window
吳定(2000):政府再造與政策制定。人力發展,83,18-23。
吳悅(2003):我國大陸經貿政策變遷之研究-新制度論觀點之分析。未出版之碩士論文,花蓮縣,國立東華大學公共行政研究所。
吳仕吉(1999):拜耳案與石化政策-政策網絡觀點。未出版之碩士論文,台中巿,國立中興大學公共政策研究所。
吳庚(1996):行政法之理論與應用(增三版)。台北市:吳庚。
吳家瑩(1990):中華民國教育政策發展史--國民政府時期(1925-1940)。台北市:五南。
吳萬福(1985):近三十年來我國國民中小學校體育發展與現況。教育資料集刊,10,99-127。new window
吳瓊恩(1989):從各學科典範變遷趨勢檢討公共組織理論實證研究的限制及其突破的可行性。國立政治大學學報,60,85-116。
吳瓊恩(1992):行政學的範圍與方法。台北巿:五南。
吳瓊恩(2002):行政學(二版)。台北巿:三民。
呂育誠(2002):公共組織變革的另類思惟:歷史制度主義觀點的啟示。公共行政學報,7,137-172。new window
邱金松(2002):體育可以跟什麼整合?中國時報,中國時報論壇(91年3月26日)。
邱蔚棠(2003):我國與美國體能促進主要計畫比較。未出版之碩士論文,桃園縣,國立體育學院運動科學研究所。
洪志朋(2002):警政菁英對警政議題取向之研究。未出版之碩士論文,桃園縣,中央警察大學行政警察研究所。
洪嘉文(2001a):學校體育政策制定之途徑及理論模式。體育學報,30,33-43。new window
洪嘉文(2001b):學校體育政策規劃及指標之探討。大專體育學刊,3(2),171-182。new window
洪嘉文(2002a):學校體育政策法制化之探討。體育學報,32,111-123。new window
洪嘉文(2002b):體育法令之概念分析。大專體育,59,54-61。new window
洪嘉文(2003):我國學校體育政策制定之研究。未出版之博士論文,台北巿,國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。new window
洪嘉文、鄭志富(2004):我國學校體育政策制定之研究。大專體育學刊,6(1),31-43。new window
洪謙德(1999):當代政治經濟學。臺北巿:揚智。
法務部(2005):行政程序法。2005年5月12日,取法務部全國法規資料庫,網址http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Query 4B. asp?FullDoc=所有條文&Lcode=A0030055
胡國堅(1996):政策網絡理論與其應用。空大行政學報,6,289-302。new window
范宜芳(2000):美國「失依兒童家庭救助」計畫之研究:政策變遷的觀點。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
香港特區政府(2001):2001-02政府財政預算案。2003年9月12日,取自香港特區政府網址http://www.budget.gov.hk /2001 /draftfc.html。
高俊雄(2002):運動休閒事業管理。台北巿:羅正芬。
馬琬甄(2001):政策執行機關之組織網絡研究--「基隆港污染防治」個案分析。未出版之碩士論文,台中縣,東海大學公共行政學系。
徐元民(1990):戰前十年中國體育思想之研究(1928-1937)。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
徐元民(1991a):戰時中國體育思想之研究(1937-1945)。體育學報,13,35-46。new window
徐元民(1991b):教育部體育司各科人員及業務局部調整報導。國民體育季刊,20(2),121-124。
徐元民(1992):戰後初期中國體育思想之形成(1945-1949)。體育學報,14,15-32。new window
徐元民(2001):五十年來中央政府體育行政組織沿革。國民體育季刊,30(3),10-12。
徐仁輝(2000a):公共財務管理:公共預算與財務行政。台北巿:智勝文化事業。
徐仁輝(2000b):財政赤字與公共債務法。主計月報,537,59-66。
徐仁輝(2001):近十年來我國預血算政策成因剖析。載於余致力、郭昱瑩、陳敦源(主編)。公共政策分析的理論與實務(pp.251-274)。台北巿:韋伯文化事業。new window
徐聯恩(1998):企業變革、組織自我更新與產業創新之探討。第七屆產業管理研討會論文集,269-286頁。
韋端、許璋瑤、鹿篤謹、蔡源坤(1998):財政改善之十年政策形成執行成果及未來展望。中華經濟研究院主辦,財政平衡與經濟發展研討會。
教育部(1912):專門以上學校宜組織運動部。政府公報,第223期(1912)。
教育部(1932):國民體育實施方案。教育公報,第四年第43-44期(1932)。
教育部(1941):修正國民體育法。教育公報,13(1941),1-2。
教育部(1946):檢討「體育節(九月九日)舉行辦法要點」,各省市教育廳遵照辦理。教育部公報,18(8),19。
教育部(1970):第五次全國教育會議報告。台北市:教育部。
教育部(1971):教育法令。台北市:正中書局。
教育部中國教育年鑑編輯委員會編(1957):第三次中華民國教育年鑑。台北市:正中書局。
教育部中國教育年鑑編纂委員會編(1971):第一次中國教育年鑑。台北市:傳記文學出版社。
教育部中國教育年鑑編輯委員會編(1974):第四次中華民國教育年鑑。台北市:正中書局。
教育部中國教育年鑑編輯委員會編(1981):第二次中國教育年鑑。台北市:宗青圖書。
教育部(1982):體育法規選輯。台北市:教育部體育司。
教育部(1994):第七次全國教育會議報告。台北市:教育部。
陳金樹(1991):體育政策及法令之探討。體育與運動,73,4-7。
陳重安(2001):公共組織設計與變遷之研究:知識創造的觀點-以台中巿政府計畫室為例。未出版之碩士論文,台中縣,東海大學公共行政研究所。
陳品芬(1998):俘虜型管制政策之研究-農會信用部之互惠網絡模式分析。未出版之碩士論文,台中縣,東海大學公共行政研究所。
陳昭欽(1992):從組織重整觀點析論行政院組織法修正案。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
陳朝福(2003):組織轉型研究—新科學典範的創造性演化觀點。未出版之博士論文,台北巿,國立臺灣大學商學研究所。new window
陳逸偵(2000):加拿大政府組織改造成功之探討。臺灣礦業,52(1),107-115。
陳威逅(1995):公共行政變遷與發展-以核能四廠興建為例。未出版之碩士論文,台中巿,國立中興大學公共行政暨政策研究所。
陳敦源(2001):新制度論的範圍與方法--一個理性選擇觀點的方法論檢視。行政暨政策學報,3,129-184。new window
陳敦源、郭昱瑩(2001):政策分析在民主政體中的機會與挑戰。載於余致力、郭昱瑩、陳敦源主編(2001)。公共政策分析的理論與實務(pp.251-274)。台北巿:韋伯文化事業。new window
陳蔭生主編(1991):中國近代體育議決案選編。北京市:人民體育出版社。
高俊雄(2002):運動休閒事業管理。台北市:羅正芬。
連宏華(1998):美國政府重組之歷史分析。空大行政學報,8,273-306。new window
孫本初(1990):政策分析中垃圾桶式的決策模式。美國月刊,4(10),90-96。
孫本初(1997):公共管理。台北市:智勝出版社。new window
孫 煒(2002):政策次級系統與政策典範--政策變遷之模型建構。政治學報,34,123-148。
郭昆明(2001):利益團體影響公共政策之研究--財團法人國際唱片業交流基金會的個案。未出版之碩士論文,高雄巿,國立中山大學政治學研究所。
曹俊漢(1995):美國聯邦補助金制度之研究-執行績效的評析。台北市:行政院國科會社資中心。new window
曹俊漢(1997):公共政策。台北市:三民書局。
許光麃(1993):中國近代洋土體育論爭之形成與發展(1915-1937)。未出版之碩士論文,桃園縣,國立體育學院體育研究所。
許沛祥(2003):體育政策執行因素之研究-以屏東縣國民小學教學為例。未出版之碩士論文,屏東縣,屏東師範學院國民教育研究所。
許時珍、張家麟(1999):中山先生與中西文化--溫和主義的詮釋觀點。中山人文社會科學期刊,7(2),159-196。
許道然(1999):從政策變遷觀點論我國公教住宅政策之演變。人事管理,36(23),3602-10-3603-23。
許義雄(1991):從建國八十一年談我國學校體育的過去、現在與未來。學校體育,創刊號,3。
許義雄、徐元民(1999):探討我國體育政策發展與展望。台北市:行政院體育委員會。
許義雄(2001):體育是國力的領先指標論。國民體育季刊,30(3),6-9。
翁興利(1996):公共政策─知識應用與政策制訂。台北市:商鼎文化出版社。
莊文忠(2003):政策體系與政策變遷之研究:停建核四政策個案分析。未出版之博士論文,台北巿,國立政治大學公共行政學系。new window
彭文賢(1996):組織原理。台北市:三民書局。
彭懷恩(1988):中華民國政治精英。台北市:洞察。
彭懷恩(2001):比較政治學。台北市:風雲論壇。
彭懷恩(2000):社會學Q & A。台北市:風雲論壇。
彭懷恩主編(2003a):運動政治學:運動、政策與政治。台北市:風雲論壇。
彭懷恩(2003b):台灣政治發展。台北市:風雲論壇。
湯京平(2001):民主治理與環境保護─從中埔慈濟案例檢視我國資源回收的政策體系。台灣政治學刊,5,178-217。new window
湯德宗(2002):憲法結構與違憲審查─司法院大法官釋字第520號解釋評釋。載於劉孔中、陳新民(主編),憲法解釋之理論與實務(初版)。台北市:中研院社科所。new window
黃世鑫、徐仁輝、張哲琛(1996):政府預算。台北縣:國立空中大學。
黃世鑫(1996):跨世紀財政赤字問題--財政社會學之剖析。華信金融季刊,12,35-68。
黃世鑫(1998):財政學概論。臺北巿:國立空中大學。
黃世鑫(2000):跨世紀財政赤字問題—財政社會學之剖析。華信金融季刊,12,35-68。
黃彥斌(2001):政府預算制度與政策的形成--理性或是權力。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立台北大學財政學系。
黃臺生(1993):公共政策概念的探討,人事行政,105,50-59。
黃臺生(1996):組織重組:銓敘部的經驗(上)。銓敘與公保月刊,5,24-31。
張世賢(1983):科技發展與公共政策。社會文化與科技發展研討會論文集,341-342。台北市:行政院國家科學委員會。
張世賢(1987):美國聯邦政府行政機關重組之探討。公共行政學報,3,11-40。new window
張志堅(1992):談法國與韓國之體育行政組織。國民體育季刊,21(1),70-75。
張明貴(1998):政策分析。台北巿:五南。
張哲琛(1983):我國政府預算編審作業改進之研究。主計月報,55(5),18。
翁興利、施能傑、官有垣、鄭麗嬌(1998):公共政策。臺北縣:空大。
游凱全(2002):我國僑教政變遷之研究--SWOT觀點的分析。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系。
曾瑞成(1990):新文化運動時期之體育思想(1919-1927)。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
曾惠娟(2000):從政策終結理論探討精省過程(1996-1998)。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立臺灣大學政治學研究所。
雷飛龍(1989):對當前公共行政的困境之瞭解與說明。行政管理論文輯,4,1-19。
詹中原(1993):大台北都會地區行政組織調整規劃。台北市政府研究發展考核委員會委託市政建設專題研究報告,244輯。台北市:台北市政府研究發展考核委員會。
趙汝功(1948):第七屆全國運動會的意義。教育通訊,5(5),4。
趙麗雲(1991):我國現行體育政策(場長班)。八十年度體育場企業化管理研習會報告書。台北巿:教育部。
楊宗文(1992):談體育政策決定之理念。中華體育,6(1),46-51。new window
楊宗文(1993):體育政策執行之影響因素與實證分析。未出版之碩士論文,桃園縣,國立體育學院體育研究所。
楊宗文(1994):如何提高我國體育政策決定的合理性。國民體育季刊,23(1),83-90。
楊宗文(2001):體育政策評估的理念。中華體育,15(1),9-17。new window
楊國政(1994):我國體育人力政策之研究。未出版之碩士論文,桃園縣,國立體育學院體育研究所。
傅岳邦(2000):公共政策研究典範的演變:從第一典範到第三典範。玄奘學報,2,269-294。
葉蓓華(2000):美濃水庫興建之政策網絡分析。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立政治大學公共行政學系。
崔劍奇等(1979):台灣省國民中小學加強民族精神教育實施研究。台北縣:台灣省國民學校教師研習會。
劉百川(1948):民主化的教學實施。教育雜誌,33(6),41。
劉昌合(1947):國民體育訓練與實施。上海市:商務印書館。
劉阿榮(2001):治權轉移與政策變遷--以環保/經濟政策為例。社會文化學報,12,85-113。
劉坤億(2001):治理概念與政府治理模式變革:評估性分析架構的提出。第二屆全國公共行政博碩士生論文研討會,政治大學公共行政學系主辦。
劉博誠(1998):從政策終結理論探討我國公共電視之演變。未出版之碩士論文,台中縣,東海大學公共行政研究所。
潘淑雯(2002):我國外籍勞工政策制定過程—政策網絡的分析。未出版之碩士論文,嘉義縣,國立中正大學勞工研究所。
樊正治(1992):體育及運動行政組織的型態與過程。大專體育,3(1),52-55。new window
蔡心怡(2003):兩岸主權主張對於我國參與國際體育活動之影響。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,台北巿立體育學院運動科學研究所。
蔡元培(1912):教育部總長蔡元培對於新教育之意見。臨時政府公報,13號(1912)。
蔡文輝(2001):社會學。台北:三民書局。
蔡長啟(1994):我國體育政策回顧與展望。國民體育季刊,23(1),6-9。
蔡禎雄(1992):我國體育行政組織發展史。國民體育季刊,21(1),18-42。
鄧陽僖(1999):從社會福利支出成長談財政改善之道。政策月刊,46,22-23。
瞿海源(2003):獨言獨行演獨腳戲。中國時報,92/10/12,A2版。
鍾岳勳(2002):臺灣科技政策決策機制變遷之研究。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立臺灣大學政治學研究所。
蕭全政(1997):組織與制度的政治經濟分析。暨大學報,1(1),1-16。
蕭全政(2000):民主化對政府經濟和社會職能的挑戰與因應之道。載於朱雲漢、包宗和主編,民主轉型與經濟衝突(pp.25-50)。台北巿:桂冠圖書。new window
簡耀輝(1994):我國體育政策回顧與展望。國民體育季刊,23(1),4-5。
戴偉謙(1998):中國民族意識與體育政策發展之研究。國立體育學院論叢,8(2),79-101。new window
魏陌、陳敦源、郭昱瑩(2001):政策分析在民主政黨當中的機會與挑戰。中國行政評論,11(1),1-28。new window
魏庸、朱志宏、詹中原、黃德福(1991):公共政策。台北縣:國立空中大學。
謝文全(1989):教育行政-理論與實務。台北市:文景書局。
謝似顏(1948):近代運動的起因及其目的。教育雜誌,33(5),13。
謝宗學(1996):我國殘障政策發展之分析:國家、公民與政策網絡。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
謝幸燕(1991):組織環境結構與變遷:三個核心醫院與政策間互動關係的個案分析。未出版之碩士論文,新竹巿,國立清華大學社會人類學研究所。
謝高橋(1995):台灣社會變遷的回顧檢討與展望。台灣經濟,226,113-130。
謝俊義(2000):新制度主義的發展與展望。中國行政,68,1-26。
謝俊義(1998):新制度論與公共行政:整合性觀點。中國行政評論,7(4),155-188。new window
謝棟梁(1998):組織慣性與結合資訊科技的組織轉型之研究。未出版之博士論文,台北巿,國立台灣大學商學研究所。new window
羅清俊(1986):組織對政策執行的影響:我國環境保護行政體系個案分析。未出版之碩士論文,台中巿,國立中興大學公共政策研究所。
羅清俊(1999):環境保護預算與政策分析。國策專刊,10,15-17。
蘇子宏(2002):江澤民時代中共意識型態變遷之研究--以"三個代表"為例。未出版之碩士論文,台北巿,中國文化大學中國大陸研究所。
蘇彩足(2000):民主化對於政府預算決策的衝擊與因應之道。載於朱雲漢、包宗和主編,民主轉型與經濟衝突(pp.51-74)。台北巿:桂冠圖書。new window
蘇維杉(2004):台灣運動產業發展的社會過程研究(1945~ 2003)。未出版之博士論文,台北巿,國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。new window
蘇瑞陽(1999):1979年之後的中共現代體育政策思想。大專體育學刊,1(1),1-16。new window
蘇雄飛(1985):近三十年來我國高級中等學校體育發展與現況。教育資料集刊,10,75-98。new window
顧燕翎(1995):婦女運動與公共政策的互動關係-墮胎法制化及平等工作權策略分析。載於蕭新煌、徐正光主編:台灣的國家與社會(151-174)。台北市:東大書局。new window
Aldrich, H. E. (1979). Organizations and environment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Aldrich, H. E., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 79-105.
Almond, G., & Powell, G. B. (1978). Comparative politics: System, process and policy. Boston: Little & Brown.
Amburgey, T. L., & Miner, A. S. (1992). Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 335-348.
Amenta, E., & Skocpol, T. (1989). Taking explaining the distinctiveness of American public policies in the last century. In F.G. Castles (ed.), The comparative history of public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, C. (1978). The logic of public problems: Evaluation in comparative policy research. In Douglas Ashford (ed.), Comparing Public Policies. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Argyris, C. (1993). On organizational learning. Cambridge: Blackwell publishers.
Argyris, C. (1996). Organizational learning. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. MA: Addsion-Wesley.
Australian Government (2004). Budget 2004-05-Budget Overview. Retrieved October 17, 2004, from Australian Government Web site: http://www.budget.gov.au/2004-05/index.htm.
Axelrod, D. (1988). Budgeting for modern government. New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.
Babbie, E. R. (1998). The practice of social research (4th ed.). Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth.
Bailey, K. D. (1987). Methods of social research (3rd ed.). New York The Free Press.
Bardach, E. (1976). Policy termination as a political process. Policy Sciences, 7(2), 123-131.
Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agendas and dynamics and policy subsystems. Journal of Politics, 53, (4), 1044-1074.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University if Chicago Press.
Behn, R. D. (1976). Closing the Massachusetts public training schools. Policy Sciences, 7(2), 151-171.
Behn, R. D. (1978). How to terminate a public policy: A dozen hints for the would-be terminator. Policy Analysis, 4 (3), 393-413.
Benson, J. K., & Weitzel, C. J. (1985). Social structure and social praxis in interorganizational policy analysis. In K. Hanf & T. A. Toonen (Eds.), Policy implementation in federal and unitary systems(PP.267-281). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Bennett, C. J. (1991). What is policy convergence and what cause it. British Journal of Political Science, 21(3): 15-233.
Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lesson of leaning: Reconciling theories of policy change. Policy Science, 25, 275-294.
Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. N. T.: Anchor Books.
Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General system theory. New York: George Braziller.
Birkland, T. A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1): 55-74.
Boettke, P. J. (1996). What is Wrong with Neoclassical Economics? In Fred E. Foldvary (ed.), Beyond Neoclassical Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Borum, F., & Westenholz, A. (1995). The incorporation of multiple institutional models: organizational field multiplicity and the role of actors. In W. R. Scott & S. Christensen (eds.), The institutional construction of organizations. London: Sage.
Boulding, K. E. (1969). Economics as a moral science. American Economic Review, 59(1), 1-12.
Brown, A. E., & Atewart, Jr., J. (1993). Competing advocacy coalitions, policy revolution, and airline deregulation. In Sabatier, Paul A. & Hank C. Jenkins-Smith (eds.), Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder CO: Westview.
Browne, W. P. (2001). The failure of national rural policy: Institutions and interests. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (1978). From private preferences to public philosophy: The development of public choice. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Buchanan, J. M. (1989). Essays on the political economy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Burlamaqui, L. (2000). Institutions and the role of the state. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Burns, D., Hambleton, R., & Hoggett, P. (1994). The politics of decentralization: Revitalizing local democracy. London: The Macmillan Press.
Caiden, N. (1983). Guidelines to federal budget reform. Public Budgeting and Finance, 3(4), 4-22.
Caiden, G. E., & Kim, B. W. (1991). A dragon’s progress: Development administration in Korea. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.
Calhoun, C., Light, D., & Keller, S. (2001). Understanding sociology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cameron, K. S. (1985). Culture congruence strength and type: Relationship to effective. In Obert E. Quinn. Beyond Rational Management (pp.142-143). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Canada (1970). A proposed sport policy for Canadians, White Paper. Ottawa: Fitness and Amateur Sport.
Canada (1981). A challenge to the nation: Fitness and amateur sport in the ‘80s. White Paper. Ottawa: Fitness and Amateur Sport.
Canada (1985). High performance athlete development in Canada, White Paper. Ottawa: Fitness and Amateur Sport.
Cashman, R. (1995). Paradise of sport: The rise of organized sport in Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Chen, L. J., & Ku, P. W. (2002). The Development of the UK Sport Policy since 1992. Annual Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science, 1, 61-84。
Chodak, S. (1973). Societal development: five approaches with conclusions from comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Christenson, R. M., Engel, A. S., Jacobs, D. N., Rejaj, M., & Waltzer, H. (1971/1985). Ideologies and modern politics. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company.
張明貴(譯):意識型態與現代政治。台北巿:桂冠圖書。
Clark, B. (1998). Political economy--A comparative approach. Connecticut: Praeger Publishers .
Cochran, C. L., & Malone, E. F. (1995). Public policy: Perspectives and choices. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Cohen, M. J., March, J., & Olson, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
Colander, D. C. (1991). Why aren’t economists as important as garbagemen? Essays on the state of economics. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Colebatch, H. K. (2002). Policy: Concepts in the social science (2nd eds). Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.
Coleman, W. D., Skogstad, G. D., & Atkinson, M. M. (1996). Paradigm shifts and policy networks: Cumulative change in agriculture. Journal of Public Policy, 16(3):273-301.
Cook, D. R., & LaFleur, N. K. (1975). A guide to educational research (2nd ed.). Boston: Ally & Bacon.
Daft, R. L. (1989). Organization theory and design (3rd ed.). St. Paul: West.
Daft, R. L. (1998). Organization Theory and Design. Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Publishing.
Daniels M. R. (1994). Termination and bureaucracy: Ending government programs, policies, and organizations. In Farazmand, Ali (eds.), Handbook of bureaucracy. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Daniels, M. R. (1997). Symposium: public policy and organization termination. International Journal of Public Administration, 20(12), 2043-2066.
Davis, G., Weller, P., Craswell, E., & Eggins, S. (1999). What drives machinery of government change? Australia, Canada and The United Kingdom, 1950-1997. Public Administration, 77 (1), 7-50.
Dawson, R. E., & Robinson, J. A. (1963). Inter-party competition, economic variables, and welfare policies in the American States. Journal of Politics, 25(2), 265-289.
DeLeon, P. (1978). A theory of policy termination. In May, J. V. & A. Wildavsky (eds.), The policy cycle. Beverley Hills, Calif: Sage.
DeLeon, P. (1987). Policy termination as a political phenomenon. In D. Palumbo (ed.), The political of program evaluation (pp.173-199). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publication.
DeLeon, P. (1998). Model of policy discourse: Insight versus prediction. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 147-161.
Department of Finance Canada (2003). Budget 2003. Retrieved September 14, 2003, from Department of finance Canada Web site:http://www.fin.gc.ca/access/ budinfoe.html.
Department of National Heritage (1995). Sport: Raising the game. London: DNH.
Department of Sport, Recreation and Tourism (1987). Annual Report 1986-87, Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service.
Departmental of Sport, Recreation and Tourism (1996). Annual reports 1996. Canberra, Australia: Australia Government Publishing Service.
Department of the Environment (1975). Sport and Recreation. London: HMSO.
Dery, D. (1984). Problem definition in policy analysis. Kansas: the University of Kansas Press.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
DiNitto, D. M. (1995). Social welfare: politics and public policy. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: a review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2): 343-357.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, LXV (2), 135-150.
Dror, Y. (1967). Policy analysis: A new professional role in government service. Public Administration Review, 27(3), 197-204.
Dror, Y. (1968). Muddling through: Science or inertia. Public Administration Review, 29(2), 145-166.
Dror, Y. (1971/1998). Design for policy sciences.
張世賢、陳恆鈞(譯):政策科學的設計。台北市:國立編譯館。
Drucker, P. F. (1999/2000). Management challenges for the 21th century.
劉毓玲(譯):21世紀的管理挑戰。台北巿:天下遠見。
Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy and political science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dryzek, J. S., & Ripley, B. (1988). The ambition of policy design. Policy Studies Journal, 7(4), 705-719.
Dunleavy, P. (1991). Democracy bureaucracy & public choice--economic explanations in political science. New York: Prentice Hall.
Dunleavy, P., & O'leary, B. (1987/1994). Theories of the state: The politics of liberal democracy.
羅慎平(譯):國家論-自由民主政治學。台北市:五南。
Duverger, M. (1954/1991). Les Partis politiques.
雷競璇(譯):政黨概論。香港:青文文化。
Duverger, M. (1980). A new political system model-semi- presidential government. European Journal of Political Research, 8 (2), 165-187.
Dye, T. R. (1995a). Politics, economics, and public policy. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Dye, T. R. (1995b). Understanding public policy (8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Dye, T. R., & Zeigler, H. (1981). The irony of democracy. Monterrey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Easton, D. (1965a). A systems analysis of political life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Easton, D. (1965b). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Edwards III, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Washington, D. C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21-32.
Elazar, D. J. (1966). American federalism: A view from states. New York: Crowell.
Elcock, H. (1991). Change and decay? Public administration in the 1990s. London: Longman.
Elison, S. K. (1997). Policy innovation in a cold climate: The family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Journal of Family Issues, 18 (1), 30-54.
Etheredge, L. S. (1981). Government Learning: An overview. In L. L. Samuel (ed.), The handbook of political behavior (Vol.2). New York: Plenum Press.
Etheredge, L. S., & Short, J. (1983). Thinking about Government Learning. Journal of Management Studies, 20, 41-58.
Fischer, F. (1998). Beyond Empiricism: Policy inquiry in post-positivist perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 130-131.
Foldvary, F. (1996). Beyond Neoclassical Economics. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.
Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48, 692-710.
Freeman, S. J., & Cameron, K. S. (1993). Organization downsizing: A convergence and reorganizational framework. Organization Science, 4 (1), 10-30.
Friedrich, C. J. (1963). Man and his government. New York: McGraw Hill.
Forester, J. (1987). Anticipating implementation: Normative practices in planning and policy analysis. In F. Fisher & J. Forester (Eds.), Confronting values in policy analysis: The politics of criteria(PP.153-173). Berverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Galbraith, J. K. (1967/1992). The New Industrial State, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
楊麗君、王嘉源(譯):自滿年代。台北:時報文化出版。
Garnett, J. L. (1987). Operationalizing the constitution via administrative reorganization: Oilcans, trends, and proverbs. Public Administration Review, 47 (1), 35-44.
Gersick C. J. G. (1991). Evolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10-36.
Glassford, R. G. (1970). Organization of game and adaptive strategies of the Canadian Eskimo, in G. Luschen, The cross-cultural analysis of sport and games (ed.). Champaign, III.: Stipes Publishing Co.
Godbey, G. (1996). Leisure in your life. State college, PA: Venture.
Godwin, M. L., & Schroedel, J. R (2000). Policy diffusion and strategies for promoting policy change: Evidence from California local gun control ordinances. Policy Studies Journal, 28(4): 760-776.
Golden, O. (1990). Innovation in public sector human services programs: The implications of innovation by ‘Groping Along’. Journal Policy Analysis and Management, 9(2), 219-248.
Goodin, R. E. (1996). The theory of institutional design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goodin, R. E., & Kligemann, H. D. (1966). A new handbook of political science. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 558-562.
Goodstein, L. D., & Burke, W. W. (1991). Creating successful organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 19 (4), 5-17.
Gordon, G. J., & Michael E. M. (1995). Public administration in America (5th). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Gore, A. (1996). The best kept secrets in government. Fourth report of the national performance review. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Graber, D. A. (1994). Media power in politics (3rd ed). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. c1994.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), 481-510.
Greener, I. (2001). Social learning and macroeconomic policy in Britain. Journal of Public Policy, 21(2): 133-152.
Grindle, M. S., & Thomas, J. W. (1991). Public choices and policy change: The political economy of reform in developing countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gross, E., & Etzioni, A. (1985). Organizations in society. N. J.: Prentice Halls.
Gunther, R. (1996). The impact of regime change on public policy: The case of Spain. Journal of Public Policy, 16, 2:157-201.
Hajer, M. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of Practice: the case of acid rain in Britain. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (eds), The argumentative turn in policy a nab-sis and planning. Durkam: Duke University Press.
Hall, R. H. (1991). Organizations: structure, processes, and outcomes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275-296.
Hanson, E. M. (1996). Educational administration organizational behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structure inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49 (2), 149-164.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Harvard University Press.
Hargreaves, J. (1985). From social democracy to authoritarian populism: State intervention in sport and physical recreation in contemporary Britain. Leisure Studies, 4, 124-131.
Harmon, M. M. (1981/1993). Action theory for public administration. N.Y.:Longman.
吳瓊恩、陳秋杏、張世杰(譯):公共行政的行動理論。台北市:五南。
Hayes, M. T. (1992). Incrementalism and public policy. New York: Longman.
Hayes, M. T. (2001). The limits of policy change: Incrementalism, worldview, and the rule of law. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Heckscher, C. (1994). Defining the post-bureaucratic type. In C. Heckscher & A. Donnellon (eds.) The post-bureaucratic organization: New perspectives on organizational change. New Delphi: Sage.
Heclo, H. (1972). Review article: policy analysis. British Journal of political Science, II, 83-108.
Heclo, H. (1974). Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment, in A. King (ed.) The new American political system (pp.87-124), New York: American Enterprise Institute.
Heywood, A. (1999/2002). Political theory: An introduction.
楊日青,李培元,林文斌,劉兆隆(譯):最新政治學新論。台北市:韋伯。
Hofmann, J. (1995). Implicit theories in policy discourse: An inquiry into the interpretation of reality in German technology policy. Policy Science, 28, 127-148.
Hogwood, B. W., & Peter, B. G. (1983). Policy Dynamics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Hogwood, B. W., & Gunn, L. A. (1984). Policy analysis for the real word. London: Oxford University Press.
Hood, C. C. (1983). The tool of government. London: Macmillan.
Hood, C. C. (1991). A public management for all reasons. Public Administration, 69, 3-19.
Houlihan, B. (1997). Sport, policy and politics: A comparative analysis. New York: Routledge.
Houlihan, B. (1997/2003). Sport, policy and politics: A comparative analysis. New York: Routledge.
彭懷恩主編(陳金盈等譯):運動政治學:運動、政策與政治。台北巿:風雲論壇出版社。
Howlett, M. (1991). Policy instrument, policy implementation: national approaches to theories of instrument choice. Policy Studies Journal, 19(2), 1-21.
Howlett, M. (1994). Policy Paradigms and Policy Change: Lessons from the old and new Canadian policies towards aboriginal peoples. Policy Studies Journal, 22(4), 631-649.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1993). Patterns of policy instrument choice: Policy style, policy learning and privatization experience. Policy studies review, 12(1/2), 2-24.
Huy, Q. N. (2001). Time, temporal capability, and planned change. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 601-623.
Ingraham, P. W. (1987). Toward more systematic consideration of policy design. Policy Studies Journal, 15 (4), 611-628.
Jacques, T. D., & Pavia, G. R. (1976). Sport in Australia: Selected readings in physical activity. Sydney: Mcgraw-Hill.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1990). Democratic politics and policy analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Broos-Cole.
Jenkins, W. I. (1978). Policy analysis: Political and organizational perspective. London: Martin Robertson.
Jevons, W. S. (1970/1998). The theory of political economy.
林翰(譯):政治經濟學理論。台北市:風雲論壇。
Jiang, M. Q. (1994). Perceptions of effectiveness in intra- organizational mergers: Assessing the impacts of acculturation and leadership. Journal of Law and Commerce, 30, 531-569.
Jones, C. O. (1977). An introduction to the study of public policy (2nd ed). North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
Jones, B. D., Baumgartner, F. R., & True, J. L. (1998). Policy punctuations: U.S. budget authority, 1947-1995. The Journal of Politics, 60(1), 1-33.
Jun, J. S. (1986/1994). Public administration design and problem solving.
黃曙曜(譯):公共行政:設計與問題解決。台北巿:五南。
Kamann, D. F., & Dtrijker, D. (1992). The network approach: Concepts and applications. In R. Camagni, The innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. Lodon: Belhaven Press.
Kamrava, M. (1996). Understanding comparative politics: A framework for analysis. London: Routledge.
Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1985). Organization and Management. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Katzenstein, P. J. (1978). Between power and plenty (ed.). Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Kaufman, H. (1976). Are government organizations immortal? Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution.
Kiel, L. D. (1989). Nonequilibrium theory and it’s implications for public administration. Public Administrative Review, 49 (6), 544-551.
Kimberly, J. R., & Bouchikihi, H. (1995). The dynamic of organizational development and change: How the past shaped the present and constrains the future. Organization Science, 6(1), 9-18.
Kingdon, J. W. (l995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little Brown.
Klijn, M. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Britain. In Fischer, F. & Forester, J. (eds), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durkam: Duke University Press.
Klijn, E. (1996). analyzing and managing policy processes in complex networks: A theoretical examination of the concept, policy network and its problem. Administration and Society, 28 (l), 90-119.
Kondra, A. Z., & Hinings, C. R. (1998). Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory. Organization Studies, 19 (5), 743-767.
Koning K. (1996). On the critique of new public management. Heltenhan, UK: Edward Elgar.
Korten, F. F., & Siy, R. Y. (1988). Transforming a bureaucracy: The experience of the Philippine National Irrigation Authority. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press.
Kraan, D. J. (1996). Budgetary decision: A public choice approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krasner, S. D. (1984). Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16(2), 223-46.
Ku, P. W., & Chen, L. J. (2001). The development of the UK sport policy since 1992. Annual Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science, 1, 61-84.
Kübler, D. (2001). Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework: An application to Swiss drug policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), 623-641.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions(2nd). Enlarged, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
王道還等(編譯):科學革命的結構。台北市:遠流。
Laffan, B. (1999). Becoming a living institution: The evolution of the European court of auditors. Common Market Studies, 37 (2), 251-268.
Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The policy orientation. In D. Lerner & H. D. Lasswell (eds.), Policy sciences. Stanford University Press.
Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A preview of policy sciences. New York: Elsevier.
Lauer, R. H. (1977). Perspectives on social change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1995/1998). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
王美音(譯):知識新之泉:價值企業的經營。台北巿:遠流。
Lester, J. P., & Stewart, Jr. J. (2000). Public policy (2nd eds). Belmont, Calif: Thomson Learning.
Lester, J. P., & Stewart, J. Jr. (2000/2001). Public policy: An evolutionary approach.
陳恆鈞(譯):公共政策:演進研究途徑。臺北市:學富。
Levy A., & Merry U. (1988). Organizational transformation: Revitalizing organization for a competitive world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lichtenstein, B. M. (1995). Evolution or transformation: A critique and alternative to punctuated equilibrium. Academy of Management Journal, Best Papers Proceedings 1995, 291-305.
Liebowitz, B. S., Prasad, S. Y., & Granger, M. (1999). Intelligent agents for knowledge management-toward intelligent web-based collaboration within virtual teams. In Liebowitz, J. (ed.), Knowledge management handbook(pp.1-4). CRC Press LLC.
Limerick, D., & Cunnington, B. (1993). Managing the new organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review, 19, 79-88.
Lindblom, C. E., & Woodhouse, E. J. (1993). The policy-making process (3rd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hell.
Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1990). Research perspectives on the design of public policy: Implementation, formulation and design. In D. Palumbo & D. J. Calistn (eds.), Implementation and policy design (pp.51-66). New York: Greenwood Press.
Lippit, D. V. (1996). Radical political economy: Explorations in alternative economic analysis. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Lowi, T. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 33, 298-310.
Narayanan, V. K., & Nath, R. (1993). Organization theory: A strategic approach. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
MacRae, D. (1993). Guidelines for policy discourse: Consensual versus adversarial. In Fischer, F. & Forester, J. (eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durkam: Duke University Press.
Majone, G. (1996). Public policy and administration: Ideas, interests, and institutions. In Robert E. Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann(eds.), A new handbook of political science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marini, J. (1992). The politics of budget control-congress, the presidency, and the growth of the administrative State. New York: Taylor & Francis New York Inc..
March, J. G. (1981). Decision in organizations and theories of choice. In A. H. Van de Ven & W. Joyce (eds.), Perspectives on organization design and behavior. New York: Wiley.
March, J. G., & Olson, J. P. (1983). Organizing political life: What administrative reorganization tells us about government. The American Political Science Review, 77(2), 281-296.
March, J. G., & Olson, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organization factors in political life. The American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734-749.
Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy communities and issue networks--beyond typology. In David Marsh & R. A. W. Rhodes(eds.), Policy networks in British government(pp. 249-268). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: The Free Press.
Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (1995/1998). Theory and methods in political science.
陳菁雯、葉銘元、許文柏(譯):政治學方法論。台北市:韋伯文化。
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. London: Reidl.
Mayer, R. R. (1985). Policy and program planning: A development perspective. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public policy, 12(4), 331-354.
Maynard-Moody, S., Musheno, M., & Palumo, D. (1990). Street-wise social policy: Resolving the dilemma of street-level influence and successful implementation. Western Political Quarterly, 43, 833-848.
McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1987). Getting the job done: alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 133-152.
McDonnell, L. M., & Marsh, D. (1998). The development of the policy network approach. In D. Marsh, Comparing policy network. Buckingham. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
McKay, J. (1986). Hegemony, the state and Australian sport, in Lawrence, G. & Rowe, D. (eds), Power play: Essays in the sociology of Australian sport. Sydney: Hale & Iremonger.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (1989). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (2nd ed.). Glenview, Illinois: Scott Foresman & Co.
Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. California: Sage.
Meyer, M. W., & Zucker, L. G. (1989), Permanently failing organizations. Newbury Park, C.A.: Sage.
Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. London: Sage.
Moore, W. E. (1967). Orders and change: Essays in comparative sociology. New York: Wiley.
Moore, W. E. (1974). Social change. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Moore, D. (1994). New minister reveals his plans for sport. Sport Report, 14(2). 8-10.
Mosher, F. C. (1980). The changing responsibilities and tactics of the federal government. Public Administration review, 40(16), 541-548.
Mueller, D. C. (1989). Public choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Munger, M. C. (2000). Analyzing policy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Munro, J. F. (1993). California water politics: Explaining policy change in a cognitively polarized subsystem. In Sabatier, P. A., & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (eds.), Policy change and learning: A advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ‘Ba’: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), Spring, 40-54.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
O’Connor, J. (1973). The fiscal crisis of the state. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
O’connor, K., & Sabato, L. J. (1992). Roots and reform. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Offe, C. (1984). Contradiction of the welfare state. MA: MIT Press.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. MA: Addison- Wesley.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1999). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Sabatier, P. A. (ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Ott, J. S., Hyde, A. C., & Shafritz, J. M. (1991). Public management: The essential readings. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Pal, L. A. (1992). Public policy analysis: An introduction. Scarborough, Ontario: Nelson Canada.
Parsons, W. (1995). Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar.
Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay. New York: Random House.
Peters, B. G. (1992). Government reorganization: A theoretical analysis. International Political Science Review, 13(2), 199-217.
Peters, B. G. (1998). Comparative politics: Theory and methods. New York: New York University Press.
Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. New York, N. Y.: Pinter.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organization: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row Publisher.
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pontusson, J. (1995). From comparative public policy to political economy. Comparative Political Studies, 28(1), 117-147.
Popper, K. R. (1956/1989). The open society and its enemies.
莊文瑞、李英明(譯):開放社會及其敵人。台北市:桂冠。
Porter, M. E. (1986). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.
Prigogine, I., & Isabelle S. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam Books.
Rainey, H. G. (1997). Understanding and managing public organizations (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ranney, A. (1990/1998). Governing: An introduction to political Science.
倪達仁(譯):政治學。台北市:雙葉。
Ranney, A. (1993). Governing: An introduction to political science. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Reisman, D. (1990). Theories of collective action--downs. Olson and Hirsch, London: Macmillan Press Ltd..
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University.
Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism against populism. Oxford: Freeman.
Riggs, F. W. (1997). Modernity and bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 57(4), 347-354.
Ripley R. B., & Franklin. G. A. (1984). Congress, the bureaucracy, and public policy. Homewood, Illinois: The Dorsey Press.
Ritzer, G. (1983). Sociological theory. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization theory: Structure, design and applications (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1996). Transforming public policy: Dynamics of policy entrepreneurship. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Robertson, D. B., & Judd, D. R. (1992). The development of American public policy: The structure of policy restrict. Scott: Foresman Company.
Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1993). Problem definition, agenda access and policy choice. Policy Studies Journal, 21 (1), 56-71.
Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 2, 3-30.
Rose, R., & Davies, P. L. (1994). Inheritance in public policy: change without choice in Britain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rosenbloom, D. H. (1993). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector (4th ed.). N. Y.: McGraw-Hill.
Rothstein, B. (1998). Political institutions: An overview. In Goodin, R.E., & H. D. Klingemann(eds.), A new handbook of political science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rubin, I. S. (1997). The politics of public budgeting: Getting and spending, borrowing and balancing (3rd ed.). Chatham, New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers, Inc.
Rubinstein, M. F., & Firstenberg, I. R. (1999). The minding organization: Bring the future to the present and turn creative ideas into business solutions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Sabatier, P. A. (1987). Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, policy change. Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8, 649-692.
Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning theory. Policy Science, 21, 129-169.
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach (eds.). San Francisco: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A., & Mazmanian D. A. (1989). Implementation and public policy. University Press of America.
Sabatier, P. A. (1999). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sacks, P. (1980). State structure and the asymmetrical society. Comparative Politics, April, 345-368.
Salamon, L. M. (1989). Beyond privatization: The tools of government action. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
Salamon, L. M., & Elliott, O. V. (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Salisbury, R. H. (1968). The analysis of public policy, in Austin Ranny (ed.). Political Science and public Policy. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co.
Savas, E, S. (1987). Privatization: The key to better government. New York: Chatham House Publishers.
Scharpf, F. W. (2000). Institutions in comparative policy research. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6/7):762-790.
Schlesinger, Jr., A. M. (1986). The cycles of American history. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. (1990a). Behavioral assumption of policy tools. Journal of Politics, 52(2), 510-529.
Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. (1990b). Policy design: Elements, premises and strategies. In S. Nagel, Policy theory and policy evaluation. New York: Greenwood Press.
Schneider, V. (1992). The structure of policy network: A comparison of the chemicals control and telecommunications policy domain in Germany. European Journa1 of Political Research, 21 (1/2), 109-129.
Schulman, P. R. (1988). The politics of ideational policy. Journal of Politics, 50, 263-291.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1991). The crisis of the tax state. in R. Swedberg (ed), The economics and sociology of capitalism(99-140). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Scott, W. (1992). Organization theory and design. N. J.: Prentice Halls.
Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations: rational, natural, and open systems. Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism ‘old’ and ‘new’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270-277.
Seo, M., & Crees, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2), 222-247.
Sharkansky I. (1972). Policy administration: Policy marking in government agencies. Chicago: Markham.
Shrivastava, P. (1983). A typology of organizational learning systems. The Journal of Management Studies, 20 (1), 7-28.
Shumann, H. E. (1988). Politics and the budget: struggle between the president and the congress. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Simon, H. A. (1985). Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review, 79, 293-304.
Singh, J. V., & Lumsden, C. J. (1990). Theory and research in organizational ecology. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 161-195.
Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & Meinhard, A. G. (1988). Are voluntary organizations structurally inert? Exploring an assumption in organizational ecology. Academy of Management Meetings, Anaheim, Calif.
Silk, L. (1984). Economics and the real world. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge University Press.
Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, Mass.: The Bellnap Press of Harvard University Press.
Slack, T. (1997). Understanding sport organizations: the application of organization theory. Champaign, IL: Human Ki
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE