:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中自然與生活科技教師對部編本教科書之滿意度調查研究
書刊名:教科書研究
作者:莊善媛李隆盛 引用關係
作者(外文):Chuang, Shan-yuanLee, Lung-sheng
出版日期:2011
卷期:4:1
頁次:頁55-85
主題關鍵詞:自然與生活科技教科書滿意度Science and technologyTextbookSatisfaction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:320
  • 點閱點閱:81
教育部在2005 年出版國中自然與生活科技部編本教科書「編撰 架構」及「第一冊」,本研究旨在瞭解使用者國中自然與生活科技教 師對該兩文件的滿意度,供後續部編本編印和選用之參考。研究對象 以選用部編本教科書的56 所學校進行問卷調查,回收有效問卷128 份(回收率69.6%)。調查結果顯示:(1)教師對部編本教科書的滿 意度不因性別、學歷、任教科別與年資不同而有所差異,故後續得以 整體教師意見討論;(2)教師對部編本教科書的「編撰架構」及第一 冊之「內容屬性」、「教學屬性」和「可讀性」滿意度中等;(3)教師 對部編本教科書第一冊之「物理屬性」具有較高的滿意度;(4)部編 本教科書的編撰架構需更妥善規劃適切的學習內容與學習順序;(5) 部編本教科書的內容應加強理念統整及內容的完整性、邏輯性與生活 化;(6)部編本教科書應更妥善規劃適切的教學目標、活動示例、評 量方式及輔助教材;(7)部編本教科書的內容須更妥善規劃圖文與字 體規格的妥適性、標題的趣味性及文句使用的適當性。
The objectives of this study were to investigate junior high school science and technology (S&T) teachers’ satisfaction levels in regard to the framework and content of volume one of the national S&T textbook for junior high school students and to examine differences based on demographic variables of the teachers. To achieve these objectives, a questionnaire with 184 items was mailed to all 56 junior high schools that selected the national S&T textbook. The following conclusions were made based on the survey results: (1) The gender, major, teaching experience, and educational background of teachers did not affect their satisfaction with the national textbook; (2) Teachers were moderately satisfied with the “framework,” “content attributes,” “teaching attributes” and “readability” of the national textbook; (3) Teachers tended to be more satisfied with the “physical attributes” of the national textbook; (4) The framework of the national textbook needs to better planned to provide more appropriate learning content and order; (5) The content of the national textbook could be improved by enhancing the integration of rationale, and the completeness, logicality, and relation to life of content; (6) The national textbook could be improved by planning instructional goals, learning activities, evaluations, and auxiliary learning materials; (7) The content of the national textbook could be improved with more appropriate illustrations, characters, fonts, interesting headings, and appropriate sentence structure.
期刊論文
1.梁福鎮(20090600)。德國中等教育的現況與改革措施。教育資料集刊,42,273-296。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃政傑(1999)。中小學教科書的審查與選用。高中教育,5,20-24。  延伸查詢new window
3.歐用生(2002)。如何選擇教科書?。康軒教育雜誌,46,8-15。  延伸查詢new window
4.王麗雲、甄曉蘭(20090600)。社會學取向的教科書政策分析。教科書研究,2(1),1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.洪若烈(20030900)。國小教師之教科書使用方式及其影響因素之探討。國教學報,15,175-192。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊雲龍、徐慶宏(20071200)。社會學習領域教師轉化教科書之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,24(2),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃政傑(19980100)。建立優良的教科書審定制度。課程與教學,1(1),1-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Fornell, Claes(1992)。A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience。Journal of Marketing,56(1),6-21。  new window
9.江姮姬(20011100)。從哈伯瑪斯的「溝通行動理論」探討我國教科書審查制度。國教學報,13,135-168。  延伸查詢new window
10.李隆盛(1998)。高中生活科技教科用書的編審。國立編譯館通訊,11(4),29-34。  延伸查詢new window
11.李隆盛、賴春金(2005)。生活科技教材使用情形與選用問題。師友月刊,454,39-43。  延伸查詢new window
12.周淑卿(2003)。今是昨非,抑或是昨是今非?教科書一綱多本爭議之分析。國立編譯館館刊,31,12-20。  延伸查詢new window
13.唐可殷、高熏芳(2005)。高中數學教科書推廣歷程之研究--出版商的觀點。黃埔學報,49,173-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Francken, D. A.、Van Raaij, W. F.(1981)。Satisfactory with leisure time activities。Journal of Leisure Research,13,337-352。  new window
15.Oakes, J.、Saunders, M.(2004)。Education's most basic tools: Access to textbooks and instructional materials in California's public schools。Teachers College Record,106(10),1967-1988。  new window
16.Schug, M. C.、Western, R. D.、Enochs, L. G.(1997)。Why do social studies teachers use textbooks? The answer may lie in economic theory。Social Education,61(2),97-101。  new window
會議論文
1.陳明印(2000)。臺灣地區國民中小學教科書編審制度。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.詹正信(2000)。臺灣教科書選用制度之探究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝安邦(2000)。大陸教科書選用制度研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李英瑋(2001)。國內綜合型運動網站使用者滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.中華民國課程與教學學會(1997)。國小審定本教科書評鑑報告。臺北市:中華民國教材研究發展學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.藍順德(2005)。教科書政策與制度。臺北市:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李隆盛(1999)。科技與職業教育的跨越。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.Gall, M. D.(1981)。Handbook for evaluating and selecting curriculum materials。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
5.Gollnick, D. M.、Chinn, P. C.(1990)。Multicultural Education in a Pluralistic Society。Merrill Publishing Company。  new window
6.Maxim, G. W.(1991)。Social Studies and the Elementary School Child。New York:Macmillan Publishing.。  new window
7.Young, M. J.、Riegeluth, C. M.(1988)。Improving the textbook selection process。Bloomington, Indiana:Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation。  new window
8.黃政傑(1993)。課程評鑑。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
9.Wilkie, William L.(1986)。Consumer Behavior。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
10.歐用生(20000000)。課程改革:九年一貫課程的獨白與對話。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃政傑(1991)。課程設計。臺北:東華。  延伸查詢new window
12.張煌熙(2007)。教科書審查制度的發展與影響--為出版業與消費者築橋。教科書制度與影響。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
13.Pepin, B.、Haggerty, L.(2004)。Mathematics textbook and their use by teachers: A window into the education world of particular countries。Curriculum landscapes and trends。Dordrecht, The Netherlands。  new window
14.Westbury, I.(1991)。Textbooks。The international encyclopedia of curriculum。Oxford。  new window
其他
1.朱國瑞(2005)。朱國瑞讀過北一女建中贊成教科書統編。  延伸查詢new window
2.沈弘俊,徐式寬(無日期)。國中自然與生活科技教科書之編輯經驗談--以生活科技類之單元為例,http://www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/nstsc/pdf/book6/01.pdf, 20091225。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2003)。國民中小學教科書制度採取「部編本與民編本併行制」是現階段最佳選擇,http://140.111.1.192/primary/importance/920115-1.htm, 20050410。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2004)。教科書一綱多本政策是延續性政策,也符合世界潮流且獲得公聽會與問卷之支持,http://, 20050330。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Eraut, M. R.(1990)。Evaluation of learning resource。The international encyclopedia of educational evaluation。Oxford:Pergamon Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE