:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學校本位龍獅運動課程之建置
書刊名:臺灣體育學術研究
作者:胡育霖潘義祥 引用關係
作者(外文):Hu, Yuh LinPan, Yi Hsiang
出版日期:2011
卷期:51
頁次:頁1-22
主題關鍵詞:課程籌畫課程設計課程內容課程架構評鑑指標Curriculum planningCurriculum designCurriculum contentCurriculum frameworkEvaluation indicators
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:164
  • 點閱點閱:89
本研究目的在探討桃園縣一所龍獅運動特色認證通過的國小,其在學校本位龍獅運動課程建置。本研究採質化研究取向的個案研究方式,研究架構主要參考潘義祥(2008)建構的學校本位體育課程發展評鑑指標,以文件分析、個別深度訪談與焦點團體訪談等方式進行資料蒐集。研究結果指出:(一)在課程籌畫方面:該校課程展委員會利用SWOT分析出該校優劣勢,依據該校運動文化之特質,規劃出龍獅運動課程,發展成學校本位體育課程特色。(二)在課程設計方面:該校教師依據學校龍獅運動課程目標,設計國小一至六年級的龍獅運動課程架構、課程內容及評量方式。本研究結論如下:(一)該校具有良好的學校本位課程籌畫過程。(二)該校具有系統性的龍獅運動課程設計。本研究對象的學校龍獅運動課程建置,可作為其他學校課程建構之參考。
The purpose of this study is to explore a planning of school-based Dragon and Lion Dance physical education curriculum in an elementary school. The study based on the school-based physical education curriculum development evaluation indexes which was made by Pan (2008), collected information from a certificated Dragon and Lion Dance Sports school in Taiwan. This case also utilized document analysis, individual interviews, and focus group interviews to conduct the research. The result of study indicated: 1.the school curriculum development committee designed a Dragon and Lion Dance Sports curriculum based on characteristics of the school sports culture. 2. the case develops a system of curriculum objective, structure, content and learning evaluation method in Dragon and Lion Dance Sports curriculum from grade 1 to grade 6. It is concluded as follows: (a) the school well processed on planning the school-based Dragon and Lion Dance Sports curriculum. (b) the school contains a systematic design of Dragon and Lion Dance Sports curriculum. The subjects of the school sports programs will be a reference for other schools when they program the same curriculum structure.
期刊論文
1.Juang, Y.-R.、Liu, T.-C.、Chan, T.-W.(2008)。Computer-Supported Teacher Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge through Developing School-Based Curriculum。Educational Technology & Society,11(2),149-170。  new window
2.Thomas, I. D.(1978)。A decision framework for school-based decision making。The Australian Science Teachers Journal,24(2),63-68。  new window
3.潘義祥(2006)。高中學校本位體育課程發展之探討。學校體育雙月刊,16(1),44-53。  延伸查詢new window
4.簡宏江(2007)。解析我國國民中小學學校本位課程政策。育達學院學報,14,111-136。  延伸查詢new window
5.Westerhold, S. P.(2000)。The Integrated Curriculum-Baodies and Bramsin Motion-Investigating the Impact of an Integrated Curriculum。Teaching Elementary Physical Education,11(6),17-21。  new window
會議論文
1.吳謄達(2004)。論海峽兩岸的民俗體育與傳統體育。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chen, H. L. S.、Chung, J.(2000)。School improvement in Taiwan problem and possibilities: the implemeniafmn of school-based curriculum development。HongKong。  new window
3.Wu, R. T. Y.(2001)。School-based curriculum development in career and technical education in Taiwan, KepuBlic of China。New Orleans, Louisiana。  new window
研究報告
1.潘義祥(2008)。普通高級中學學校本位體育課程評鑑指標建構之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳金春(2002)。九年一貫學校本位課程發展--以吳興國小健康與體育為例(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.林佩璇(1999)。學校本位課程發展的個案研究:臺北縣鄉土教學活動的課程發展(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃惠珍(1998)。綜合高中學校本位課程發展--一所學校之個案分析(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.呂淑媛(2002)。學校本位課程發展之行動研究--以高雄市三民國中為例(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.顏曉湘(2004)。國民小學學校本位課程發展之調查研究--以雲嘉地區為例(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
6.江連君(2003)。偏遠小學學校本位課程發展之行動研究--以嘉義大湖國小為例。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾巧如(2000)。國民中小學校本位課程發展策略之研究--以嘉義縣市為例。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rink, J. E.(2009)。Designing the Physical Education curriculum。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.方德隆(2004)。九年一貫課程改革的理論與實務。高雄:臺北市:麗文:麗文。  延伸查詢new window
3.Tinning. R.(2010)。Pedagogy and Human Movement: Theory, Practice, Research。New York:Routledge。  new window
4.Foriska, T. J.(1998)。Restructuring around standards: A practitioner's guide to design and implementation。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
5.Wiles, J.、Bondi, J.(1993)。Curriculum Development: A Guide to Practice。New York, NY:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
6.教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程(第一學習階段)暫行綱要。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.McCormick, R.、James, M.(1983)。Curriculum evaluation in schools。London:Croom Helm。  new window
8.Eggleston, J.(1980)。School-based curriculum development in Britain: A collection of case studies。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
9.Skilbeck, Malcolm(1984)。School-based curriculum development。London:Harper & Row。  new window
10.謝文全(2006)。教育行政學。臺北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
11.蔡清田(20010000)。課程改革實驗:以研究發展為根據的課程改革。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李坤崇(1999)。多元化教學評量。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Marsh, C. J.(1992)。Key concepts for understanding curriculum。Falmer Press。  new window
14.Lawton, Dennis(1989)。Education, culture and the National Curriculum。Hodder and Stoughton。  new window
15.林生傳(1999)。九年一貫課程與教學革新。台北。  延伸查詢new window
16.Wang, Y. Z.(2002)。A model for technovocational school-based curriculum planning and evaluation under the framework of total quality management。ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED 468490。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE