:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國國立大學校長由官派制改為遴選制對大學經營效率之影響
書刊名:中山管理評論
作者:歐進士 引用關係林秋萍
作者(外文):Ou, Chin S.Lin, Chiu Ping
出版日期:2000
卷期:8:2
頁次:頁213-248
主題關鍵詞:經營績效經營效率管制制度非營利事業資產包絡分析法UniversityOperating efficiencyControl systemNot-for-profit organizationData envelopment analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:13
  • 共同引用共同引用:582
  • 點閱點閱:28
     過去國立大學校長的產生係屬官派校長制,由於對既有制度的反彈及政治與社會情勢的改變,再加上當時教授治校的理念受到各界廣大的迴響,校長遴選制呼聲不斷高漲。1993年底,大學法修正三讀通過,大學校長產生制度正式由官派轉變為遴選。 大學校長身為大學的領導人,對大學的經營效率負最主要的責任。官派校長為教育部所派任,權力來自於中央政府,易使其較注重與上級單位的關係,而忽略大學內部的經營;反之,遴選校長的權力是透過學校組織成員的認同而取得,會促使校長的經營重心較偏重於校內。因此,本文為產生方式不同,會的校長對大學經營重心不同,進而對大學經營效率造成不同的影響。本研究的主要目的,即在探討國立大學校長的產生方式由官派制改變為遴選制,對國立大學經營效率的影響。 由於大學校長產生方式從官派到遴選,過討論的焦點著重在學術獨立與大學自治的實現。本文是首篇從經營效率的觀點,以大學實際經營資料探討國立大學校長由官派制改為遴選制,對大學經營效率的影響。
     In the past, the president of a national university in Taiwan is designated by the central government; however, the call for the university president electing system is surging higher and higher due to the heavy backlash to the existing designation system, the change of the political and social atmosphere and the well-discussed and resounding concept that university should be dominate by the faculty. At the end of 1993, the University Law is validated, and the president creating system is therefore changed form the designated to the elected system. As a leader of a university, a president is responsible for most of the operating efficiency of the university. The president who is designated by the Ministry of Education acquires his power from the central government and therefore tends to put more stress on his relationship with the authorities instead of the management of the university; on the contrary, the elected president will tend to pay more attention to the internal affairs of the university, for his power comes from the recognition of each members in the university. Hence, in this paper we suggest that the difference between the two president creation systems will significantly affect the president’s priority on which field to put more emphasis, and furthermore cause different effects on the operating efficiency of a university. The main purpose of this research is to evaluate the influence over the operating efficiency of a university form the president designating system to the president electing system. Because a university has the properties of multiple inputs and outputs and is a not-for-profit institution, in this paper we use the Data Envelopment Analysis and the Regression Analysis to verify the above empirical hypothesis. This paper is the first one to use actual operating data to test the above empirical hypothesis. The empirical results reveals that, after the change of president creating system for the designated to the elected, the operation efficiencies of the national universities are significantly increased. That is, the president electing system has a significant and positive effect on the operating efficiencies of the national universities in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Beasley, J. E.(1990)。Comparing University Departments。Omega International Journal of Management Science,18(2),171-183。  new window
2.Higgins, J. C.(1989)。Performance measurement in universities。European Journal of Operational Research,38(3),358-368。  new window
3.Kao, Chiang(1994)。Evaluation of Junior Colleges of Technology: The Taiwan Case。European Journal of Operational Research,72(1),43-51。  new window
4.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
5.Golany, Boaz、Roll, Yaakov(1989)。An application procedure for DEA。OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science,17(3),237-250。  new window
6.Farrell, Michael James(1957)。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency。Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General),120(3),253-290。  new window
7.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
8.Sinuany-Stern, Z.、Barboy, A.、Mehrez, A.(1994)。Academic Departments Efficiency via DEA。Computers & Operations Research,21(5),543-556。  new window
9.王富茂(1993)。遴選大學校長之評議-由大學校園自治談學術自由的實現。師說:中華民國全國教育會月刊,55,2-6。  延伸查詢new window
10.張德銳(1991)。校長在有效能學校應扮演的角色。現代教育,6(1),93-103。  延伸查詢new window
11.Ettorre, Barbara(1999)。What constitutes a good board?。Management Review,88(6)。  new window
12.Rhodes, John D.(1999)。The challenges of governance in the global marketplace: Satisfying shareholders。Pharmaceutical Executive,19(7),86-91。  new window
13.Tapsell, Sherrill(1999)。Measuring up the CEO。New Zealand Management,46(6),60-61。  new window
14.Witherell, William(1999)。The OCED and corporate governance。Accountancy,123(1270)。  new window
學位論文
1.吳瑞虹(1995)。非營利組織之績效評估--以各國立大學院校為例(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳雪珍(1997)。台灣地區公立高級中學管理績效之探討與評估(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃增榮(1991)。我國大學教師研究出產力之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭淑芳(1998)。國立大學校院相對效率之研究--使用資料包絡分析法(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.顧志遠(1987)。有關非營利機關效率評估及預算再分配之整體規劃模式研究(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.曹學仁(1997)。高級中學校長權力運用之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.林麗能(1995)。雲嘉南地區高級職業學校行政績效之評估(碩士論文)。國立雲林技術學院。  延伸查詢new window
8.王保進(1993)。高等教育表現指標之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Szilagyi, A. D. Jr.(1984)。Management and Performance。New Jersey:Scott Foresman。  new window
2.大學教育改革促進會(1993)。台灣高等教育白皮書。臺北:時報文化出版企業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃振球(1992)。學校管理與績效。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蓋浙生(1985)。教育經濟學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳舜芬(1994)。大學校長遴選。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
6.張潤書(1990)。行政學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳清山(19980000)。學校效能研究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1992)。中華民國教育統計,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.French, J. R. P.、Raven, B. H.(1959)。The Bases of Social Power。Studies in Social Power。Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE