:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教師與學校行政人員互動的微觀政治素養研究
書刊名:嘉大教育研究學刊
作者:林志興侯世昌
作者(外文):Lin, Chih-hsingHou, Shih-chang
出版日期:2015
卷期:35
頁次:頁63-104
主題關鍵詞:國民小學微觀政治微觀政治素養微觀教育政治學ElementaryMicropoliticsMicropolitical literacyMicro education politics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:180
  • 點閱點閱:62
本研究在探討台灣地區公立國民小學教師與學校行政人員互動的微觀政治素養。研究採取文獻探討、調查研究與半結構訪談等方法。調查研究以台灣本島地區各縣市公立國民小學1688位教師為樣本,蒐集資料後分別以描述性統計、t考驗與單因子變異數分析等統計方法進行資料分析。進一步依據母群體,分別抽取教師兼主任、教師兼組長、級任教師與科任教師各3人,共12人進行訪談。 本研究結論如下: 一、教師與學校行政人員互動的微觀政治素養頗佳。 二、男教師與學校行政人員互動的微觀政治素養高於女教師。 三、不同職務的教師與學校行政人員互動的微觀政治素養有差異,其中以教師兼主任微觀政治素養最高。 四、校齡41年以上學校之教師與學校行政人員互動的微觀政治素養,高於校齡16-40年之學校教師。
This research aims to investigate the interaction of micropolitical literacy among elementary school teachers and administrative staff members in Taiwan. The research methods include literature, survey, and semi-structured interviews. The research sample includes one thousand six hundred and eighty-eight public elementary school teachers in Taiwan. After data collection, descriptive analysis, t-test, and one-way ANOVA analysis were employed to analyze the data. Twelve teachers were randomly selected for the interviews. Out of the twelve subjects, three of whom were chiefs, three section chiefs, three teachers, and the other three were homeroom teachers. The findings are as follows. 1.These teachers and administrative staff members in the interaction have adequate micropolitical literacy. 2.Compared with female teachers, male teachers have higher micropolitical literacy as they interact with administrative staff members. 3.Micropolitical literacy varies among teachers with different. Those teachers who also work as chiefs have the highest micropolitical literacy. 4.Micropolitical literacy in schools with more than 41 years of history is higher than those between 16-40 years of history.
期刊論文
1.Curry, M.、Jaxon, K.、Russel, J. L.、Callahan, M. A.、Bicais, J.(2008)。Examining the practice of beginning teachers' micropolitical literacy within professional inquiry communities。Teaching and Teacher Education,24(3),660-673。  new window
2.Lavie, J. M.(2006)。Academic discoures on school-based teacher collaboration: Revisiting the arguments。Education Administration Quarterly,42(5),773-805。  new window
3.Somech, A.、Bogler, R.(2002)。Antecedents and consequences of teacher organization and professional commitment。Educational Administration Quarterly,38(4),555-577。  new window
4.Ballet, K.、Kelchtermans, G.、Loughran, J.(2006)。Beyond intensification towards a scholarship of practice: analysing changes in teachers' work lives。Teachers and Teaching,12(2),209-229。  new window
5.黃乃熒(20020200)。以教師彰權益能觀點重建學校權力生態的機會之窗--教評會運作之論述。教育政策論壇,5(1),62-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Kelchtermans, G.(2005)。Teacher's emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy。Teaching and Teacher Education,21,995-1006。  new window
7.林曜聖(20030500)。權力運作與衝突處理中的學校政治行為--校園微觀政治之概念、分析架構與方法。學校行政,25,64-76。  延伸查詢new window
8.秦夢群、王友聖(20071000)。學校教師會發展與運作之研究分析。教育研究,162,61-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳幸仁(20070600)。微觀政治學:一個學校行政的新興研究領域。教育行政與評鑑學刊,3,67-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳幸仁(20080500)。學校組織行為之微觀政治探究。教育理論與實踐學刊,17,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳幸仁(20071200)。組織結構與教師行動的辯證關係:以一所小學為例。彰化師大教育學報,12,103-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳幸仁(20121000)。校長微觀政治素養之探討。教育人力與專業發展,29(5),27-37。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳依萍(20010500)。論教評會、學校教師會和校長的權責與衝突。學校行政,13,78-88。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃宗顯(20011200)。國民小學潛在行政學研究:只可以做但不能明說之行政信念及其意涵探討。國民教育研究集刊. 臺南師院,7,69-103。  延伸查詢new window
15.蔡清田(20091200)。國民教育素養與課程改革。教育研究月刊,188,127-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Achinstein, B.(2002)。Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration。Teachers College Record,104(3),421-455。  new window
17.Bakkenes, I.、Brabander, C. D.、Imants, J.(1999)。Teacher isolation and communication network analysis in primary schools。Educational Administration Quarterly,35(2),166-202。  new window
18.Chen, Hsin-Jen(2009)。Micropolitics of the staff meeting in a Taiwanese primary school。Eurasian Journal of Educational Research,35,21-38。  new window
19.Johnson, B.(2003)。Teacher collaboration: Good for some, not so good for others。Educational Studies,29(4),337-349。  new window
20.Kelchtermans, Geert(1996)。Teacher vulnerability: Understanding its moral and political roots。Cambridge Journal of Education,26(3),307-323。  new window
21.Kelchtermans, G.、Ballet, K.(2002)。The micropolitics of teacher induction: A narrative-biographical study on teacher socialisation。Teaching and Teacher Education,18(1),105-120。  new window
22.陳幸仁(20080300)。學校教師會運作之微觀政治分析:一所小學之個案研究。屏東教育大學學報. 教育類,30,23-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.黃乃熒(20011000)。從學校組織權力弔詭管理觀點建構學校組織變革模式。師大學報.教育類,46(2),145-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Blasé, Jo、Blasé, Joseph(2002)。The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research。Educational Administration Quarterly,38(1),6-44。  new window
25.蔡清田(20101200)。課程改革中的「素養」(competence)與「能力」(ability)。教育研究月刊,200,93-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.蔡清田(20110300)。課程改革中的「素養」(competence)與「知能」(literacy)之差異。教育研究月刊,203,84-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Kelchtermans, G.、Ballet, K.(2002)。Micropolitical literacy: Reconstructing a neglected dimension in teacher development。Internation Journal of Educational Research,37(8),755-767。  new window
28.Lindle, J. C.(1999)。What can the Study of Micropolitics Contribute to the Practice of Leadership in Reforming Schools?。School Leadership & Management,19(2),171-178。  new window
學位論文
1.張愷庭(2008)。國民小學學校組織氣氛與教師微觀政治策略運用之研究--以嘉義縣市為例(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃愉雯(2011)。南部地區小型國民中學兼任行政工作教師之微觀政治素養分析(碩士論文)。屏東科技大學,屏東縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇香瑾(2012)。中等學校實習教師之微觀政治素養(碩士論文)。屏東科技大學,屏東縣。  延伸查詢new window
4.林君齡(2001)。國民中學學校教師會運作之微觀政治個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.林志興(2013)。國民小學教師微觀政治素養之研究(博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張以莊(2009)。一所國小教師會之個案研究--以幸福國小為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊淑芬(2009)。國小初任主任之微觀政治研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
8.胡石明(2004)。國民中學教職員運用微觀政治策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.胡士琳(2003)。學校行政體系之微觀政治現象研究--以一所國民中學為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.謝文全、黃乃熒、吳清山、陳麗珠、王麗雲、王如哲、潘慧玲(2007)。教育行政學:理論與案例。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Oade, A.(2009)。Managing politics at work。New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
3.Blase, J.、Anderson, G.(1995)。The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowership。London, England:Cassell。  new window
4.吳清山、林天祐(2007)。教育新辭書。臺北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡璧煌(2008)。教育政治學。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
6.Blasé, Joseph(1991)。The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation。Newbury Park, California:Sage。  new window
7.DuBrin, A. J.(2009)。Political behavior in organizations。Sage。  new window
8.Rychen, Dominique Simone、Salganik, Laura Hersh(2003)。Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society。Hogrefe & Huber Publishers。  new window
9.Ball, S. J.(1987)。The micropolitics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization。London, England:Methuen。  new window
10.黃宗顯(19990000)。學校行政對話研究:組織中影響力行為的微觀探討。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與統計應用。臺北:知城數位科技。  延伸查詢new window
12.吳清山、林天祐(2007)。教育e辭書。台北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
13.Morgan, Gareth(1986)。Images of Organization。Sage。  new window
其他
1.教育部統計處(2011)。各縣市國民小學專任教師人數表,http://www.edu.tw/Default.aspx?WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Kurchner-Hawkins, R.、Miller, R.(2006)。Organizational politics: Building positive political strategies in turbulent times。Handbook of organizational politics。Northampton, MA:William Pratt House。  new window
2.簡賢昌(2004)。微觀政治與教育。教育政治學。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE