:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國課程史研究的過去與未來:兼論對臺灣課程史研究的啟示
書刊名:嘉大教育研究學刊
作者:鍾鴻銘 引用關係
作者(外文):Jong, Horng-ming
出版日期:2017
卷期:39
頁次:頁83-114
主題關鍵詞:課程史教育史再概念化修正主義克立巴德Curriculum historyEducational historyReconceptualizationRevisionismKliebard
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:118
  • 點閱點閱:11
本文的目的在於闡述美國課程史研究的過去與未來的發展趨勢。本文指出,在美國1960 年代以前屬分析的課程史研究。1970年代初出現批判的課程史研究,且課程史亦開始成為一個別的研究領域。迨至晚近,課程史研究已漸趨成熟,其趨勢是:對課程史學進行反思,研究領域的擴充,研究取向的增生,研究解釋呈現多元性,課程史研究朝向國際化。以上五種趨勢,皆有尚處初生階段的臺灣課程史研究借鑑之處。
The aim of this paper was to explicate the past and future trends of curriculum history research in America. This paper indicated that before 1960s the attribute of curriculum history research was analytic research. Since early 1970s critical curriculum history was initiated, and curriculum history research became a distinct research area. Recently curriculum history research is getting mature, and its trends include: curriculum historiography is self-examining; research area is widening; research approach is proliferating; research explanation is toward multiplicity. The five trends mentioned above could be reference and inspiration for Taiwan nascent curriculum history research
期刊論文
1.Wraga, W. G.(1998)。''Interesting, If True'': Historical Perspectives on the ''Reconceptualization'' of Curriculum Studies。Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,14(1),5-28。  new window
2.鍾鴻銘(20081200)。課程研究:從再概念化到後再概念化及國際化。臺灣教育社會學研究,8(2),1-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Labaree, D. F.(1987)。Politics, markets, and the compromised curriculum。Harvard Educational Review,57(4),483-494。  new window
4.Kliebard, H. M.(1970)。The Tyler Rationale。School Review,78(2),259-272。  new window
5.Triche, S.(2013)。Gabriel Harvey's 16th century theory of curriculum。Journal of Curriculum Theorizing,29(1),45-62。  new window
6.McKnight, D.、Triche, S.(2011)。Puritan origins of technological understanding in the USA: From William Ames's Technologia to Technicism。Journal of Curriculum Theorizing,27(3),33-45。  new window
7.Doll, W. E. Jr.(2012)。Complexity and the culture of curriculum。Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education,9(1),10-29。  new window
8.Fallace, T.(2008)。Did the social studies really replace history in American secondary schools?。Teachers College Record,110(10),2245-2270。  new window
9.Mazza, K. A.(1982)。Reconceptual Inquiry as an Alternative Mode of Curriculum Theory and Practice: A Critical Study。Journal of Curriculum Theorizing,4(2),5-89。  new window
10.Fallace, T. D.(2009)。John Dewey's influence on the origins of the social studies: An analysis of the historiography and new interpretation。Review of Educational Research,79(2),601-624。  new window
11.Popkewitz, T. S.(2009)。Curriculum studies, curriculum history, and curriculum theory: The reason of reason。Journal of Curriculum Studies,41(3),301-319。  new window
12.Popkewitz, T. S.(2011)。Curriculum history, schooling and the history of the present。History of Education,40(1),1-19。  new window
13.Bellack, A. A.(1969)。History of curriculum thought and practice。Review of Educational Research,39(3),283-292。  new window
14.鍾鴻銘(2010)。《課程、社群與都市學校改革》導讀。課程研究,5(1),147-155。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.鍾鴻銘(2015)。課程字源義的宗教根源及其意涵。課程與教學季刊,18(4),85-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Brown, A. L.、Au, W.(2014)。Race, memory, and master narratives: A critical essay on U.S. curriculum history。Curriculum Inquiry,44(3),358-389。  new window
17.Wright, H. K.(2005)。Does Hlebowitsh improve on curriculum history? Reading a rereading for its political purpose and implications。Curriculum Inquiry,35(1),103-117。  new window
18.Westbury, I.(2013)。Reading Schwab's the "practical" as an invitation to a curriculum enquiry。Journal of Curriculum Studies,45(5),640-651。  new window
19.Westbury, I.(2005)。Reconsidering Schwab's "practicals": A response to Peter Hlebowitsh's "generational ideas in curriculum: A historical triangulation。Curriculum Inquiry,35(1),89-101。  new window
20.Tröhler, D.(2016)。Curriculum history or the educational construction of Europe in the long nineteenth century。European Educational Research Journal,15(3),279-297。  new window
21.Tröhler, D.(2016)。Curriculum history in Europe: A historiographic added value。Nordic Journal of Educational History,3(1),3-24。  new window
22.Triche, S.、McKnight, D.(2004)。The quest for method: The legacy of Peter Ramus。History of Education,33(1),39-54。  new window
23.Thomas, T. P.(1999)。The difficulties and successes of reconstructionist practice: Theodore Brameld and the Floodwood Project。Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,14(3),260-282。  new window
24.Schubert, W. H.(1987)。Curriculum history and the dilemma of social control。The Review of Education,13(2),131-136。  new window
25.Reid, W. A.(1986)。Curriculum theory and curriculum change: What can we learn from history?。Journal of Curriculum Studies,18(2),159-166。  new window
26.Parks, D. J.(2011)。Lest we forget our past: A leader in curriculum development - Ralph Winfred Tyler。The Educational Forum,75,80-86。  new window
27.McLeod, J.(2005)。Feminist poststructuralism and curriculum history。Curriculum Perspectives,25(1),60-63。  new window
28.Kliebard, H. M.(1976)。Curriculum past and curriculum present。Educational Leadership,33(4),245-248。  new window
29.Kliebard, H. M.(1975)。The rise of scientific curriculum making and its aftermath。Curriculum Theory Network,5(1),27-38。  new window
30.Kliebard, H. M.(1968)。Curricular objectives and evaluation: A reassessment。The High School Journal,51(6),241-247。  new window
31.Kliebard, H. M.(1967)。Curriculum differentiation for the disadvantaged。The Educational Forum,32(1),47-54。  new window
32.Kliebard, H. M.(1966)。The patterning of classroom discourse。Journal of Teacher Education,17(4),469-480。  new window
33.Kliebard, H. M.(1966)。Dimensions of meaning in classroom discourse。Journal of Teacher Education,17(2),233-244。  new window
34.Kett, J. F.(1979)。On revisionism。History of Education Quarterly,19(2),229-235。  new window
35.Kaestle, C. F.(1976)。Conflict and consensus revisited: Notes toward a reinterpretation of American educational history。Harvard Educational Review,46(3),390-396。  new window
36.Hazlett, J. S.(1979)。Conceptions of curriculum history。Curriculum Inquiry,9(2),129-135。  new window
37.Green, B.(2005)。Post-curriculum history。Curriculum Perspectives,25(1),51-55。  new window
38.Franklin, B. F.(1999)。The state of curriculum history。History of Education,28(4),459-476。  new window
39.Franklin, B. M.(1976)。Technological models and the curriculum field。The Educational Forum,40(3),303-312。  new window
40.Franklin, B. M.(1976)。Curriculum thought and social meaning: Edward L. Thorndike and the curriculum field。Educational Theory,26(3),298-309。  new window
41.Donato, R.、Lazerson, M.(2000)。New directions in American educational history: Problems and prospects。Educational Researcher,29(8),4-15。  new window
42.Costa, A. L.、Loveall, R. A.(2002)。The legacy of Hilda Taba。Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,18(1),56-62。  new window
43.Cormack, P.(2005)。Researching curriculum history。Curriculum Perspectives,25(1),55-59。  new window
44.單文經(20050400)。美國中小學歷史課程標準爭議始末(1987-1996)。師大學報. 教育類,50(1),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.Hlebowitsh, Peter S.(2005)。Generational ideas in curriculum: A historical triangulation。Curriculum Inquiry,35(1),73-87。  new window
46.Null, J. W.(2004)。Social efficiency splintered: Multiple meanings instead of the hegemony of one。Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,19(2),99-124。  new window
47.鍾鴻銘(20040300)。H. M. Kliebard的課程史研究及其啟示。教育研究集刊,50(1),91-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.鍾鴻銘(20161200)。T. Popkewitz的後現代課程史研究進路及其意涵。臺灣教育社會學研究,16(2),105-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Lybarger, M.(1981)。Origins of the modern social studies: 1865-1916(博士論文)。University of Wisconsin,Madison, WI。  new window
2.歐用生(1990)。我國國民小學社會科「潛在課程」分析(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hendry, P. M.(2011)。Engendering curriculum history。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
2.Franklin, B. M.(2010)。Curriculum, community, and urban school reform。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
3.Popkewitz, T. S.(1987)。The formation of school subjects: The struggle for creating an American institution。London:Falmer。  new window
4.Schubert, W. H.、Schubert, A. N. L.、Thomas, T. P.、Carroll, W. M.(2002)。Curriculum Books: The First Hundred Years。N.Y.:Peter Lang。  new window
5.Goodson, I. F.(1987)。International perspectives in curriculum history。Croom Helm。  new window
6.Halvorsen, A.(2013)。A history of elementary social studies: Romance and reality。New York, NY:Peter Lang。  new window
7.Ravitch, D.(1978)。The Revisionists Revised: A Critique of the Radical Attack on the Schools。New York:Basic Books。  new window
8.Jorgensen, C. G.(2012)。John Dewey and the dawn of social studies: Unraveling conflicting interpretations of the 1916 report。Charlotte, North Carolina:Information Age Publishing。  new window
9.Kliebard, H. M.(2004)。The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958。New York:Routledge Falmer。  new window
10.甄曉蘭(2007)。課程經典導讀。台北市:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
11.Kridel, C.(2000)。Books of the century catalog。Columbia, SC:University of South Carolina。  new window
12.Cremin, Lawrence Arthur(1961)。The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education, 1876-1957。New York:Knopf。  new window
13.周淑卿、歐用生、楊國揚(2016)。臺灣國民中小學教科書課程觀的演變:口述史的研究。新北:國家教育研究院。  延伸查詢new window
14.楊智穎(2015)。課程史研究。學富。  延伸查詢new window
15.Baker, B.(2009)。New curriculum history。Rotterdam:Sense Publishers。  new window
16.Schubert, W. H.(1987)。Curriculum books: The first eighty years。Lanham, NY:University Press of America。  new window
17.Popkewitz, T. S.(2015)。The "reason" of schooling: Historicizing curriculum studies, pedagogy, and teacher education。New York:Routledge。  new window
18.Pereyra, M. A.、Franklin, B. M.(2014)。Systems of reason and the politics of schooling: School reform and sciences of education in the tradition of Thomas S. Popkewitz。New York:Routledge。  new window
19.Marshall, J. D.、Sears, J. T.、Schubert, W. H.(2007)。Turning points in curriculum: A contemporary American memoir。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall。  new window
20.Manson, C.(2009)。Reading Appalachia from left to right: Conservatives and the 1974 Kanawha County textbook controversy。Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press。  new window
21.Kliebard, H. M.(1995)。The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958。New York:Routledge。  new window
22.Johnson, C.(1904)。Old time schools and schoolbooks。New York:Macmillan。  new window
23.Flinders, D. J.、Thornton, S. J.(2007)。The curriculum studies reader。New York:Routledge。  new window
24.Bobbitt, F.(1918)。The curriculum。Houghton Mifflin。  new window
25.Pinar, William F.、Reynolds, William M.、Slattery, Patrick、Taubman, Peter M.(1995)。Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses。Peter Lang。  new window
26.Stanley, W. B.(1992)。Curriculum for Utopia--Social Reconstructionism and Critical Pedagogy in the Postmodern Era。State University of New York Press。  new window
27.Kliebard, H. M.(1992)。Forging the American Curriculum: Essays in Curriculum History and Theory。Routledge。  new window
28.白亦方(20080000)。課程史研究的理論與實踐。臺北:高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Franklin, B. M.(1986)。Building the American community: The school curriculum and the search for social control。Falmer Press。  new window
30.Hlebowitsh, P. S.(1993)。Radical curriculum theory reconsidered: A historical approach。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
31.Kliebard, H. M.(1986)。The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
32.Seguel, M. L.(1966)。The curriculum field: Its formative years。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
33.Evans, R. W.(2004)。The social studies wars: What should we teach the children?。Teachers College Press。  new window
34.Tanner, Daniel、Tanner, Laurel(1990)。History of the school curriculum。Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
圖書論文
1.Cormack, P.、Green, B.(2009)。Re-reading the historical record: Curriculum history and the linguistic turn。New curriculum history。New Rotterdam:Sense。  new window
2.Franklin, B. M.(2008)。Curriculum history and its revisionist legacy。Rethinking the history of American education: Essays on the post- revisionist era beyond。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
3.Franklin, B. M.(2009)。Some musings on what's new in the new curriculum history。New curriculum history。Rotterdam:Sense。  new window
4.Fendler, L.(1998)。What is it impossible to think? A genealogy of the educated subject。Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
5.Kliebard, H. M.(1968)。The Curriculum Field in Retrospect。Technology and the Curriculum。New York:Teacher College Press。  new window
6.Popkewitz, T. S.(2001)。The production of reason and power: Curriculum history and intellectual traditions。Cultural history and education: Critical Essays on knowledge and schooling。New York:RoutledgeFalmer。  new window
7.楊龍立(2003)。西方課程概念初探。課程與教學的饗宴。高雄市:復文。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Kridel, C.、Newman, V.(2003)。A random harvest: A multiplicity of studies in American curriculum history research。International handbook of curriculum research。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
9.Schubert, W. H.(2008)。Curriculum inquiry。The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction。Sage。  new window
10.Luzón, A.、Torres, M.(2014)。The scholarship of Thomas S. Popkewitz, 1970-2013。Systems of reason and the politics of schooling。New York:Routledge。  new window
11.Kliebard, H. M.(1992)。Constructing a history of the American curriculum。Handbook of research on curriculum。New York:Macmillan。  new window
12.單文經、鍾鴻銘(2007)。美國教育學會二十六期年刊。課程經典導讀。台北:學富。  延伸查詢new window
13.鍾鴻銘(2009)。變革的進程:二十世紀美國課程的改革。課程改革:研究議題分取徑。台北:學富。  延伸查詢new window
14.Watkins, W. H.(2009)。Black curriculum orientation: A preliminary inquiry。New curriculum history。New Rotterdam:Sense Publishers。  new window
15.Strickland, K.(1991)。Research into the curriculum, 1918-1938: Highlights of the work of the first generation。Society for the Study of Curriculum History: Meetings and papers 1977-1991。  new window
16.Tanner, L. N.(1991)。Curriculum history: Whither though goest。Society for the Study of Curriculum History: Meetings and papers 1977-1991。  new window
17.Pinar, W. F.(2014)。Curriculum research in the United States: Crisis, reconceptualization, and internalization。International handbook of curriculum research。New York:Routledge。  new window
18.Pinar, W. F.(2008)。Curriculum theory since 1950: Crisis, reconceptualization, internalization。The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
19.Pinar, W. F.(1988)。[Contemporary curriculum discourses] Introduction。Contemporary curriculum discourses。Arizona:Gorsuch Scarisbrick。  new window
20.Kliebard, H. M.(1971)。Bureaucracy and curriculum theory。Freedom, bureaucracy, and schooling。Washington, D.C.:ASCD。  new window
21.Green, B.(1993)。[The insistence of the letter: Literacy studies and curriculum theorizing] Introduction。The insistence of the letter: Literacy studies and curriculum theorizing。London:Falmer Press。  new window
22.Green, B.、Cormack, P.(2009)。After the linguistic turn: Or, a brief note on post-curriculum history。New curriculum history。New Rotterdam:Sense Publishers。  new window
23.Franklin, B. M.、Nye, R. K.(2015)。Curriculum history and interpretation。International handbook of interpretation in educational research。London:Springer。  new window
24.Franklin, B. M.、Johnson, C. C.(2008)。What the schools teach: A social history of the American curriculum since 1950。The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
25.Franklin B. M.(2000)。Introduction: Herbert M. Kliebard's intellectual history。Curriculum & consequence: Herbert M. Kliebard and the promise of schooling。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
26.Franklin, B. M.(1985)。The social efficiency movement and curriculum change 1939-1976。Social histories of the secondary curriculum: Subjects for study。London:Falmer。  new window
27.Kliebard, H. M.(1975)。Persistent curriculum issues in historical perspective。Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists。Berkeley, California:McCutchan Publishing Corporation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE