一、中文部分
王福林(1990)。新竹師院學生與師專學生家庭社經地位及其行為學習成就之調查。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
王薌茹(1994)。概念圖教學在國中生物學習之成效。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
王薰巧（2004）。國小自然與生活科技領域課程運用概念構圖之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系未出版碩士論文。
方金雅、鍾易達、邱上真(1998)。國小學童閱讀摘要能力評定規範之發展。載於國小教學評量的反省與前瞻，123-137。台南：台南師院測驗發展中心。
方淑貞（2003）。Fun 的教學─圖畫書與語文教學。台北：心裡。
江淑卿（2000）。徑路探測法在測量知識結構的效度研究。測驗年刊，47(1)，73-94。
江淑卿(2001)。經驗式和統計式概念構圖對兒童的知識結構與理解能力之影響。屏東師院學報，14，371-396頁。余民寧 (1997)。有意義的學習概念構圖之研究。台北市：商鼎文化。余民寧、陳嘉成（1998）。以概念構圖為學習策略之教學對自然科學習的促進效果之研究。國立政治大學學報，77，201-236。
余民寧、林曉芳、蔡佳燕（2001）。國小學生數學知識結構認知診斷評量之研究。教育與心理研究，24(2)，263 - 301。全中平（1992）。國立台北師範學院非數理系學生對概念圖學習態度之研究。台北師院學報，5，299-318。
吳英長（1997）。國民小學國語故事體課文摘寫大意的教學過程之分析。論文發表「師範學院實小八十六年度國語文教學策略理論與實務整合發表會論文集」（1-29）。吳敏而（1994）。摘取文章大意的教材教法。載於國民小學國語科教材教法研究第三輯（87-101）。台灣省國民學校教師研習會。
吳敏而（2000）。語文學習百分百。台北：天衛文化。
吳裕聖、曾玉村（2003）。概念構圖教學策略對小五學生科學文章理解及概念構圖能力之影響。教育研究集刊，49(1)，135 - 169。李咏吟（1998）。認知教學理論與策略。台北：心理。
李秀娟、張永達、黃達三(1998)。概念圖應用於國中生物教材之分析與評論─以神經系統為例。科學教育月刊，213，14-26。
李秀美（2004）。概念構圖對提升國小學童說話能力成效之研究。國立臺中師範學院語文教育學系未出版碩士論文。
李博宏、王薰巧（2004）。概念構圖融入自然與生活科技領域課程之教材教法。生活科技教育月刊，37(2)，32-47。
何治鈴（2002）。概念構圖與合作學習應用於綜合高中會計科目教學成效之研究。中原大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
何嘉雯、李芃娟（2003）。交互教學法對國小閱讀理解困難學生教學成效之研究。特殊教育與復健學報，11，101-125。宋曜廷、劉佩雲、簡馨瑩（2003）。閱讀動機量表的修訂及相關因素研究。中國測驗學會測驗學刊，50（1），47-72。杜正治(1995)。靜坐法對智能障礙學生的適應行為、學習特徵及學習態度之影響。特殊教育研究學刊，11，19-37。邱上真 (1989)。知識結構的評量：概念構圖技巧的發展與試用。特殊教育學報，4，215-254。林人龍（1999）。概念構圖－科技認知學習的另一種方法。生活科技教育，32(2)，10-19。
林千惠、郭惠君(1997)。同儕個別教學對高職智能障礙學生學業表現與學習態度效果之研究。特殊教育季刊，12，125-152。
林宜利（2003）。「整合繪本與概念構圖之寫作教學方案」對國小三年級學童記敘文寫作表現之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所未出版碩士論文。
林原宏（1996）。知識結構分析－徑路搜尋、多向度量尺和集群分析的方法論探討。測驗統計年刊， 4，47-68。。
林清山譯(1997)。教育心理學—認知取向。台北：遠流。
林清財（1986）。國中學生對學校態度之調查分析。輔導月刊，22期, .31-36。
林純年（1997）。概念圖對國小學童自我學習科學說明資料之影響。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
林建平(1994)。整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解困難兒童的輔導效果。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所未出版博士論文。林曉芳（1999）。知識表徵與概念學習之研究 ─ 以路徑蒐尋網路分析為評量工具。教育與心理研究，教育與心理研究，24(2)，229 - 258。官淑如(1997)。綜合高中學生學習態度及其相關因素之研究。台北：國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
官美媛（民88）。國小學生摘取文章大意策略之教學研究－以五年級說明文為例。國立東華大學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
柯華葳（1991）。台灣地區閱讀文獻回顧。中國語文心理學研究第一年度結案報告。
洪月女譯（1998）。談閱讀。台北：心理。
洪麗卿（2001）。社會科概念圖示教學策略之行動研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
涂金堂（2001）。知識結構的評量與改變之研究－以國小學生數學文字題為例。國立政治大學教育系未出版博士論文。孫易新（2001）。心智圖基礎篇－多元知識管理系。台北：耶魯國際文化。
孫易新（2002）。多元知識管理系統2－心智圖法進階篇。台北：耶魯國際文化。
許松樑(1989)。國中生物科概念構圖技巧研究。國立臺灣教育學院科學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
張春興（1993）。現代心理學。臺北：東華書局。
張新仁（1982）。 我國國中學生學習行為之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。張新仁（1992）。奧斯貝的學習理論與教學應用。教育研究雙月刊，32，31-51。陳李綢（1995）：「學習策略訓練方案」對國中生閱讀理解學習之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理學報，28，77-98。陳惠娟（2003）。國中綜合活動領域實施概念構圖教學之成效研究。國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭研究所未出版碩士論文。陳嘉成(1995)。以概念構圖為學習策略之教學對小學生自然科學習之成效研究。國立政治大學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳嘉成(1998)：合作學習式概念構圖在國小自然科教學之成效研究。教育與心理研究，21，頁107-128。陳綻玉編（2002）。歌我童年。高雄市：七賢國小。
陳櫻代（1998）。概念構圖策略促進閱讀理解能力之研究。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
郭生玉、江淑卿（1997）。不同學習過程的概念構圖策略對促進知識結構專家化與理解能力之效果研究。教育學報，42，1-16.郭靜姿（1994）。不同閱讀能力成敗歸因方式、策略運用與後設認知能力之差異比較。師大學報，39，284-325。黃玉佳（2003）。概念構圖與摘要策略對不同性別學生學習成效之影響。國立成功大學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃俊傑（2000）。概念構圖訓練在閱讀教學上的應用。教師之友，42，29-36。
黃雲淨、黃台珠(1995)。Vee圖對國一生物實驗學習之影響。論文發表於國立高雄師範大學主辦第十一屆科學教育學術研討會。
黃福興（2003）。概念構圖應用於科學文章閱讀教學之研究。國立臺中師範學院教育測驗統計研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃萬居（1993）。國小學生的概念構圖和自然科學學習成就之研究。臺北市立師範學院學報，24，47-66。
黃瓊儀（1996）。相互教學法對國小高年級學童閱讀理解能力.後設認知能力與閱讀態度之影響。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃藍億、潘靖瑛（2002）。概念構圖策略結合英文閱讀理解之初探性研究。論文發表於慈濟大學主辦「91年度大學英文教學理論與課程實施研討會」。
曾玉玲(1993)。台北市高智商低成就國中學生學習信念與相關因素之探討。台北：國立政治大學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
馮樹人（2002）。以潛在語意分析法發展摘要寫作評量系統。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
詹秀萍、王逸芝（2000）。語意圖法在學習障礙學生閱讀教學上的應用。國民教育，40(4)，36-43。
葉瓊華、周台傑、詹文宏（2000）。概念構圖、自問自答及畫重點策略對國小閱讀障礙兒童閱讀理解能力及後設認知能力教學就之研究。特殊教育學報，14，189-231。鄭照明（1993）。認知心理學－理論與實踐。台北：桂冠。
謝佳燕（民89）。國小學生數學學科知識結構評量之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
蔡銘津（1996）。文章結構分析策略教學對增進兒童閱讀理解與寫作成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系未出版博士論文。劉信雄（1992）。國小學生認知風格、學習策略、自我效能標語學業成就關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所未出版博士論文。劉美慧（1999）。多元文化取向的社會科教學研究。高雄：復文。
劉麗琴（2002）。在國小融合式班級中實施概念構圖教學以植入人工電子耳的聽障生為個案之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
錡寶香（1999）。國小學童閱讀理解能力之分析。國教學報，第11期，頁100-133。
顏若映（1994）。先前知識與文章連貫性對國小學童閱讀理解之影響。國立政治大學教育研究所未出版博士論文。謝武彰編（1997）。寫給兒童的好散文。台北：小魯文化。
謝真華（1999）。概念構圖教學對國小四年級學童在自然科學習成效之研究。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
謝富榮（2003）。概念構圖策略與認知型態對自然科網路化教學影響之研究。東海大學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。戴保羅譯，Colin Rose & Malcolm J. Nicholl 著（1999）。學習地圖－21世紀加速學習革命。台北：經典傳訊出版。
簡紅珠（1992）。教學研究的主要派典及其啟示之探析。高雄：復文。魏靜雯（2004）。心智繪圖與摘要教學對國小五年級學生閱讀理解與摘要能力之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所未出版碩士論文。
羅彥文（1995）。國中學生國文閱讀學習之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系未出版碩士論文。
羅廷瑛(2001)。「概念構圖教學課程」對國小一年級學生自然科學學習表現影響之研究。教育資料與研究，38，29-35。蘇宜芬（1991）。後設認知訓練課程對國小低閱讀能力學生的閱讀理解能力與後設認知能力之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所未出版碩士論文。二、英文部分
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 201-252.
Alexander, P.A. (1997). Knowledge seeking and self-schema: A case for the motivational dimensions of exposition. Educational Psychologist, 32, 83-94.
Antonacci, P. A. (1991). Students search for meanings in the text through semantic mapping. Social Education, 55, 175-194.
Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1980). The effect of mapping on the free recall of expository text . ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 182 735.
Ausubel,D. P.（1968）. Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winton.
Babyak, A.E., Koorland, M.A., & Mathes, P.G. (2000). The effects of story mapping instruction on the reading comprehension of students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 239-258
Baker, L., & Wigfield, A.（1999）.Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly,34（4）,452-477.
Barr, R., & Johnson, B. (1997). Teaching reading and writing in elementary classrooms. 2nd edition. New York: Longman.
Baumann, J. F., & Bergeron, B. S. (1993). Story map instruction using children's literature: Effects on first graders' comprehension of central narrative elements. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(4), 407-437.
Begum﹐F. (1985). Factor related to students' attitude toward education. Indian Psychological Review,28(6)﹐7-16
Berkowitz, S. J. (1986). Effects of instruction in text organization on sixth-grade students' memory for expository reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(2), 161-178.
Bernaus, M., Masgoret, A.-M., Gardner, R. C., & Reyes, E. (2004). Motivation and attitudes toward learning languages in multicultural classrooms. International Journal of Multilingualism,1, 75-89.
Beyerbach, B. A. (1988). Developing a technical vocabulary on teacher planning: Preservice Teachers' concept maps. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(4), 339-347.
Boyle, J.R., ＆ Weishaar, M.（1997）.The effects of expert-generated versus student-generated cognitive organizers on the reading comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research ＆ Practice, 12, 228-235.
Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S.（1977）. Rating the importance of structural unit of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1-8.
Brown, A.L., Campione, J.C., & Day, J.D.(1981). Learning to Learn: On Training Students to Learn from Texts. Educational Researcher 10 ,14-21.
Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D.（1983）. Macrorules for summarizing texts: the development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968-979.
Brown, H. D. (1980). Principles of Language Teaching and Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Buzan, T.（1996）. The mind map book : How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain's untapped potential. New York: Plume
Canas, A., Ford, K. M., Novak, J. D., Hayes, P., Reichherzer, T. R., & Suri, N. (2001). Online Concept Maps: Enhancing collaborative learning by using technology with concept maps. The Science Teacher, 68(2):49-51, April.
Carr, E., & Ogle, D. (1987). K-W-L Plus: A strategy for comprehension and summarization. Journal of Reading, 30, 626-631.
Cardill, M. C., & Jitendra, A. (1999). Advanced story map instruction: Effects on reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 2-18.
Caswell, R. M., & Heim, K. (1988). The Use of Mapping as a Mediating Strategy by Poor Readers To Produce Written Summaries. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 311399.
Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, I. D. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1) 5-23.
Chmielewski, T. L., & Dansereau, D. F.（1998）. Enhancing the recall of text: Knowledge mapping training promotes implicit transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 407-413.
Clements-Davis, G. L., & Ley, T. C. (1991). Thematic preorganizers and the reading comprehension of tenth-grade world literature students. Reading Research & Instruction, 31(1), 43-53.
Cliburn, J.W. (1990). Concept maps to promote meaningful learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 19 (4), 212-217
Cook, L. K. (1982). The effects of text structure on the comprehension of scientific prose. Unpublished octoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Cunningham, J. W., & Moore, D. W.(1986). The confused world of main idea. In J. F. Baumann(Ed. ), Teaching main idea aomprehension (pp.1-17). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Darom﹐E., & Rich﹐Y.(1988). Sex differences in attitudes toward school. British Journal of Educational Psychology﹐58(3), 350-355
Dermody, M. (1988). Metacognitive strategies for development of reading comprehension for younger children. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 292070.
Diekhoff, S. M., & Diekhoff, R. B. (1982). Cognitive maps as a tool in communicating structural knowledge. Educational Technology, 22(1-6), 28-30.
Edmondson, K. M. (1999). Assessing Science understanding through Concept Maps, In J. D., Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Ed.) Assessing Science Understanding: A Human Constructivist View, 22-33. Toronto: Academic Press.
Englert, C. S., & Hiebert, D. H.（1984）. Children’s developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 65-74.
Fisher, K.M., Faletti, J., Patterson, H., Thornton, R., Lipson, J., & Spring, C. (1990). Computer assisted concept mapping. Journal of College Science Teaching, 19 (6), 347-352.
Flower, L. (1979). Writer-based prose” A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41, 19-36.
Frances, S., & Eckart, J. A. (1992). The effects of Reciprocal teaching on comprehension. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED350572.
Gagn’e, R. (1985). The Conditions of Learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gagn’e, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2 n.d. Edition). NY: Harper Collins.
Garner, R. (1982). Efficient text summarization: Costs and benefits. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 275-279.
Garner, R. (1985). Text summarization deficiencies among older students: awareness or production ability. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 549-560
Garner, R., Belcher, V., Winfield, E., & Smith T. (1985). Multiple measures of text proficiency: What can fifth-grade students do? Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 140-153.
Goldsmith, T. E., Johnson, P. J., & Acton, W. H. (1991). Assessing structural knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 88-96.
Gowin, D. B. (1981). Educating. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.
Graves, M.J., Juel, C., Graves, B. (1998). Teaching reading in the 21st century. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Griffin, C. C., Malone, L. D., & Kameenui, E. J. (1995). Effects of graphic organizer instruction on fifth-grade students. Journal of Education Research, 89(2), 98-107.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Von Secker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 331-341.
Hahn, J. M., & Goldman, S. R. (1983, April). Children's summarization behaviors. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Haladyna, T., Olsen, R., & Shaughnessy, J. (1983). Correlates of class attitude toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 311-324.
Hall, R. (1988). Knowledge maps and the presentation of related information domains. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX.
Hare, V.C., & Borchardt, K. M. (1984). Direct instruction of summarization skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 62-78.
Hare, V. C. (1992). Summarizing text. In J. W. Irwin & M. A. Doyle(Ed.) Reading/Writing connections: Learning from research. Newark, Del.: IRA
Harmon, J. M. (2000). Assessing and supporting independent word learning strategies of middle school students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(6), 23-32.
Hidi, S., & Anderson,V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56:473–493.
Heimlich, J. E., & Pittelman, S. D.（1986）. Semantic mapping: Classroom application. Delaware: Internation Reading Service.
Heinze-Fry, J. A., & Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping brings long-term movement towards meaningful learning. Science Education, 74(4), 461-472.
Holley, C. D., & Dansereau, D. F. (1984). Networking: The technique and the empirical evidence. In C. D. Holley, D. F. Dansereau (Eds.), Spatial learning strategies: Techniques, applications, and related issues. New York: Academic Press.
Idol, L., & Croll, V. J. (1987). Story-mapping training as a means of improving reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(3), 214-229.
Janassen, D. H., Beissener, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structure knowledge: Techniques for representing coverying, and acquiring structure knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jegede, O. J., Alaiyemola, F. F., & Okebulola, P.A.（1990）.The effect of concept mapping on students’ anxiety and achievement in biology. Journal of Research Science Teaching, 27(10), 951-960.
Johnson, N. (1983). What do you do if you can’t tell the whole story? The development of summarization skills. In K. E. Nelson(Ed. ), Children’s language(vol. 4)(pp.315-383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jones, B.F., Palincsar, A.S., Ogle, D.S., & Carr, E.G. (1987). Strategic teaching and learning: Cognitive instruction in the content areas. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Joseph, S. H. (2002).Using concept maps to aid reading comprehension in a high school biology classroom.. [WWW document]. http://education.ucsc.edu/faculty/ gwells/networks/journal/Vol5(1).2002march/Joseph.html.
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85 (5), 363-394.
Langer, J.A., & Allington, R.L. (1992). Curriculum research in writing and reading. In P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 687-725). New York: Macmillan.
Lau, K. L. (2004). Construction and initial validation of the Chinese Reading Motivation Questionnaire. Educational Psychology, 24(6), 845-865.
Leahy, R. (1989). Concept Mapping: Developing Guides to Literature. College Teaching 37(2): 62-69.
Lehman, J. D., Carter, C., & Kahle, J. B. (1985) Concept mapping, Vee mapping, and achievement: results of a field study with black high school students. Journal of Research Science Teachin, 22(7), 663-673.
Lehr, S.（1988）. The child’s developing sense of theme. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(3), 337-357.
Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91-101.
Mcgee,L. M. (1982). Awareness of text structure: Effects on child’s recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 581-590.
Miller, C. D., Miller, L. F., & Rosen, L. A. (1988). Modified reciprocal teaching in a regular classroom. Journal of Experimental Education, 56, 183-186.
Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J., & Novak, J. (Eds.). (2000). Assessing science understanding. San Diego: Academic Press.
Morrell﹐P. D., ＆ Lederman﹐N. G. (1998). Students' attitudes toward school and classroom science: are they independent phenomena? School Science & Mathematics﹐98(2), 76-83.
Newby, R. F., Caldwell, J., & Recht, D. R. (1989). Improving the reading comprehension of children with dysphonetic and dyseidetic dyslexia using story grammar. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(6), 373-380.
Novak, J. D. (1981). Applying learning psychology and philosophy of science to biology teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 43, 12-20.
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools for science and mathematics education. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52.
Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Publishers.
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Johansen, G. T. (1983) .The Use of Concept Mapping and Knowledge Vee Mapping with Junior High School Science Students. Science Education, 67(5), 625-645.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Novak, J. D., & Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 117-153.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A.L. (1987). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension- fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In M. Maehr, and C.Ames (Eds.) Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation Enhancing Environments. Vol.6, (pp. 117-160). Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
Pearson, P.D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson. Handbook of reading research. (Vol. 2). 815-860. New York: Longman.
Plotnick, E.（1997）. Concept mapping-A graphical system for understanding the relationship between concepts. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407938.
Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children’s memory and comprehension of text. The Elementary Scoll Journal, 90(1), 3-32.
Raymond, M. K., & Roberts, D. M. (1983). Development and validation of a foreign language attitude scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 1239-1246.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1979). In search of a better way to organize instruction: The elaboration theory. Journal of Instructional Development, 2, 8-15.
Renehart, S. D., Stahl, S. A., & Erickson, L. G. (1986). Some Effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 422-438.
Reutzel, D. R. (1986). Investigating a synthesized comprehension instructional strategy: The cloze story map. Journal of Educational Research,79(6), 343-349.
Reutzel, D. R., & Fawson, P. (1991). Literature webbing predictable books: A prediction strategy that help below-average, first-grade readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 30(4), 20-29.
Rewey, K. L., Dansereau, D. F., Hall, R. H., & Pitre, U. (1989). Effects of knowledge maps and scripted cooperation on the recall of technical material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 604-609.
Rice, D. C., Ryan, J. M., & Samson, S. M. (1998). Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: Must different methods compete? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1103-1127.
Schmid, R. F., & Telaro, G. (1990). Concept mapping as an instructional strategy for high school biology. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 78-85.
Seaman, T. (1990). On the high road to achievement: cooperative concept mapping. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 335140
Sinatra, R. (1986). Visual literacy connections to thinking, reading, and writing. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
Smith, K. M., & Dwyer, F. M. (1995). The effect of concept mapping strategies in facilitating student achievement. International Journal of Instructional Media, 22(1), 25-31.
Stice, C. F., & Alvarez, M. C. (1986). Hierarchical concept mapping: Young children learning how to learn (A viable heuristic for the primary grades) (Report No. 5). ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 274 946.
Tamir, P. (1989). Training teachers to teach effectively in the laboratory. Science Education, 73, 59-69.
Tarquin, P., & Walker, S. (1997). Creating success in the classroom. Englewood, CO:Teacher Ideas Press.
Tennyson,R.D., & Park, O.C.(1980).The teaching of concepts: A review of instructional design research literature. Review of Educational Research, 50, 55-70.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Vauras, M., Kinnunen, R., & Kuusela, L. (1994). Development of text-processing skills in high-, average-, and low-achieving primary school children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26(4), 361-389.
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Tanzman, M. S. (1994). Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding, and orthographic coding. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 279-329).
Yussen, S. R.（1982）. Children’s impressions of coherence in narratives. In B. A. Hutson（Ed.）, Advances in reading/language research, vol. 1. Greenwich, Co: JAI Press.
Wandersee, J. H. (1990). Concept mapping and the cartography of cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 923-936.
Wigfield, A. (1997).Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist,32（2）,59-68.
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Wigfield, A., ＆ Guthrie, J.T.（1997）.Relations of Children’s Motivation for Reading to the Amount and Breadth of Their Reading. Journal of Education Psychology, 89（3）, 420-432.
Wilkes, L. Cooper, K., & Lewin, J. (1999). Concept mapping: promoting science learning in BN learners in Australia. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 30, 37-44.
Winograd, P. N. (1984). Strategic difficulties in summarizing text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 404-425.