臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：教師自我效能與教學行為的關係--實徵取向的分析
書刊名：國立臺北師範學院學報
作者：孫志麟 引用關係
作者(外文)：Sun, Chih-lin
出版日期：2001
卷期：14
頁次：頁109+111-140
主題關鍵詞：教師自我效能；教學行為；信念與行動的連結；因果模式；Teacher efficacy；Teaching behavior；Belief-action links；Causal model
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(37) 博士論文(19) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:36
  • 共同引用共同引用:197
  • 點閱點閱:141
　　　　　教師思考研究的基本假定是：教師的教學行為取決於教師對教學所持的信念。此種連結信念與行動的主張，是晚近教學研究領域中的重要課題。不過，國內有關這方面的研究，在理論與方法上仍未成熟。至於教師信念與教學行為關係的本質，以及教師信念影響教學行為的可能機制，也有待澄清。教師自我效能是教師信念的核心，意旨教師對個人教學能力的判斷。高、低自我效能的教師，對學生學習和學校教育的看法不同，所展現出來的教學行為亦有差異。本研究探討教師自我效能與教學行為的關係，並檢視二者之間的因果模式。研究策略是採取實徵取向的研究途徑，研究對象是415位國民小學教師，研究工具包括：「教師自我效能量表」和「教學行為調查表」。調查所得資料，以相關係數和線性結構模式統計方法進行分析。研究發現：教師自我效能與教學行為呈正向相關，但關聯強度不高。此外，教師自我效能和教學行為之間的連結模式未獲得支持，實際資料無法證實教師自我效能是否真正會影響教學行為。換句話說，教師自我效能與教學行為的關係，只是相關而沒有明顯的因果推論。這些發現擴展了教學研究的知識基礎，一方面對教師思考研究的基本假定提出質疑，認為信念不一定會影響行動；另一方面也說明了教學歷程的複雜多變，不易推斷其中的因果關係。最後，本研究也論述此項發現在師資培育上的意涵，並對後續研究提出建議。
　　　　　Studies of teaching have recently begun to focus on exploring connections between teacher beliefs and teaching behaviors. However, there are theoretical and methodological problems in the existing literature. Theoretically, the linkage between teacher beliefs and teaching behaviors needs to be clarified, and the mechanism through which belief affects behavior also needs to be explored. Teacher efficacy is an important concept in teaching research. It also plays a powerful role in school improvement. Teacher efficacy has been defined as teachers’ beliefs that they can influence how well students learn, even those students who may be difficult or unmotivated. Teaching behaviors are substantially influenced and even determined by teachers’ thought processes. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship of teachers’ sense of efficacy to their teaching behaviors. The sample consists of 415 primary school teachers in Taiwan. Two instruments were developed and used : Teacher Efficacy Scale (TES) and Teaching Behavior Inventory (TBI). The data are analyzed by correlation analyses and structural equation model. The results indicated that there are positive and small relations between teacher efficacy and teaching behaviors. However, it does not show a direct causal relationship between teacher efficacy and teaching behaviors. The data used by this study probably fail to test whether teacher efficacy really effects the teaching behaviors of primary school teachers. Implications of the findings for teacher education and further inquiry are discussed.
期刊論文
1.孫志麟(19921000)。教師思考研究之探討。教育研究，27，24-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Kagan, D. M.(1990)。Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks Principle。Review of educational research，60(3)，419-469。  new window
3.孫志麟(19960500)。國小教師自我效能與班級管理取向。國立政治大學學報，72(上)，121-149。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kirsch, I.(1982)。Efficacy expectations or response predictions: The meaning of efficacy ratings as a function of task characteristics。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，42(1)，132-136。  new window
5.孫志麟(19920100)。教師自我效能的基本概念及其研究取向。現代教育，7(1)=25，103-113。  延伸查詢new window
6.Ashton, Patricia T.(1984)。Teacher Efficacy: A Motivational Paradigm for Effective Teacher Education。Journal of Teacher Education，35(5)，28-32。  new window
7.Woolfolk, Anita E.、Rosoff, Barbara、Hoy, Wayne K.(1990)。Teachers' Sense of Efficacy and Their Beliefs about Managing Students。Teaching & Teacher Education，6(2)，137-148。  new window
8.孫志麟(19950700)。教師效能的研究途徑與評量理念。教育資料與研究，5，67-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Dembo, Myron H.、Gibson, Sherri(1985)。Teachers' Sense of Efficacy: An Important Factor in School Improvement。The Elementary School Journal，86(2)，173-184。  new window
10.Guskey, T. R.(1986)。Context variables that affect measures of teacher efficacy。Journal of Educational Research，81(1)，41-47。  new window
11.Guskey, Thomas R.(1988)。Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation。Teaching & Teacher education，4(1)，63-69。  new window
12.Denham, Carolyn H.、Michael, Joan J.(1981)。Teacher Sense of Efficacy: A Definition of the Construct and a Model for Further Research。Educational Research Quarterly，6(1)，39-63。  new window
13.Newmann, F. M.、Rutter, R. A.、Smith, M. S.(1989)。Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community, and expectations。Sociology of Education，62(4)，221-238。  new window
14.Gibson, Sherri D.、Dembo, Myron H.(1984)。Teacher Efficacy: A Construct Validation。Journal of Educational Psychology，76(4)，569-582。  new window
15.Bandura, Albert(1977)。Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change。Psychological Review，84(2)，191-215。  new window
16.Guskey, T. R.(1981)。Measurement of the responsibility teachers assume for academic successes and failures in the classroom。Journal of Teacher Education，32(3)，44-51。  new window
17.Tschannen-Moran, Megan、Woolfolk Hoy, Anita、Hoy, Wayne K.(1998)。Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure。Review of Educational Research，68(2)，202-248。  new window
18.Bandura, Albert(1982)。Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency。American Psychologist，37(2)，122-147。  new window
19.Woolfolk, Anita E.、Hoy, Wayne K.(1990)。Prospective Teachers' Sense of Efficacy and Beliefs about Control。Journal of Educational Psychology，82(1)，81-91。  new window
20.Saklofske, D. H.、Michayluk, J. O.、Randhawa, B. S.(19881000)。Teachers' efficacy and teaching behaviors。Psychological Reports，63(2)，407-414。  new window
21.Wheatley, K. F.(2000)。Positive teacher efficacy as an obstacle to educational reform。Journal of Research and Development in Education，34(1)，14-27。  new window
22.Mckinney, M.、Meyerson, M. J.、Sexton, T.(1999)。Validating the Efficacy-bases Change Model。Teaching and Teacher Education，15(5)，471-485。  new window
23.Ross, J. A.(1998)。The Antecedents and Consequences of Teacher Efficacy。Advances in Research on Teaching，7，49-73。  new window
研究報告
1.張德銳、裘友善、簡紅珠、成虹飛、張美玉、高淑芳(1994)。國小教師教學評鑑系統之研究。新竹：國立新竹師院初等教育研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Berman, P.、Bass, G.、Zellman, G.、Pauly, E.、McLaughlin, M.(1977)。Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. 7. Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation。0。  new window
學位論文
1.王湘栗(1997)。國民小學教師關注與教師效能感之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.林麗美(1997)。國中實習教師的社會支持、教學困擾、教師效能及教師承諾之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳婷芳(1995)。幼稚園教師教育信念與教學行為之研究(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林偉文(1997)。國民中學教師心理學信念及其在教育上的涵義(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.林清財(1990)。我國國民小學教師教育信念之相關研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.湯仁燕(1993)。國民小學教師教學信念與教學行為關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.顏銘志(1996)。國民小學教師教學信念、教師效能與教學行為之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
8.王受榮(1992)。我國國民中小學教師效能感及其影響因素之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.孫志麟(1991)。國民小學教師自我效能及其相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.Franklin, Virgil L.(1989)。Teacher Efficacy and Selected Organizational Climate Variables in Urban and Suburban School Settings，沒有紀錄。  new window
11.蔡昆瀛(1991)。國中階段啟聰學校（班）數學科教師行為之研究，0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bennett, N.、Jordan, J.、Long, G.(1976)。Teaching styles and pupil progress。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Ashton, P. T.、Webb, R. B.、Doda, N.(1986)。Making a difference: Teacher's sense of efficacy and student achievement。Longman。  new window
3.Borich, G. D.(1996)。Effective teaching methods。Merrill。  new window
4.Bandura, A.、Wessels, S.(1997)。Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control。New York：Freeman。  new window
5.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
6.Armor, D.(1976)。Analysis of the School Preferred Reading Program in Selected Los Angeles Minority Schools。Analysis of the School Preferred Reading Program in Selected Los Angeles Minority Schools。Santa Monica, CA。  new window
7.Ashton, P.(1982)。A Study of Teachers' Sense of Efficacy. Final Report, Vol. I。A Study of Teachers' Sense of Efficacy. Final Report, Vol. I。沒有紀錄。  new window
8.Ashton, P.(1982)。A Study of Teachers' Sense of Efficacy. Final Report, Vol. II。A Study of Teachers' Sense of Efficacy. Final Report, Vol. II。沒有紀錄。  new window
9.Ashton, P.(1983)。A study of teachers' sense of efficacy. Final report, Executive summary。A study of teachers' sense of efficacy. Final report, Executive summary。沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.簡紅珠(1990)。教學研究的趨勢。教學原理。台北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Clark, Christopher M.、Peterson, Penelope L.(1986)。Teachers' thought processes。Handbook of Research on Teaching。Macmillan。  new window
3.Flanders, N. A.(1963)。Teacher influence in the classroom。Theory and research in teaching。New York, NY：Teacher College Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：430（臺灣：430，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2133566 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67929842
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上