:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小綜合活動學習領域創意課程與教學設計之分析--以全國創意教學獎優等方案為例
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:丘愛鈴 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiu, Ai-ling
出版日期:2009
卷期:12:4
頁次:頁191-221
主題關鍵詞:綜合活動學習領域課程設計教學設計全國創意教學獎Integrated activities learning areaCurriculum designInstructional designGreaTeach Award
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:297
  • 點閱點閱:86
本研究旨在分析國小綜合活動學習領域四大主題軸的創意課程設計與教學設計。研究者以高雄市國小教師榮獲2005至2007年「全國創意教學獎」的四件綜合活動學習領域特優和優等獎方案為研究對象,採用文件分析法與訪談法。研究結論發現:(一)創意方案背景來自生活情境議題。(二)創意課程採用「主題統整課程」和「螺旋式課程」設計。(三)創意教材編選自政府和民間的優質出版品與網站資源。(四)創意教學方法採用案例教學、討論教學、合作學習、體驗學習、批判思考教學、團體動力、問題解決教學等以思考為中心學習的教學設計。(五)評量方式採用實作評量、口語評量、學習單評量等多元評量。(六)教學困境包括省思時間不足、專業術語難以理解、語言溝通、參與動機、班際學生衝突處理、生活實踐能力評量不易等。根據研究結論,本研究提出若干改進建議,提供國小教師參考。
This study aimed to analyze the creative curriculum and instructional design in Integrated Activities Learning Area of elementary school teachers who received the GreaTeach Award from 2005 to 2007 in Taiwan. The researcher selected four cases which have won the award for super excellence and excellence of GreaTeach Award 2005-2007 Integrated Activities Learning Area in elementary schools in Kaohsiung City as subjects of this study. Documentary analysis and interview method were adopted in this study. The major findings were as follows: (1) The four thematic backgrounds of creative teaching designs come from life issues. (2) Curriculum designs employ the models of thematic integrated curriculum and spiral curriculum. (3) Subject matters come from the publications and websites resources of governmental and private sectors. (4) Teaching methods include case teaching, discussion method, cooperative learning, experiential learning, critical thinking teaching, group dynamics, problem-solving learning and so forth. (5) Assessments incorporate performance assessment, oral assessment, worksheet assessment and so forth. (6) Difficulties encountered in the implementation include the shortage of time for reflection, the understanding of professional terminology, language communication, motivation of participation, the management of conflicts among students across different classes, the assessment of practicing in real-life situations and so forth. According to the findings, some suggestions were proposed to help teachers improve the curriculum and instructional design of Integrated Activities Learning Area in the future.
期刊論文
1.史美奐(20040100)。教師創新教學的類型與可能。課程與教學,7(1),1-14+177。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.丘愛鈴(20061200)。綜合活動學習領域的理論基礎初探。教育學刊,27,145-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Chen, L. L.、Wang, C. C.、Tasi, H. C.(1998)。Exploration of effect in improving bowel movement of using acupoint massage on post-cesarean section women。Journal of Nursing Research,6(6),526-533。  new window
4.洪久賢、洪榮昭、林麗娟、蔡長艷(20070800)。影響教師創意教學因素之研究--以綜合活動領域為例。師大學報. 教育類,52(2),49-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳毓瑩(20030100)。多元評量之解毒與解讀。課程與教學,6(1),133-154+171。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.魏惠娟(20071000)。「方案規劃」的創意教學設計與實施之行動研究。課程與教學,10(4),63-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Fogarty, Robin(1991)。Ten Ways to Integrate Curriculum。Educational Leadership,49(2),61-65。  new window
8.張景媛(20050300)。謙卑的面對人生--教學活動設計應考量的因素。教育研究月刊,131,76-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.丘愛鈴(2006)。臺灣綜合活動學習領域研究的回顧與展望。高雄師大學報,20,21-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.沈翠蓮(2005)。創意課程設計與教學實踐之研究。課程與教學季刊,8(3),55-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.洪榮昭、林雅玲、林展立(2004)。國小創意教師教學策略之研究-四位創意教師特優教師的個案分析。教育心理學報,35(4),375-392。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳家幸(2007)。複合式批判思考運作模式及其教學設計。教育資料與研究雙月刊,76,89-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.黃惠君、葉玉珠(2007)。國中教師教玩興、教學動機、教學快樂感受與創意教學之關係 。教育與心理研究,31(2),65-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Fisher, R. J.(1976)。Third Party Consultation: A Skill for Professional Psychologists in Community Practice。Professional Psychology,7,344-351。  new window
學位論文
1.林雅玲(2003)。國中小創意教師教學策略與成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.許瀞尹(2006)。綜合活動實施創意教學方案之成效評估研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.游弋姍(2007)。國中綜合活動學習領域教學創新行為之研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭美娟(2006)。綜合活動教師實施創意教學之專業成長研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.方德隆(2004)。九年一貫課程改革的理論與實務。高雄:臺北市:麗文:麗文。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dewey, J.(1916)。Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education。New York, NY:Free Press。  new window
3.Doll, W. E. Jr.(1993)。A post-modern perspective on curriculum。New York:Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
4.李坤崇(2004)。綜合活動學習領域概論。臺北:心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃永和(2001)。後現代課程理論之研究 : 一種有機典範的課程觀。臺北:師大書苑有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Beane, James A.(1997)。Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education。Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
7.溫明麗(1997)。批判性思考教學:哲學之旅。臺北市:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學理論與實際。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.林秀珍(20070000)。經驗與教育探微:杜威(J. Dewey)教育哲學之詮釋。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Slavin, R. E.(2005)。教育心理學-理論與實務。教育心理學-理論與實務。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.Ayers, W.、Quinn, T.、Stovall, D. O.、Scheiern, L.(1997)。Teachers' Experience of Curriculum。The Sage Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction。Los Angeles, CA。  new window
12.Fullan, M.(2008)。Curriculum Implementation and Sustainability。The Sage Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction。Los Angeles, CA。  new window
13.Nitko, A. J.、Brooktart, S. M.(2007)。Educational Assessment of Student。New Jersey:Pearson。  new window
其他
1.Hatton-Yeo, A.,Ohsako, T.(2000)。Intergenerational Programmes: Public Policy and Research Implications an International Perspective。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dei, G. S.(2002)。Spiritual knowing and transformative learning。Expanding the boundaries of transformative learning。New York。  new window
2.Miller, J. P.、丘愛鈴(2009)。科目的關聯性。生命教育--全人課程理論與實務。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cranton, P.(1994)。Understanding Transformative Learning。Understanding and Promoting Transformative Learning。San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE