臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：教育實習評量典範的探究與轉移
書刊名：師資培育與教師專業發展期刊
作者：黃嘉莉 引用關係
作者(外文)：Huang, Jia-li
出版日期：2012
卷期：5:2
頁次：頁1-24
主題關鍵詞：教育實習；實習評量；情境學習；表現評量；標準本位師資培育；Educational practicum；Internship assessment；Situated learning；Performance-based assessment；Standard-based teacher education；SBTE
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:98
  • 點閱點閱:79
本文旨在分析我國教育實習評量問題，釐清標準本位師資培育政策的理念下，我國教育實習評量應朝向認知取向典範，進而規劃教育實習評量系統。為達上述目的，本文建立以典範為依據的比較架構，蒐集歷史文件、文獻以及相關研究結果，首先分析我國教育實習的目的與功能，進而釐清現行教育實習評量問題，並確認教育實習的詮釋問題。其次，在標準本位師資培育政策下，本文以情境學習觀點分析教育實習評量應是認知取向為主的表現評量典範。再者，本文從美國經驗探求表現評量模式、類型、方法與工具，配合我國法令之規範，規劃我國教育實習評量項目與系統。最後，本文在以表現評量作為評估實習學生真實能力之典範，提出支持系統性運用網絡之建議。
This study analyzed the problems of educational practicum assessments in the context of standards-based teacher education policy in Taiwan to recognize the cognitive paradigm of performance-based assessment, of which a design was required for the future. To achieve the goal of this study, the comparative structure of a paradigm was established to gather documents, references, relative studies, and a comparison. First, this study found the problems, design, tool, and narrative results of an educational practicum. Second, this study clarified the paradigm of educational practicum with SBTE from the perspective of situated learning and performance assessment. Third, according to the experience of the United States, this study devised the methods and tools to reify internship learning in actual schools. Finally, in accordance with SBTE, we drafted a system of educational practicum assessment and proposed suggestions to support the network of conducting internships for performance assessments.
期刊論文
1.王素芸、賴光真(20040300)。教育實習的概念分析--論我國教育實習制度及其改革。國立編譯館館刊，32(1)，48-59。  延伸查詢new window
2.Darling-Hammond, L.(2001)。Teacher testing and the improvement of practice。Teaching Education，12(1)，1-34。  new window
3.Lampert, M.(2010)。Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean?。Journalof Teacher Education，61(1/2)，21-34。  new window
4.洪志成(2005)。教師檢定測驗不是教師專業最後防線。現代教育論壇，12，462-477。  延伸查詢new window
5.Zeichner, K. M.(2003)。The adequacies and inadequacies of three current strategies to recruit, prepare, and retain the best teachers for all students。Teachers College Record，105(3)，490-519。  new window
6.Messick, Samuel(1994)。The Interplay of Evidence and Consequences in the Validation of Performance Assessments。Educational Researcher，23(2)，13-23。  new window
7.黃凱旻、金鈐(20030400)。一個輔導中學數學實習教師教學概念轉變的行動研究。師大學報. 科學教育類，48(1)，21-44。  延伸查詢new window
8.Ingvarson, L.、Rowe, K.(2008)。Conceptualising and evaluating teacher quality: Substantive and methodological issues。Australian Journal of Education，52(1)，5-35。  new window
9.陳嘉彌(19980900)。自情境教學探討師徒式教育實習。教育研究資訊，6(5)，21-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Tamir, P.(1991)。Professional and personal knowledge of teachers and teacher educator。Teaching & Teacher Education，7(3)，263-268。  new window
11.Resnick, Lauren B.(1987)。The 1987 Presidential Address: Learning in School and out。Educational Researcher，16(9)，13-20+54。  new window
12.歐用生、黃嘉雄(19970900)。落實高級中等以下學校暨幼稚園實習教師教育實習之研究。教育研究資訊，5(5)，15-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.朱苑瑜、葉玉珠(20030400)。實習教師信念改變的影響因素之探討。師大學報. 教育類，48(1)，41-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Cochran-Smith, Marilyn、Lytle, Susan L.(1999)。Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities。Review of Research in Education，24(1)，249-305。  new window
15.Brown, John Seely、Collins, Allan、Duguid, Paul(1989)。Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning。Educational Researcher，18(1)，32-42。  new window
16.Little, J. W.(2002)。Locating learning in teachers' communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work。Teaching and Teacher Education，18(8)，917-946。  new window
17.Shulman, Lee S.(1987)。Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform。Harvard Educational Review，57(1)，1-23。  new window
會議論文
1.葉連祺(2004)。中小學教師檢定方法相關課題之分析。教師檢定之理論與實務會議。國立教育資料館。29-43。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.孫志麟(2010)。師資教育的未來：政策與實踐。臺北市：學富。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hattie, John(2009)。Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement。Routledge。  new window
3.臺灣省教育廳(1987)。臺灣教育發展史料彙編師範教育篇。南投縣：臺灣省教育廳。  延伸查詢new window
4.Wenger, E.(1998)。Communities at practice: Learning, meaning, and identity。England：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Robett, L. L.、Norman, E. G.、鄒慧英(2003)。測驗與評量--在教學上的應用。台北：洪葉文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Linn, R. L.、Gronlund, N. E.(2000)。Measurement and assessment in teaching。Merrill/Prentice Hall。  new window
7.歐滄和(2002)。教育測驗與評量。台北：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Lave, Jean、Wenger, Etienne(1991)。Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.余民寧(2011)。教育測驗與評量：成就測驗與教學評量。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.吳武典(2005)。教師專業的師資培育制度之建構。  延伸查詢new window
2.丁志權(2004)。落實以學校為基地的實習輔導制度。  延伸查詢new window
3.李奉儒(2008)。師資培育。  延伸查詢new window
4.周水珍(2003)。師院生集中實習的教學轉化歷程之研究。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林凱胤、王國華(2007)。實習教師經由觀摩與反思途徑擷取輔導教師內隱知識之研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.教育部(1995)。第七次全國教育會議實錄，臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.教育部(2006)。師資培育素質提升方案。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃嘉莉(2012)。美國加州檢核職前教師表現制度之研究。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.楊深坑、黃嘉莉(2011)。各國師資培育制度與教師素質比較分析。  延伸查詢new window
10.薛梨真、朱潤康(2007)。半年全時實習問題探究。  延伸查詢new window
11.Brookhart, S. M.(1999)。Response to Delandshere and Petrosky’s “Assessment of complex performances: Limitations of key measurement assumptions”。  new window
12.Cobb, P.(2003)。Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district。  new window
13.Darling-Hammond, L.(2000)。Authentic assessment of teaching in context。  new window
14.Darling-Hammond, L.(1995)。Changing conceptions of teaching and teacher education。  new window
15.Darling-Hammond, L.(2008)。Reshaping teaching policy, preparation, and practice: Influences of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards。  new window
16.Delandshere, G.(1994)。Capturing teachers’ knowledge: Performance assessmenst, (a) and post-structuralist epi stemology, (b) from a post-structuralist perspective, (c) and post-structura lism, (d) none of the above。  new window
17.Elam, S.(1971)。Performance based teacher education: What is the state of the art?，Washington, DC：American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education。  new window
18.Feiman-Nemser, S.(2003)。What new teachers need to learn。  new window
19.Gage, N. L.(1963)。Paradigm for research on teaching。  new window
20.GTC(2003)。Making CPE better: Bringing together research about CPD。  new window
21.Kuhn, T. S.(1970)。Structure of scientific revolution (2nd ed.)，Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
22.Lyons, N.(1998)。Portfolio possibilities: Validating a new teacher professionalism。  new window
23.Messick, S.(1995)。Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning。  new window
24.Orey, M. A.(1997)。The impact of situated cognition: Instructional design paradigms in Transition。  new window
25.Piercey, C.(1995)。Assessing clinical competencies。  new window
26.Richmond, J.(2003)。Substantive collaboration in a learning to teach system。  new window
27.Stephenson, J.(1999)。Evaluation of teacher education in England and Wales。  new window
28.Swanson, D. B.(1995)。Performance-based assessment: Lessons from the health professions。  new window
29.Sykes, G., & Plastrik, P.(1993)。Standard setting as educational reform: trends and issues paper No. 8，Washington, DC：ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education and American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education。  new window
30.Valli, L.(2002)。New standards and assessments? Curriculum transformation in teacher education。  new window
31.Wei, R. C., & Pecheone, R.(2010)。Assessment for learning in preservice teacher education: Performance-based assessments。  new window
32.Whitty, G., & Willmott, E.(1991)。Competence- based teacher education: Approaches and issues。  new window
33.Wise, A., & Leibbrand, J.(1996)。Profession- based accreditation: A foundation for high-quality teaching。  new window
34.Youngs, P., Pogodzinski, B., & M. Low(2010)。The role of formative assessment in new teacher induction。  new window
圖書論文
1.Shulman, L.(1998)。Teacher portfolios: a theoretical activity。With portfolio in hand: validating the new teacher professionalism。New York, NY：Teachers College Press。  new window
2.Tellez, K.(1996)。Authentic assessment。Handbook of Research on Teacher Education。Macmillan。  new window
3.Pring, P.(2004)。Teaching and the good teacher。Education and the good society。London, UK：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
4.Shulman, L. S.(1986)。Paradigms and Research Programs in the Study of Teaching: A Contemporary Perspective。Handbook of Research on Teaching。New York, NY：Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1445（臺灣：1433，外國：12） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1827278 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67643167
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上