:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:權力、知識、主體性:ThomasS.Popkewitz思想的分析與應用
作者:涂志賢
作者(外文):Chih-shien, Tu
校院名稱:國立臺北教育大學
系所名稱:教育政策與管理研究所
指導教授:歐用生
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2008
主題關鍵詞:新馬克思主義後結構主義批判教育研究Neo-MarxismPost-structuralismCritical educational research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:14
摘要
本研究旨在進行Popkewitz思想的分析與應用。思想分析方面,筆者探究Popkewitz思想的學術脈絡與學術淵源,指出Popkewitz從後結構主義的角度,在教育研究、師資培育、教育改革問題上,不同於「誰的知識最有價值」的主流批判提問方式,透過「有價值的知識如何形成(如何成為可能)」的提問方式,重新思考權力、知識、主體與歷史的概念,及其概念之間的連結-權力生產知識,知識建構主體,從歷史上檢視這個過程。這是一種不同於主流批判教育研究思維的另類批判教育研究思維。
完成思想分析之後,筆者則進行Popkewitz思想的應用,面對客家人主體性不易出現,在尋求客家主體解放途徑上,筆者透過「客家人主體性不易出現如何形成」或「客家人主體性何以不易出現」的提問方式,把焦點移向客家人主體性的歷史建構,從論述形構的角度,了解客家人主體性所存在的論述空間而非壓迫客家人主體性的社會結構,以此方式進行另類批判教育研究。
最後,則是依上述Popkewitz思想的分析與應用的結果提出結論,並對未來研究提出建議。
關鍵詞:新馬克思主義、後結構主義、批判教育研究
Power, Knowledge and Subjectivity:
The analysis and application of Popkewitz’s thought
Abstract
The study aimed at the analysis and application of Popkewitz’s thought. On the analysis, it explored the origin and the context. It looked into the questions of educational research, teachers’ education and educational revolution by ways of questioning “how to make the valuable knowledge possible” from the post-structuralism to rethink the concepts of power, knowledge, subjectivity and history, as well as the connections between them – power produces knowledge, knowledge constructs subjectivity. A process checked from the historical point of view. It is a different approach from the mainstream of “who benefits from the valuable knowledge” on critical educational research.
After completing the analysis, the study delved into the immerged Hakka’s subjectivity by the application of Popkewitz’s thought. On the liberation of Hakka’s subjectivity, by questioning “how the Hakka’s immerged subjectivity is formed ? ” shifting the focus of Hakka’s subjectivity to the historical construction. Instead of oppressing the social structure of Hakka’s subjectivity, it tried to understand the discursive spaces from the discursive formation’s point of view.
Lastly, the study concluded by the results of the analysis and application of Popkewitz’s thought and the suggestions to the future researches.
Key words: Neo-Marxism, Post-structuralism, Critical educational research
參考書目
一、中文部份

尹章義(民78)。台灣開發史研究。臺北市:聯經出版事業公司。new window
文馨瑩(民79)。經濟奇蹟的背後-台灣美援經驗的政經分析(1951-1965)。臺北市:自立晚報。
王甫昌(2003)。當代台灣社會的族群想像。台北:群學出版公司。new window
王慧蘭(2002)。Thomas Popkewitz「靈魂的抗爭」一書評介。臺灣教育社會學研究,2(1),269-277。new window
王麗雲(1990)。艾波教育思想研究。臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
卯靜儒(2001)。台灣近十年來課程改革之政治社會學分析。臺灣教育社會學研究,1(1),79-101。new window
卯靜儒(2002)。波克維茲:《教育改革的政治社會學》導論,載於蘇峰山(主編),意識、權力與教育:教育社會學理論導論,232-233。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所。
卯靜儒(2004)。從新馬克思主義到後結構主義:課程社會學研究的再概念化。教育研究集刊,50(1),119-142。new window
江運貴(民85)。客家與臺灣。臺北市:常民文化事業有限公司。
何憶如(2003)。桃園縣新屋國小校史之研究(1905-2003)。臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
吳庚(民82)。韋伯的政治理論及其哲學基礎。臺北市:聯經。new window
吳美娟(2001)。Popkewitz的知識論觀點在課程上的應用。國立台北師範學院第三屆課程與教學論壇課程改革的反省與前瞻學術研討會論文集,上册,249-262。
宋德宣(1994)。新儒家。台北是:揚智文化。
李子建、黃顯華(1996)。課程:範式、取向和設計。臺北市:五南。new window
李世偉(1999)。日據時期臺灣儒教結社與活動。臺北市:文津。new window
李永熾(民82)。客家人與台灣政治-客家人未來在台灣的角色扮演。載於台灣客家公共事務協會(主編),台灣客家人新論,22-25。臺北市:臺原出版社。
李喬(民80a)。客家人的政治立場。載於台灣客家公共事務協會(主編),新个客家人,31-32。臺北市:臺原出版社。
李喬(民80b)。客家人在台灣社會的發展。載於台灣客家公共事務協會(主編),新个客家人,33-40。臺北市:臺原出版社。
李貌華(民78)。戒嚴的實施。歷史月刊,23,89-90。
沈翠蓮(2004)。台灣小學師資培育史。臺北市:五南。
周珮儀(1998)。季胡課程理論之研究。臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版。new window
林鐘雄(民76)。台灣經濟發展40年。臺北市:自立晚報。
林鐘雄(民84)。台灣經濟經驗一百年。臺北市:三通圖書。
金耀基(民91)。百年來兩岸民族主義的發展與反省(金序)。載於洪泉湖、謝政諭(主編),百年來兩岸民族主義的發展與反省,1-6。臺北市:東大。
施正鋒(2004)。台灣客家族群政治與政策。台中市:新新台灣文化教育基金會。new window
施正鋒(民91)。台灣民族主義與墾殖國家的政治民族塑造。載於洪泉湖、謝政諭(主編),百年來兩岸民族主義的發展與反省,451-473。臺北市:東大。new window
施良方(1997)。課程理論:課程的基礎、原理與問題。高雄:麗文。
范巽綠(2005)。教育改革與社會重建。載於第12屆課程與教學論壇,社會重建課程的理念與實踐-覺醒、增能與行動國際學術研討會會議手冊,19-21。
唐岱蘭(民78)。1949年前後的台灣社會風貌。歷史月刊,23,21-40。
徐正光(民80)。塑造台灣社會新秩序。載於徐正光(主編),徘徊於族群和現實之間,4-9。台北市:正中書局。new window
徐正光(民83)。台灣的族群關係-以客家人為主體的探討。中華民國八十三年度全國文藝季系列活動,客家文化研討會論文集,381-399。
徐正光、鄭力軒(民91)。當代台灣客家社會生活。載於徐正光等作,台灣客家族群史社會篇,272-405。南投:台灣省文獻會。
徐正光、蕭新煌(1995)。客家族群的語言問題-臺北地區的調查分析。中央研究院民族所資料彙編,第十期,1-40。new window
徐南號(民77)。現代化與技職教育演變。臺北市:幼獅文化事業公司。
高宣揚(民87)。當代社會理論。臺北:五南。
梁榮茂(民82)。客家文化的危機與轉機。載於台灣客家公共事務協會(主編),台灣客家人新論,43-49。臺北市:臺原出版社。
國史館(民85)。中華民國史事紀要-中華民國41年7至12月。
國史館(民86)。中華民國史事紀要-中華民國 39年7至9月。
屠炳春(民66)。社會課程修訂重點及新舊內容比較。載於台灣省國校教師研習會編,新頒國民小學課程標準研習資料。
屠炳春(民68)。社會課程的精神。台灣教育,339。
張佳琳(2002)。課程改革的政治社會學分析—以技職一貫課程改革為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育系博士論文。new window
張茂桂(1996)。台灣的政治轉型與政治的族群化過程。施正鋒編,族群政治與政策。台北:前衛。
張茂桂等著(1993)。省籍問題與民族主義。張茂桂等著,族群關係與國家認同。台北:業強。new window
張茂桂(1994)。語言、族群與政治傾向:閩南人與客家人的比較。載於伊慶春(主編),台灣地區社會意向調查,111-132。台北:中央研究院中山人文社科所。
教育改革審議委員會(民85)。教育改革總諮議報告書。臺北:行政院。
教育部(民57)。國民小學暫行課程標準。臺北市:正中書局。
教育部(民82)。國民小學課程標準。臺北市:台捷。
教育部(民89)。九年一貫課程暫行綱要。
許佩賢(2005)。殖民地臺灣的近代學校。臺北市:遠流。new window
許福明(民75)。中國國民黨的改造。臺北市:正中書局。
許誌庭(2004)。1990年代台灣教育改革論述形構中的權力╱知識與主體之研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所博士論文,未出版。。new window
陳仰天(Chen, yang-tien)(2003). Comparing the past and present: The global and local in taiwan educational reform. Unpublished Dissertation. University of Wisconsin - Madison.
陳伯璋(1984)。潛在課程研究之分析。臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版。new window
陳瑞麟(民90)。社會建構中的實在。國立政治大學哲學學報,第七期,97-126。new window
陳運棟(民80)。義民乎?不義之民乎?載於台灣客家公共事務協會(主編),新个客家人,102-116。臺北市:臺原出版社。
彭懷恩(民86)。認識台灣-台灣政治變遷五十年。臺北市:風雲論壇出版社。
黃柏叡(2004)。T. Popkewitz的教育研究方法論探析。國立中正大學教育系博士論文,未出版。。new window
黃庭康(2002)。葛蘭西:國家權力與文化霸權,載於蘇峰山(主編),意識、權力與教育:教育社會學理論導論,嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所,1-34。
黃榮洛(民80)。客家人的台灣史,載於徐正光(主編),徘徊於族群和現實之間,150-169。台北市:正中書局。new window
黃瑞祺(2000)。現代與後現代。台北市:巨流。new window
黃嘉雄(1989)。柏恩斯坦分類與架構概念及其在課程研究上之意義。臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
黃嘉雄(1994)。轉化社會結構的課程理論:課程社會學的觀點。臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版。new window
楊祥銀(2004)。口述史學。臺北市:揚智文化。
楊智穎(2004)。文化歷史觀點的課程改革研究。載於單文經(主編),課程與教學新論,121-140。台北:心理。
楊智穎(2006)。課程史研究的歷史回顧及重要議題分析。課程與教學季刊,9(2),105-115。new window
葉啟政(2004)進出「結構-行動」的困境:與當代西方社會理論論述對話。臺北市:三民書局。
甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務:解構與重建。臺北市:高等教育。
翟本瑞(1999)。社會理論與比較文化。臺北市: 洪葉文化事業公司 。new window
劉文斌(民94)。台灣國家認同變遷下的兩岸關係。臺北市:問津堂書局。new window
劉定霖(1989)。政治意識型態與國民中學公民與道德教材之研究。臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
歐用生(1985)。國小社會科教科書意識型態分析。省立新竹師專學報,12,91-125。
歐用生(1990)。我國國民小學社會科潛在課程分析。臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版。new window
蕭新煌(民76)。三十年來臺灣的社會學:歷史與結構的探討,載於賴澤涵主編,三十年來我國人文及社會科學之回顧與展望,329-390。臺北市:東大。
蕭新煌(民79)。台灣新興社會運動的分析架構,載於徐正光與宋文里合編,台灣新興社會運動,21-46。臺北市:巨流。new window
蕭新煌、黃世明(2001)。台灣客家族群史政治篇-地方社會與族群政治的分析(上、下)。南投:台灣省文獻會。
戴國煇(1988)。日帝統治下台灣客家。客家風雲,5,5-10。
薛曉華(2006)。T. S. Popkewitz:當代「社會知識論」代表人物,載於譚光鼎、王麗雲(主編),教育社會學:人物與思想,471-502。
鍾肇政(民80)。硬頸子弟,邁步向前。載於台灣客家公共事務協會(主編)新个客家人,26-28。臺北市:臺原出版社。
羅肇錦(民82)看不見的族群:只能做隱忍維生的弱勢人民嗎?載於台灣客家公共事務協會(主編)台灣客家人新論,31-36。臺北市:臺原出版社。

一、英文部份

Anderson, B.(1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Anyon, J.(1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of education, 62, 67-92.
Apple, M. W.(1979/1991). Ideology and curriculum. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Apple, M. W.著,王麗雲譯(2002)。意識型態與課程。臺北市:桂冠。
Apple, M.(1986). Teachers and texts, a political economy of class and gender relationals in education. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bloch, M., Holmlund, K., Moqvist, I. & Popkewitz, T. S. (Eds.)(2003). Governing children, families, and education: Restructuring the Welfare state. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bloch, M., Holmlund, K., Moqvist, I. & Popkewitz, T. S. (2003). Global and Local Patterns of Governing the Child, Family, their Care, and Education: An Introduction. In Bloch, M., Holmlund, K., Moqvist, I. & Popkewitz, T. S. (Eds.), Governing children, families, and education: Restructuring the Welfare state, 3-34. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bourdieu, P.(1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P.(1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste.(by R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P.(1988). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P.(1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological theory, 7(1), 14-25.
Bourdieu, P.(1990). The logic of practical. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Braudel, F.(1980). On history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burke P.著,江正寬譯(2002)。歷史學與社會理論。台北市:麥田。
Butler,, J.(1992). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism”. In J. Bulter and J. Scott(Eds.), Feminists theorize the political, 3-21. New York: Routledge.
Cherryholmes, C.(1988). Power and criticism: Post-structural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College press.
Dahl, R. A.(1957).Who Governs? Chicago: Universality of Chicago Press.
Dean, M.(1994). Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. New York: Routledge.
Dreyfus, H. & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Elias, N.(1978). The history of manners: The civilizing process (Vol. 1). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge & The discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1975). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception(trans. by A. Smith). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M.(1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. By A. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M.(1980a). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Trans. By R. Hurley. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M.(1980b). Power / Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Gordon, C.(Ed.)New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M.(1982). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow. Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 208-226. The Harvester Press.
Foucault, M.(1984). The Foucault reader. In P. Rabinow.(Ed.). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M.(1985). The Use of Pleasure. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M.(1988). The Political Technology of Individuals. In Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984 Paul Rabinow, Series ED. Volume 3, edited by James D. Faubion, 2000, New York: The New Press.
Foucault, M.(1991a).The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M.(1991b). Remarks on Marx: Conversations with Duccio Trombadori. Translated by R. J. Goldstein and J. Cascatito. New York: Semiotext(e), Columbia University.
Foucault, M.(1997). Technologies of the Self. In P. Rabinow (ed.), Michel Foucault: Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth, 223-251. New York: The New Press.
Franklin, B., Bloch, M. & Popkewitz, T. S. (Eds.)(2003). Educational partnerships and the state: The paradoxes of governing schools, children, and families. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Franklin, B., Bloch, M. & Popkewitz, T. S.(2003). Educational Partnerships: An Introductory Framework. In Franklin, B., Bloch, M. & Popkewitz, T. S. (Eds.), Educational partnerships and the state: The paradoxes of governing schools, children, and families, 1-23. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Giddens, A.(1976). New rules of sociological method. London: Hutchinson.
Giddens, A.(1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley, Ca.: University of California Press.
Giddens, A.(1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A.(1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Stanford, Ca.: Stanford University Press.
Ginsburg, M.(1988). Contradictions in teacher education and society, a critical analysis. New York: Falmer.
Giroux, H. A.(1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.

Grove, R. & Short, E. C.(1991). Theoretical inquiry: Components and structure. In E. C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry, 211-224. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hacking, I.(1986). The archeology of Foucault. In D. C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: A critical reader , 27-40. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hacking, I.(1990). The taming of chance. New York: Cambridge University press.
Hamilton, D.(1989). Towards a theory of schooling. London: The Falmer Press.
Hamilton, D.(1993). The idea of history and the history of ideas, image. Journal of nursing scholarship, 25, 45-48.
Hay, C. (1990). What is sociological History?. In S. Kendrick, P. Straw & D. McCrone (Eds.), Interpreting the past, understanding the present, 20-37. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Hobbes, T.(1955).Leviathan or the matter, Forme and Power of a Commonweath Ecclesiasticall and Civil by Oakeshott, M. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Jary, D.& Jary, J.著,周業謙、周光淦譯(2005)。社會學辭典。台北市:貓頭鷹出版社。
Kliebard, H.(1986). Struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kuhn, T.(1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Latour, B.(1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Maravall, J.(1986). Culture of the Baroque: Analysis of historical structure. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Meyer, J.(1986). The politics of educational crisis in the United States. In W. Cummings(Ed.), Educational politics in crisis, 44-58. New York: Praeger.
Popkewitz, T. S., Tabachnick, B. R., & Wehlage, G.(1982). The myth of educational reform: School responses to planned change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Popkewitz, T. S. (1984). Paradigm and ideology in educational research: Social functions of the intellectual. London: Falmer Press.
Popkewitz, T. S. (ed.) (1987). Critical studies in teacher education: Its folklore, theory and practice. London: Falmer Press.
Popkewitz, T. S.(1988). What's in a research project: Some thoughts on the intersection of history, social structure, and biography. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 381-383.
Popkewitz, T. S.(1991). A political sociology of educational reform: Power/Knowledge in teaching, teacher education, and research. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
Popkewitz, T. S. (Ed.) (1993). Changing patterns of power: Social regulation and teacher education reform. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Popkewitz, T. S.(1994). Professionalization in teaching and teacher education: Some notes on its history, ideology, and potential. Teaching and teacher education, 10(1), 1-14.
Popkewitz, T. S.(1995). “Foreword”, in P. L. McLaren and J. M. Giarelli(Eds.) Critical Theory and Educational Research, xi-xxii. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Popkewitz, T. S. & Brennan M. (1997). Restructuring of social and political theory in education: Foucault and a social epistemology of school practices. Educational theory, 47(3), 287-313.
Popkewitz, T. S.(1997). The Production of reason and power: Curriculum History & Intellectual Traditions. Journal of curriculum studies, 29(2), 131-164.
Popkewitz, T. S. & Brennan, M. (Eds.)(1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Popkewitz, T. S. & Brennan, M.(1998a). Restructuring of social and political theory in education. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education, 3-35. New York: Teachers College Press.
Popkewitz, T. S.(1998b). The sociology of knowledge and the sociology of education: Michel Foucault and critical traditions. In C. A. Torres & T. R. Mitchell (Eds.), Sociology of education: Emerging perspectives, 47-89. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Popkewitz, T. S.(1998c). Struggling for the soul: The politics of education and the construction of the teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
Popkewitz, T. S.(1998d). The culture of redemption and the administration of freedom in educational research. Review of educational Research, 68(1), 1-34.
Popkewitz, T. S. & Fendler, L. (Eds.) (1999). A Social Epistemology of Educational Research. Critical theories in education: Changing terrains of knowledge and politic. New York: Routledge.
Popkewitz, T. S. (1999a). Critical traditions, modernisms, and the posts. In T. S. Popkewitz. & L. Fendler. (Eds.), Critical theories in education: Changing terrains of knowledge and politics, 1-13. New York: Routledge.
Popkewitz, T. S. (1999b). A Social Epistemology of Educational Research. In T. S. Popkewitz. & L. Fendler. (Eds.), Critical theories in education: Changing terrains of knowledge and politics, 17-42. New York: Routledge.
Popkewitz, T. S. (Ed.)(2000). Educational knowledge: Changing relationships between the state, civil society, and the educational community. State University of New York Press.
Popkewitz, T. S.(2000a). “Curriculum as a problem of knowledge, governing, and the social administration of the soul”, In B. M. Franklin(Ed.). Curriculum & consequence: Herbert M. Kliebard and the promise of schooling, 75-99. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
Popkewitz, T. S.(2000b). Globalization/Regionalization, knowledge, and the educational practices: Some notes on comparative strategies for educational research. In T. S. Popkewitz(Ed.), Educational knowledge: Changing relationships between the state, civil society, and the educational community, 3-27. State University of New York Press.
Popkewitz, T. S.(2000c). Rethinking decentralization and the state/civil society distinctions: The state as a problematic of governing. In T. S. Popkewitz(ed.), Educational knowledge: Changing relationships between the state, civil society, and the educational community, 173-199. State University of New York Press.
Popkewitz, T. S., Franklin, B. M. & Pereyra, M. A. (Eds.).(2001). Cultural history and education: Critical essays on knowledge and schooling. New York: Routledge.
Popkewitz, T. S., Pereyra, M. A., & Franklin, B. M.(2001). History, the problem of knowledge, and the new cultural history of schooling. In T. S. Popkewitz, B. M. Franklin, & M. A. Pereyra (Eds.), Cultural history and education: Critical essays on knowledge and schooling, 3-44. New York: Routledge.
Popkewitz, T. S.(2001a). The production of reason and power: Curriculum history and intellectual traitions. In T. S. Popkewitz, B. M. Franklin & M. A. Pereyra(Eds.), Cultural history and education: Critical essays on knowledge and schooling, 151-183. New York: Routledge.
Popkewitz, T. S.(2001b). Dewey and Vygotsky: Ideas in historical spaces. In T. S. Popkewitz, B. M. Franklin & M. A. Pereyra (Eds.), Cultural history and education: Critical essays on knowledge and schooling, 313-349. New York: Routledge.
Popkewitz, T. S.(2003a). Partnerships, the social pact, and changing systems of reason in a comparative perspective. In B. M. Franklin, M. N. Bloch & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Educational partnerships and the state: The paradoxes of governing schools, children, and families, 27-54. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Popkewitz, T. S.(2003b). Governing the Child and pedagogicalization of the parent: A historical excursus into the present. In M. N. Bloch, K. Holmlund, I. Moqvist & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Governing children, families, and education: Restructuring the Welfare state, 35-61. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Popkewitz, T. S.(2003c). National imaginaries, the indigenous foreigner, and power: Comparative educational research. In Schriewer, J. (Ed.), Discourse formation in comparative education, 261-294. New York: Routledge.
Popkewitz, T. S.(2005). Social reconstruction and the expertise of the governing of the soul: toward a political sociology of schooling. 載於第12屆課程與教學論壇,社會重建課程的理念與實踐-覺醒、增能與行動國際學術研討會會議手冊,1-28。
Qi, J.(2001). Japanese educational reform: A genealogy of the construction of the student. Unpublished Dissertation. University of Wisconsin - Madison.
Ricoeur, P.著,王建華譯(1997)。法國史學對史學理論的貢獻。上海:上海科學院出版社。
Riley, D.(1988). Am I that name: Reminism and the Category of ‘Womaen’ in history. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ritchie, D. A. 著,王芝芝譯(1997)。大家來做口述歷史。臺北市:遠流。
Rose, N.(1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schubert, W. H.(1986). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. New York: Macmillan.
Smith, Douglas Clifford (Ed.). (1991). The Confucian Continuum: Educational
Modernization in Taiwan. New York: Praeger.
Short, E. C.(1991). Introduction: Understanding curriculum inquiry. In E. C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry, 1-25. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Tosh, J. 著,趙干城、鮑世奮譯(1996)。史學導論。臺北:五南。
Wagner, P.(1994). The sociology of Modernity. New York: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, L.(1966). The philosophical investigations: A collection of critical essays(G. Pilcher, Ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Whitty, G.(1985). Sociology and school knowledge: Curriculum theory, research and politics. London: Methuen.
Wrony, D.(1979).Power: its Forms, Bases and Uses. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Young, M.(1971). Knowledge and control. London: Macmillan, Collier.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE