:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:海德格的詮釋現象及其在教育學方法論的意涵
書刊名:花蓮師院學報
作者:李文富
作者(外文):Lee, Wen-fu
出版日期:2003
卷期:16(教育類)
頁次:頁89-107
主題關鍵詞:此有存有論存在論分析教育學方法論DaseinThe Existential analysisOntologyMethodology of education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:184
  • 點閱點閱:67
     本文指出教育是一門關於人的學科。人不但離不開社會,更具有存有的性質。人的存有與存在問題恰恰構成教育的問題核心。海德格的詮釋現象學揭露了重提存有問題的必要性。海德格用“此有”來形容實在的人,並通過“此有”的“在世存有”的存在論分析:一方面剔透出人的在世存有情境,突顯了人最一般的日常生活的非理性存在樣態;另一方面則在“存有”的追問下,超越了傳統認識論的二元對立困境,從而確立了以此有為基礎的人文社會學科的存有論。準此,本文從海德格的詮釋現象學的“此有”分析出發,嘗試建構一個“存在的-存有論”為基礎的教育學方法論,並指出其在教育研究上的可能貢獻。
     This essay indicates that education is a subject concerning humans. Humans not only fail to stay away from sociality but also are endowed with the quality of Being. Thus educational problems consist of the problem of human being and existence. Heidegger revealed the necessity for explicitly restating the question of Being. He took the ontological analytic of Dasein as laying the horizon for an interpretation of the meaning of Being and existential constitution in general . Another hand, in this process of questioning anew the meaning of Being , Heidegger overtook a strait of antagonism which raised by traditional epistemology and thereby to establish firmly base for ontology which rooted Dasein . Based on this , this essay, by analyzing hermeneutic phenomenology of Heidegger , intends to manipulate the methodology of education on the basis of existential-ontology and to point out the possible contribution in educational studies.
期刊論文
1.洪漢鼎(19950400)。詮釋學和詮釋學哲學的觀念。哲學雜誌,12,130-144。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳嘉映(1998)。也談海德格爾哲學的翻譯。中國現象學與哲學評論,1998(2),280-301。  延伸查詢new window
3.葉啟政(19960300)。社會學科的性質和意義。通識教育,3(1),91-98。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.馬克思、中共中央編譯局(1995)。馬克斯恩格思選集。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳嘉映(1995)。海德格爾哲學概念。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊深坑(1988)。證釋與實踐--教育學方法論論文集。台北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Bauman, Z.(1992)。Hermeneutics and social science: Approaches to understanding。Eng.:Gregg Revivals。  new window
5.Bourdieu, R.、Nice, R.(1990)。The Logic of Practice。Cambridge:Polity。  new window
6.Bourdieu, P.、Wacquant, L. J. D.(1998)。An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology。Cambridge:Polity。  new window
7.Dreyfus, Hubert L.(1991)。Being-in-the-world: a commentary on Heidegger's Being and time。Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press。  new window
8.Heidegger, M.、Hofstadter, A.(1988)。The basic problems of phenomenology。Indiana University Press。  new window
9.Heidegger, M.、孫周興(1988)。路標。臺北市:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.Heidegger, M.、陳嘉映、王慶節(1999)。存在與時間。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
11.Kojeve, A.(1980)。Introduction to the reading of Hegel。Ithaca, N. Y.:Cornell University Press。  new window
12.Kosik, K.、Kovanda, K.、Schmidt, J.(1976)。Dialectics of the concrete: a study on problems of man and world。Boston:D. Reidel Press。  new window
13.Lukace, G.、張西平(1993)。關於社會存在的本體論。重慶:重慶出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.Richardson, J.(1986)。Existential epistemology: A Heideggerian critique of the Cartesian project。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
15.Ricoeur, P.、Thompson, J. B.(1989)。Hermeneutics and Human Sciences。Cambridge:Cambridge University。  new window
16.Heidegger, Martin、Macquarrie, John、Robinson, Edward S.(1962)。Being and Time。Harper & Row。  new window
圖書論文
1.Heidegger, M.、孫周興(1994)。形而上學是什麼。海德格爾選集。上海:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kant, I.、李明輝(1988)。答何謂啓蒙。思想。台北:聯經出版。  延伸查詢new window
3.馮朝霖(1995)。主體性困境對教育之挑戰--李歐塔哲學與教育思想的初解。當代教育哲學論文集。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE