臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：人格特質、學習型態與學習表現關係之研究--以臺灣餐旅教育學生為例
書刊名：觀光研究學報
作者：胡夢蕾／李怡君
作者(外文)：Hu, Meng-lei／Lee, Yi-chun
出版日期：2004
卷期：10:3
頁次：頁1-22
主題關鍵詞：餐旅；人格特質；學習型態；學習表現；Hospitality；Personality traits；Learning style；Learning performance
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:123
  • 點閱點閱:84
本研究旨在探討餐旅學生之的學習型態、人格特質與學習表現之關係。研究對象為四所設有餐旅管理科系學校之學生，共發出 600份問卷，回收有效問卷 379份，有效回收率為 63.17%。研究工具為結構性問卷，其一為人格特質量表（Mini-Marker, 1994），二為學習型態量表（KLSI, 1984），以相關分析、單因子變異數（ANOVA）與複迴歸分析，進行人格特質、學習型態與學習表現之關聯與預測分析。研究結果發現，台灣餐旅學生學習型態以「適應者」、「收斂者」居多；人格特質中「情緒敏感性」、「經驗開放性」、「親和性」顯著影響學習型態；「嚴謹自律性」與「經驗開放性」對學習型態均有顯著正相關。另外，在檢驗人格特質、學習型態構面與人口特性的預測能力時發現，人格特質中僅有「情緒敏感性」、「嚴謹自律性」、「經驗開放性」可以有效預測學習表現；但是學習型態無法預測學習表現；最後，人口特性中的「年齡」與「性別」是學習表現的最有效預測數。本研究結果有助於餐旅教育者在教學訓練與設計課程時參考運用。
The purposes of this study were to examine the relationship between personality, learning styles and learning performance. A survey was distributed to 600 students who had majored in hospitality management programs at four schools. Of the 376 valid samples, representing a response ratio of 63.17%, the structured questionnaire included scales such as Mini-Maker (1994) and KLSI (1989) aimed at evaluating the predictive power and correlation between personality, learning style and learning performance by using correlation, ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis. Empirical results indicate that most of the hospitality students in Taiwan belong to the ”accommodators” and “convergers”. The “neuroticism”, “openness to experience” and “agreeableness” dimensions of Big-five personality had impacts on learning style. And the ”conscientiousness “ and “openness to experience” are significantly and positively related to learning style. As for the examination of personality, we found that only ”conscientiousness“, “conscientiousness” and “openness to experience” exhibit predictive power over learning performance; but learning style can not predict learning performance. Finally, demographic variable’s age and sex are the best preditors of learning performance. Implications on school teachers, teaching and designing curriculum are subsequently discussed.
期刊論文
1.Davidson, R. A.(2002)。Relationship of study approach and exam performance。Journal of Accounting Education，20，29-44。  new window
2.黃英忠、陳儀蓉、黃培文(20030600)。學習成就對努力歸因之影響--以三明治式教學之技專院校餐飲管理科為例。商管科技季刊，4(2)，149-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Busato, V. V.、Prins, F. J.、Elshout, J. J.、Hamaker, C.(1999)。The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education。Personality and Individual Differences，26(1)，129-140。  new window
4.Goldberg, L. R.(1990)。Alternative Description of Personality? The Big-Five Factor。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，59(6)，1216-1229。  new window
5.Salgado, J. F.(1997)。The Five Factor Model of Personality and Job Performance in the European Community。Journal of Applied Psychology，82(1)，30-43。  new window
6.Goldberg, Lewis R.(1992)。The Development of Markers of the Big-Five Factor Structure。Psychological Assessmner，4(1)，26-42。  new window
7.Boudreau, J. W.、Boswell, W. R.、Judge, T. A.(2001)。Effects of personality on executive career success in the United States and Europe。Journal of Vocational Behavior，58(1)，53-81。  new window
8.Eysenck, H. J.(1994)。Creativity and Personality: Word Association, Origence, and Psychoticism。Creativity Research Journal，7(2)，209-216。  new window
9.Fumham, A.、Medhurst, S.(1995)。Personality correlates of academic seminar behaviour: A study of four instruments。Personality and Individual Differences，19(2)，197-208。  new window
10.Judge, T. A.、Higgins, C. A.、Thoresen, C. J.、Barrick, M. R.(1999)。The big five personal traits, general mental ability, and career success the life span。Personnel Psychology，52(3)，621-652。  new window
11.McCrae, R. R.、John, O. P.(1992)。An introduction to the five-factor model and its application。Journal of Personality，60(2)，175-215。  new window
12.Mount, M. K.、Barrick, M. R.(1998)。Five Reasons Why The "Big Five" Article Has Been frequently Cited。Personnel Psychology，51(4)，849-857。  new window
13.Lynch, T. G.、Woelfl, N. N.、Steele, D. J.、Hanssen, C. S.(1998)。Learning Style Influences Student Examination Performance。The American Journal of Surgery，176(1)，62-66。  new window
14.Davidson-Shivers, G. V.、Nowlin, B.、Lanouette, M.(2002)。Do multimedia lesson structure and learning styles influence undergraduate writing performance?。College Student Journal，36(1)，20-32。  new window
15.Felder, R. M.、Silverman, L. K.(1988)。Learning and teaching styles in engineering education。Engineering Education，78(7)，674-681。  new window
16.張景媛(19900100)。不同後設認知能力的大學生在學業成績與認知適應上之差異。測驗年刊，37，143-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Woodman, Richard W.、Sawyer, John E.、Griffin, Ricky W.(1993)。Toward a theory of organizational creativity。The Academy of Management Review，18(2)，293-321。  new window
18.謝孟穎(20030600)。家長社經背景與學生學業成就關聯性之研究。教育研究集刊，49(2)，255-287。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Norman, W. T.(1963)。Toward and adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure。Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology，66(6)，574-583。  new window
20.Saucier, G.(1994)。Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's Unipolar Big-Five Markers。Journal of Personality Assessment，63(3)，506-516。  new window
21.Anderson, J. K.(1998)。Orientation with style: matching teaching/learning style。Journal for Nurses in Staff Development，74(4)，192-197。  new window
會議論文
1.沈進成、孫君儀(2002)。遊樂園服務人員人格特質、情緒智力與工作表現影響之探討--以劍湖山世界股份有限公司為例。第二屆觀光休閒暨餐旅產業永續經營學術研討會，國立餐旅學院主辦 135-144。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.詹秉鈞(2003)。以電腦輔助教材進行交線與展開圖教學對學生學習表現之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.顏月玲(2001)。餐旅業界對高等餐旅學校實施三明治教學與傳統校外教學實習成效滿意度之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立台北科技大學，台北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.王全得(2003)。成人教育的學習型態、動機和滿意度相關性研究(碩士論文)。義守大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Norman, W. T.(1967)。2800 personality trait descriptors: Normative operating characteristics for a university population。Ann Arbor, MI：University of Michigan Press。  new window
2.Kearsley, G.(2000)。Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth Publishing。  new window
3.Costa, Paul T. Jr.、McCrae, Robert R.(1985)。The NEO Personality Inventory: Manual Form S and Form R。Psychological Assessment Resources。  new window
4.邱皓政(2000)。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Kolb, D. A.(1976)。Learning style inventory technical manual。Boston：McBer & Co。  new window
6.吳萬益、林清河(2001)。企業研究方法。臺北：華泰圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Pervin, L. A.(1993)。Personality: Theory and research。New York, NY：John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
8.Cattell, R. B.(1946)。Description and Measurement of Personality。World Book。  new window
9.張紹勳(2001)。研究方法。滄海書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.Allport, Gordon Willard(1961)。Pattern and Growth in Personality。Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
其他
1.陳玉蘭(1998)。教專班學生學習型態之探討。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉文葵(2002)。比較不同科系大學學生在網路教學情境下之學習成效--以實踐大學為例。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉佩雲(2003)。國中學生成敗歸因、學習失敗容忍力、學習策略與學業成就的關係。  延伸查詢new window
4.戴芳美(2000)。Variables related to differences in EFL learning styles: course development。  new window
5.Baily, P., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daley, C.(2000)。Using learning style to predict foreign language achievement at the college level。  new window
6.Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. R., & Judge, T. A.(2001)。The FFM personality dimensions and job performance: Meta-Analysis of meta-analyses。  new window
7.Benson, A., Guy, T., & Tallman, J.(2001)。Viewing online learning through the lens of perspective transformation。  new window
8.Berger, F.(1983)。Disparate learning styles of hospitality student, professors and managers。  new window
9.Butler, K. A.(1988)。How kids learn: What theorists say。  new window
10.Cowley, E.(2002)。East-West consumer confidence and accuracy in memory for product information。  new window
11.Ebeling, D. G.(2000)。Adapting your teaching to any learning style。  new window
12.Fox, J., & Bartholomae, S.(1999)。Student learning style and educational outcomes: evidence from a family financial management course。  new window
13.Furnham, A.(1992)。Personality and learning style: a study of three instruments。  new window
14.Furnham, A.(1996)。The FIRO-B, the learning style questionnaire and the Five-Factor Model。  new window
15.Furnham, A., Jackson, C. J., & Miller, T.(1999)。Personality, learning style and work performance。  new window
16.Hayes, N., & Joseph, S.(2003)。Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective well-being。  new window
17.Honey, P., & Mumford. A.(1986)。The manual of learning styles。  new window
18.Honey, P., & Mumford. A.(1989)。The manual of learning opportunities。  new window
19.Hsu, C. H. C., Smith, F. M., & Finley, D. H.(1991)。Restaurant managers’ learning styles and their implications。  new window
20.Hsu, C. H. C.(1999)。Learning styles of hospitality students: Nature or nurture?。  new window
21.Jackson, C. J., & Lawty-Jones, M.(1996)。Explaining the overlap between personality and learning styles。  new window
22.John, O. P.(1990)。The big five factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the nature language and in questionnaires。  new window
23.Kolb, D.(1984)。Experimental learning: Experience as a Source of Learning and Development。  new window
24.Raad, B. D.(1998)。Personality traits in learning and education。  new window
25.Ross, J. L., Drysdale, M. T. B., & Schulz, R. A.(2001)。Cognitive learning styles and academic performance in two postsecondary computer application course。  new window
26.Rindermnn, H., & Neubauer, A. C.(2001)。The influence of personality on three aspects of cognitive performance: processing speed。  new window
27.Ruble, T. L., & Stout, D. E.(1993)。Comments on the ise of the LSI in research on student performance in accounting education。  new window
28.Ruokamo, H., & Pohjolainen, S.(2000)。Distance learning in a multimedia networks project: main results。  new window
29.Wan, W. N., Luk, C. L, & Lai, C. L.(2000)。Personality correlates of loving styles among Chinese students in Hong Kong。  new window
30.Witt L. A.(2002)。The interactive effects of extraversion and conscientiousness on performance。  new window
圖書論文
1.Goldberg, L. R.(1981)。Language and individual differences: The search universals in personality lexicons。Review of personality and social psychology。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage。  new window
2.楊國樞(1993)。劉邵的人格理論及其詮釋。人觀、意義與社會。臺北：中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 國小學校教育再製社會階層化?家長社會資本對學童學業成就及學校適應之作用
2. 離島地區國中生的家庭社經地位與英語學習成就相關之研究：以父親與自我教育期望為中介變項
3. 評劉嘉薇，《客家選舉政治：影響客家族群投票抉擇因素的分析》(臺北市：五南出版社，2019)
4. 國中生家庭社經地位與英文學習成就之研究：以併列教育期望為中介變項
5. 「我」對「他們」：都會弱勢國中生公民素養之研究
6. 臺南市偏鄉學校國中生的學習動機對其社經地位與學業成就之中介效果
7. 經濟弱勢學生學習態度與學業表現之縱貫研究
8. 家庭社經地位與學業成就關係之研究--以學業發展自我效能為中介變數
9. 家長參與和國小學童抗拒文化關聯之研究
10. 能力分班、補習與學習成效的關聯：從地域特徵與學校屬性談起
11. 學做工還是怕做工？臺灣社會高學業成就勞動階級學生及其家長的反再製心態之分析
12. 應用重要-表現程度分析法探討大學生專業英語學習成效--以觀光管理學系學生為例
13. 探討高職餐旅學生人格特質、學習滿意度與學習成效之研究--以北部地區高中職餐旅群學生為例
14. 臺灣近20年(1994∼2014)教育研究的回顧和比較--家庭背景與教育成就之間關係的分析
15. 提升人力資本以強化國際競爭力的新移民子女教育政策之探討
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：787（臺灣：786，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67468234
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上