:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中學藝術與人文領域「探索與表現」能力指標轉化初探--以七年級表演藝術課程為例
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:林玫君 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Mei-chun
出版日期:2013
卷期:16:3
頁次:頁79-109
主題關鍵詞:能力指標轉化表演藝術課程戲劇課程課程設計行動研究Transformation of competence indicatorPerforming arts curriculumDrama curriculumCurriculum designAction research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:106
  • 點閱點閱:31
本研究是以指標轉化的整體概念,從「探索與表現」面向出發,探討臺灣國中藝術與人文領域指標轉化的歷程與課程實踐的問題。研究結果一發現我國課程主軸與與英美課程類似,都包含「創作基本」、「展演應用」、「賞析回應」與「社會生活的連結」等四個面向。經過進一步縱向分析指標,發現「探索與表現」包含六個共通的核心概念;而在橫向分析中,找出指標中小學與中學生在不同發展階段的能力差異。研究結果二分析我國補充教材說明及英美課程內容,找出表演藝術詳細的課程內容與具體的教學目標,提供後續課程設計的依據。研究結果三,實際設計八週課程並進行三個循環的行動省思,發現中學教師在面對課綱時,除了轉化解釋的問題外,在協助學生接續小學課程及準備表演藝術應用與展演的課程上也是一大挑戰。研究結果提供未來課程設計與教學之建議,也可以做為未來師培及課程轉化之參考。
Based on the whole concept in the transformation of competence indicator s, this study focused on the transferring process from the competence indicators of Art and Humanity to curriculum and teaching objectives for Performing Arts in middle schools in Taiwan. A comparison between the Performing Arts indicators and those in drama curriculum from U.K. and U.S showed that the core concepts of indicators in the Arts and Humanity were similar in four aspects: ”Exploring,” ”Performing,” and ”Responding,” and ”Connecting to social life.” Moreover, through the vertical analysis on the indicators, there were six core concepts under ”Exploring & Performing”. Through the horizontal analysis, the developmental differences between elementary and middle school students were found. Furthermore, the detailed curriculum content and concrete teaching objectives were found in the present study through the complementary reference from Taiwan and curriculum details from UK and US. The analysis became the framework for the eight-week curriculum plan in the next session. Finally, an eight-week curriculum was designed and experimented through a three-cycled action research. Aside from the problems in transformation, there was a big challenge for teachers to equip their students with the ability to make the connections from elementary schools to middle high schools. The results of the present study could not only offer suggestions for future curriculum design and teaching in Performing Arts but also provide references for future teacher education and curriculum transformation.
期刊論文
1.林玫君(2006)。英美戲劇教育之歷程發展。美育,154,20-36。  延伸查詢new window
2.林玫君(20100600)。表演藝術評分規範之建立--以小學低年級「戲劇創作能力之應用」為例。當代教育研究,18(2),113-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.謝政達(20100600)。初探國中藝術與人文教科書教學和能力指標之校準研究。教科書研究,3(1),41-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林玫君(20100600)。國小戲劇課程之實作評量研究--建立「戲劇基本能力」之評分規範。教育學刊,34,179-222。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.李勝雄(20020700)。健康與體育領域能力指標之概念分析、轉化與教材發展。國教天地,149,3-12。  延伸查詢new window
6.林玫君(20061000)。表演藝術之課程發展與行動實踐--從「戲劇課程」出發。課程與教學,9(4),119-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.潘麗珠、楊龍立、蕭千金(20040400)。九年一貫本國語文第三階段能力指標的具體轉化及示例分析。人文及社會學科教學通訊,14(6),6-22。  延伸查詢new window
8.林玫君(20110500)。國小中年級戲劇賞析評分規範與實作評量任務之發展研究。藝術教育研究,21,1-31+33-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.葉連祺(20020400)。九年一貫課程與基本能力轉化。教育研究月刊,96,49-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.許民陽、林麗詩、卓家夙(200411)。轉化能力指標設計教案模組及多元評量實務探討。自然與生活科技學習領域課程研討會,國立臺灣師範大學 。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.楊思偉(1999)。規劃國民中小學九年一貫基本能力實踐策略。臺北:臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Neelands, J.(2004)。Beginning Drama 11-14。London, UK:David Fulton。  new window
2.Hornbrook, D.(1991)。Education in drama: Casting the dramatic curriculum。London, UK:Routledge。  new window
3.Kempe, A.、Marigold, A.(2000)。Progression in secondary drama。London, UK:Heinemann。  new window
4.Yorks, L.、Marsick, V. J.(2000)。Organizational learning and transformation。Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
5.American Alliance of Theatre for Youth、American Association for Theatre in Secondary Education(1987)。National Theatre Education Project. A Model Drama/ Theatre Curriculum Philosophy, Goals and Objectives。New Orleans, LA:Anchorage Press。  new window
6.McCaslin, Nellie(2006)。Creative Drama in the Classroom and Beyond。Pearson Education。  new window
7.Salisbury, B.(1987)。Theatre arts in the elementary school (k-3) and (4-6)。New Orleans, LA:Anchorage Press。  new window
8.Siks, G. B.(1983)。Drama with children。New York, NY:Harper & Row。  new window
9.李坤崇(2004)。綜合活動學習領域概論。臺北:心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要藝術與人文學習領域。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
11.English, Fenwick W.(1992)。Deciding What to Teach and Test: Developing, Aligning, and Auditing the Curriculum。Newbury Park, CA:Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
12.Beane, James A.(1997)。Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education。Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
13.Cranton, P.(1994)。Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educators of adults。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
14.李坤崇(20060000)。教學目標、能力指標與評量。臺北:高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.林玫君(2005)。創造性戲劇理論與實務:教室中的行動研究。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.Mezirow, Jack(1991)。Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning。Jossey-Bass。  new window
圖書論文
1.高新建(2003)。能力指標轉化模式(一):能力指標之分析及其教學轉化。社會學習領域課程設計與教學策略。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE