:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:組織健康文化與組織健康促進效能、員工效能之探討~多層次分析驗證模式
作者:林雅雯
作者(外文):Yea-Wen Lin
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:管理學院博士班
指導教授:林玥岑
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:組織健康文化組織健康促進效能員工效能多層次分析organizational health culturehealth promotion effectiveness of organizationemployee effectivenessmulti-level analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:175
組織健康文化是組織所建構的一套建康導向的核心屬性,為組織成員所共享,並具有規範員工行為的作用。本研究以多層次觀點驗證組織健康文化分別對組織成效與個體成效的影響,組織成效部份著重於組織的健康促進效能,個體成效則著重於員工效能。具體而言,本研究以多層次觀點驗證組織健康文化、組織健康促進效能、員工個人健康行為與員工效能之間的關係。
以立意抽樣選取55家台灣企業組織為研究樣本,並自每家企業組織中選取20位專職員工進行問卷施測。本研究針對研究架構中的構念特性分別設計「組織問卷」及「員工問卷」為研究工具,以蒐集相關資料。組織問卷由企業組織中負責健康促進業務之人員依據組織的實際狀況進行填答;員工問卷則由專職員工進行填答。最後有效回收之企業家數為54家,員工人數共1011人,有效問卷回收率為91.91%。資料分析方面,除了進行描述性統計、相關與迴歸分析之外,並利用層級線性模型來進行多層次假說的驗證。
研究結果發現,在組織成效方面,組織健康文化對健康促進規劃成效、健康促進產出,以及員工平均教育訓練費用、健康諮詢率等有顯著影響。而對於病假率、意外事件發生率、健康促進活動出席率與健康促進活動滿意度則無顯著影響。在個體成效方面,組織健康文化對於員工效能三面向(自評工作績效、利他行為與幸福感)的影響,是透過健康行為的完全多層次中介作用而產生。此外,研究亦發現個人健康價值觀對其健康行為有顯著的正向影響關係,但個人健康價值觀對於組織健康文化與員工健康行為並未具有調節作用。
研究結果支持組織健康文化對於組織在健康促進上的推動成效,以及組織內成員的健康行為與工作效能的影響,在跨層次理論基礎下,本研究建立這些連接點,有助於健康促進相關理論的建構與發展。研究的重要發現亦提醒企業組織,組織的健康文化與員工的健康行為確實有助於員工工作效能的提升,投資職場健康促進計畫來強化員工健康行為、改善組織健康環境與文化,長期而言必可獲致效益。
Organizational health culture is a set of health-oriented core attributes created by an organization and shared among its members that regulate employee behavior. This study attempts to apply the multi-level analysis to verify the effects of organizational health culture on the organizational-level and individual-level effectiveness of health promotion. The organizational-level effectiveness is focusing on the health promotion effectiveness of organization, and the individual-level effectiveness is focusing on the employee effectiveness. Specifically, this study adopts a multi-level perspective to verify the relationship among the organizational health culture, health promotion effectiveness of organization, employee health behavior, and employee effectiveness.
The purposive sampling method was used to sample 55 enterprises across Taiwan for organizational sample to fill out organization questionnaires that is designed to collect effectiveness information on the WHP. Additionally, a sample of the employee survey (filled out by 20 full-time employees) was collected from each enterprise. They contained information related to personal perception on organizational health culture. This information was personally filled out by individual employees and was aggregated into organizational-level data. Questionnaires that were gathered and validated included 54 returns from organizational survey and 1011 returns from employee surveys, indicating a valid response rate of 91.91%. Following the calculation of descriptive statistics, the Pearson product moment correlation was used to analysis the relationship among the constructs. Thereafter, Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) was used to test the multi-level hypotheses.
Terms of the organizational-level effectiveness, the results showed that organizational health culture had a significant impact on the planning effectiveness and the output of health promotion. However, organizational health culture had no significant impact on the sick leave rate, accidents rate, satisfaction, and attendance of health promotion activities. Terms of the individual-level effectiveness, the results showed that the effect of organizational health culture on three dimensions of employee effectiveness (self-evaluated performance, altruism, and happiness) were full multi-level mediated by employee healthy behavior. Furthermore, the study found that individual health value has a significant positive effect on employee health behaviors, but no significant moderating effect on the relationship between organizational health culture and employee health behavior.
The results of this study support that organizational health culture has impacts on the health promotion effectiveness of organization and employee effectiveness. In the multi-level model, this study established the connection of these constructs will help the construction of health promotion theories. The findings also remind business executives that organizational health culture and employee health behavior help improving employee effectiveness. Investment in workplace health promotion programs improve employee health behavior and enhance organizational health culture and environment would benefit the organization in the long run.
中文部分:
呂學琳(2003)。三軍總醫院發展健康促進醫院組織環境之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立國防醫學院,台北市。
李卓倫(1985)。健康的定義與假說。公共衛生,12(2),146-159。
李新民、戴嘉南、黃美惠(2005)。幼兒教師的組織文化知覺與組織承諾初探。南大學報,39(1),21-40。new window
李再長(譯)(2006 )。組織理論與管理 (原作者:Daft, R. L.)。台北市:華泰文化公司。(原著出版年:1999)。
李蘭(1988)。衛生教育與促進健康。台北:巨流。
李蘭(1991)。健康行為的概念與研究。中華民國公共衛生學會雜誌,10(5),199-211。
李蘭(2010)。健康行為的概念。載於李蘭(主編),健康行為與健康教育。台北市:巨流圖書公司。
江宜珍、李蘭(2010)。社會認知理論,健康行為與健康教育。載於李蘭(主編),健康行為與健康教育。台北市:巨流圖書公司。
吳明隆(2003)。SPSS統計應用學習實務--問卷分析與應用統計。台北市:知城數位科技公司。
吳清山(1992)。學校效能研究。台北市:五南圖書公司。new window
范國棟、李蘭(2008)。職場健康促進:國際與台灣經驗之比較。台灣公共衛生雜誌 27(4),271-281。new window
徐儆暉(2002)。職業安全衛生新使命-創造促進健康的工作場所。勞工安全衛生簡訊,53,1-2。
洪瑞斌、李志鴻、劉兆明、周志明(2007)。從組織文化角度探究健康組織之意涵。應用心理研究,36,151-191。new window
陳淑玲(2006)。創新行為與創新績效跨層次分析-資源基礎理論觀點(未出版之博士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。new window
陳美燕、周傳姜、黃秀華、王明城、邱獻章、廖張京棣(1997)。健康促進的生活方式量表中文版之修訂與測試。長庚護理 8(1),14-21。new window
陳禹(2005)。健康的職場與健康的人:科技合作與整合的需要。應用心理研究,28,18-22。
陳芬苓(2005)。企業規模與實施職場健康促進之調查研究。台灣管理學刊,5(1),149-168。new window
陸洛 (1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊人文及社會科學,8(1),115-137。
郭信智(2010)。職場健康促進計畫執行之組織脈絡及其經濟性效益。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC 98-2511-S-214-001),未出版。
郭建志(2005)。職場健康心理學的機會與挑戰。應用心理研究,28,12-14。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。new window
溫福星、邱皓政 (2009a)。多層次模型方法論:階層線性模式的關鍵議題與試解。台大管理論叢,19(2),263-294。new window
溫福星、邱皓政 (2009b)。組織研究中的多層次調節中介效果:以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例。管理學報,26(2),189-211。new window
溫福星、邱皓政(2011)。多層次模式方法論~階層線性模式的關鍵問題與試解。台北市:新亞測驗評量計技術研究中心。new window
鄭伯壎(1990)。組織文化價值觀的數量衡鑑。中華心理學刊,32,31-49。new window
鄭伯壎(1993)。組織價值觀與組織承諾、組織公民行為、工作績效的關係:不同加權模式與差距模式之比較。中華心理學刊,35(1),43-57。new window
鄭伯壎(1985)。工作取向領導行為與部屬工作績效:補足模式及其驗證(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣大學,台北市。new window
鄭伯壎、林姿葶、鄭弘岳、周麗芳、任金剛、樊景立(2010)。家長式領導與部屬效能:多層次分析觀點。中華心理學刊 52(1),1-23。new window
鄭伯壎、郭建志(1993)。組織價值觀與個人工作效能--符合度研究途徑。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,75:69-103。
鄭曜忠(2001)。高級中學行政主管知識管理態度、學校組織文化與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。new window
劉俊昌(2000)。企業文化契合度與留職傾向之研究-以中國石油公司為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。

英文部分:
Allen, J. (2002). Building supportive cultural environments. In M. P. O’Donnell (Ed.), Health promotion in the workplace (pp. 202-217). Third Edition, Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers, Inc.
Allen, R. F., &; Linde, S. (1981). Lifegain: The exciting new program that will change your health-and your life. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Bagozzi, R. P., &; Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structure equations models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16(1), 76-94.
Bassiri, D. (1988). Large and small sample properties of maximum likelihood estimates for the hierarchical linear model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Becker, H. S. (1982). Culture: A Sociological View. Yale Review, 71, 513-27.
Bretz, R. D., &; Judge, T. A. (1993). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32-54.
Raudenbush, S. W., &; Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as Paradox:Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5), 539-553.
Cameron, K. S., &; D. A. Whetten (1983). Organizational Effectiveness:A Comparison of Multiple Model. New York:Academic Press.
Cameron, K. S., &; Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Chatman, J. A. (1989).Improving International Organizational Research : A Model of Person-Organization Fit. Academy of Management Review,14(3), 333-349.
Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459-484.
Chapman, L. S. (2003). Meta-evaluation of worksite health promotion economic return studies. Art of Health Promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion , 6, 1–16.
Chu, C., Driscoll, T., &; Dwyer, S. (1997). The health-promoting workplace: an integrative perspective. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 21(4), 377-385.
Connolly, T., Conlon, E. J., &; Deutsch, S. J. (1980). Organizational Effectiveness: A Multiple-Constituency Approach. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 211-217.
Cooke, R. A., &; Szumal, J. L. (1993). Measuring normative beliefs and shared behavioral expectations in organizations: The reliability and validity of the Organizational Culture Inventory. Psychological Reports, 72, 1299-1330.
Cutknecht, D. B., &; Cutknecht, D. M. (1990). Building Productive Organizations Through Health and Wellness Program. Lanham, MD: University Press
Deal, T. E., &; Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Fielding, J. E., &; Piserchia, P. V. (1989). Frequency of Worksite Health Promotion Activities. American Journal of Public Health, 79, 16-20.
European Network for Workplace Health Promotion (2007). The Luxembourg Declaration on Workplace Health Promotion in the European Union. [Online]. Available at: http://www.enwhp.org/index.php?id=29#c995.
Fornell, C., &; Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unbervables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
Fredrickson, B. L., &; Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60 (7), 678-686.
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., &; Donnelly, J. H. (2000). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Process(10th edition). London: McGraw Hill Company.
George, J. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in group. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 107-116.
Gochman, D. S. (1982). Labels, Systems, and Motives: Some Perspectives on Future Research. Health Education Quarterly, 9, 167-174.
Gochman, D. S. (1997). Health Behavior Research: Definitions and Diversity. In D. S. Gochman (Ed.). Handbook of Health Behavior Research, Vol. I. Personal and Social Determinants. New York: Plenum Press.
Golaszewski, T., Hoebbel, C., Crossley, J., Foley G., &; Dorn J. (2008). The reliability and validity of an organizational health culture audit. The American Journal of Health Studies, 23(3), 116-142.
Goetzel, R., &; Ozminkowski, R. (2008). The health and cost benefits of worksite healthpromotion programs. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 303-23.
Hekman, K. (2003). What dose a healthy medical practice look like? The Hekman Group [Online].Available at: http://www.hekmangroup.com/practicelook.htm.
Heward, S., Hutchins, C., &; Keleher, H. (2007). Organizational change-key to capacity building and effective health promotion. Health Promotion International, 22, 170-178.
Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723-744.
Hollander, R., &; Lengermann, J. (1988). Corporate characteristics and worksite health promotion programs: survey findings from Fortune 500 companies. Social Science &; Medicine, 26(5), 491-501.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., &; Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
Janer, G. S., &; Kogevinas M. (2002). Health Promotion Trials at Worksites and Risk Factors for Cancer. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 28(3), 141-157.
Katz, D. &; Kahn, R. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
Kirtley, G. (1999). Designing for the Healthy Organization. Health Promoting Hospitals in Practice: Developing Projects and Networks. HPH Series Vol: 3. Health Promotion Publications. Gamburg. Germany. Kok, G. (1993). Why are so many health promotion programs ineffective? Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 3, 12–17.
Kok, G. (1993). Why are so many health promotion programs ineffective? Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 3(2), 12–17.
Krull, J. L., &; MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel Modeling of Individual and Group Level Mediated Effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(2), 249-277.
Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., &; Adkins, C. L. (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 424-432.
Moorman, R. H., &; Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism-Collectivism as An Individual Difference Predictor of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 127-143.
Muto, T., &; Yamauchi, K. (2001). Evaluation of a Multicomponent Workplace Health Promotion Program Conducted in Japan for Improving Employees' Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors. Preventive Medicine, 33(6), 571-577.
National Quality Institute[NQI] (1998). The Canadian Healthy Workplace Criteria. Canada:NQI, 2-5.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (Second Edition), New York: McGraw-Hill.
O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J. A., &; Caldwell, D. (1991). People and organizational culture: A Profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516.
Peters, T. J., &; Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Harper &; Row.
Quick, J. C., Macik-Frey, M., &; Cooper, C. L. (2007). Managerial Dimensions of Organizational Health: The Healthy Leader at Work. Journal of Management Studies, 44(2), 189–205
Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organizational Behavior: concepts, controversies and applications (8th Edition). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In B. M. Staw &; L. L. Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1-37), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
R yff, C. D., &; Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9 (1), 1-28.
Sathe, V. (1983). Implications of corporate culture: A manager’s guide to action. Organization Dynamics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Siehl, C., &; Martin, J. (1990). Organizational culture: A key to financial performance? In Schneider, B. (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25). New York: Academic Press.
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership (Second Edition), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Stewart, W. H., Ledgerwood, D. E., &; May, R. C. (1996). Educating Business Schools About Safety &; health is No Accident. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 919-926.
Steers, R. (1975). Problems in the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 546-48.
Wilson, R. A., &; Wagner, D.A. (1997). Developing organizational health at the worksite. American Journal of Health Studies, 13(2), 105-109.
WHO (1946), Definition of Health. Retrieved 11-10-2005 [Online]. Available at: http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/.
van der Leeden, R., &; Busing, F. (1994). First iteration versus IGLS/RIGLS estimates in two-level models: A Monte Carlo study with ML3. Unpublished manuscript. Leiden: Department of Psychometrics and Research methodology, Leiden University.
Vinson, E. E., Scott, H. E., &; Lamont, L. M. (1977). The Role of Personal Value in Marketing and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing, 41(2), 44-50.
Wiener, Y. (1988). Forms of value systems: A focus on organizational effectiveness and cultural change and maintenance. Academy of Management Review, 13, 534-545.
Yuchtman, E., &; Seashore, J. (1967). A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 32, 891-903
Zammuto, R. F. (1982). Assessing organizational effectiveness: System change, adaptation, and strategy. New York: State University of New York Press.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 部屬啊!您有做自己的機會嗎?尚嚴、專權雙元領導與部屬任務績效之關聯性:以情緒調節策略揭開潘朵拉的盒子
2. 部屬難為:領導者利組織不道德行為與部屬離職傾向、越級建言、主管導向組織公民行為與沉默行為之關係:以領導者-部屬交換關係為調節效果
3. 設計思考提升學習動機與問題解決信心--臺灣大學生學習設計思考課程的實證分析
4. 學校支持對教師創造力教學行為影響之研究:角色認定與專業學習社群的多層次中介分析
5. 國小教師參與專業學習社群對學生學習動機與學習行為影響之研究
6. 國際觀光旅館職場友誼與工作表現關係之探討--以卓越能力商數為中介變項
7. 教師協作在校長教學領導對教師自我效能影響的多層次中介效果研究:兼論教育階段的調節效果
8. 青少年社會網絡指標及幽默表現風格之交互作用影響與被霸凌經驗之關係
9. 中高齡職涯未來時間觀、職場成功老化和就業力之關係--探討工作要求與資源的調節式中介作用
10. 轉換型領導、交易型領導、倫理氣候與情緒智力對房屋仲介經紀人員工作績效之影響--以信任管理者為中介變數
11. 多元個案管理對失智者問題行為及家庭照顧者困擾、自我效能、憂鬱、負荷和健康促進行為之成效
12. 國民小學實施課程標準時期教育領導研究趨勢之探究--應用文字探勘技術分析
13. 國小教師工作壓力與工作滿意度之關係研究:教師自我效能感的中介效果
14. 居服員留任傾向之研究
15. 國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能、任務價值對學習投入之影響
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE