:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以素養導向觀點探討中等學校藝術師資培育教材教法課程現況與實踐
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:陳育祥
作者(外文):Chen, Yu-hsiang
出版日期:2018
卷期:63:4
頁次:頁89-117
主題關鍵詞:十二年國民基本教育素養導向師資培育藝術教材教法12-year compulsory educationArts teaching material and methodsCompetence-orientedTeacher education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:226
  • 點閱點閱:9
鑑於十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱核心素養理念,藝術領域課程綱要核心素養與學習重點也依循對應與發展,藝術師資培育階段面對十二年國民基本教育課程政策的典範轉移與實踐轉化,亦需以現存之情境脈絡、處境與課題進行思考。本研究除以文獻梳理探討中等教育階段藝術領域師資培育的學術發展趨勢,並蒐集藝術師資培育單位分科/領域教材教法課程大綱,透過課程大綱文件內容分析與教材教法授課教師個別訪談,將資料概念化與類目化交叉比對,以探討師資培育階段藝術分科/領域教材教法課程與實踐現況。研究結果指出,受到藝術師資生起點行為、課程時數與教師甄選實際考量因素,藝術教材教法課程之現況重視教案設計與教學能力、學習內容多元變異性高、課程綱要之理解與鑑賞教學內容缺乏、合科教學成效不佳等情形,面對未來十二年國民基本教育課程綱要施行,有待思考素養導向之實踐,本研究依據結果提出相關建議。
Because the curriculum guidelines of 12-year compulsory education consider competency to be its core philosophy, the guidelines drafted for the arts curriculum thus include key learning points and the development of core competencies. However, in addition to these guidelines, changes to the practice and requirements of arts teacher training programs in accordance with this shift in policy require investigation. Through a literature review, this study offers a discussion of the trend of academic development in secondary school teacher training programs. In addition to collecting syllabi for "fine arts/visual arts teaching materials and methods" from teacher training institutes, the researcher conducted individual interviews with instructors of these courses. Through interviews and an analysis of document contents, the data were conceptualized and categorized to cross-verify and investigate the status quo and practice of the "teaching materials and methods" curriculum in teacher training programs. The research results indicated discrepancies in preservice teacher entry behavior, number of teaching hours, and anxiety related to participating in screening tests, and that these factors had the most significant effect on teaching competence and lesson plan design. Significant variance was observed among teacher responses to learning contents, including inadequate understanding of curriculum guidelines, insufficient appreciation for teaching arts, and ineffective interdisciplinary teaching. Therefore, how arts teaching materials and methods are practiced during the implementation of 12-year compulsory education curriculum guidelines requires further investigation. Suggestions are also provided in this study based on the research results.
期刊論文
1.趙惠玲(19960600)。從我國國中美術教育現況談師資培育的一些課題。師大學報,41,573-605。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王采微、羅美蘭(20101200)。藝術師資培育生的全球化與全球在地觀點的視覺文化影象研究。國際藝術教育學刊,8(2),95-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Shulman, J. H.、Colbert, J. A.(1989)。Cases as catalysts for cases: Inducing reflection in teacher education。Action in Teacher Education,11(1),44-52。  new window
4.郭禎祥、楊須美(19880600)。以艾斯納(E. W. Eisner)「學術本位的美術教育」(DBAE)為理論基礎探討現今我國國民美術教育。師大學報,33,575-593。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Clark, G. A.、Day, M. D.、Greer, W. D.(1987)。Discipline-base art education: Becoming student of art。The Journal of Aesthetic Education,21(2),129-193。  new window
6.Hamblen, K. A.(1997)。Second Generation DBAE。Visual Arts Research,23(2),98-106。  new window
7.蔡清田(20110600)。課程改革的核心素養之功能。教育科學期刊,10(1),203-217。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.黃嘉雄(20110200)。九年一貫課程該實施學習領域之合科教學或分科教學。教育資料與研究,98,27-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.趙惠玲(20030500)。典範與妥協:我國中學階段視覺藝術師資之培育。藝術教育研究,5,49-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林曼麗(20030900)。藝術教育於二十一世紀教育中應有的角色。國家政策季刊,2(3),91-102。  延伸查詢new window
11.Krug, D. H.、Cohen-Evron, N.(2000)。Curriculum integration positions and practices in art education。Studies in Art Education,41(3),258-275。  new window
12.呂燕卿(19990400)。藝術與人文學習領域綱要與統整性互融式課程設計之觀念。美育,106,29-38。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳瓊花(20010500)。從美術教育的觀點探討課程統整設計之模式與案例。視覺藝術,4,97-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Efland, A. D.(1995)。The Spiral and the lattice: Changes in cognitive learning theory with implications for art education。Studies in Art Education,36(3),134-153。  new window
15.Greer, W. D.(1984)。Discipline-based art education: Approaching art as a subject of study。Studies in Art Education,25(4),212-218。  new window
16.Darling-Hammond, Linda(2000)。Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence。Education Policy Analysis Archives,8(1),1-44。  new window
17.Duncum, P.(2002)。Clarifying visual culture Art education。Art Education,55(3),6-11。  new window
18.吳清山(20060300)。師資培育的理念與實踐。教育研究與發展期刊,2(1),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Zimmerman, E.(1994)。Current research and practice about pre-service visual art specialist teacher education。Studies in art education,35(2),79-89。  new window
20.李翠玲、黃澤洋(20160600)。應用案例教學法增進師資生特殊教育知能之研究。教育理論與實踐學刊,33,1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.陳瓊花(20170300)。美感素養導向教學之理論與實踐。教育研究月刊,275,18-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.洪如玉、陳惠青(20160300)。解構哲學之探討及其對審美教育學之啟示。教育科學研究期刊,61(1),115-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.王麗雁、鄭明憲(20110300)。蛻變中的成長--臺灣視覺教育百年。美育,180,6-15。  延伸查詢new window
24.吳清山(20171100)。素養導向教師教育:理念、挑戰與實踐。學校行政,112,14-27。  延伸查詢new window
25.吳清山、王令宜(20170300)。教師專業標準的理論與應用。學校行政,108,98-118。  延伸查詢new window
26.吳政達、蔡瑜庭(20170100)。從能力本位到標準本位的師資培育。教育研究月刊,273,48-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.張民杰、吳佩真(20070600)。課程大綱應具備的內容與大學生運用情形初探。教育科學期刊,7(1),58-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.張民杰、濮世緯(20120600)。微型教學在師資培育課程「教學原理」之應用。教育理論與實踐學刊,25,57-59+61-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.陳育祥(20161200)。心智圖像策略運用於師資生視覺藝術課程設計之實踐探究。國際藝術教育學刊,14(2),142-185。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.陳昭儀(20090400)。臺灣之大學創造力課程大綱內容分析之探究。課程與教學,12(2),1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.黃嘉莉、葉怡芬、許瑛玿、曾元顯(20170600)。取得中學教職的關鍵因素:運用決策樹探勘師資培育歷程。教育科學研究期刊,62(2),89-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.趙惠玲、高震峰(20170500)。視覺藝術教育領域之熱門及前瞻研究議題分析:2006至2016。藝術教育研究,33,1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.鄭明憲、李其昌、陳曉嫻(20171200)。中等教育階段藝術領域教師職前專門課程基準方向的建構。藝術教育研究,34,1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.蕭炳欽(20030300)。提昇藝術教育師資水準之行政策略。美育,132,70-73。  延伸查詢new window
35.Comeaux, E.、Brown, A.、Sieben, N. P.(2015)。Issues in athletic administration: A content analysis of syllabi from intercollegiate athletics graduate courses。Innovative Higher Education,40(4),359-372。  new window
36.Jonassen, D. H.、Hernandez-Serrano, J.(2002)。Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving。Educational Technology Research and Development,50(2),65-77。  new window
37.Niemi, H.、Nevgi, A.、Aksit, F.(2016)。Active learning promoting student teachers' professional competences in Finland and Turkey。European Journal of Teacher Education,39(4),471-490。  new window
38.Orchard, J.、Winch, C.(2015)。What training do teachers need?: Why theory is necessary to good teaching。Impact,22,1-43。  new window
39.袁汝儀(19941200)。由戰後臺灣的五種視覺對藝術教育趨勢--探討視覺藝術教師自主性之重要性與培養。美育,54,39-52。  延伸查詢new window
40.趙惠玲(20040800)。後現代藝術教育思潮:視覺文化藝術教育。臺灣教育,628,14-22。  延伸查詢new window
41.Shulman, Lee S.(1986)。Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching。Educational Researcher,15(2),4-14。  new window
42.Pintrich, Paul R.(2004)。A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students。Educational Psychology Review,16(4),385-407。  new window
43.張民杰(20080300)。以案例教學法增進實習教師班級經營知能之研究。國民教育研究學報,20,147-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.張栢烟、許雯婷(20040600)。視覺文化藝術教育內涵分析。臺東大學教育學報,15(1),245-263。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳朝平(2000)。臺灣美術教育思想的演變與跨世紀的思維。2000年臺灣美術教育發展國際學術研討會。臺北市:國立歷史博物館。190-215。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳瓊花(2005)。當前視覺藝術教育研究的趨勢。藝術教育研究的回顧與展望研討會,國立屏東教育大學主辦 。屏東市:國立屏東教育大學。1-22。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃壬來(2006)。國際視覺藝術教育趨勢。2006全國藝術教育專題研討會,國立花蓮教育大學主辦 。花蓮縣。9-38。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳瓊花、康台生、姚世澤、趙惠玲、吳舜文、蘇郁惠、林佳儀(2003)。臺灣地區高級中等學校暨大專院校一般藝術教育現況普查及問題分析。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃冬富(2008)。戰後臺灣的中小學視覺藝術師資養成教育 (計畫編號:NSC96-2411-H-153-003-)。屏東市:國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gordon, J.、Halász, G.、Krawczyk, M.、Leney, T.、Michel, A.、Pepper, D.、Putkiewicz, E.、Wisniewski, J.(2009)。Key competences in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education。Warsaw:Case-Center for Social and Economic Research。  new window
2.Eisner, E. W.(1989)。Educating artistic vision。Reston, Virginia:The National Art Education Association。  new window
3.Feldman, Eldmand Burke(1970)。Becoming Human Through Art: Aesthetic experience in the school。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersery:Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
4.王秀雄(1990)。美術與教育。台北:臺北市立美術館。  延伸查詢new window
5.Efland, Arthur D.(2002)。Art and Cognition: Integrating the Visual arts in the Curriculum。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
6.Walker, S. R.(2001)。Teaching Meaning in Artmaking。Worcester, Mass.:Davis Publications。  new window
7.Holsti, Ole R.(1969)。Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities。Reading, Mass:Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.。  new window
8.Wiggins, G. P.、McTighe, J.(2011)。The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units。Alexandria, Virginia:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
9.莫大元(1956)。怎樣教美術。臺北市:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.莫大元(1968)。美術科教材教法。臺北市:國民中學教師職前訓練班。  延伸查詢new window
11.Broudy, H. S.(1972)。Enlightened cherishing: An essay on aesthetic education。Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press。  new window
12.Cavin, R. M.(2007)。Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teachers through microteaching lesson study。Tallahassee, FL:The Florida State University。  new window
13.Neuman, W. L.(2013)。Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
14.Newble, D.、Cannon, R.(2000)。A handbook for teachers in universities & colleges: A guide to improving teaching methods。London:Kogan Page。  new window
15.Walker, John A.、Chaplin, Sarah(1997)。Visual culture: An introduction。Manchester University Press。  new window
16.林曼麗(20000000)。臺灣視覺藝術教育研究。臺北:雄獅。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Lowenfeld, Viktor、Brittain, W. Lambert(1987)。Creative and mental growth。Macmillan。  new window
18.Strauss, Anselm、Corbin, Juliet(1998)。Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounder Theory。Sage。  new window
其他
1.曾鈺羢(2017)。師培重大變革--課程將全面鬆綁由大學自主,https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%B8%AB%E5%9F%B9%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%A7%E8%AE%8A%E9%9D%A9-%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E5%B0%87%E5%85%A8%E9%9D%A2%E9%AC%86%E7%B6%81%E7%94%B1%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E8%87%AA%E4%B8%BB-041100146.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.Erickson, M.(2004)。Interaction of teachers and curriculum。Handbook of research and policy in art education。Reston, VA:National Art Education Association。  new window
2.Thurber, F.(2004)。Teacher education as a field of study in art education: A comprehensive overview of methodology and methods used in research about art teacher education。Handbook of research and policy in art education。Reston, VA:National Art Education Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE