一、中文部分
王太慶、賀麟譯(1978)。哲學史演講錄。G. W. F. Hegel 原著:Vorlesungen uber die Geschichte der Philosophie。台北:谷風。
何俊青(2000)。建構式概念教學在國民小學社會科的實驗研究。國立高雄師範大學:未出版的博士論文。何衛平(2002)。高達瑪。台北市:生智文化事業。
吳穎沺(2003)。建構主義式的科學學習活動對國小高年級學生認知結構之影響。國立交通大學:未出版的碩士論文。呂燿宗(2001)。國小六年級自然科學建構式教學之研究。國立中正大學:未出版的碩士論文。
周華山(1993)。意義:詮釋學的啟迪。臺北市:臺灣商務。
林鶴貞(2003)。國小五年級視覺藝術色彩教學研究建構主義教學理念之應用。國立屏東師範學院:未出版的碩士論文。
姜得勝(2002)。教育問題的哲學思索。台北市:桂冠圖書。
國立臺灣師範大學學校體育研究與發展中心(1993)。樂趣化體育教材(一)。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學學校體育研究與發展中心。
國立臺灣師範大學學校體育研究與發展中心(1997)。籃球教材教法與評量。台北市:教育部。
張頌齡(2002)。建構式音樂教學之實徵研究。國立臺灣師範大學:未出版的碩士論文。
郭世德(2000)。理解式教學在國小五年級學生足球學習效果的研究。國立體育學院:未出版的碩士論文。
陳昇飛(2005)。社會建構主義在國小語文教學之實踐─社會互動教學與語文能力建。國立臺灣師範大學:未出版的博士論文。掌慶維、李勝雄、張美莉(1998)。體育合作學習與國小一般體育教學之教學效能比較。中華民國大專院校八十七年度體育學術研討會會刊(1053-1064頁)。屏東師範學院:1998中華民國大專院校體育學術研討會。
曾育豐 (1998)。國小六年級數學科建構式教學法與講授式教學法比較之研究。國立高雄師範大學:未出版的碩士論文。
馮朝霖(2002)。教育哲學導論。台北市:高等教育出版社。
黃志成(2004)。理解式球類教學對國小六年級學生羽球學習效果之研究。國立臺灣師範大學:未出版的碩士論文。
黃政傑(1991)。課程設計。台北市:東華。
黃鳳琴(2002)。建構主義教學對國小五年級學生「看星星」單元學習成效及概念分析研究。臺北市立師範學院:未出版的博士論文。
楊大春(2003)。梅洛龐蒂。台北市:生智文化事業。楊深坑(1988)。理論、詮釋與實踐。台北市:師大書苑。
楊深坑(2002)。科學理論與教育學發展。台北市:心理出版社。鄔昆如(1994)。現代西洋哲學思潮。台北市:黎明文化事業。
廖雯玲(1998)。建構主義取向教學法對國小六年級學生在「地球運動」單元學習之影響。國立台南師範學院:未出版的碩士論文。
廖經宏(2002)。建構取向教學模式對國小學童光學相關概念之影響。國立花蓮師範學院:未出版的碩士論文。
蔡宗達(2004)。理解式球類教學法與技能取向球類教學法比較研究。國立臺灣師範大學:未出版的碩士論文。
蔡錚雲(2001)。從現象學到後現代。台北市:五南圖書。鄭金川(1993)。梅洛龐蒂的美學。台北市:遠流出版社。蘇幼良(2002)。以建構主義教學策略探究國小二年級學童對「聲音」的概念學習。國立台北師範學院:未出版的碩士論文。
Gadamer, H. G. (2002)。在現象學與辯證法之間:一種自我批判的嘗試。載於洪漢鼎等譯,詮釋學經典文選下集(323-349頁)。台北市:桂冠圖書。
Gréhaigne, J. F., Chang, C. W. & Wallian, N. (2004). 建構取向體育教學的策略。載於台灣運動教育學會主編,建構取向體育教學策略研習會研習手冊(16-45頁)。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
蔡敏玲(2004)。我看教育質性研究創塑意義的問題與難題:經歷、剖析與再脈絡化。國立臺北師範學院學報,17(1),493-518頁。凌新福(1999)。胡賽爾的現象學及其在教育上的蘊含。教育研究,7,327-339。
鄭明長(1998)。教師知識與教室談話。國教學報,10,217-248。
甄曉蘭、曾志華。(1997)。建構教學理念的興起與運用。國民教育研究學報,3,179-208。陳正乾(1998)。發展與學習之間的關係―皮亞傑與維高斯基的對話。幼教天地,15,185-203。
陳明珠(2001)。從梅洛龐蒂之現象身體論及傳播的身體。世新大學人文社會學報,3期,169-189頁。陳淑敏(1998)。從社會互動看皮亞傑與維高斯基的理論及其對幼教之啟示。幼教天地,15,167-183。
鄭明長(2002)。發問對教學歷程之影響初探。國立台北師範學院學報,15,87-114。郭諭陵(2000)。教育研究典範的回顧與前瞻。教育研究資訊,8(6),89-108。游家政(1993)。詮釋學與教育研究。載於賈馥茗、楊深坑主編:教育學方法論,65-81。
曾月紅(1996)。符號學與認知學習、科際整合、教育研究的關係。教育資料與研究,9期,66-68。張景媛(1998)。新學習時代的來臨:建構學習的理論與實務。教育研究資訊,6(1),52-65。游家政(1998)。建構取向課程設計的評析。課程與教學季刊,1(3),31-46。洪蘭(2005)。閱讀,讓你的腦更有創造力。科學人雜誌,45,42-45。
歐用生(2003)。教師聲音和主體―當前課程領導的重要課題。載於歐用生、莊梅枝主編,活化課程領導(18-34頁)。台北縣:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
林生傳(1998)。建構主義的教學評析。課程與教學季刊,1(3), 1-14。朱則剛(1996)。建構主義對教學設計的意義。教育科技與媒體,26,3-12。闕月清(2005, 12)。理解式球類教學法對中學生學習效果之探討。報告發表於2005年國際運動教育學術研討會。國立體育學院。二、外文部分
Allison, S., & Thorpe, R.D. (1997). A comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching games within physical education: A skills approach versus a games for understanding approach. British Journal of Physical Education, 28(3), 17-21.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Azzarito, L., & Ennis, C. D. (2003). A sense of connection: Toward social constructivist physical education [Abstract]. Sport, education and society, 8, 179-198.
Azzarito, L., Solmon, M. A., & Afeman, H. (2003). Investigation a constructivist approach in physical education: Bridging theory and practice [Abstract]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 3, 35-36.
Bachelard, G. (1938). La formation de l’esprit scientifique [The formation of scientific spirit]. Paris: Vrin.
Bauersfeld, H. (1988). Interaction, construction, and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematic education. In T. Cooney & D. Grouws (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching (pp. 27-46). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Blomqvist, M., Luhtanen, P., & Laakso, L. (2000). Expert-novice differences in game performance and game understanding of youth badminton players. European Journal of Physical Education, 5(2), 208-219.
Blomqvist, M., Väattinen, T., & Luhtanen, P. (2005). Assessment of the secondary school students’ decision-making and game-play ability in soccer. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(2), 107-119.
Bredo, E. (1994). Reconstructing educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 23-45.
Brooker, R., Kirk, D., Braiuka, S., & Bransgrove, A. (2000). Implementing a game sense approach to teaching junior high school basketball in a naturalistic setting. European Physical Education Review, 6, 7-26.
Brooks, J. G. (1990). Teachers and students: Constructivists forging new connection. Educational Leadership, 18, 32-42.
Bucci, T. T. (2002). Paradigm parallel pedagogy: The significance of parallel paradigms. Journal of Educational Thought, 36(1), 69-85.
Bunker, D. J., & Thorpe, R. D. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in the secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 10, 9-16.
Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Ports-mouth, NH: Heinemann.
Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507-535). London: Sage.
Chen, A., Ennis, C. D., Martin, R. J., & Sun, H. C. (2005). Is physical activity level at risk in constructivist physical education [Abstract]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2, 64-65.
Chen, W. Y., & Rovegno, I. (2000). Examination of expert and novice teachers’ constructivist-oriented teaching practices using a movement approach to elementary physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71(4), 357-372.
Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, G. (1992). Learning the language: Discourse analysis in physical education. In A. C. Sparkes (Ed.), Research in physical education and sport: Exploring alternative visions (pp. 146-166). London: Falmer Press.
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23, 13-20.
Collins, A., Brown, J., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and methematics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 284181.)
Conquet, P., & Devaluez, J. (1986). Conception de l’éducation physique [Conception of physical education]. In P. Conquet & J. Devaluez (Eds.), Dossier d’éducation physique et sportive: Contenus et didactique (pp. 91-103). Paris: SNEP.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Crum, B. (1997). In search of paradigmatic identities: General comparison and commentary. In P. G. Schempp (Ed.), Scientific development of sport pedagogy (pp. 239-258). Münster: Waxmann.
Cunningham, D. J. (1992). Beyond educational psychology: Steps toward an educational semiotic. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 165-194.
Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Cognition as semiosis: The role of inference. Theory and Psychology, 8, 827-840.
Deleplace, R. (1979). Rugby de mouvement–Rugby total [Rugby in mouvement–Total rugby]. Paris: Édition Physique Education.
Descartes, R. (2000). Discours de la méthode [Discourse of the method]. Paris: GF Flammarion.
Dewey, J. (1960). The quest for certainty. New York: Capricorn.
Eagleton, T. (1996). Literary theory: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Eco, U. (1979). Lector in fabula. Paris: Poche.
Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Eco, U. (1985). Le rôle du lecteur [The role of the reader]. Paris: Grasset.
Eco, U. (1988). Sémiotique et philosophie du langage [Semiotic and language philosophy]. Paris: PUF.
Entwistle, N., Entwistle, A., & Tait, H. (1993). Academic understanding and contexts to enhance it: A perspective from research on student learning. In T. Duffy, J. Lowyck, D. H. Jonassen & T. M. Welsh (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 331-357). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Erdmann, R. (1997). Empirical sport pedagogy. In P. G. Schempp (Ed.), Scientific development of sport pedagogy (pp. 174-202). Münster: Waxmann.
Evans, J., & Clarke, G. (1988). Changing the face of physical education. In J. Evans (Ed.), Teachers, teaching and control in physical education (pp. 125-143). London: Falmer Press.
Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 8-33). New York: Teachers College Press.
French, K. E., & Thomas, J. R. (1987). The relation of knowledge development to children’s basketball performance. Journal of Psychology, 9, 15-32.
French, K. E., Spurgeon, J. H., & Nevett, M. E. (1995). Expert-novice differences in cognitive and skill execution components of youth baseball performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 194-201.
Gadamer, H. G. (1990). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. Marshall, Trans.). Taipei: Bookman Books.
Gallahue, D., & Ozmun, J. (2001). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults (5th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Brandsford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gréhaigne, J. F., & Godbout, P. (1998a). Observation, critical thinking and transformation : three key elements for a constructivist perspective of the learning process in team sport. In R. Feingold, C. Roger Rees, G. Barette, L. Fiorentino, S. Virgilio & E. Kowalski, (Eds.), Proceedings of the AIESEP World Sport Science Congress. New York: Adelphi University Press.
Gréhaigne, J. F., & Godbout, P. (1998b). Formative assessment in team sports with a tactical approach. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 69(1), 46-51.
Gréhaigne, J. F., Billard, M., & Laroche, J. Y. (1999). L’enseignement des jeux sportifs collectifs à l’école: Conception, construction, évaluation. Brussels: De Boeck.
Gréhaigne, J. F., Godbout, P., & Bouthier, D. (1997). Performance assessment in team sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 500-516.
Gréhaigne, J. F., Richard, J. F., Griffin, L. (2005). Teaching and learning team sports and games. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Gréhaigne, J. F., & Godbout, P. (1995). Tactical knowledge in team sports from a constructivist and cognitivist perspective. Quest, 47, 490-505.
Gréhaigne, J. F., Billard, M. & Laroche, J. Y. (1999). L’enseignement des jeux sportifs collectifs à l’école : Conception, construction, évaluation [Teaching games sports in school: Conception, construction, evaluation]. Bruxelles: De boeck.
Gréhaigne, J. F., Billard, M., Guillon, R., & Roche, J. (1989). Vers une autre conception de l'enseignement des sports collectifs [Toward alternative teaching conception of team sports]. In G. Bui-Xuan, P. Boyer, P. Chifflet & Y. Leziart (Eds.), Méthodologie et didactique de l'éducation physique et sportive (pp. 201-216). Paris: Association Francophone pour la Recherche en Activités Physiques et Sportives.
Gréhaigne, J. F., Godbout, P., & Bouthier, D. (2001). The teaching and learning of decision making in team sports. Quest, 53, 59-76.
Gréhaigne, J. F., Guillon, R., & Roche, J. (1993). Contribution à une réflexion sur les savoirs en sport collectif à l'école [Contribution to a reflexion on the knowledge of school team sports]. In G. Bui-Xuan & J. Gleyse (Eds.), Enseigner l'éducation physique et sportive (pp. 27-38). Clermont-Ferrand: Association Francophone pour la Recherche en Activités Physiques et Sportives.
Greisch, J. (2000). Le phénomène du jeu et les enjeux ontologiques de l’herméneutique [The phenomenon of the play and ontological stakes of hermeneutic]. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 3, 445-468.
Griffin, L. L., & Placek, J. H. (2001). The Understanding and development of learners' domain-specific knowledge: Introduction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20(4), 299-300.
Griffin, L. L., Oslin, J. L., & Mitchell, S. A. (1995). An analysis of two instructional approaches to teaching net games [Abstract]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 64.
Griffin, L., Butler, J., Lombardo, B., & Nastasi, R. (2003). An introduction to teaching games for understanding. In J. Butler, L. Griffin, B. Lombardo & R. Nastasi (Eds.), Teaching games for understanding in physical education and sport (pp. 1-9). Reston, VA: The National Association for Sport and Physical Education.
Grondin, J. (2003). Le tournant herméneutique de la phénomenologie [The turning hermenneutic of the phenomenology]. Paris: PUF.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). London: Sage.
Hagedorn, G. (1992a). Spiel [play]. In E. Beyer (Ed.), Wörterbuch des Sportwissenschaft (pp. 554-568). Schorndorf: Karl Hofmann.
Hagedorn, G. (1992b). Sportspiel [game sports]. In E. Beyer (Ed.), Wörterbuch des Sportwissenschaft (pp. 603-605). Schorndorf: Karl Hofmann.
Hayward, J. W. (1992). Scientific method and validation. In J. W. Hayward & F. J. Varela (Eds.), Gentle bridges: Conversation with the Dalai-Lama on the science of mind. Boston: Shambhala.
Heller, M. (2001). Discourse and interaction. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 250-264). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Helsen, W., & Pauwels, J. M. (1988). The use of a simulator in evaluation and training of tactical skills in soccer. In T. Reilly, A. Lees, K. Davids & W. J. Murphy (Eds.), Science and Football, 493-497.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, P. T., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Research, 25(4), 12-20.
Holt, N., Strean, W., & Bengoechea, E. (2002). Expanding the teaching games for understanding model: New Avenues for future research and practice. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 21, 162-176.
Honebein, P. C., Duffy, T. M., & Fishman, B. J. (1993). Constructivism and the design of learning environments: Context and authentic activities for learning. In T. Duffy, J. Lowyck, D. H. Jonassen & T. M. Welsh (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 97-108). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Hopper, T. (1996). Teaching games centered games using progressive principles of play. Canadian Association for Health Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 64, 4-7.
Iser, W. (1974). The implied reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jarvis, P. (1992). Paradoxes of learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Jauss, H. R. (2001). Pour une esthétique de la réception [Toward an aesthetic of reception]. Paris: Gallimard.
Jullien, F. (2000). Traité de l’efficacité [Treaty of effeciency]. Paris: Seuil.
Kerry, D. S., & Armour, K. M. (2001). Sport sciences and the promise of phenomenology: Philosophy, method, and insight. Quest, 52, 1-17.
Kirk, D., & Macdonald, D. (1998). Situated learning in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 376-387.
Koch, T. (1995). Interpretive approaches in nursing research: The influence of Husserl and Heidegger. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21, 827-836.
Larochelle, M., & Bednarz, N. (1998). Constructivism and education: Beyond epistemological correctness. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz & J. Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism and Education (pp. 1-20).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New york: Cambridge University Press.
Le Moigne, J. L. (1999). Les épistémologies constructivistes [The epistemologies of constructivists]. Paris: PUF.
Le Moigne, J. L. (2001). Le constructivisme: Les enracinements [The constructivism: The roots]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Light, R., & Fawns, R. (2003). Knowing the game: Integrating speech and action in games teaching through TGfU. Quest, 55, 161-176.
Loveland, K. A. (1991). Social affordances and interaction: Autism and the affordances of the human environment. Ecological Psychology, 3, 99-119.
Magill, R. (1998). Knowledge is more than we can talk about: Implicit learning in motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 104-110.
Maingueneau, D. (2002). La linguistique du discours [The linguistic discourse]. In P. Charaudeau & D. Maingueneau (Eds.), Dictionnaire d’analyse du discours. Paris: Seuil.
Masselot-Girard, M. (2000). Lire, interpréter, évaluer: Des lecteurs-acteurs [Read, interpret, evaluate: Readers and actors]. In M. Griselin, M. Masselot-Girard, M. Petey, S. Ormaux, J. Ritter & Y. Jouvenot (Eds.), Multimédia et construction des saviors (pp. 7-13). Besançon: PUFC.
McPherson, S., & Thomas, J. R. (1989). Relations of knowledge and performance in boy’s tennis: Age and expertise. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 190-211.
Mercer, N (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Sydney: Multilingual Matters LTD.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception [Phenomenology of Perception]. Paris: Gallimard.
Mitchell, S. A., Griffin, L. L., & Oslin, J. L. (1995). The effects of two instructional approaches on game performance. Pedagogy in Practice: Teaching and Coaching in Physical Education and Sports, 1(1), 36-48.
Morf, A. (1998). An epistemology for didactics: Speculations on situating a concept. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz & J. Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism and education (pp. 29-42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newell, K. (1986). Constrains on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting(Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341-360). Amsterdam: Martinies NIJHOS.
Oers, V. B., & Wardekker, W. (1999). On becoming an authentic learner: Semiotic activity in the early grades. Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 229-249.
Pascal, B. (2002). Pensées [Thoughts]. Paris: GF Flammarion.
Pecqueux, C. (2003). Jeux de basket-ball à l’école [School basketball games]. Paris: Édition Revue EPS.
Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Piaget, J. (1936). La naissance de l’intelligence chez l’enfant [The origins of intelligence in children]. Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Piaget, J. (1937). La construction du réel chez l’enfant [The construction of reality in the child]. Nestlé: Delachaux.
Piaget, J. (1980). Les formes élémentaires de la dialectique [The elementary forms of dialectic]. Paris: Gallimard.
Pissanos, W., & Allison, P. C. (1993). Students’ constructs of elementary school physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64(4), 425-435.
Prain, V., & Hickey., C. (1995). Using discourse analysis to change physical education. Quest, 47, 76-90.
Reboul, A., & Moeschler, J. (1998). Pragmatique du discours: De l’interprétation de l’énoncé à l’interprétation du discours [Discourse pragmatic: From statement interpretation to discourse interpretation]. Paris: Colin.
Rémigy, M.J. (2000). De la sémiologie à la sémiotique : pour une école de pensée ? In A. Jaillet (Ed.), Education et Sémiotique. Hommage à Michel Tardy. Strasbourg: PUS.
Rink, J. (1996). Tactical and skill approaches to teaching sport and games: Introduction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 397-398.
Rink, J. (2001). Investigating the assumptions of pedagogy. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20, 112-128.
Rink, J. E., French, K. E., & Tjeerdsma, B. L. (1996). Foundations for the learning and instruction of sport and games. Journal of Teaching in Physical education, 15, 399-417.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing socialculture activities one the planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Socialcultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Canbridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rossi, T. (2003). Linking games for understanding with dynamic systems of skill acquisition: Old milk in new bottles or have we really got a new research agenda in physical education and sport? In J. Butler, L. Griffin, B. Lombardo & R. Nastasi (Eds.), Teaching games for understanding in physical education and sport (pp. 169-179). Reston, VA: The National Association for Sport and Physical Education.
Rovegno, I. (1995). Theoretical perspectives on knowledge and learning and a student teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge of dividing and sequencing subject matter. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 284-304.
Rovegno, I. (1998). The development of in-service teachers’ knowledge of a constructivist approach to physical education: Teaching beyond activities. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69(2), 147-162.
Rovegno, I. (2002). What is taught and learned in physical activity programs: The role of content. E-Journal de la Recherche sur l’Intervention en Éducation Physique et Sport, 2, 2-20.
Rovegno, I., Nevett, M., & Barbariaz, M. (2001b). Learning and teaching invasion-game tactics in 4th grade: introduction and theoretical perspective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20, 341-351.
Rovegno, I., Nevett, M., Brock, S., & Babiarz, M. (2001a). Teaching and learning basic invasion game tactics in 4th grade: A descriptive study from situated and constrains theoretical perspectives. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20, 370-388.
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (2001). Introduction: What is discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 1-10). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Schmit, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflexive practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic books.
Schubert, W. (1986). Curriculum: Perspectives, paradigm, and possibilities. New York: Macmillan.
Searle, J. R. (2001). Rationality in Action. Boston: MIT Press.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
Siebert, H. (2003).Pädagogischer Konstruktivismus: Lernen als konstruktion von wirklichkeit [Pedagogical constructivism: Learning as construction form reality]. München: Luchterhand.
Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (2005). Analyzing talk in qualitative inquiry: Exploring possibilities, problems, and tensions. Quest, 57, 213-242.
Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suhor, C. (1984). Towards a semiotics-based curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(3), 247-257.
Terhart, E. (2003). Constructivism and teaching: A new paradigm in general didactics? Journal of curriculum studies, 35(1), 25-44.
Thomas, K., & Thomas, J. R. (1994). Developing expertise in sport: The relation of knowledge and performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 25, 295-315.
Turner, A. P., & Martinek, T. J. (1999). An investigation into teaching games for understanding: effects on skills, knowledge, and game play. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(3), 286-296.
Turner, A. P., & Martinek, T. J. (1992). A comparative analysis of two models for teaching games: Technique approach and game-centered (tactical focus) approach. International Journal of Physical Education, 29(4), 15-31.
Van der Mars, H. (1989). Observer reliability: Issues and procedures. In P.W. Darst, D. B. Zakrajsek & V. H. Mancini (Eds.), Analyzing physical education and sport instruction (2nd ed., pp. 53-80). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Vandevelde, M., & Amade-Escot, C. (2005). L’action de formation d’Alès en basket-ball: Étude de cas. In B. David (Ed.), Impulsions 4: Recheches en didactique des APS, de l’EPS, des STAPS (pp. 201-212). Lyon: Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique.
Varela, A. H., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MA: Massachusetts Istitute of Technology.
Varela, F. (1989). Connaître les sciences cognitives: Tendances et perspectives [Introduction of the cognitive sciences: Tendencies and perspectives]. Paris: Le seuil.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1999). Le Moigne's defense of constructivism. In J. L. de Grasce (Ed.), Entre systémique et complexité, chemin faisant (Between systemics and complexity - making the way) (pp. 85-90). Paris: PUF.
Vygotsky, L. (2000). Pensée et langage [Thought and language]. Paris: La Dispute.
Wallian, N., & Gréhaigne, J.F. (2003). Vers une approche sémioconstructiviste des apprentissages moteurs [Toward a semioconstructivist approach of motor learning]. In G. Carlier (Ed.), Si on parlait du plaisir d'enseigner l'éducation physique (pp. 64-80). Montpellier: Association Francophone pour la Recherche en Activités Physiques et Sportives.
Wright, S., McNeill, M., Fry, J., & Wang, J. (2005). Teaching teachers to play and teach games. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 1, 61-82.
Wulf, G., & Weigelt, C. (1997). Instructions about physical principles in learning a complex motor skill: To tell or not to tell. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 362-367.
Yaaron, M., Tenenbaum, G., Zakay, D., & Bar-Eli, M. (1997). The relationship between age and level of skill and decision making in basketball. In R. Lidor & M. Bar-Eli (Eds.), Innovations in sport psychology: Linking theory and practice (pp. 768-770).