:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中生學業情緒之認知評估中介歷程:二階調節效果
作者:賴英娟
作者(外文):Ying-ChuanLai
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
指導教授:程炳林
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:自主動機自我效能知識信念教師自主支持課室目標結構學業情緒autonomous motivationself-efficacyepistemological beliefsteachers’ autonomy supportclassroom goal structuresacademic emotions
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:28
本研究的目的有四:(一)探討自我效能與自主動機在知識信念與學業情緒之間的中介效果;(二)探討課室脈絡變項(教師自主支持、課室目標結構)對學業情緒的脈絡效果;(三)分析課室脈絡變項對自我效能與學業情緒之關係的調節效果;(四)分析課室脈絡變項對自主動機與學業情緒之關係的調節效果。為完成前述研究目的,本研究以叢集抽取的方式,抽取台灣地區之八年級國中生60個班,1723名學生為研究樣本。研究工具包含教師自主支持量表、課室目標結構量表、知識信念量表、自我效能量表、自主動機量表,以及學業情緒量表等。本研究所蒐集的資料以MSEM進行考驗。
  本研究的發現如下:
一、本研究所建構的學業情緒認知評估中介模式獲得觀察資料的支持,即知識信念會透過自我效能與自主動機的中介對學業情緒產生影響。
二、班級層次的教師自主支持對樂趣與無聊的脈絡效果達顯著水準,惟教師自主支持其對生氣與焦慮的脈絡效果未達顯著。其次,課室精熟目標結構對於學業情緒(樂趣、生氣、焦慮及無聊)的脈絡效果未達顯著。此外,課室表現目標結構對負向的學業情緒(生氣、焦慮及無聊)的脈絡效果皆達顯著,但對於正向情緒(樂趣)則未達顯著。
三、課室表現目標結構對自我效能與焦慮之關係具有跨層次的負向調節效果。
四、教師自主支持對自主動機與焦慮之關係具有跨層次的負向調節效果。
本研究將依據研究結果提出建議,以供學習輔導與未來研究之參考。
The four aims of the study are (1) examining the mediating effect of self-efficacy and autonomous motivation between epistemological beliefs and academic emotions; (2) probing the contextual effect of classroom contextual variables (i.e., teachers’ autonomy support and classroom goal structures) on academic emotions; (3) analyzing the moderating effects of classroom contextual variables between self-efficacy and academic emotions; (4) testing the moderating effects of classroom contextual variables between autonomous motivation and academic emotions. A cluster sampling was used in the study, and the participants were 1723 eighth grade students. They were recruited from 60 classes of 30 junior high schools in Taiwan. The instruments used in the study included the Teachers’ Autonomy Support Scale, Classroom Goal Structure Scale, Epistemological Beliefs Scale, Self-efficacy Scale, Autonomous Motivation Scale, and Achievement Emotions Questionnaire. The collection data were analyzed by Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling (MSEM).
The results of this study were summarized as follows: (1) the effects of epistemological beliefs on academic emotions were mediated by self-efficacy and autonomous motivation. (2) The class level of teachers’ autonomy support had significant contextual effect on enjoyment and boredom, but not on anger and anxiety. In addition, the effect of the classroom mastery goal structure on academic emotions (e.g., enjoyment, anger, anxiety, and boredom) was not significant. Moreover, the classroom performance goal structure had significant effect on negative academic emotions (e.g., anger, anxiety, and boredom), but not on positive emotion (e.g., enjoyment). (3) The classroom performance goal structure had cross-level negatively moderating effect between self-efficacy and anxiety. (4) Teachers’ autonomy support had cross-level negative moderating effect between autonomous motivation and anxiety.
Based on the results, this study provides several implications and suggestions for educational practice and future research.
一、中文部分
行政院經濟建設委員會(2011)。都市及區域發展統計彙編【原始數據】。取自htp://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0000486&key=&ex=2&ic=0000153
吳靜吉、程炳林(1992)。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,39,59-78。new window
宋秋美、程炳林、周啟葶(2010)。課室目標結構對個人目標導向的調節效果。教育心理學報,42(1),99-122。new window
巫博瀚、陸偉明、賴英娟(2011)。所知覺的學習環境對學業情緒之影響:線性混合模式在叢集資料之應用。教育與心理研究,34(1),29-54。
巫博瀚、賴英娟(2011)。性別、自我效能、工作價值、科學素養及學校層次因素對臺灣青少年學習情緒之影響:個人與情境交互作用之多層次分析。教育科學研究期刊,56(3),119-149。new window
李仁豪、余民寧(2008)。二層次結構方程模型的應用:以教育心理學為例。師大學報:教育類,53(3),95-123。new window
李俊青(2007)。學業情緒歷程模式分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
林紀慧(2001)。知識學習信念與不同電腦繪圖型態的國小電腦數學學習成效研究。新竹師院學報,14,69-85。new window
邱皓政(2007)。脈絡變數的多層次潛在變數模式分析:口試評分者效應的多層次結構方程模式應用。中華心理學刊,49(4),383-405。new window
施淑慎(2006)。教室目標結構與成就目標取向對國小學童自我阻礙行為及考試焦慮之預測作用。教育與心理研究,29(3),517-546。new window
施淑慎(2008)。學習情境中之自主支持與國中生成就相關歷程間關係之探討。教育與心理研究,31(2),1-26。new window
施淑慎(2009)。國中生使用逃避策略相關因素徑路模式之檢驗。教育與心理研究,32(1),111-145。new window
唐淑華(2000)。以讀書治療挑戰低成就學生之知識信念的實驗研究。中華輔導學報,8, 21-50。new window
許嘉家、詹志禹(2010)。「高中職生個人知識信念量表」之編製與驗證。測驗學刊,57(3),433-458。new window
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2009)。多變量分析方法-統計軟體應用(第五版)。臺北市:五南。
陳品華(2008)。大學生學科為主的知識與學習信念、自我調整學習之關係研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC 96-2413-H-153-002),未出版。
陳淑萍、鄭中平(2011)。潛在調節徑路模型的模型設定。教育研究與發展期刊,7(4),1-24。new window
陳萩卿(2005)。知識信念影響學習運作模式之驗證暨「調整知識信念的教學策略」對國中生學習歷程影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。new window
陳萩卿、張景媛 (2007)。知識信念影響學習運作模式之驗證。教育心理學報,39(1),23-43。new window
陳嘉成(2008)。調節假設或適配假設?-二個相競假設的檢驗與知覺目標結構變化對學習組型影響之研究。教育與心理研究,31(2),27-58。new window
彭台光、高月慈及林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。new window
程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類,48(1),15-40。new window
程炳林(2006)。主觀能力與逃避策略之關係。師大學報:教育類,51(2),1-24。new window
黃豊茜(2010)。學業情緒歷程模式:探析情緒調整策略的效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
劉佩雲(2009)。課室結構知覺對科學知識信念、學習成就與迷思概念的影響。課程與教學季刊,12(2),135-160。new window
賴英娟(2010)。教師支持、數學自我效能及數學興趣對職業意向之影響。中華輔導與諮商學報,28,1-27。new window
簡嘉菱(2009)。自我決定動機與學業情緒模式之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。

二、西文部分
Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., Van der Werf, G., & Kuyper, H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents' achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 36-46.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Review, 103, 411-423.
Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social congitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinctiion in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Beedie, C. J., Terry, P. C., & Lane, A. M. (2005). Distinctions between emotion and mood. Cognition and emotion, 19, 847-878.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory. Science Education, 84, 740-756.
Boekaerts, M. (2007). Understanding students' affactive processes in the classroom. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in Education (pp. 37-56). San Diego: Elsevier Inc.
Bong, M. (2008). Effects of parent-child relationships and classroom goal structures on motivation, help-seeking avoidance, and cheating. Journal of Experimental Education, 76, 191-217.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2004). Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 371-388.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among norwegian postsecondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 539–565.
Chan, K. W. (2003). Hong Kong teacher education students' epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning. Research in Education, 69, 36-50.
Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 75–87.
Ciani, K. D., Middleton, M. J., Summers, J. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (2010). Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 88-99.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Daniels, L. M., Haynes, T. L., Stupnisky, R. H., Perry, R. P., Newall, N. E., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Individual differences in achievement goals: A longitudinal study of congitive, emotional, and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 584-608.
Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., & Newall, N. E. (2009). A longitudinal analysis of achievement goals: From affective antecedents to emotional effects and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 948-963.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what and “why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., Lüdtkeb, O., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions during homework in mathematics: Testing a theoretical model of antecedents and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 25-35.
Dorothea, B., Dolores, P., & Michael, C. (2007). Motivation, interest, and positive affect in traditional and nontraditional undergraduate students. Adult Education Quarterly: A Journal of Research and Theory, 57, 141-158.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22.
Fast, L. A., Lewis, J. L., Bryant, M. J., Bocian, K. A., Cardullo, R. A., Pettig, M., et al. (2010). Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 729-740.new window
Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Forgas, J. P. (1994). The role of emotion in social judgments: An introductory review and an affect Infusion model (AIM). European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 1-24.
Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Sutton, R. E. (2009). Emotional transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 705-716.
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007a). Girls and mathematics- A hopeless issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 497-514.
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007b). Perceived learning environment and students' emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17, 478-493.
Frenzel, A. C., Thrash, T. M., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Achievement emotions in Germany and China - A cross-cultural validation of the academic emotions questionnaire-mathematics. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 302-309.
Goetz, T., Cronjaeger, H., Frenzel, A. C., Ludtke, O., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Academic self-concept and emotion relations: Domain specificity and age effects. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 44-58.
Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 9-33.
Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. C. (2006). The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 5-29.
Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Hall, N., & Haag, L. (2006). Academic emotions from a social-cognitive perspective: Antecedents and domain specificity of students' affect in the context of Latin instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 289-308.
Halvari, H., Ulstad, S. O., Bagøien, T. E., & Skjesol, K. (2009). Autonomy support and its links to physical activity and competitive performance: Mediations through motivation, competence, action orientation and harmonious passion, and the moderator role of autonomy support by perceived competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 533-555.
Hardre, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students’ intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 347–356.
Hofer, B. K. (1994). Epistemological Beliefs and First-Year College Students: Motivation and Cognition in Different Instructional Contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405.
Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13, 353-383.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The Development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
Hox, J. J. (1995). Applied Analysis. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Jahromi, R. G., Lavasani, M. G., Rastegar, A., & Mooghali, A. (2010). Presenting a model of predicting computer anxiety in terms of epistemological beliefs and achievement goals. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 602–608.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588-600.
Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 191-211.
Kizilgunes, B., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students’epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 243 - 256.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NY: The Guilford Press.
Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., & Muthe´n, B. (2008). The multilevel latent covariate model: A new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies. Psychological Methods, 13, 203-229.
Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). Interplay between personal goals and classroom goal structures in predicting student outcomes: A multilevel analysis of person-context interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 15-29.
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions and academic engagement: Introduction to the special issue. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 1-3.
Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students' motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 197-213.
Linnenbrink, E. A. (2007). The role of affect in student learning: A multi-dimensional approach to considering the interaction of affact, motivation, and engagement. In P. A. Schuzt & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in Education (pp. 107-124). San Diego: Elsevier Inc.
Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1, 86-92.
Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2004). Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis. Statistica Neerlandica, 58, 127-137.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503.
Meuleman, B., & Billiet, J. (2009). A monte carlo sample size study: How many countries are needed for accurate multilevel SEM? Survey Research Methods, 3, 45-58.
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(852-863).
Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 432-447.
Nasser, F., & Birenbaum, M. (2005). Modeling mathematics achievement of Jewish and Arab eighth graders in Israel: The effects of learner-related variables. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11, 277-302.
Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13, 59-74.
O'Donnell, A. M., Reeve, J. M., & Smith, J. K. (2007). Educational psychology: Reflection for action. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1993). What motivates children's behavior and emotion joint? Effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 781-791.
Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (1999). Student motivation and epistemological beliefs. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 39, 365-384.
Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (2005). The conditional and interaction effects of epistemological beliefs on the self-regulated learning of college students: Motivational strategies. Research in Higher Education, 46, 731-768.
Pekrun, R. (1992). Expectancy-value theory of anxiety: overview and implications. In D. G. Forgays, T. Sosnowski & K. Wresniewski (Eds.), Anxiety: Recent developments in cognitive, psychophsysiological and health research. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational Psychology of Human Development (pp. 143-163). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Pekrun, R. (2005). Progress and open problems in educational emotion research. Learning and Instruction, 15, 497-506.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341.
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583-597.new window
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115-135.
Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotion in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 13-36). San Diego: Elsevier Inc.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2005). Academic Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ): User’s manual. Munich, Germany: University of Munich, Department of Psychology.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research Educational Psychologist 37, 91-105.
Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2009). Goals, emotions, and emotion regulation: Perspectives of the control-value theory. Human Development, 52, 357-365.
Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2010). Achievement emotion: A control-value approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 238-255.
Phan, H. P. (2008). Multiple regression analysis of epistemological beliefs, learning approaches, and self-regulated learning. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 14, 157-184.
Phan, H. P. (2009). Amalgamation of future time orientation, epistemological beliefs, achievement goals and study strategies: Empirical evidence established. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 155–173.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209-233.
Rastegar, A., Jahromi, R. G., Haghighi, A. S., & Akbari, A. R. (2010). The relation of epistemological beliefs and mathematics achievement: the mediating role of achievement goals, mathematics self-efficacy, and cognitive engagement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 791–797.
Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209-218.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of Intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in tellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7, 329-363.
Schommer-Aikins, M., & Easter, M. (2008). Epistemological beliefs' contributions to study strategies of Asian Americans and European Americans. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 920–929.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.
Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 293-319.
Schraw, G., & Sinatra, G. M. (2004). Epistemological development and its impact on cognition in academic domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 95-102.
Shedish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Shih, S. S. (2008). The relation of self-determination and achievement goals to Taiwanese eight graders' behavioral and emotional engagement in schoolwork. . The Elementary School Journal, 108, 313-334.
Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in 3 life domains: The role of parents' and teachers' autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589–604.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 411-433.new window
Tyson, D. F., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Hill, N. E. (2009). Regulating debilitating emotions in the context of performance: Achievement goal orientations, achievement-elicited emotions, and socialization contexts. Human Development, 52, 329-356.
Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 524–551.
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, 19-31.
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246-260.
Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 468-483.
Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767-779.new window
Wu, P. H., Luh, W. M., & Lai, Y. C. (2010, April). The effects of perceived learning environment on the achievement emotions: Analyzing clustered data by using linear mixed models. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual meeting of the American Education Research Association (AERA), Denver, CO.
Xiao, C., Yu, P., & Yan, L. (2009). Influences on affect and achievement: High school student’s epistemological beliefs about mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2, 1-11.
Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts, findings, and future directions. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in Education (pp. 165-184). San Diego: Elsevier Inc.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 部屬啊!您有做自己的機會嗎?尚嚴、專權雙元領導與部屬任務績效之關聯性:以情緒調節策略揭開潘朵拉的盒子
2. 部屬難為:領導者利組織不道德行為與部屬離職傾向、越級建言、主管導向組織公民行為與沉默行為之關係:以領導者-部屬交換關係為調節效果
3. 設計思考提升學習動機與問題解決信心--臺灣大學生學習設計思考課程的實證分析
4. 大一新生入學選擇、學涯規劃及興趣與能力之縱貫性研究--以北部某私立科技大學為例
5. 國小教師參與專業學習社群對學生學習動機與學習行為影響之研究
6. 國際觀光旅館職場友誼與工作表現關係之探討--以卓越能力商數為中介變項
7. 青少年社會網絡指標及幽默表現風格之交互作用影響與被霸凌經驗之關係
8. 中高齡職涯未來時間觀、職場成功老化和就業力之關係--探討工作要求與資源的調節式中介作用
9. 研究生和大學生的學生評鑑教師教學分數真的要一起比較嗎?傾向值結構方程模型分析
10. 工作記憶與知識論信念對批判思考技巧表現的預測力
11. 國中生考試愉悅歷程模式之驗證與分析
12. 居服員留任傾向之研究
13. 「大學生批判思考意向量表」之編製
14. 國中生逃避策略的改變暨其與知覺課室目標結構及羞愧情緒之關係
15. 國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能、任務價值對學習投入之影響
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE