:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中小學教師評鑑機制規劃之芻議:英國的經驗與啟示
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:李奉儒 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Feng-jihu
出版日期:2006
卷期:2:3
頁次:頁193-216
主題關鍵詞:教師評鑑教師評估英格蘭與威爾斯Teacher evaluationTeacher appraisalEngland and Wales
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(14) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:217
  • 點閱點閱:112
教師評鑑制度是改善與維繫教師素質管理之核心,中小學教師必須準備迎接教師評鑑時代的來臨,而教育部也有必要妥善規劃合理可行的教師評鑑機制。 本文以英國的教師評鑑(或稱評估)制度發展與現況作為討論的對象,運用歷史研究法與文件分析法,分從教師評鑑的目的、規準、方式、人員、實施歷程、結果運用和困難等七個議題進行探討。 本文有如下幾項主要的發現與建議: 1.由國家正式立法作為實施教師評鑑制度的依據。 2.確立教師評鑑的機制兼具專業成長之形成性目的與績效評量之總結性目的。 3.教師評鑑的規準必須考量新任教師和在職教師在教學知能與專業發展上的不同需求。 4.教師評鑑的實施方式可以教室觀察為主,並輔以評估晤談、評量會議和其他相關資料的蒐集與分析。 5.教師評鑑的實施初期可以規劃以兩年為一循環週期,其評鑑結果的運用可以與教師的升遷密切結合。 6.提供客觀周延的教師評鑑結果作為處理不適任教師的合理依據。 7.教師評鑑機制的評鑑者需要適當的訓練,初期可優先考量由校長或主任擔任,並編列充分的預算來執行。
Since the Teacher Education Act was enacted in 1994, the issue of how to maintain and manage schoolteachers’ high quality has been one of the major concerns of educational reform in Taiwan. This research, by taking the teacher appraisal system in England and Wales as a case, assumes the schemes of teacher evaluation will improve schoolteachers’ performance and professional development. This research employs historical research and documents analysis methods to study the historical development and practices of teacher appraisal/evaluation system for schoolteachers in England and Wales. And this research finally makes some preliminary suggestions for the planning of schoolteachers’ evaluation system in Taiwan. The main results and suggestions for this research are as follows: 1.The Act of Teacher Evaluation must be enacted as a legal base. 2.The aims of Teacher Evaluation Scheme are to improve teachers’ professional development and assess teachers’ performance. 3.The criteria of Teacher Evaluation must take the different professional needs of new teachers and in-service teachers into consideration. 4.The main methods for doing teacher evaluation could be classroom observation, together with other methods such as appraisal interview, assessment/review meeting, relevant data collection, etc. 5.The promotion of teachers must rest upon the actual results of teacher evaluation. 6.The treatment of ineligible teachers can be according to the objective results of teacher evaluation. 7.The evaluator must have appropriate training and the government must invest enough funds for the operation of teacher evaluation schemes.
期刊論文
1.Reynolds, D.、Muijs, D.、Treharne, D.(2003)。Teacher evaluation and teacher effectiveness in the United Kingdom。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,17(1),83-100。  new window
2.吳清山、林天祐(2002)。教師評鑑。教育資料與研究,49。  延伸查詢new window
3.張德銳(1996)。國小教師成績考核系統之研究。教育研究資訊,4 (5),89 -99。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李奉儒(2003)。英國教師職前培育、素質管理與專業發展的新趨勢。臺灣教育,623,34-45。  延伸查詢new window
5.張德銳(20030700)。我國中小學教師評鑑的規劃與推動策略。教育資料與研究,53,1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Mayo, W. R.(1997)。Trends in teacher evaluation。The Clearing House,70(5),269-270。  new window
7.McMahon, A.(1992)。Teacher appraisal: Development and accountability。Journal of Teacher Development,1(1),19-28。  new window
8.丁一顧、張德銳(20040900)。美英兩國教師評鑑系統比較分析及其對我國之啟示。臺北市立師範學院學報. 教育類,35(2),85-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡培村(19991100)。我國實施教師職級制度可行性研究。教育資料與研究,31,1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.羅清水(19990200)。教師專業發展的另一途徑--談教師評鑑制度的建立。研習資訊,16(1),1-10。  延伸查詢new window
11.簡茂發、李虎雄、黃長司、彭森明、吳清山、吳明清、毛連塭、林來發、黃瑞榮、張敏雪(19970500)。中小學教師應具備的基本素質。教育研究資訊,5(3),1-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.蘇永明(2001)。英國的教師評鑑標準。新竹。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃光雄、楊國賜、王如哲• 李奉儒、林明地等(2003)。國民中小學學校文化重建之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡清華、汪履維(2000)。我國中小學教師職級制度之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄺執中(1999)。我國小學教師任用制度之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾榮華(1997)。教師聘任政策與國民小學教師工作士氣之研究(碩士論文)。台北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.張喬媚(1999)。國小教師甄選制度之研究,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Department for Education and Employment(2001)。Schools: Building on success。London:Department for Education and Employment。  new window
2.蔡培村(1996)。教師生涯與職級制度。高雄市:復文圖書出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.DES(1983)。Teaching quality。London:HMSO。  new window
4.DES(1985)。Better schools。London:HMSO。  new window
5.HMI(1989)。Developments in the Appraisal of Teachers。London:HMSO。  new window
6.Teacher Training Agency(2002)。Supporting Induction: Part 4 Quality Assurance of the Induction Arrangements。London, England:Teacher Training Agency。  new window
7.Hargreaves, A.(1994)。Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age。New York:Columbia University, Teachers College Press。  new window
8.Department for Education and Employment(1998)。Teaching and Higher Education Act 1998。London:Department for Education and Employment。  new window
9.DfEE(1998)。Teachers: Meeting the Challenge of Change。London:The Stationery Office Limited。  new window
10.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1995)。教育改革諮議報告書。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
11.李奉儒(20010000)。英國教育:政策與制度。嘉義:濤石文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.DES(1985)。Quality in Schools: Evaluation and appraisal。London:HMSO。  new window
13.DfEE(1998)。School Standards and Framework Act。London。  new window
14.DfEE(2001)。Education (School Teacher Appraisal) (England) Regulations。London。  new window
15.DfEE(2003)。Guidance on the Threshold Process in 2003 (Round 4) in England。London:DfES。  new window
16.DfES(2005)。Education Act 2005。London:DfES。  new window
17.Ofsted(1996)。The Appraisal of Teachers 1991-1 996。London。  new window
18.Teacher Training Agency(2002)。Supporting Induction:Part 2 Support & Mentoring of the Newly Qualy’led Teacher。London。  new window
19.Teacher Training Agency(2002)。Supporting Induction: Part 3 Assessment of the Newly Qualfied Teacher。London。  new window
其他
1.DES(1991)。The education (school teacher appraisal) regulations (No, 1511),London:HMSO。  new window
圖書論文
1.吳清山、張素偵(2002)。教育評鑑:理念、挑戰與策略。師資培育的政策與檢討。臺北市:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.傅木龍(1995)。英國中小學教師評鑑制度研究。教育評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.張德銳(1992)。國民小學教師評鑑之研究。教育專業。臺北:師大師苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE