臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：應用資料探勘技術探究我國高中生適性學習影響因素
書刊名：當代教育研究季刊
作者：蔡明學／黃建翔 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tsai, Ming-hsueh／Huang, Chien-hsiang
出版日期：2019
卷期：27:2
頁次：頁39-76
主題關鍵詞：適性學習；高中教育；十二年國教；政策分析；資料探勘；Adaptive learning；Senior high school education；Twelve years of basic education；Policy analysis；Data mining
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:283
  • 點閱點閱:6
研究目的：本文主要探究我國高級中等學校教學環境、教師活化教學、學生家庭背景與學習歷程等相關因素對於學生適性學習的影響，其結果可提供教育政策研擬與教育資源投入之參據。根據上述，本研究目的如下：（1）應用不同資料探勘理論，分析我國高中學生適性學習之關鍵影響因素；（2）探究我國高中學生適性學習相關因素之影響排序；（3）研究結果提供中央教育主管機關，作為教育政策擬定之參據。研究設計／方法／取徑：本研究採問卷調查法，調查研究對象為105學年度高一、二學生，採問卷調查法進行。調查設計以學校為母體，採多階段分層隨機抽樣。本次調查共計抽出121所學校，每校共發出60份問卷，高一與高二各30份問卷，回收有效樣本數為6,628人。本研究將所蒐集之樣本進行資料探勘理論—類神經網路、k－平均演算分析及決策樹分析，探究不同因素對於適性學習的影響效果。研究發現或結論：1.學校教學環境是影響學生適性學習的主要因素。2.學生家庭期望對於學生適性學習效果影響程度較低。3.學生學習歷程與教師活化教學對於學生適性學習的影響尚待後續評估。研究原創性／價值：本研究係以評估高中學生適性學習的前提下，運用資料探勘方法—類神經網路、k－平均演算分析及決策樹。從學校環境、教師教學、學生學習歷程、家庭期望等，分析影響高中學生適性學習的關鍵因素，解決過往線性模式分析對於因素影響程度的不確定性。教育政策建議或實務意涵：本研究分析結果顯示，學校教學環境是學生適性學習關鍵影響因素。然，檢視我國近年來高中均優質化政策之推展，加上完全免試入學政策的推動，著實改善目前高中學校教學環境，對於協助學生適性學習有若干幫助。然下一階段有關學校教學環境提升，應配合特色課程發展為主，協助各校建構其特色與專長，讓學生在高中學習階段具備更多元選擇，達成我國發展適性學習的教育目的。
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the teaching environment, teacher creative teaching, students' family background and learning process on students' adaptive learning. The results of this study can be used to provide suggestions for education policies and the input of educational resources. The purpose is (1) applying different machine learning theory to investigate the key factors impacting high school students' adaptive learning (2) investigate the orders of factors impacting high school students' adaptive learning (3) results can be used to provide suggestions for policy makers for educational authorities. Design/methodology/approach: This study uses the questionnaire survey to investigate the 10th and 11th graders in 2016. The study use the multilevel random sampling design, a total of 121 schools is sampled and each school receives 60 questionnaires. Each grade has 30 questionnaires, totally 6,628 students finish the questionnaires. Data mining approach, including neural network, k-means, and decision tree analysis are used to investigate the factors impacting adaptive learning. Findings: 1. School teaching environment is the main factor, which impacts students' adaptive learning. 2. Students' family expectation has low impact on students' adaptive learning. 3. The impact of student learning process and teachers' teaching on students' adaptive learning needs further investigation. Originality/value: This study applies the machine learning approach neural network, k-means, decision tree analysis to investigate the factors impacting students' adaptive learning, including school environment, teacher teaching, students' learning process and family background. The uncertainty level for previous linear model analysis can be solved. Implications for policy/practice: The result of this study shows that school environment is the key factor impacting students' adaptive learning. Current completely non-exam entrance policy can assist students' adaptive learning; however, for promoting the school teaching environment in the next level, schools should develop their own feature curriculum. Students can have multiple options for deciding their high school, so the purposes of adaptive learning can be achieved.
期刊論文
1.Super, D. E.(1984)。Creating a Career Development Center。HR Focus，55，11-12。  new window
2.Wang, Ying、Peng, Huamao、Huang, Ronghuai、Hou, Yanhua、Wang, Jingjing(2008)。Characteristics of distance learners: research on relationships of learning motivation, learning strategy, self-efficacy, attribution and learning results。Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning，23(1)，17-28。  new window
3.Ram, B.、Hou, F.(2003)。Changes in family structure and child outcome: Role of economic and familial resources。Policy Studies Journal，31，309-330。  new window
4.Anderson, K. M.(2007)。Differentiating instruction to include all students。Preventing School Failure，51(3)，49-54。  new window
5.江羿臻、林正昌(20140300)。應用決策樹探討中學生學習成就的相關因素。教育心理學報，45(3)，303-327。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Hmelo-Silver, C. E.、Duncan, R. G.、Chinn, C. A.(2007)。Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006)。Educational Psychologist，42(2)，99-107。  new window
7.周新富(20041200)。家庭社經地位、家長參與學習與國中生能力分組關係之研究。臺灣教育社會學研究，4(2)，113-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Abes, E. S.、Jones, S. R.、McEwen, M. K.(2007)。Reconceptualizing the model of multiple dimensions of identity: The role of meaning-making capacity in the construction of multiple identities。Journal of College Student Development，48(1)，1-22。  new window
9.Kuo, R. J.、Ho, L. M.、Hu, C. M.(2002)。Integration of self-organizing feature map and k-means algorithm for market segmentation。Computers & Operations Research，29(11)，1475-1493。  new window
10.Jain, B. A.、Nag, Barin N.(1995)。Artificial neural network models for pricing initial public offerings。Decision Sciences，26(3)，283-302。  new window
11.Pike, G. R.、Smart, J. C.、Ethington, C. A.(2012)。The mediating effects of student engagement on the relationships between academic disciplines and learning outcomes: An extension of Holland's theory。Research in Higher Education，53(5)，550-575。  new window
12.Duff, A.、Boyle, E.、Dunleavy, K.、Ferguson, J.(2004)。The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance。Personality and Individual Differences，36(8)，1907-1920。  new window
13.吳清山(20000300)。學校績效責任的理念與策略。學校行政，6，3-13。  延伸查詢new window
14.Nath, R.、Rajagopalan, B.、Ryker, R.(1997)。Determining the saliency of input variables in neural network classifiers。Computers and Operations Research，24(8)，767-773。  new window
15.蔡志明(20120800)。高中優質化輔助方案之政策規劃構念。臺灣教育評論月刊，1(10)，14-21。  延伸查詢new window
16.Martinez-Pons, M.(2002)。Parental influences on children's academic self-regulatory development。Theory into Practice，41(2)，126-131。  new window
17.Tsai, M. H.、Liu, F. Y.(2013)。Multi-group Structural Equation Approach: Examing the Relationship among Family Socioeconomic Status, Parent-Child Interaction, and Academic Achievement using TASA Samples。International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics，6(4)，353-373。  new window
18.黃政傑、張嘉育(20100700)。讓學生成功學習：適性課程與教學之理念與策略。課程與教學，13(3)，1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Guyon, I.、Elisseeff, A.(2003)。An introduction to variable and feature selection。Journal of Machine Learning Research，3，1157-1182。  new window
20.張景媛(19880600)。教學類型與學習類型適配性研究暨學生學習適應理論模式的驗證。教育心理學報，21，113-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Chiu, C. Y.、Park, C. S.(1994)。Fuzzy Cash Flow Analysis Using Present Worth Criterion。The Engineering Economist，39(2)，113-138。  new window
22.張新仁(20140100)。分組合作教學--改變課堂教學生態的希望工程。師友月刊，559，36-43。  延伸查詢new window
23.林俊瑩、黃毅志(20080600)。影響臺灣地區學生學業成就的可能機制：結構方程模式的探究。臺灣教育社會學研究，8(1)，45-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Komarraju, Meera、Karau, Steven J.、Schmeck, Ronald R.、Avdic, Alen(2011)。The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement。Personality and Individual Differences，51(4)，472-477。  new window
25.Campbell, C. M.、Cabrera, A. F.(2014)。Making the mark: Are grades and deep learning related?。Research in Higher Education，55(5)，494-507。  new window
26.黃建翔(20150800)。資料探勘在教育領域之發展與應用。臺灣教育評論月刊，4(8)，78-84。  延伸查詢new window
27.阮孝齊(20150900)。國中學生學校歸屬感影響模式之研究。當代教育研究季刊，23(3)，81-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.吳清山(20140100)。善用活化教學．提升學生學習效能。師友月刊，559，31-35。  延伸查詢new window
29.黃建翔、蔡明學(20160600)。影響高中職學生學習成就關鍵因素之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊，19，73-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.簡梅瑩、孔令堅(20160100)。教師專業學習社群於推動適性教育之運作：以一所私立高中特色課程規劃為例。學校行政，101，146-165。  延伸查詢new window
31.吳清山、黃建翔(20130800)。提升學生學習成就策略之探析。教育研究月刊，232，5-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.林吟霞(20100700)。自主學習取向之適性課程與教學研究：臺灣小學與德國小學「方案教學」個案比較。課程與教學，13(3)，47-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Bandura, A.(1977)。Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change。Psychological Review，84(2)，191-215。  new window
34.盧鴻興(20171100)。複雜資料分析的統計降維法。自然科學簡訊，29(4)，112-113。  延伸查詢new window
35.Brusilovsky, P.、Peylo, C.(2003)。Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems。International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education，13，156-169。  new window
36.Lee, J.、Kim, D. G.(2012)。Adaptive learning system applied bruner' EIS theory。Procedia，2，794-801。  new window
37.Maringe, F.、Sing, N.(2014)。Teaching large classes in an increasingly internationalizing higher education environment: Pedagogical, quality and equity issues。Higher Education，67(6)，761-782。  new window
38.張鈿富(20120300)。大學生學習投入理論與評量實務之探討。高教評鑑，特刊，41-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.李敦仁(20070900)。人力資本、財務資本、社會資本與教育成就關聯性之研究：Coleman家庭資源理論模式之驗證。教育與心理研究，30(3)，111-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology，94(suppl.)，S95-S120。  new window
41.余民寧、韓珮華(20090300)。教學方式對數學學習興趣與數學成就之影響：以TIMSS 2003臺灣資料為例。測驗學刊，56(1)，19-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.Huebner, T. A.(2010)。Differentiated instruction。Educational Leadership，67(5)，79-81。  new window
會議論文
1.Kuan, P. Y.、Yang, M. L.(2004)。Educational achievement and family structure: Evidence from two cohorts of adolescents in Taiwan。The meeting on Social Stratification, Mobility, and Exclusion, the Research Committee on Social Stratification and Mobility。Neuchatel：International Sociological Association。  new window
研究報告
1.蔡明學、林新發(2015)。我國後期中等教育階段適性教育體制建構之研究 (計畫編號：NAER-104-36-C-1-01-00-2-03)。新北市：國家教育研究院。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fayyad, U. M.、Irani, K. B.(1991)。A machine learning algorithm (GlD3*) for automated knowledge acquisition: Improvements and extensions。Warren, MI：GM Research Labs。  new window
學位論文
1.蔡毓智(2008)。台灣地區國中生家庭教育資源結構之探究及其與學業表現之關連(博士論文)。國立政治大學，台北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sleeman, D.、Brown, J. S.(1982)。Intelligent tutoring systems。Academic Press。  new window
2.簡禎富、許嘉裕(2014)。資料挖礦與大數據分析。前程文化公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Berry, Michael J. A.、Linoff, Gordon(2000)。Mastering Data Mining The Art & Science of Customer Relationship Management。New York：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
4.Mitchell, T. M.(1997)。Machine Learning。McGraw-Hill。  new window
5.張春興(2005)。現代心理學。台北市：東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Marzano, R. J.(2003)。What works in schools: translating research into action。Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
7.謝邦昌、鄭宇庭(2016)。大數據概論。臺北市：新陸。  延伸查詢new window
8.Steinberg, D.、Cardell, N. S.(2016)。Methods and systems for automatic selection of preferred size classification and regression trees。Washington, DC：U.S. Patent and Trademark Office。  new window
9.黃政傑(1993)。課程教學之變革。臺北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
10.祁瑞華(2016)。Google就是這樣猜中你的心：用機器學習及演算法分析文字語意。臺北市：佳魁資訊。  延伸查詢new window
11.孫惠民(2007)。資料採掘理論與實務規劃手冊。臺北市：松崗。  延伸查詢new window
12.Canada, J. R.、Sullivan, W. G.、White, J. A.(2004)。Capital investment analysis for engineering and management。Upper Saddle River, NJ：Prentice Hall。  new window
13.Hamel, G.(2012)。What matters now: How to win in a world of relentless change, ferocious competition, and unstoppable innovation。Boston, MA：Harvard Business Pres。  new window
14.Peña-López, I.(2012)。PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy。Paris：OECD。  new window
15.Walberg, H. J.、Paik, S. J.(2000)。Effective educational practices。The International Academy of Education。  new window
16.Witten, Ian H.、Frank, Eibe(2005)。Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques。Amsterdam：Morgan Kaufmann。  new window
17.Coleman, J. S.、Campbell, E.、Hobson, C.、McPartland, J.、Mood, A.、Weinfeld, F.、York, R.(1966)。Equality of Educational Opportunity。Washington, DC：U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Education。  new window
其他
1.林淑芬(2015)。R軟體資料探勘實務（上）--分類模型，https://www.cc.ntu.edu.tw/chinese/epaper/0034/20150920_3410.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳清山(20050600)。知識管理活化教育發展動能：評介E. Sallis和G. Jones《教育知識管理》。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2015)。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫，https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&s=37E2FF8B7ACFC28B。  延伸查詢new window
4.IBM(2011)。IBM SPSS Decision Trees 20，ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/20.0/zh_TW/client/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Decision_Trees.pdf。  new window
5.PISA(2009)。Results: Executive summary，https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf。  new window
6.PISA(2012)。Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know，https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A59795。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wigfield, A.、Eccles, J. S.、Schiefele, U.、Roeser, R. W.、Davis-Kean, P.(2006)。Development of achievement motivation。Handbook of child psychology。Hoboken, NJ：John Wileys & Sons。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1333（臺灣：1300，外國：33） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67664374
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上