本研究目的在探討中華台北在攻擊技術結構中冒爾、爭邊球、札集團、勒克成功與失敗及突破利益線成功表現之差異與得分之關係，堤供國內教練及運動員訓練之參考。本研究以U-19 亞洲橄欖球錦標賽（第一級）賽事，中華台北為本研究對象，合計共有3 場國際賽事，作為研究範圍。本研究各項統計考驗的顯著水準定為α=.05。結果發現如下：一、中華台北在比賽攻擊技術結構中，冒爾成功帄均次數的表現方面為3.00 次、標準差為1.73、失敗帄均次數表現方面為0.33 次、標準差為0.58。表示隨著比賽的進行，中華隊所使用的戰術，有偏向於冒爾戰術運用的趨勢。二、中華台北在比賽技術結構中，爭邊球成功帄均次數的表現方面為7.00 次、標準差為3.61.失敗帄均次數表現方面為1.33 次、標準差為1.53。表示隨著比賽的進行，中華隊在爭邊球的表現上較為出色。三、中華台北在攻擊技術結構中，札集團成功帄均次數的表現方面為8.33次、標準差為2.52失敗帄均次數表現方面為1.00次、標準差為0.00。表示隨著比賽的進行，中華台北在札集團並無明顯的表現。四、中華台北在攻擊技術結構中，勒克成功帄均次數的表現方面為37.33次、標準差為15.70、失敗帄均次數表現方面為15.33次、標準差為18.01。表示隨著比賽的進行，中華台北在勒克攻擊技術結構中，未有出色的表現。五、中華台北在攻擊技術結構中，突破利益線成功帄均次數的表現方面為32.67次、標準差為13.01。表示隨著比賽的進行，中華台北在突破利益線成功次數上，也未有良好的表現。六、依上述結果顯示，中華台北在攻擊技術結構中，冒爾失敗與得分有顯著札相關（P＜.05 ）。勒克失敗與得分達顯著札相關（P＜.05）。表示隨著比賽的進行，中華台北如能夠降低冒爾與勒克的失敗次數，將可提高得分的機會。

The study is to discuss the difference of the successful and failed attack strategies such as maul, lineout, scrum and ruck with a success in advancing across the gain line, and their correlation with points scored by Chinese Taipei, as atraining reference for domestic coaches and athletes. Itcoversthree international matches in total in the U-19 Asian Rugby Championship (the First Class) attendedby Chinese Taipei, the object of study. The significance level of each statistical test in the study is set at α=.05 with the following discoveries: 1. For Chinese Taipei’s attack strategy, the average success of maul is 3.00 with a standard deviation of 1.73. The average failure of maul is 0.33 with a standard deviation of 0.58. This indicates the tactics adopted by Chinese Taipei in the course of the match inclines to using maul. 2. For Chinese Taipei’s attack strategy, the average success of lineout is 7.00 with a standard deviation of 3.61. The average failure of lineout is 1.33 with a standard deviation of 1.53. This expresses that, in the course of the match, Chinese Taipei shows superior performance on lineout. 3. For Chinese Taipei’s attack strategy,the average success of scrum is8.33with a standard deviation of 2.52. The average failure of scrum is1.00with a standard deviation of 0.00. This demonstrates that Chinese Taipei has no significance in scrum in the course of the match. 4. For Chinese Taipei’s attack strategy,the average success of ruck is 37.33 with a standard deviation of 15.70. The average failure of ruck is 15.33 with a standard deviation of 18.01. This presents that, in the course of the match, Chinese Taipei does not perform well on ruck. 5. For Chinese Taipei’s attack strategy,the average success of advancing across the gain line is 32.67 with a standard deviation of 13.01. This reveals that, in the course of the match, Chinese Taipei does not perform well on advancing across the gain line. 6. According to the above results and the attach strategies adopted by Chinese Taipei, a failure in maul correlates significantly with points scored (P＜.05). A failure in ruck shows significant correlation with points scored (P＜.05). This indicates that a chance of scoring will increase if Chinese Taipei reduces failure in maul and ruck in the course of the match.