臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：教育專業與教育改革的關係之探討：以臺灣與美國的發展為例
書刊名：教育學刊
作者：楊巧玲 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yang, Chiao-ling
出版日期：2004
卷期：22
頁次：頁109-128
主題關鍵詞：教育專業；教育改革；教育行政；師資培育；Educational profession；Educational reform；Educational administration；Teacher education
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:245
  • 點閱點閱:74
本文旨在探討教育專業與教育改革的關係，主要的立論是：教育專業與教育改革的關係甚為複雜，隨著時空而有所變動，教育改革可能有助於教育專業的形塑，而教育專業的發展可能有助於教育改革的推動，不過這種互惠的關係並非必然。以台灣1990年代以來的教育改革為例，說明教育改革可以形塑教育專業的成長與發展，以美國1980年代以來的教育改革為例，說明教育專業可以促進教育改革的設計與推動，然而二者之間也存在著矛盾與對立，在台灣，教育專業對教育改革的影響有所削弱，在美國，由教育專業倡議的教育改革遭逢困難。不管是台灣或是美國，可以發現教育專業的建立與教育改革的推行都鑲嵌在特定的歷史社會情境中，從美國的經驗來看，教育專業的參與或主導並不能保證教育改革的成效或品質，因為影響教育改革的因素非常複雜，事實上，教育專業如行政、教學也是在某種時空背景下形成的，甚至是順應教育改革、社會變遷的趨勢與要求。本文主張在探討教育專業與改革的關係時，必須同時著眼於廣大的社會面向，以跳脫教育專業與教育改革的矛盾與對立、超越「眾矢之的」與「代罪羔羊」的處境與宿命。
The article is to explore the relationship between education profession and education reform. Its main point is that that relationship is extremely complicated and varies from time to time, from place to place. Education reform may be conducive to the shaping of education profession and the development of education profession to the facilitating of education reform. However, such a reciprocal relationship is not inherently necessary. Taking as an example the education reform that has been taking place since the 1990s in Taiwan, it is safe to say that education reform does contribute to the growth and development of education profession. Taking as another example the education reform that has been taking place since the 1980s in the United States, it is also safe to say that education profession does influence the design and implementation of education reform. But there exist some paradoxes and oppositions between both. In the case of Taiwan, the influence that education profession wields on education reform is weaker. In the case of the United States, education reform advocated by education profession encounters difficulties. No matter which case, we can see that both the building of education profession and the enforcing of education reform are embedded in a particular historical and societal condition. In terms of the United States’ experience, the participation or leading of education profession does not guarantee the effectiveness or quality of education reform, because the factors that have an impact on education reform are extremely complicated. Indeed, education profession such as administration and teaching is conditioned by social and historical backgrounds as well, even demanded by education reform and social change. This article maintains that we must take the broad society into consideration simultaneously while thinking about the relationship between education profession and education reform in order to go beyond paradoxes and oppositions and not to serve as a ready-made scapegoat.
期刊論文
1.Wiggins, S. P.(198610)。Revolution in the Teaching Profession: A Comparative Review of Two Reform Reports。Educational Leadership，44(2)，56-59。  new window
2.Hargreaves, A.(2000)。Four ages of professionalism and professional learning。Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice，6(2)，151-182。  new window
3.Evans, C.、Stewart, P. M.、Mangin, M.、Bagley, C.(2001)。Teacher quality: Issues and research。Education，122(1)，200-204。  new window
4.郭玉霞(19981200)。教育專業倫理準則初探--美國的例子。國民教育研究集刊，6，1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭文星(19990800)。師資培育與教育專業學程的規劃與實施。臺灣教育，584，37-40。  延伸查詢new window
6.歐用生(19960300)。教育改革的希望在教師。桃縣文教，1，19-21。  延伸查詢new window
7.張芳全(20000900)。教育改革行動方案評析。教育研究，77，33-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭富森(20010400)。教學評量：教育改革成敗的關鍵。臺灣教育，604，2-14。  延伸查詢new window
9.葉連祺(1998)。中等學校試用教師教育專業信念之研究。教育資料文摘，42(4)=249，76-87。  延伸查詢new window
10.楊巧玲(2000)。教育鬆綁與學校分權的教育改革策略分析。教育研究資訊，8(6)，1-15+a12。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.楊巧玲(20001100)。教育行政的典範移轉與學校經營的模式革新。教育研究，79，29-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳伯璋、李琪明(19950300)。中等學校教師修習教育專業科目及其學分之研究。教育研究資訊，3(2)，27-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳奎憙(19980600)。我國師資培育制度變革之分析。教育資料集刊，23，171-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.郭玉霞(19960600)。教育專業地位的維護與師資素質的提高。初等教育學報，9，479-486。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.朱匯森(1978)。如何培養教育專業精神。國教輔導，17(9/10)，1-3。  延伸查詢new window
16.孫沛德、梁尚勇(1984)。如何培養教育專業精神。教與學，1，13-14。  延伸查詢new window
17.卯靜儒(20010600)。臺灣近十年來課程改革之政治社會學分析。臺灣教育社會學研究，1(1)，79-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.馮朝霖(20020300)。自我賦權、公民社會與教育改革--臺灣近十年教育改革的理論與反思。亞洲研究，42，53-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.吳鐵雄、劉佑星、汪榮才、曾燦燈、張進上、董承文、黃宗顯、丁振豐、游麗卿(19950600)。師院教育專業課程之規畫:發展以國小教育為核心之師資培育課程。國民教育研究集刊. 臺南師院，1，1-80。  延伸查詢new window
20.鍾任琴(1995)。國小實習教師價值觀，任教意願與教育專業信念關係之探討。嘉義師院學報，9，53-90。  延伸查詢new window
21.吳明清(2002)。教育改革：教育人的反省與專業追求。中等教育，53(6)，152-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.翁麗芳(2002)。從教育改革談創新教學。教師天地，121，8-12。  延伸查詢new window
23.陳碧祥(1999)。教育改革與教育意識－兼談九年一貫課程之實施。課程與教學，2(4)，89-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.曾憲政(1996)。從美、澳、日的教育改革談行政院教育改革審議委員會的成立及運作。高市鐸聲，6(2)，9-12。  延伸查詢new window
25.葉學志(1971)。師範教育專業精神檢討與改進。中央月刊，3(5)，198-199。  延伸查詢new window
26.蔡慧娟(1999)。做孩子的親密伙伴：談內在教育專業理念。師友，383，84-87。  延伸查詢new window
27.Ballou, D.、Podgursky, M.(2000)。Reforming Teacher Preparation and Licensing: What is the Evidence?。Teachers College Record，102(1)，5-27。  new window
28.Boyd, W. L.(1992)。The Power of Paradigms: Reconceptualizing Educational Policy and Management。Educational Administration Quarterly，28(4)，504-528。  new window
29.Boyd, W. L.(1999)。Environmental Pressures, Management Imperatives, and Competing Paradigms in Educational Administration。Educational Management & Administration，27(3)，283-297。  new window
30.Carlgren, I.(1999)。Professionalism and Teachers as Designers。Journal of Curriculum Studies，31(1)，43-56。  new window
31.Clarke, M. M.、Madaus, G.、Horn, C. L.、Ramos, M. A.(2000)。Retrospective on Educational Testing and Assessment in the 20th Century。Journal of Curriculum Studies，32(2)，159-181。  new window
32.Darling-Hammond, L.(1988)。The Futures of Teaching。Educational Leadership，46(3)，4-10。  new window
33.Darling-Hammond, L.(1994)。Will 21st-Century Schools Really Be Different?。Education Digest，60(1)，4-8。  new window
34.Gallagher, M.(1996)。Why Has Education Reform Failed?。Human Events，52(40)。  new window
35.Gitlin, A.(1996)。Gender and Professionalization: An Institutional Analysis of Teacher Education and Unionism at the Turn of the Twentieth Century。Teachers College Record，97(4)，588-624。  new window
36.Hallinan, M. T.、Khmelkov, V. T.(2001)。Recent Developments in Teacher Education in the United States of America。Journal of Education for Teaching，27(2)，175-185。  new window
37.Lubienski, S. T.(2002)。Research, Reform, and Equity in U. S. Mathematics Education。Mathematical Thinking and Learning，4(2/ 3)，103-125。  new window
38.Wise, A.(1990)。Six Steps to Teacher Professionalism。Educational Leadership，47(7)，57-60。  new window
39.Wise, A.(1996)。Building a System of Quality Assurance for the Teaching Profession Moving into the 21st Century。Phi Delta Kappa，78(3)，190-192。  new window
40.Wise, A.(1999)。A Hard-Won System Begins to Pay Off。Education Week，18(36)，68-69。  new window
41.Zeichner, K. M.(1991)。Contradiction and Tensions in the Professionalization of Teaching and the Democratization of Schools。Teachers College Record，92(3)，363-379。  new window
圖書
1.謝維和(2002)。教育社會學。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.羊憶蓉(1999)。教育。社會學與臺灣社會。臺北：巨流。  延伸查詢new window
3.Capper, C. A.(1993)。Educational Administration in a Pluralistic Society。Albany, NY：State University of New York Press。  new window
4.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。總諮議報告書。臺北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.薛曉華(1996)。台灣民間教育改革運動：國家與社會的分析。臺北：前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張光甫(2003)。教育哲學：中西哲學的觀點。台北市：雙葉書廊。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.台灣研究基金會編輯部(19940000)。台灣的教育改革。臺北：前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.丁志權(2002)。教育專業與師資培育。新世紀的教育學概論－科技整合導向。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.Callahan, R.(1962)。Education and the Cult of Efficiency: A Study of the Social Forces That Have Shaped the Administration of the Public Schools。Education and the Cult of Efficiency: A Study of the Social Forces That Have Shaped the Administration of the Public Schools。Chicago, IL。  new window
10.Denmoyer, R.、Imber, M.、Scheurich, J. J.(1995)。Introduction: Knowledge Base Problems in Educational Administration。The Knowledge Base in Educational Administration: Multiple Perspectives。Albany, NY。  new window
11.Merz, C.、Furman, G.(1997)。Community and Schools: Promise & Paradox。Community and Schools: Promise & Paradox。New York, NY。  new window
12.陳麗華(2003)。課程發展實務導引。課程發展實務導引。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Murphy, J.(1995)。The knowledge base in school administration: Historical footings and emerging trends。The Knowledge Base in Educational Administration。New York, NY：The State University of New York Press。  new window
2.Darling-Hammond, L.(1988)。Policy and professionalism。Building a professional culture in schools。New York：Teachers College Press。  new window
3.單文經(1990)。教育專業知識的性質初探。師範教育政策與問題。臺北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1008（臺灣：991，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67669492
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上