:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「類能力分班」體制下教師工作經驗之探究
書刊名:臺灣教育社會學研究
作者:許惠茹洪志成 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Hui-juHung, Chih-cheng
出版日期:2010
卷期:10:1
頁次:頁175-225
主題關鍵詞:教育機會均等教師工作經驗建制俗民誌社會關係能力分班制度Equality of educational opportunityTeachers’ working experienceInstitutional ethnographySocial relationshipTracking system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:333
  • 點閱點閱:122
本研究基於對社會正義與教育機會均等觀點之關注,主要以一所採行「類能力分班」的國中為個案,探究於「類能力分班」體制下的教師工作經驗及其隱含的社會關係。本研究採行建制俗民誌為研究方法,研究發現學校生活的三個面向,包括義務與期待的相互作用、規範與共識的相互建構,以及資本與資源的相互滲透或缺乏,造成教師工作經驗的差異,並與學校行政以及家長產生編制性連結,共構出多元的社會網絡關係,依據研究發現歸結之研究結論則包括:一、教師、學校行政與資優班家長形成再製階級的建制社群,共構合法化霸權。二、再製階級建制社群成員協調彼此工作經驗,合理化教學安排,三、互為統治的多元社會關係,形成一個學校、兩個世界的教育學習。文末則根據研究結論提出研究建議,做為教育工作者實務與復續研究之參考。
This study aims to explore the tension of teachers in their experiences in Pander Junior High School with a “gifted program” under the pseudo- tracking system. Institutional ethnography methodology was adopted as the research methodology. We present a three-dimensions model of teaches’ life experiences to explain the diversity of tension perceived by teachers in that school, including the interplay of the obligations and expectations, the mutual constructions of the social norms and common consensuses, and the mutual permeation or lack of the capitals and resources, Using the above model, we analyze the overlapping social relations in terms of organizational connections among those teachers, school administrators, and parents. Three major findings were threefold. Firstly, a legitimate hegemony in Pander Junior High School was shaped by the connections, in which the teachers in the gift program, the parents and school administrators form an accomplice structure. Second, all the members in that accomplice structure coordinate their working experiences and rationalize the teacher’s arrangements, which might favor only partial students. Finally, two types of ruling social relationships between the elite but minority, the gift programs, and the majority, the non-gift programs make the school two different systems in terms of educational learning opportunists.
期刊論文
1.陳昺麟(20090200)。國中能力分班與社會階層再製:一個徑路分析的實證研究。國立高雄海洋科大學報,23,161-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.周新富(20000600)。對國中能力分班的省思。中等教育,51(3),131-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Mykhalovskiy, E.、McCoy, L.(2002)。Troubling ruling discourses of health: Using institutional ethnography in community-based research。Critical Public Health,12(1),17-37。  new window
4.許惠茹(20091200)。國三學生考試經驗之詮釋與反思。教育實踐與研究,22(2),33-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林俊瑩、吳裕益(20071200)。家庭因素、學校因素對學生學業成就的影響:階層線性模式的分析。教育研究集刊,54(4),107-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.人本教育基金會(2003)。人本2003年各縣市升學編班狀況調查報告。人本教育札記,173,38-44。  延伸查詢new window
7.周新富(20041200)。家庭社經地位、家長參與學習與國中生能力分組關係之研究。臺灣教育社會學研究,4(2),113-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Giroux, H. A.(1983)。Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis。Harvard Educational Review,53(3),257-293。  new window
9.許殷宏(20060600)。教學實踐與學生身分認同--國中美術班與普通班的比較。教育研究集刊,52(2),125-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.許宏儒(2004)。Bourdieu的「文化資本」概念及對教育機會均等的解釋。教育研究資訊,12(3),75-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.魏宗明(20010600)。學校在文化再製中的角色--Bourdieu觀點。國民教育研究學報,7,85-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.周新富(20061200)。Coleman社會資本理論在臺灣地區的驗證--家庭、社會資本與學業成就之關係。當代教育研究,14(4),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳建州、劉正(20041200)。論多元入學方案之教育機會均等性。教育研究集刊,50(4),115-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.周新富(20080600)。社會階級對子女學業成就的影響:以家庭資源為分析架構。臺灣教育社會學研究,8(1),1-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.戴曉霞(19980100)。能力分班與常態編班:美國經驗的啟示。課程與教學,1(1),123-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.楊正誠(20051200)。析論組織俗民誌的意義、概念、方法與實例。女學學誌,20,223-253。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.甄曉蘭(20070900)。偏遠國中教育機會不均等問題與相關教育政策初探。教育研究集刊,53(3),1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.姜添輝(20031200)。教師是專業或是觀念簡單性的忠誠執行者?文化再製理論的檢證。教育研究集刊,49(4),93-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.張建成、陳珊華(20060300)。生涯管教與行為管教的階級差異:兼論家庭與學校文化的連續性。教育研究集刊,52(1),129-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.LeTendre, G. K., Hofer, B. K.,、Shimizu, H.(2003)。What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the United States, Germany, and Japan。American Educational Research Journal,40(1),43-89。  new window
21.Mills, C.(2008)。Reproduction and transformation of inequalities in schooling: The transformative potential of the theoretical constructs of Bourdieu。British Journal of Sociology of Education,29(1),79-89。  new window
22.LeTendre, G. K.、Hofer, B. K.、Shimizu, H.(2003)。What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the United States, Germany, and Japan。American Educational Research Journal,40(1),43-89。  new window
23.Mills, C.(2008)。Reproduction and transformation of inequalities in schooling: The transformative potential of the theoretical constructs of Bourdieu。British Journal of Sociology of Education,29(1),79-89。  new window
學位論文
1.陳珊華(2004)。小學生文化資本之累積與作用(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.許誌庭(2000)。國小教師對「文化再製」現象的知覺性之研究(碩士論文)。臺南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kulik, J. A.(1992)。An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives。Storrs, Connecticut:The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut。  new window
2.Wheelock, A.(1992)。Crossing the tracks : how 'untracking' can save America's schools。New York:Boston:Teachers College Press:Massachusetts Advocacy Center。  new window
3.Griffith, A. I.、Smith, D. E.(2005)。Mothering for schooling。RoutledgeFalmer。  new window
4.Spring, Joel H.(1976)。The Sorting Machine。David McKay。  new window
5.Borich, G. D.、Tombari, M. L.(1997)。Educational psychology。New York, NY:Kendall/ Hunt。  new window
6.Emerson, Robert M.、Fretz, Rachel I.、Shaw, Linda L.(1995)。Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.姜添輝(2002)。資本社會中的社會流動與學校體系:批判教育社會學的分析。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bourdieu, Pierre、Passeron, Jean-Claude、Nice, Richard(1990)。Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture。Sage Publications。  new window
9.Bourdieu, Pierre(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste。Harvard University Press。  new window
10.Mayer, Richard E.(1987)。Educational Psychology: A Cognitive Approach。Don Mills:HaperCollins Publisher。  new window
11.Bourdieu, Pierre、Passeron, Jean-Claude、Nice, Richard、Bottomore, Tom(1977)。Reproduction in education, society and culture。Sage。  new window
12.林南(2001)。Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action。Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Coleman, James S.、Campbell, Ernest Q.、Hobson, Carol J.、McPartland, James、Mood, Alexander M.、Weinfeld, Frederic D.、York, Robert L.(1966)。Equality of educational opportunity。U.S. Government Printing Office。  new window
14.Coleman, James Samuel(1990)。Foundations of social Theory。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
15.Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D. et al.(1965)。Equality of educational opportunity。Washington, DC。  new window
16.Hollifield, J.(1987)。Ability grouping in elementary schools。ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education Urbana IL.(ED No. 290542)。  new window
17.Metz, M. H.(1993)。Teachers’ ultimate dependence on their students。Teacher’s work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts。New York。  new window
18.Shaw, T. A.(1996)。Taiwan school against Themselves: School culture versus the subjectivity of youth。The cultural production of the educated person: Critical ethnographies of schooling and local practice。Albany, NY。  new window
19.Smith, D. E.(2002)。Institutional ethnography。Qualitative research in action。London:Sage。  new window
20.Wheelock, A.(1992)。Crossing the tracks: How “untracking” can save America’s school。New York。  new window
21.Metz, M. H.(1993)。Teachers’ ultimate dependence on their students。Teacher’s work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts \\ J. W. Little ; M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.)。New York。  new window
22.Shaw, T. A.(1996)。Taiwan school against Themselves: School culture versus the subjectivity of youth。The cultural production of the educated person: Critical ethnographies of schooling and local practice \\ B. A. Levinson ; D. E. Foley ; D. C. Holland (Eds.)。Albany, NY。  new window
23.Smith, D. E.(2002)。Institutional ethnography。Qualitative research in action \\ T. May (Ed.)。London。  new window
單篇論文
1.Hollifield, J.(1987)。Ability grouping in elementary schools(ED 290542)。  new window
其他
1.Loveless, T.(1998)。The tracking and ability grouping debate。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳珊華(2006)。P. Bourdieu : 強調文化再製的批判取向社會學者。教育社會學 : 人物與思想。臺北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bourdieu, Pierre(1997)。The forms of capital。Education, Culture, Economy and Society。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Bourdieu, P.(1986)。The forms of capital。Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education。Greenwood Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE