:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中生活科技課程實施之微觀政治分析
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:張永宗李隆盛 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Yung-tsungLee, Lung-sheng
出版日期:2016
卷期:19:1
頁次:頁27-58
主題關鍵詞:生活科技課程實施微觀政治權力意識形態Living technologyCurriculum implementationPowerIdeologyMicro-politics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:263
  • 點閱點閱:79
本研究以微觀政治分析,探究生活科技在和自然合併為「自然與生活科技領域」後在國中階段的實況與理想的落差。經問卷普查臺中市26所公立國中並訪談相關人員,歸納出下列結論:(1)國中生活科技教師員額比例不足,各校開缺增聘意願不高。(2)多數生活科技教師未從事本科教學工作。(3)僅剩極少數學校因教師堅持或無法任教其他學科而在國一獨立設置生活科技課程。(4)絕大多數國中生活科技課程時數,交由自然科教師合併於領域內教學。(5)意識形態、利益關係、和權力運作等微觀政治現象,直接交互影響國中生活科技課程之實施樣貌。(6)在意識形態的氛圍、利益關係的衡量和權力運作的算計中,國中生活科技課程正邁向邊緣化、荒蕪化和消逝化。並做出對應建議。
Assertively incorporating the subject "Living Technology (LT)" into the learning area "Science and Technology (S&T)" by using a top-down approach is a typical political event in the field of curriculum when the National Curriculum Guideline for Grade 1-9 was developed in Taiwan. Employing a micro-political analysis with both qualitative and quantitative approaches, the current study aimed at investigating the discrepancy between the actual and the ideal curriculum implementation of LT in junior high schools. Based on the data collected from a questionnaire survey of all 26 public junior high schools in Taichung City and an interview with some stakeholders, the following six conclusions were made: (1) Qualified LT teachers in schools are insufficient but most schools are unwilling to recruit new teachers. (2) The majority of current LT teachers are not teaching LT as they have switched to other professions/subjects/areas. (3) Only few LT courses are left in very few schools and are independently offered for grade 7 by those LT teachers who are insistent or are incompetent to teach other subjects/areas. (4) Most of the teaching hours which should be allocated to LT are dominated by science teachers, so that the curriculum guidelines regarding LT have been misled and ill-implemented. (5) The micro-political phenomena, such as ideology, benefits and power, have directly affected the implementation of LT. (6) Influenced by the interweaving of ideology, benefits and power, the LT curriculum has been marginalized, uncultivated and diminished. Finally, some recommendations were made in response to the above conclusions.
期刊論文
1.林崇熙(19980200)。從革命到被革命--科學家何以不願科學研究來研究科學。當代,8=126,18-33。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝文斌、張永宗、李隆盛(20050200)。臺中市國中生活科技在職合格教師任教現況與課題。中等教育,56(1),52-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李隆盛(2002)。促使生活科技轉向良性循環。生活科技教育月刊,35(2),1。  延伸查詢new window
4.林崇熙(20001200)。從兩種文化到「科技與社會」。通識教育,7(4),39-58。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃乃熒(20020800)。析論九年一貫課程領導的途徑及策略。教育研究,100,70-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.李隆盛(19991000)。「科技」在「自然與科技」學習領域中應和「自然」分立並行。生活科技教育,32(10),2-4。  延伸查詢new window
7.張永宗(19920400)。理化與工藝,科學亦科技--國中理化、工藝課程內涵的異同比較與改進建議。中學工藝教育月刊,25(4),12-15。  延伸查詢new window
8.張永宗(1992)。科技在未來工業經濟中的重要性。中學工藝教育月刊,25(3),9-12。  延伸查詢new window
9.張永宗(20001000)。自然可以取代或包含科技嗎?。師友月刊,400,22-25。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉欽敏、張永宗(20020200)。從霸權歧視走向平權統整--國中教師合理授課節數推估與建議。師友月刊,416,47-51。  延伸查詢new window
11.顧柏岩(19610803)。工藝教育在中學課程中之重要性。教育與文化,265/266,29-31。  延伸查詢new window
12.Bacharach, S. B.、Mundell, B. L.(1993)。Organizational politics in school: Micro, macro, and logics of action。Educational Administration Quarterly,29(4),423-352。  new window
13.張永宗(20030600)。是美麗的約定?還是浪漫的期待?--九年一貫學校課程計畫剖析:以臺中市公立國中為例。中等教育,54(3),96-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.劉欽敏、張永宗(20020500)。從函數對應走向非函數關係的師資結構供需--九年一貫課程國中領域教師合理員額配置之推估與建議。學校行政,19,158-169。  延伸查詢new window
15.卯靜儒(20010600)。臺灣近十年來課程改革之政治社會學分析。臺灣教育社會學研究,1(1),79-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳瑞麟(20010600)。社會建構中的「實在」。國立政治大學哲學學報,7,97-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.黃乃熒(2002)。課程改革對於學校組織文化的衝擊及其因應。教育部九年一貫課程學校經營研發組國中「組織文化調整與資源運用」中區研討會。臺中市:臺北市:臺中市立向上國民中學:教育部。7-8。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.羅文基(1986)。教育、訓練與人力發展。高雄:復文圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Datnow, A.(1998)。The gender politics of educational change。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
3.Bocock, Robert、田心喻(1991)。文化霸權。臺北:遠流出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Snow, Charles Percy、林志成、劉藍玉(2000)。兩種文化。臺北:貓頭鷹。  延伸查詢new window
5.李隆盛(2000)。科技與人力教育的提升。臺北市:師大書苑有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Mannheim, Karl、艾彥(2001)。意識形態和烏托邦。北京:華夏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡璧煌(2008)。教育政治學。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃政傑(1999)。課程設計。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.李隆盛(1986)。我國國中階段工藝課程發展之研究。臺北市:中華民國工藝教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bacharach, S. B.、Laweler, E. J.(1980)。Power and politics in organizations: The social psychology of conflict, coalitions, and bargaining。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
11.林天祐、王博弘、吳玉明、陳政宏、劉惠玲、劉宜容、王玉麟、許傳德、高家斌、簡賢昌(2004)。教育政治學。臺北:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.Lukes, Steven、林葦芸(2006)。權力:基進觀點。商周。  延伸查詢new window
13.Kakabadse, Andrew、Parker, Christopher、蔡麟筆(1990)。權力、政治與組織。臺北市:巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.Foucault, Michel、劉北成、楊遠嬰(1998)。規訓與懲罰:監獄的誕生。臺北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Apple, M. W.(1985)。Education and Power。Boston, MA:Routledge and Kegan Paul:Ark Paperbacks。  new window
16.Ball, S. J.(1987)。The micro-politics of the school: Toward a theory of school organization。London:Methuen。  new window
17.Blasé, J.、Anderson, G. L.(1995)。The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment。Teachers College Press, Columbia University。  new window
18.McLellan, D.(1986)。Ideology。Milton Keynes:Minneapolis:Open University Press:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
19.Morgan, G.(1986)。Image of Organizations。Beverley Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
20.Popkewitz, T. S.(1991)。A political sociology of education reform: Power/knowledge in teaching, teacher education, and research。New York:Teachers College Press:Columbia University。  new window
21.Apple, M. W.(1993)。Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age。New York, NY:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
22.Doll, William E. Jr.、王紅宇(1999)。後現代課程觀。臺北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
23.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1996)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
24.陳伯璋(2001)。新世紀課程改革的省思與挑戰。台北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.李隆盛(1996)。科技與職業教育的課題。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
26.Burke, Peter、許綬南(1997)。製作路易十四。臺北:麥田。  延伸查詢new window
27.張清濱(1997)。學校行政與教育革新。臺灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
28.黃政傑(19970000)。課程改革的理念與實踐。臺北:漢文。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Shapin, Steven、Schaffer, Simon(1985)。Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life。Princeton University Press。  new window
30.Foucault, Michel、Smith, A. M. Sheridan(1972)。The Archaeology of Knowledge。Pantheon Books。  new window
31.Apple, Michael W.(1990)。Ideology and curriculum。Routledge。  new window
單篇論文
1.王志弘(1999)。文化研究講義。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bloome, D.、Willett, J.(1991)。Toward a micropolitics of classroom interaction。The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
2.黃政傑(1993)。社會變遷、意識形態與學校課程。文化變遷與教育發展。嘉義縣:國立中正大學成人教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.林崇熙(2004)。技術的權力秘密。科技渴望社會。臺北:群學。  延伸查詢new window
4.張永宗(1994)。工藝/科技教育是一門學科。國民中學輔導手冊之十--工藝科。臺中市:臺灣省教育廳。  延伸查詢new window
5.卯靜儒(2002)。個人的/政治的:艾波的權力、知識與教育。意識、權力與教育:教育社會學理論導讀。臺北市:嘉義縣:復文:南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.Malen, B.(1995)。The micropolitics of education: mapping the multiple dimensions of power relations in school polities。The Study of educational politics: the 1994 commemorative yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (1969-1994)。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
7.楊深坑(1988)。意識型態的批判與教育學研究。意識型態與教育。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
8.Blase, J.(1991)。Everyday political perspectives of teachers toward students: The dynamics of diplomacy。The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation。Newbury Park,CA:Corwin Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE