臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：教育知識的國際化或本土化﹖--兼論臺灣近年來的教育研究
書刊名：教育學報
作者：楊深坑 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yang, Shen-keng
出版日期：1998
卷期：26:2/27:1
頁次：頁361-381
主題關鍵詞：臺灣；教育研究
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:184
  • 點閱點閱:50
　　　　　本文旨在透過教育知識性質、功能與類型的分析，探討教育知識國際化和本土化 之間的衝突與統合。據以檢討近年來臺灣教育研究之得失，進而展望建立亞洲觀點教育知識 體系之可能性。就性質言，教育知識係一種專業的實踐性知識，其功能所涉及的不僅是制度 化的教育，也涉及教育與社會交織而成的複雜社會情境。西方啟蒙運動以來，技術宰制性的 知識，襲捲全球，教育研究亦然。試圖建構不涉及文化情境的知識體系，其結果喪失了教育 宜植根於本土的實踐性性格，近年來臺灣教育研究全盤西化之情況尤為顯然。後現代主義卻 反其道而行，強調知識的本土性、局部性。兩者之間的統合，只有透過多層面的動態知識觀 ，亦即將及普遍有效的教育知識視為只是知識的深層結構，其外圍圍繞著不同層次的本土知 識，透過本土觀點的知識形式，參與不同知識形式的對話，才能覺知本土知識的侷限性，而 更能以含容而平等的精神參與國際化、全球化的知識建構。亞洲觀點的教育知識，亦宜以亞 洲意識為核心，尊重各地區不同文化的特殊性，重新加以建構。
　　　　　This paper attempts to deal with the confrontations and their resolutions between internationalization and indigenization in educational research, as well as the possibility of construction of an educational knowledge system from the Asian perspective through an analysis of nature, function and patterns of educational knowledge. Educational knowledge is a professional knowledge belonging to that of practice. Thus it should be rooted in indigenous culture. However, the construction of universally valid educational knowledge has been the ideal of positivism-oriented educational research since the Enlightenment with the consequence of sacrificing the cultural particularities embedded in educational practice. On the other hand, postmodernism denounces the internationally valid knowledge as Euroceantrism, totalitarianism in scientific discourse. It is thus proposed that the Asian educational knowledge system be constructed through continuous dialogues of different indigenous cultures under the common awareness of Asian consciousness.
期刊論文
1.Welch, A. R.(1991)。Knowledge and Legitimation in Comparative Education。Comparative Education Review，35(3)，508-531。  new window
2.Cornwell, G.、Johnson, B.(1991)。The conflicts of postmodern and traditional epistemologies in curricular reform: A dialogue。Studies in Philosophy and Education，11，149-166。  new window
3.Montane, M.(1994)。Professionalisation of teaching: The outcomes of an ATEE seminar。European Journal of Teacher Education，17(1/2)，119-126。  new window
4.Psacharopoulos, G.(1990)。Comparative education: From theory to practice, or are you A:\neo.* or B:\*.ist?。Comparative Education Review，34(3)，369-380。  new window
5.Yang, S. K.(1995)。Asian perspectives in comparative education for the 21st century。Comparative Education，44，97-100。  new window
6.Goodenow, R.(1996)。The cyberspace challenge: Modernity, post-modernity and reflections on international networking policy。Comparative Education，32(2)，197-216。  new window
7.Masemann, V. L.(1990)。Ways of knowing: Implications for comparative education。Comparative Education Review，34(4)，465-473。  new window
8.Peters, M.(1996)。Cybernetics, cyberspace and the politics of university reform。Australian Journal of Education，40(2)，162-176。  new window
9.Popkewitz, T. S.(1994)。Professionalization in teaching and teacher education: Some notes on its history, ideology, and potential。Teaching and Teacher Education，10(1)，1-14。  new window
10.Rust, V. L.(1991)。Postmodernism and Its Comparative Education Implications。Comparative Education Review，35(4)，610-626。  new window
研究報告
1.楊深坑(1997)。教育學門東亞區域研究發展現況、推動策略與優先議題 (計畫編號：NS086-2418-H-002-007)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gadamer, H. G.(1986)。Wahrheit und Methode。Tübingen：J. C. B. Mohr。  new window
2.Schneider, Friedrich(1959)。Europäische Erziehung。Basel Freiburg Wien：Herder。  new window
3.Scheler, Max(1925)。Die Formen des Wissens und die Bildung。Bonn：Friedrich Cohen。  new window
4.Postman, N.(1993)。Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology。New York：Vintage Books。  new window
5.Popkewitz, T. S.(1984)。Paradigm and Ideology in Educational Research。The Falmer Press。  new window
6.d'Holbach, P. H. T.(1770)。Système de la nature。Berlin (Ost.)。  new window
7.Gadamer, H. G.、Smith, P. C.(1986)。The idea of the good in Platonic-Aristotelian philosophy。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。  new window
8.Jullien, M. A.(1816)。Plan and preliminary view of a work on comparative education, 1816-1817。New York：Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
9.de La Mettrie, J. O.(1948)。L'homme machine。Paris：Gallimard。  new window
10.Latouche, S.、Morris, R.(1996)。The westernization of the world。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
11.Meyer, J. W.、Kamens, D. H.、Benavot, A.(1992)。School knowledge for the masses: World models and national categories in the 20th century。Washington, DC：The Rand Corporation。  new window
12.Payne, J.(1880)。Lectures on the science and art of education。London：Longmans, Green & Co.。  new window
13.Alisch, L. M.、Rössner, L.(1978)。Erziehungswissenschaft als technologische Disziplin。München：E. Reinhardt。  new window
14.Bell, Daniel(1973)。The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting。New York：Basic Books。  new window
15.Conant, James B.(1963)。The Education of American Teachers。New York：McGraw-Hill Book Co.。  new window
16.von Cube, F.(1965)。Kybernetische grundlagen des lernens und lehrens。Stuttgart。  new window
17.Koerner, J. D.(1963)。The Miseducation of American Teachers。Boston：Houghton Mifflin Co.。  new window
18.Ringer, F. K.(1979)。Education and society in modern Europe。Bloomington：Indiana University Press。  new window
19.Lyotard, Jean-Francois、Bennington, Geoff、Massumi, Brian(1984)。The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge。Manchester：Manchester University Press。  new window
20.Waller, W.(1932)。The sociology of teaching。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
21.楊深坑(19880000)。理論．詮釋與實踐：教育學方法論論文集。臺北：師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Masemann, V. L.(1990)。Educational Reform: Impact of Indigenous Forms of Knowledge。International Encyclopedia of Education。  new window
2.葉啟政(1993)。社會科學論述的移植與本土化的根本問題。西方社會科學理論的移植與應用。香港：中文大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gadamer, H. G.(1991)。Was ist praxis? Die Bedingungen gesellschaftlicher vernunft。Vernunft im zeitalter der wissenschaft。Frankfurt am Main：Suhrkamp Verlag。  new window
4.Habermas, J.(1968)。Erkenntnis und Interesse。Technik und Wissenschaft als "Ideologic"。Frankfurt am M.：Suhrkamp。  new window
5.Kant, Immanuel(1968)。Immanuel Kant Über Pädagogik。Kants Werke。Berlin：Walter de Gruyter。  new window
6.Noah, H. J.(1973)。Defining comparative education: Conceptions。Relevant methods in comparative education。Hamburg：UNESCO Institute for Education。  new window
7.Oelkers, J.、Tenorth, H. E.(1993)。Pädagogisches Wissen als Orientierung und als Problem。Pädagogisches Wissen。Beltz Verlag。  new window
8.Weniger, E.(1953)。Theorie und praxis in der erziehung。Die Eigenstdndigkeit der Erziehung in Theorie und Praxis。Weinheim。  new window
9.Yang, S. K.(1998)。Explanation and understanding in comparative education。Comparison, understanding and teacher education in international perspective。Frankfurt am Main：Peter Lang。  new window
10.Gadamer, H. G.(1979)。Problem of historical consciousness。Interpretative social science: A reader。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
11.Holmes, B.(1958)。Social change and the curriculum。Yearbook of education: The secondary school curriculum。London：Evans Brothers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1134（臺灣：1088，外國：46） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67395538
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上