:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:雲端上的科學專題導向學習 -運用雲端運算服務於國小科學之專題導向學習研究
作者:顏膺修
作者(外文):Ying-Hsiu Yen
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:科學教育研究所
指導教授:張惠博
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:專題導向學習雲端學習資訊教育project-based learningcloud learninginformation education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:56
本研究旨在探討運用雲端資源於國小自然科專題導向學習的可行性,透過行動研究評估此先導性教學模式之成效。選擇某公立國小六年級10個班進行實驗,根據FOCUS模式設計一個資訊教育結合自然與生活領域的雲端專題導向學習實驗,探討「天氣的變化」、「雨量統計分析」及「氣候變遷」等主題。其中2班實施行動研究,瞭解教師引導學生運用雲端資源製作科學研究專題時面臨的問題及其解決方法,包含:雲端學習平台建置、教學活動設計、教學觀察與討論等。另外8班隨機分成控制組與實驗組各4班進行準實驗研究,控制組施以單機資源學習,實驗組施以雲端資源學習。各組學生完成小組報告做為實作評量,由教師評量並分析其差異。
實驗結果顯示專題初期控制組的實作表現優於實驗組,然而,後續的專題製作實驗組的實作表現優於控制組,即學生持續應用雲端資源提升專題成果。行動研究結果顯示選擇生活化科學議題作為專題主題,學生較易從中發現問題,進而探索相關問題;此外,雲端資源具有跨平台、異地備援、免安裝及免費使用等單機軟體不及的優勢。根據上述的研究發現,本研究認為國小自然與生活領域結合資訊教育的課程,以FOCUS模式為基礎設計雲端專題導向學習是一種可行的創新教法。
當教師採行此法時,可參考下列原則:(1)指導學生應用心智工具時,應從累積小成就開始,進而習得應用方法;(2)合作學習時要注意分組方式、工作分配與協調;(3)提供寫作鷹架和參與小組討論協助學生對問題的思考與理解;(4)利用「家長分享」、「全班報告」或「公開發表」等方式可協助專題導向學習。
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effect of a project-based learning (PBL) with cloud resources approach on primary school science and technology courses. Based on the FOCUS model, a PBL with cloud resources including weather transition, rainfall statistics, and climate change topics was developed and implemented to 10 classes of the sixth grader’s science and technology and information education classes at a public elementary school. In order to understand the problems and solutions such as learning platform configuration, teaching activities designing, observations, and discussions that teachers faced during the PBL, an action research was employed in two classes. Other 8 classes were randomly assigned into control and experimental groups, namely 4 classes for each. The control group conducted PBL with digital resources pre-installed in computers and the experimental group conducted PBL with cloud resources on Internet. Each group completed a project report as performance assessment that was rated and analyzed by the teachers.
Results of the experiments showed that the control group’s performance was better than the experimental group’s at the early stage of PBL. However, the experimental group performed better than the control group afterwards in terms of students continuously used cloud resources would promote their PBL achievements. Results of action research revealed that PBL topics selected from the daily life was easier for students to locate problems and more engaged in inquires toward the targeted issues. Moreover, cloud resources had more advantages than pre-installed software, such as cross-platforms, disaster recovery, and free to use. Grounded upon the findings, it is concluded that implementing PBL with cloud resources based on the FOCUS model in primary school science and technology courses is a feasible and innovative teaching method.
Guidelines for implementing PBL with cloud resources are as follows: (1) Beginning with accumulation of small achievements then learning of application methods while directing students to use mind tools; (2) Taking care of grouping, tasks assignments, and coordination during the cooperative learning; (3) Providing writing scaffolds and involving group discussions to facilitate student’s thinking and understanding of problems. (4) By ways of parent’s sharing, class presentation, or outcome publishing to enhance student’s PBL.
Google(2012a)。 Google 文件基本介紹。取自 http://docs.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=b5&;answer=49008
Google(2012b)。 Google 應用服務介紹。取自http://www.google.com/apps/intl/zh-TW/business/collaboration.html
牛頓編輯群(2006)。自然與生活科技第七冊。臺北:牛頓。
王千倖(1999)。「合作學習」和「問題導向學習」-培養教師及學生的科學創造力。教育資料與研究,28,31-39。new window
余民寧(2002)。教育測驗與評量:成就測驗與教學評量。臺北:心理。
李坤崇(2008)。九年一貫課程的總綱四次變革及展望。教育研究月刊,175,5-21。new window
李建億(2006)。網際網路專題學習互動歷程之研究。科學教育學刊,14,101-120。new window
余政賢、梁雲霞(2008)。數位式問題導向學習之教育意涵:設計架構與實踐成效。教學科技與媒體,83,28-46。new window
林天佑(2005)。教師行動研究準則:普及化的基石。學校行政雙月刊,35,1-16。
林鈺維(譯)(2008)。自由軟體的定義。取自 http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
林建良、黃台珠、吳裕益(2008)。促進知識整合的網路學習環境量表發展。科學教育學刊,16,605-626。new window
林凱胤、王國華、蔡維真(2007)。部落格在師資培育課程應用之研究。科學教育學刊,15,461-490。new window
林曉雯(2001)。國小自然科教師試行「學習環」之合作行動研究。屏東師院學報,14,935-986。
行政院教育改革審議委員會[行政院教改會](1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。
邱皓政(2000)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北:五南。
邱富宏、陳錦章(2002)。融入認知策略與工具的網路學習環境對學生學習影響之研究。科學教育學刊,10,261-285。new window
吳清山、劉春榮、林天祐、陳明終、黃旭鈞、高家斌(2004)。2004年國民教育政策與問題調查研究(初步研究結果)。臺北:國立教育資料館。
吳為聖、張惠博、陳錦章(2004)。網路學習環境對科學教學與學習之影響:高中師生的觀點。「中華民國第十九屆科學教育學術研討會」發表之論文,國立臺灣師範大學。
南一出版社(2012)。南一國小教師網-自然與生活科技。取自:http://www.nani.com.tw/nani/eteacher/etnatu/etnatu_teachservice_1.jsp
南一編輯群(2009)。自然與生活科技第七冊。臺南:南一。
計惠卿、張杏妃(2001)。全方位的學習策略─問題導向學習的教學設計模式。教學科技與媒體,55,58-71。new window
莊明貞(2008)。九年一貫課程重大議題研修變革之探析。教育研究月刊,175,75-82。new window
徐新逸(2001)。如何利用網路幫助孩子成為研究高手?網路專題式學習與教學創新。臺灣教育,607,25-34。
秦夢群、賴文堅(2006)。九年一貫課程實施政策與問題之分析。教育政策論壇,9,23-44。new window
許瑛玿、廖桂菁(2002)。情境式網路輔助學習環境之研發與實踐。科學教育學刊,10,157-178。new window
夏林清(譯)(2000)。行動研究方法導論-教師動手做研究(原作者:Altrichter, H., Posch, P., &; Somekh, B.)。臺北:遠流。(原著1997年出版)
張玉琦(2008)。雲端運算風暴來襲。數位時代月刊,173。取自:http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/cid/0/id/10163
張召雅(2004)。化教學行動為行動研究的歷程探討。明新學報,30,227-245。new window
張世平、胡夢鯨(1988)。教育研究法的探討與應用。臺北:師大書苑。
張基成、詹雅婷(2003)。網路專題導向學習策略與學習活動-學習目標導向拼圖式合作學習。「國際電腦輔助教學研討會論文集」發表之論文,國立臺灣師範大學。
張惠博(1995)。學習的社會層面觀點:科學教師的基本見解。建構與教學,2。取自:http://sewww.ncue.edu.tw/c&;t/issue1-8/v2-2.htm
張靜嚳(1995)。何謂建構主義?建構與教學,3。取自:http://macro.bio.ncue.edu.tw/~biowww/c&;t/issue1-8/v3-1.htm
陳惠邦(1998)。教育行動研究。臺北:師大書苑。
郭生玉(1993)。心理與教育研究法。臺北:精華。
康軒編輯群(2009a)。自然生活科技第五冊。臺北:康軒。
康軒編輯群(2009b)。自然生活科技第七冊。臺北:康軒。
教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。臺北:教育部。
教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。臺北:教育部。new window
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北:教育部。new window
教育部(2008a)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北:教育部。new window
教育部(2008b)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要-自然與生活科技。臺北:教育部。new window
教育部(2008c)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要-資訊教育。臺北:教育部。new window
游文楓、佘曉清(2006)。網路化問題解決教學策略對學生生物學習成效的影響。科學教育學刊,14,381-400。new window
游家政(1999)。再造國民教育九年一貫課程的圖像-課程綱要的規劃構想與可能問題。教育資料與研究,26,4-18。new window
彭富源、張素貞(2005)。九年一貫課程政策理念與實踐之探究-社會重建的觀點。臺北市立教育大學學報,36,93-112。new window
楊家興(1995)。情境教學理論與超媒體學習環境。教學科技與媒體,22,40-48。new window
楊龍立(2008)。當前課程研究方向的五個建議。教育研究月刊,176,5-14。new window
維基百科(2012)。雲端運算。取自:http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/雲端運算
黃光國等(2003)。終結教改亂象,追求優質教育。取自: http://www.ba.ncku.edu.tw/stuff/teacher/yong/z_hot_issue_topics/college_quality_job_impact/new_page_5.htm
黃亦筠(2009)。筆電之後是什麼?林百里:我不去藍海,我去雲端。天下雜誌,433,204-207。
黃政傑(2001)。行動研究與課程教學革新。臺北:揚智文化。
黃炳煌(1999)。談「課程統整」-以國民教育九年一貫課程為例。「新世紀的教育展望國際學術研討會」發表之論文,嘉義:國立中正大學。
黃國禎、朱蕙君、陳佐霖、王姿婷、曾秋蓉、黃國豪(2007)。線上自律學習輔助系統之研究與實證。科學教育學刊,15,317-334。new window
歐用生(1994)。提升教師行動研究的能力。研究資訊,11,1-7。
劉源俊(2001)。剖析國教九年一貫課程。取自:http://vschool.scu.edu.tw/Class02/Content.asp?Data_Code=150
翰林出版社(2010年)。98翰林國小教材簡介-架構特色。取自: http://media.worldone.com.tw/2009book/98e_a/na56/na56_03.htm
翰林編輯群(2009)。自然與生活科技第七冊。臺南:翰林。
顏膺修(2006)。電腦與網路。臺中:暢談國際文化出版。
顏膺修、張惠博、李一平(2008)。國小六年級資訊教育課程計畫之內容分析。「2008年臺灣網際網路研討會」發表之論文,高雄:義守大學。
顏膺修、張惠博(2008)。不同網路學習平台應用於專題導向學習之研究。「2008年臺灣網際網路研討會發表之論文,高雄:義守大學。
Anderson, G. L., Herr, K., &; Nihlen, A. S. (1994). Studying your own school: An educator’s guide to qualitative practitioner research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., &; Cocking, R. R. (Eds). (2000). Technology to support learning. How people learn: Brain, mind,experience, and school . Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=9853
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., &; Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
Clark, D. B., &; Sampson, V. D. (2007). Personally-seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 253-277.
Copi, I. M. (1997). Introduction to logic. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Delisle, R. (1997). How to use problem-based learning in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Department for Education and Employment [DfEE]. (1999). The National Curriculum for England: Information and Communication Technology. London, England: Author.
Dodge, B. (2012). What is a WebQuest? Retrieved from http://webquest.org/
Donovan, W., &; Nakhleh, M. (2007). Student use of web-based tutorial materials and understanding of chemistry concepts. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26, 291-327.
Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 255-272.
Fogarty, R. (1997). Problem based learning &; other curriculum models for the multiple intelligences classrooms. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight Professional Development.
Horrigan, J. B. (2008). Use of cloud computing applications and services. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Use-of-CloudComputing- Applications -and-Services.aspx
Jackson, D. F., Bourdeau, G., Sampson, A., &; Hagen, T. J. (1997). Internet resources for middle school science: Golden opportunity or silicon snake oil? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6, 49-57.
Jacobs, J. W., &; Dempsey, J. V. (2006). Emerging Instructional Technologies: The Near Future. In Reiser, R. A. &; Dempsey, J. V. (Eds.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (2nd ed., pp.323-334). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jocabs, H. (Ed.). (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Johnson, R. T., &; Johnson, D. W. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn &; Bacon.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computer as mindtools for school: Engaging critical thinking (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Modeling with technology: Mindtools for conceptual change (3rd ed. ). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Katz, R. N. (2008). The tower and the cloud: Higher education in the age of cloud computing. Berkeley, CA: EDUCAUSE.
Leask, M., &; Pachler, N. (2005). Learning to teach using ICT in the secondary school. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lonning, R. A. (1993). Effect of cooperative learning strategies on students’ verbal Interactions and achievement during conceptual change Instruction In 10th grade general science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1087-1102.
Loveless, A., &; Dore, B. (2002). ICT in the primary school. Philadelphia, PA: Buckingham.
McMillan, J. H., &; Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
Oblinger, D. G., &; Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the net generation. In Oblinger, D. G. &; Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation (pp. 2.1-2.20). Berkeley, CA: EDUCAUSE.
Reese, G. (2009). Cloud application architectures: Building applications and infrastructure in the cloud. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
Rittinghouse, J. (2009). Cloud computing: Implementation, management, and security. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Roberts, G. R. (2005). Technology and learning expectations of the net generation. In Oblinger, D. G. &; Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation (pp. 3.1-3.7). Berkeley, CA: EDUCAUSE.
Solomon, G. (2003). Project-based learning: A primer. Technology &; Learning Magazine, 23. Retrieved from http://www.techlearning.com/article/17708
Solomon, J. (1992). The classroom discussion of science-based social issues presented on television: knowledge, attitudes and values. International journal of Science Education, 14, 431-444.
Steinberg, A. (1997). Real learning, real work. New York, NY: Routledge.
Sun Microsystems, Inc. (2009). Introduction to cloud computing architecture: White paper(1st ed.). Santa Clara, CA: Author.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk.
Toolin, R. E. (2004). Striking a balance between innovation and standards: A study of teachers implementing project-based approaches to teaching science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 179-187.
Velte, A. T., Velte, T. J., &; Elsenpeter, R. (2009). Cloud computing: A practical approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in education. Retrieved from http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/114
Waks, S., &; Sabag, N. (2004). Technology project learning versus lab experimentation. Journal of Science Education and Technology,13, 333-342.
Wildstrom, S. H. (2009). Cloud computing: understand the risks. Business Week. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2009-03-24/cloud-
computing-understand-the-risks
Yang, K. Y., &; Heh, J. S. (2007). The impact of internet virtual physics laboratory instruction on the achievement in physics, science process skills and computer. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 451-461.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE