:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區高中/技職分流與教育機會不均等性之變遷
書刊名:教育研究集刊
作者:陳怡靖 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Yi-gean
出版日期:2001
卷期:47
頁次:頁253-282
主題關鍵詞:高中技職教育分流教育機會不均等性之變遷教育資源分配不平等性The division of senior high school vocational schoolThe inequality of educational opportunitiesThe inequality of educational resources
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(22) 博士論文(7) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:17
  • 共同引用共同引用:620
  • 點閱點閱:187
先前陳怡靖、鄭燿男(2000)的研究發現,出身背景好的人之所以有較高的教育年數,是因其社會資本、財務資本、文化資本較高所致。此發現為背景因素對教育年數的影響找到重要解釋。本研究進一步分析這三個資本對於國中後的升學情況(包括是否升學、升學後讀高中或是技職)是否也具有解釋力。結果發現,背景變項對國中後繼續升學的機率有影響,但對升學後讀高中或技職則影響不大。而背景因素對升學機率的影響,是透社會資本、財資本的中介作用所致,Coleman的社會資本論及財務資本論得到進一步證實。至於文化資本,本研究發其對國中後的升學機率影響並不顯著,Bourdieu文化資本論的適用性是值得再探討的問題。 本研究結果進一步證明:無論背景因素或是中介變項,都是對國中後的升學機率有影響,至於升學後是讀高中或技職則影響大都不顯著。另外,先前陳鄭研究透過分析各年代背景變項對於國中以上教育年數的迴歸係數β值的變化,而發現臺灣地區民眾受國中以上教育年數的教育機會不平等性是隨年代的加增而先升後降。本研究進一步分析各年代的整體國中後升學機率,分別為74%,69%,86%,以第二組年代的升學機率最接近50%,教育機會也最不均;而根據邏輯迴歸係數β值的分析結果,發現臺灣地區民眾教育資源分配之不平等性並沒有明顯一致的變化趨勢,前述受教育年數的機會不平等性之變遷,並非受教育資源分配不平等性的影響,而主要是受到整體升學不同的鉅視結構影響,在升學率最接近50%時,受教育年數的教育機會最不均等。
A study by Chen Yi-gean and Cheng Jan-nan reveals that students from wealthy families enjoy more years of education due to better social capital, financial capital, and cultural capital. The results of the study offer an important explanation for the effect of background factors on number of years of education. Therefore, the aim of the study is to explore further relation ships between the three forms of capital and the opportunity of entering a higher school (including entering a higher school or not and attending a senior high school or vocational school). The results show that background variables have a stronger effect on the rate of entering a higher school than the effect on attending a senior high school or vocational school. Through the intervening function of social capital and financial capital, background factors can effect the rate of entering a higher school. According to Coleman’s social capitalism and financial capitalism, the study can be confirmed. The study also founds that cultural capital has little effect on entering a higher school, but it has a strong effect on the number of years of education after junior high school. The adaptation of Bourdieu’s cultural capitalism can be further explored. The research also shows that opportunities of entering a higher school will be largely influenced by background factors or four intervening variables which have little effect on entering a senior high school or vocational school. Through the analysis of the change in the influence of background variables on the regression beta B of years of education, the inequality of educational opportunities in Taiwan, with the annual increase, will rise in the beginning and fall at the end. Another result of the study is that the total rate of entering a higher school in 74 percent, 69 percent, and 86 percent. For educational opportunities, the second group is most inequal when the rate of entering a higher school increases up by 50 percent. Through the analysis of logical regression beta B, the change in the inequality of opportunities of years of education in Taiwan is mainly influenced by various sharp structures of a total rate of entering a higher school, and not by the inequality of educational resources. When the rate of entering a higher school is nearly 50 percent, the opportunity of years of education is most inequal.
期刊論文
1.Adams, D. K.(1988)。Extending the educational planning discourse: Conceptual and paradigmatic explorations。Comparative Education Review,32(4),400-415。  new window
2.Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W.、Downey, D. B.(1998)。Assessing the Oppositional Culture Explanation for Racial/Ethnic Differences in School Performance。American Sociological Review,63(4),536-553。  new window
3.黃毅志(19960300)。量化社會階層歷史比較研究方法與鉅視結構分析。思與言,34(1),71-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Hao, L.、Bonstead-Bruns, M.(1998)。Parent-child differences in educational expectations and the academic achievement of immigrant and native students。Sociology of Education,71(3),175-198。  new window
5.Muller, C.(1998)。Gender differences in parental involvement and adolescents math achievement。Sociology of Education,71(4),336-356。  new window
6.Hagan, J.、MacMillan, R.、Wheaton, B.(1996)。New Kid in Town : Social Capital and Life Course effects of Family Migration on Children。American Sociological Review,61,368-385。  new window
7.Fejgin, N.(1995)。Factors Contribulting to the Academic Excellence of American Jewish and Asian Students。Sociology of Education,68,18-30。  new window
8.黃毅志(19921200)。地位取得--理論與結構分析。思與言,30(4),131-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.DiMaggio, Paul J.(1982)。Cultural Capital and School Success: The Impact of Status Culture Participation on the Grades of U.S. High School Students。American Sociological Review,47(2),189-201。  new window
10.Guo, G.、VanWey, L. K.(1999)。Sibship size and intellectual development: Is the relationship causal。American Sociological Review,64,169-187。  new window
11.Swanson, C. B.、Schneider, B.(1999)。Students on the move: Residential and educational mobility in America's schools。Sociology of Education,72,54-67。  new window
12.黃毅志(19951200)。臺灣地區教育機會不平等性之變遷。中國社會學刊,18,243-273。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.謝小芩(19920700)。性別與教育機會--以二所北市國中為例。國家科學委員會研究彙刊(人文及社會科學),2(2),179-201。  延伸查詢new window
14.孫清山、黃毅志(19960300)。補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。臺灣社會學刊,19,95-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.黃毅志(19900300)。臺灣地區教育機會之不平等性。思與言,28(1),93-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Farkas, George、Grobe, Robert P.、Sheehan, Daniel、Shuan, Yuan(1990)。Cultural Resources and School Success: Gender, Ethnicity, and Poverty Groups within an Urban School District。American Sociological Review,55(1),127-142。  new window
17.Lockheed, Marlaine E.、Fuller, Bruce、Nyirongo, R.(1989)。Family Effects on Students' Achievement in Thailand and Malawi。Sociology of Education,62(4),239-256。  new window
18.Wong, Raymond Sin-Kwok(1998)。Multidimensional Influences of Family Environment in Education: The Case of Socialist Czechoslovakia。Sociology of Education,71(1),1-22。  new window
19.黃毅志(19921200)。結構變遷與地位取得之關係:以教育擴充為例。中國社會學刊,16,89-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Stevenson, David Lee、Baker, David P.(1992)。Shadow Education and Allocation in Formal Schooling: Transition to University in Japan。American Journal of Sociology,97(6),1639-1657。  new window
21.林大森(19990300)。臺灣地區家庭背景對中等教育分流的影響:「高中/高職」與「公立/私立」差異的探討。東吳社會學報,8,35-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.陳怡靖、鄭燿男(20000700)。臺灣地區教育階層化之變遷--檢證社會資本論、文化資本論及財務資本論在臺灣的適用性。國家科學委員會研究彙刊.人文及社會科學,10(3),416-434。  延伸查詢new window
23.黃毅志(19980400)。臺灣地區新職業分類的建構與評估。調查研究:方法與應用,5,5-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.陳建志(19980600)。族群及家庭背景對學業成績之影響模式--以臺東縣原、漢學童作比較。教育與心理研究,21(上),85-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.巫有鎰(19990700)。影響國小學生學業成就的因果機制--以臺北市和臺東縣作比較。教育研究集刊,43,213-242。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.林義男(19930600)。國中學生家庭社經背景、父母參與及其學業成就的關係。輔導學報,16,157-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology,94(suppl.),S95-S120。  new window
會議論文
1.Chen, K.、Hsiu-Jen, Y.(1998)。Social Structure at Work: The Effects of Educational Development on Educational Mobility in Taiwan。International Conference on Social Stratification and Mobility: Newly Industrializing Economies Compared,(會議日期: 1998/01/07-09)。Taipei。  new window
2.李碧涵(1995)。後工業轉型與臺灣企業經濟之結構調整。社會結構與社會變遷--世界體系觀點之應用學術研討會,中央研究院歐美所 。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部統計處(2001)。大學校數統計。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部統計處(2001)。大學日間部錄取率。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部統計處(2001)。高中高職學生人數統計。  延伸查詢new window
4.瞿海源(1998)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計劃:第三期第三次調查計劃執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC-86-2418-H-001-001-B1)。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃毅志(1994)。社經背景與地位取得過程之結構機制:教育,社會資源及文化資本(博士論文)。東海大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林大森(1996)。中等教育分流體制與社會地位取得(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃毅志(1989)。台灣地區民眾社經地位取得過程(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.羊憶蓉(1994)。教育與國家發展:臺北經驗的反省。  延伸查詢new window
2.李沛良(1988)。社會研究的統計分析。臺北:巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.林生傳(1994)。教育社會學。高雄:復文。  延伸查詢new window
4.邱兆偉(1983)。技職教育的目標及計畫。高雄:復文。  延伸查詢new window
5.馬信行(1986)。教育社會學。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃毅志(1999)。社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊瑩(1995)。教育機會均等:教育社會學的探究。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳奎憙(1990)。教育社會學。臺北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.章英華、薛承泰、黃毅志(1996)。教育分流與社會經濟地位:兼論對技職教育改革的政策意涵。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
10.羊憶蓉(19940000)。教育與國家發展:台灣經驗。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bourdieu, P.(1973)。Cluture reproduction and social reproduction。Knowledge, Education, and Culture Change。London:Tavistock。  new window
2.沈姍姍(1998)。教育機會均等理念之式微?--自教育改革趨勢探討。社會變遷中的教育機會均等。台北:揚智。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE