:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:家長式領導與部屬效能:多層次分析觀點
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:鄭伯壎 引用關係林姿葶 引用關係鄭弘岳周麗芳 引用關係任金剛 引用關係樊景立
作者(外文):Cheng, Bor-shiuanLin, Tzu-tingCheng, Hung-yuehChou, Li-fangJen, Chin-kangFarh, Larry Jiing-lih
出版日期:2010
卷期:52:1
頁次:頁1-23
主題關鍵詞:多層次分析家長式領導個人層次組織層次部屬效能Employee effectivenessIndividual levelMultiple-level approachesOrganizational levelPaternalistic leadership
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(24) 博士論文(5) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:24
  • 共同引用共同引用:607
  • 點閱點閱:141
隨著家長式領導概念的提出、三元模式的建立及測量工具的發展,研究者逐漸釐清家長式領導的內涵及其與部屬效能間的關係。可是,在檢視家長式領導三元模式之相關研究與結果之後,仍可發現有幾個問題尚待解決,其中,首先需要釐清的便是家長式領導的構念層次與不同層次之間的影響效果。因此,本研究將在過去的基礎之上,持續探討家長式領導在個人層次與組織層次對部屬效能的影響效果,以及兩個層次間的互動效果。本研究以華人中小企業之領導人與部屬之對偶作為研究對象,採取問卷調查的方式進行資料的蒐集,回收資料包含70家企業的382份有效問卷。研究結果除了再度驗證個人層次家長式領導的影響效果外,也呈現團體層次之平均家長式領導對部屬效能的影響,並彰顯平均德行領導的重要性,以及平均家長式領導對對偶家長式領導效果的調節影響效果,而證實家長式領導並非局限於單純的個人層次,或是單純的群體層次,而是屬於「群體中的個人層次」(individual within the group)。此結果頗符合華人社會的相依性概念:對組織成員而言,領導者對其效果的影響,除了要看個別對待的對偶領導行為之外,亦會受到領導者對所有人之領導行為的調節影響,而展現「個人」、「群體」及「領導者」間的集體相依關係。最後,就研究結果進行討論,並提出未來的研究方向。
Along with the constructs and measurement of triad models of Chinese Paternalistic Leadership (PL), the PL and its effectiveness within Chinese organizations have been gradually clarified by a series of empirical studies. But some existed issues still need to be refined further. The one of most important is the multiple levels of analysis of PL: The group difference approach which considers the leader would treat all employees equally and the individual difference approach which considers the leader would treat employees differently. Therefore, based on past research, this study continues to explore the effects of PL on the employee effectiveness both operating at individual or dyadic level (or micro-level), organizational level (or macro-level), and the interaction effect. The data is formed of participants of 70 businesses with 382 employees, who have close job-interaction with CEO, and collected by survey. The results proved again the influences of PL at individual level and showed the influences of PL at group level which emphasized the importance of Moral Leadership. Besides, the result showed the moderator influence of average PL on the relationship between the individual PL and employee effectiveness which then verified PL was not pure individual level or group level but the individual within the group level. The consequences were conformed to the construct of interdependence in Chinese society. The effect of leadership on employees is not only from the individual leadership but also from the moderated effect of average leadership, which highlights the interdependent relationship among individual, group, and leader. Finally, contributions and implications were discussed, and the suggestions for future studies were also provided.
期刊論文
1.Hu, H. H.、Hsu, W. L.、Cheng, B. S.(2004)。The reward allocation decision of the Chinese manager: Influences of employee categorization and allocation situation。Asian Journal of Social Psychology,7(2),221-232。  new window
2.Bliese, P. D.、Halverson, R. R.(1998)。Group Size and Measures of Group-level Properties: An Examination of Eta-squared and ICC Values。Journal of Management,24(2),157-172。  new window
3.Ferris, G. R.(1985)。Role of Leadership in the Employee Withdrawal Process: A Constructive Replication。Journal of Applied Psychology,70(4),777-781。  new window
4.Dansereau, F.(1995)。A dyadic approach to leadership:Creating and nurturing this approach under fire。The Leadership Quarterly,6,479-490。  new window
5.Cheng, B. S.、Chou, L. F.、Wu, T. Y.、Huang, M. P.、Farh, J. L.(2004)。Paternalistic Leadership and Subordinate Reverence: Establishing a Leadership Model in Chinese Organization。Asian Journal of Social Psychology,7(1),89-117。  new window
6.Katergberg, R.、Horn, P. W.(1981)。Effects of within-group and between groups variation in leadership。Journal of Applied Psychology,66,218-223。  new window
7.Ferron, J.、Dailey, R. F.、Yi, Q.(2002)。Effects of Misspecifying the First-level Error Structure in Twolevel Models of Change。Multivariate Behavioral Research,37(3),379-403。  new window
8.Cheng, B. S.、Huang, M. P.、Chou, L. F.(2002)。Paternalistic leadership and its effectiveness: Evidence from Chinese organizational teams。Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies,3(1),85-112。  new window
9.Meyer, John P.、Allen, Natalie J.、Smith, Catherine A.(1993)。Commitment to Organizational and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three-component Conceptualization。Journal of Applied Psychology,78(4),538-551。  new window
10.James, L. R.、Demaree, R. G.、Wolf, G.(1993)。An assessment of within group interrater agreement。Journal of Applied Psychology,78(2),306-400。  new window
11.彭台光、林鉦棽(20080200)。組織現象和層次議題:非獨立性資料的概念和實徵。組織與管理,1(1),95-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林姿葶、鄭伯壎(20071200)。性別與領導角色孰先孰後?--主管-部屬性別配對、共事時間及家長式領導。中華心理學刊,49(4),433-450。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Schneider, B.(1983)。Interactional psychology and organizational behavior。Research in organizational behavior,5,1-31。  new window
14.樊景立、鄭伯壎(20000600)。華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究,13,127-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Castro, S. L.(2002)。Data analytic methods for the analysis of multilevel questions: A comparison of intraclass correlation coefficients, rwg(j), hierarchical linear modeling, within- and between-analysis, and random group resampling。The Leadership Quarterly,13(1),69-93。  new window
16.Gavin, Mark B.、Hofmann, David A.(2002)。Using hierarchical linear modeling to investigate the moderating influence of leadership climate。The Leadership Quarterly,13(1),15-33。  new window
17.James, Lawrence R.、Demaree, Robert G.、Wolf, Gerrit(1984)。Estimating Within-Group Interrater Reliability with and Without Response Bias。Journal of Applied Psychology,69(1),85-98。  new window
18.鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(20001200)。家長式領導:三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究,14,3-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.鄭伯壎(19950200)。差序格局與華人組織行為。本土心理學研究,3,142-219。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Pellegrini, E. K.、Scandura, T. A.(2008)。Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research。Journal of Management,34(3),566-593。  new window
21.鄭伯壎、謝佩鴛、周麗芳(20020600)。校長領導作風、上下關係品質及教師角色外行為:轉型式與家長式領導的效果。本土心理學研究,17,105-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.林鉦棽、彭台光(20061200)。多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報,23(6),649-675。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.鄭伯壎、黃敏萍、周麗芳(20020000)。家長式領導及其效能:華人企業團隊的證據。Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies,3(1),85-112。  延伸查詢new window
24.Dansereau, Fred Jr.、Graen, George B.、Haga, William J.(1975)。A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,13(1),46-78。  new window
25.Hofmann, D. A.(1997)。An overview of the logic and rational of hierarchical linear models。Journal of Management,23(6),723-744。  new window
26.Burns, J. Z.,、Otte, F. L.(1999)。Implications of leadermember exchange theory and research for human resource development research。Human Resource Development Quarterly,10,225-248。  new window
27.Farh, J. L.,、Cheng, B. S.(1997)。Modesty bias inself-ratings in Taiwan: Impact of item wording,modesty value, and self-esteem。Chinese Journal of Psychology,39,103-118。  new window
28.Sagie, A.(1997)。Leader direction and employee participation in decision making: Contradictory or compatible practices?。Applied Psychology: AnInternational Review,46(4),387-452。  new window
29.Somech, A.(2003)。Relationships of participative leadership with relational demography variables: A multi-level perspective。Journal of Organizational Behavior,24,1003-1018。  new window
30.Vecchio, R. P.(1982)。A further test of leadership effects due to between-group variation and withingroup variation。Journal of Applied Psychology,67,200-208。  new window
31.Vecchio, R. P.(1985)。Predicting employee turnover from leader-member exchange: A failure to replicate。Academy of Management Journal,28(2),478-485。  new window
32.Williams, M. L., Podsakoff, P. M.,、Huber, V.(1992)。Effects of group-level and individual-level variation in leader behaviors on subordinate attitudes and performance。Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,65,115-129。  new window
33.Yammarino, F. J.,、Dubinsky, A. J.(1992)。Superior-subordinate relationships: A multiple levels of analysis approach。Human Relations,45,575-600。  new window
34.Yammarino, F. J.,、Markham, S. E.(1992)。On the application of within and between analysis: Are absence and affect really group-based phenomena?。Journal of Applied Psychology,77,168-176。  new window
35.Yammarino, Francis J.、Naughton, Thomas J.(1992)。Individualized and group-based views of participation in decision making。Group and Organization Management,17(4),398-413。  new window
會議論文
1.鄭伯壎、周麗芳、黃敏萍(2002)。家長式領導的三元模式:中國大陸企業組織的證據。第四屆華人心理學家暨第六屆華人心理與行為科際國際學術研討會。臺北:中央研究院。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Chou, L. F.、Cheng, B. S.、Jen, C. K.(2005)。The contingent model of paternalistic leadership: Subordinate dependence and leader competence。2005 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management,(會議日期: 2005, August 8)。  new window
研究報告
1.鄭伯壎(2005)。家長式領導三元模式:現代轉化及影響機制(1/4)--家長式領導三元模式:構念修正與再驗證 (計畫編號:NSC94-2752-H-155-001)。  延伸查詢new window
2.任金剛、樊景立、鄭伯壎、周麗芳(2003)。高階主管之家長式領導與組織效能:一項個人與組織層次的分析。台北:國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭伯壎(1996)。家長權威與領導行為之關係探討 (計畫編號:NSC85-2413-H-002-005)。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭伯壎(1995)。不同家長權威價值與領導作風的關係:台灣民營企業的實徵研究 (計畫編號:NSC83-0301-H002-056)。台北:國科會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cohen, J.、Cohen, P.(1983)。Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for Behavioral Sciences。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
2.Bryk, Anthony S.、Raudenbush, Stephen W.(1992)。Hierarchical Linear Models in Social and Behavioral Research: Applications and Data Analysis Methods。Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications。  new window
3.Dansereau, F.、Alutto, J. A.、Yammarino, F. J.(1984)。Theory testing in organizational behavior: The varient appronch。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Kanungo, Rabindra N.、Mendonca, Manuel(1996)。Ethical Dimensions of Leadership。Thousand Oaks, California:Sage Publications。  new window
5.鄭伯壎、樊景立、周麗芳(2006)。家長式領導:模式與證據。臺北:華泰文化公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Pedhazur, E. J.(1982)。Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and prediction。Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
7.鄭伯壎(20050000)。華人領導:理論與實際。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Hofstede, Geert H.(1980)。Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values。Beverly Hills, California:Sage。  new window
9.Fiedler, F. E.、Chemers, M. M.、Mahar, L.(1976)。Improving leadership effectiveness: The leader match concept。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
10.Raudenbush, S. W.、Bryk, A. S.、Cheong, Y. F.、Congdon, R. T. Jr.、Du Toit, M.(2004)。HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling。Scientific Software International, Inc.。  new window
11.Blalock, H. M., Jr.(1972)。Social statistics (2nd ed.)。New York。  new window
12.Courgeau, D.(2003)。General introduction。Methodology and epistemology of multilevel analysis: Approaches from different social sciences。Dordrecht。  new window
13.Dansereau, F., Alutto, J. A., Markham, S. E.,、Dumas,M.(1982)。Multiplexed supervision and leadership:An application of within and between analysis。Leadership beyond established views。Carbondale, IL。  new window
圖書論文
1.Farh, J. L.、Cheng, B. S.、Chou, L. F.、Chu, X. P.(2006)。Authority and benevolence: Employees' responses to paternalistic leadership in China。China's domestic private firms: multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance。New York:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
2.Chemers, M. M.(1993)。An integrative theory of leadership。Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions。Academic Press。  new window
3.徐瑋伶、黃敏萍、鄭伯壎、樊景立(20060000)。德行領導。華人組織行為:議題、作法及出版。臺北:華泰。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Farh, Jiing-Lih、Cheng, Bor-Shiuan(2000)。A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations。Management and organizations in the Chinese context。Macmillan。  new window
5.Firebaugh, G.(1980)。Groups as contexts and frogponds。Issues in aggregation。San Francisco,CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE