:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:校長領導、學校氣氛對學生閱讀素養影響之多層次分析:以PISA 2009臺灣之資料為例
書刊名:教育政策論壇
作者:吳勁甫 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Jin-fu
出版日期:2015
卷期:18:2=54
頁次:頁89-123
主題關鍵詞:多層次分析校長領導國際學生能力評量計畫學生閱讀素養學校氣氛Multilevel analysisPrincipal's leadershipPISAStudent's reading literacySchool climate
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:826
  • 點閱點閱:228
校長領導雖被視為是改善學生學習成效的重要因素,但因國內絕大多數研究受 限於資料的可取得性,均未能將採取標準化測驗之資料納入,用以探究校長領導與 學生學習成就之關聯究係為何。為填補此研究缺漏,本研究應用PISA 2009之台灣 資料,以多層次直接效果模式檢測校長領導是否會直接影響學生閱讀素養,並採取 多層次中介效果模式檢測校長領導是否可藉由學校氣氛之中介作用,間接影響學生 閱讀素養。研究結果顯示,「確認教師的專業發展活動與學校的教學目標一致」和 「確保教師工作呼應學校的教育目標」兩者對學生閱讀素養具有正向的影響力; 「觀察課堂的教學」則對於學生閱讀素養具有負向影響力。此外,「確認教師的專 業發展活動與學校的教學目標一致」及「確保教師工作呼應學校的教育目標」兩者 皆可透過「教師行為」此學校氣氛面向之中介作用,間接且正向影響學生閱讀素養。
Principal’s leadership is considered a vital factor in improving student achievement; however, the proposition has seldom been examined in Taiwan since most of the relative domestic researches do not include standardized test dataset due to its inaccessibility. This study utilized Taiwan’s data from Programme for International Student Assessment 2009 (PISA 2009) to explore the effects of principal’s leadership and school climate on student’s reading literacy. In order to elucidate the complex relationships among such variables as principal’s leadership, school climate and student literacy, this study adopted multilevel analysis to examine whether the direct-effects model and the mediated-effects model could be accepted in Taiwan. Five main findings emerged from this study. First, both “to make sure that the professional development activities of teachers are in accordance with the teaching goals of the school” and “to ensure that teachers work according to the school’s educational goals” could have positive impacts on student’s reading literacy. Second, “to observe instruction in classrooms” could have negative impacts on student’s reading literacy. Third, both “to make sure that the professional development activities of teachers are in accordance with the teaching goals of the school” and “to ensure that teachers work according to the school’s educational goals” could have positive effects on student’s reading literacy, which could be mediated by “teacher behavior.”
期刊論文
1.Hallinger, P.、Bickman, L.、Davis, K.(1996)。School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement。The Elementary School Journal,96(5),527-549。  new window
2.江芳盛、李懿芳(20131200)。分析單位改變對跨國比較研究的影響--以TIMSS數學學習心理特質與學習成就之關聯性探究為例。教育學刊,41,123-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Sebastian, J.、Allensworth, E.(2012)。The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning。Educational Administration Quarterly,48(4),626-663。  new window
4.Zhang, Z.、Zyphur, M. J.、Preacher, K. J.(2009)。Educational Administration Quarterly。Organizational Research Methods,12(4),695-719。  new window
5.李安明(20120600)。校長教學領導之改善、學生學習成就及學生學習測驗成績之研究。教育行政研究,2(1),21-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林明地(20090300)。教育領導研究的新議題。當代教育研究,17(1),137-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.吳勁甫(20110100)。校長領導對學校效能影響模式之探析。教育經營與管理研究集刊,7,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Supovitz, Jonathan、Sirinides, Philip、May, Henry(2010)。How principals and peers influence teaching and learning。Educational Administration Quarterly,46(1),31-56。  new window
9.方杰、張敏強、邱皓政(2010)。基於階層線性理論的多層級中介效應。心理科學進展,18(8),1329-1338。  延伸查詢new window
10.李懿芳、江芳盛(20080500)。有效的學校領導對數學學習成就之影響:以TIMSS 2003臺灣調查資料為例。教育政策論壇,11(2),107-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.林明地(20000400)。校長領導的影響:近三十年來研究結果的分析。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,10(2),232-254。  延伸查詢new window
12.De Maeyer, Sven、Rymenans, Rita、Van Petegem, Peter、Van den Bergh, Huub、Rijlaarsdam, Gert(2007)。Educational leadership and pupil achievement: The choice of a valid conceptual model to test effects in school effectiveness research。School Effectiveness and School Improvement,18(2),125-145。  new window
13.林明地、陳威良(20101200)。國小校長道德領導對學校組織文化與學生學習表現之影響。教育學刊,35,129-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.謝傳崇、王瓊滿(20110600)。國民小學校長分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為對學生學習表現影響之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,28(1),35-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Louis, Karen Seashore、Dretzke, Beverly、Wahlstrom, Kyla(2010)。How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey。School Effectiveness and School Improvement,21(3),315-336。  new window
16.Preacher, Kristopher J.、Zyphur, Michael J.、Zhang, Zhen(2010)。A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation。Psychological Methods,15(3),209-233。  new window
17.Witziers, Bob、Bosker, Roel J.、Krüger, Meta L.(2003)。Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association。Educational Administration Quarterly,39(3),398-425。  new window
18.李懿芳、江芳盛、喬麗文(20100300)。國小校長領導行為、學校氣氛與學習成就之關聯研究。教育研究月刊,191,39-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.林明地(20100300)。國中校長提升課程品質及師生教與學成效之作為分析。當代教育研究,18(1),43-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Hallinger, P.、Heck, R. H.(1998)。Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995。School Effectiveness and School Improvement,9(2),157-191。  new window
21.林鉦棽、彭台光(20061200)。多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報,23(6),649-675。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Hallinger, Philip(2011)。Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research。Journal of Educational Administration,49(2),125-142。  new window
23.Leithwood, K.、Mascall, B.(2008)。Collective leadership effects on student achievement。Educational Administration Quarterly,44(4),529-561。  new window
24.郭小蘋、吳勁甫(2011)。臺灣校長教學領導研究之分析與展望--以學位論文為例。學校行政雙月刊,73,63-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.秦夢群(2013)。教育領導:理論與應用。臺北市:五南圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.OECD(2010)。PISA 2009 results: What makes a school successful? Resources, policies and practices。Paris:OECD。  new window
3.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2012)。PISA 2009 technical report。Paris:OECD。  new window
4.Hattie, John(2009)。Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement。Routledge。  new window
5.謝文全(2012)。教育行政學。臺北市:高等教育文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Marzano, R. T.、Waters, T.、McNulty, B. A.(2005)。School leadership that works: From research to results。Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
7.台灣PISA國家研究中心(2012)。台灣PISA2009結果報告。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
8.羅勝強、姜嫵(2014)。管理學問卷調查研究方法。重慶:重慶大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.Firestone, W. A.、Riehl, C.(2006)。A new agenda for research in educational leadership。New York, NY:Columbia University。  new window
10.Hoy, Wayne K.、Miskel, Cecil G.(2012)。Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice。McGraw-Hill。  new window
11.Raudenbush, S. W.、Byrk, A. S.、Cheong, Y. F.、Congdon, R. T. Jr.、Du Toit, M.(2011)。HLM7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling。Scientific Software International。  new window
12.Willms, J. D.、Smith, T. M.(2005)。A manual for conducting analyses with data from TIMSS and PISA。Montreal:United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization Institute for Statistics。  new window
13.OECD(2009)。PISA data analysis manual: SPSS。Paris:OECD。  new window
14.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2009)。PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science。Paris:OECD Publishing。  new window
15.溫福星、邱皓政(2012)。多層次模式方法論:階層線性模式的關鍵問題與試解。前程文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.吳清山、林天祐(2003)。教育小辭書。臺北市:國立教育資料館。  延伸查詢new window
17.溫忠麟、劉紅雲、侯杰泰(2012)。調節效應和中介效應分析。教育科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.張芳全(2010)。多層次模型在學習成就之研究。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.吳清山(19980000)。學校效能研究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Snijders, T. A. B.、Bosker, R. J.(2012)。Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling。London:Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE。  new window
其他
1.台灣PISA國家研究中心(2009)。PISA2009學生問卷,http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/web_qa/student_qa.pdf。  new window
2.台灣PISA國家研究中心(2009)。PISA2009學校問卷,http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/web_qa/school_qa.pdf。  new window
3.温福星(20140600)。書評:《教育資料的多層次模式分析》。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林吟霞(2014)。閱讀素養。認識P1SA與培養我們的素養。台北:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪碧霞、吳正新、劉妍希(2012)。緒論:台灣PISA 2009。台灣PISA2009結果報告。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪碧霞、吳正新、劉妍希(2012)。台灣PISA 2009執行說明。台灣PISA2009結果報告。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄒慧英、黃秀霜、陳昌明、張貴琳(2012)。學生閱讀表現分析。台灣PISA2009結果報告。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
5.廖卉、莊璦嘉(2014)。多層次理論模型的建立及硏究方法。組織與管理研究的實證方法。台北:華泰文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Rutkowski, L.、Zhou, Y.(2013)。Using structural equation models to analyze ILSA data。Handbook of international large-scale assessment: Background, technical issues, and methods of data analysis。New York, NY:CRC Press。  new window
7.Scheerens, J.(2012)。Summary and conclusion: Instructional leadership in schools as loosely coupled organizations。School leadership effects revisited: Review and meta-analysis of empirical studies。London:Springer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE