中文部分
王乃仁(1996)。職業學校電機電子群專業及實習科目教師素質指標相關因素之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,084NTNU0037018。
王聰輝(2006)。中小學校長對師資培育多元化成效之意見調查研究。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,094TKU05620004。
王鶴程(1981)。我國公立高級工業職業學校工科教師素質之調查研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,069NTNU4037001。
石璧菱(2003)。國民小學實施學校本位教師評鑑之研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,已出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,091NTPTC576044。
全國法規資料庫(2006)。高級中學法。2006年11月20日,取自:http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Query4A.asp?FullDoc =all&Fcode=H0060001
朱淑雅(1998)。國民小學教師評鑑指標之研究。國立臺北師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,086NTPT4576001。
朱慶璋(2003)。國民中學教師對教師評鑑知覺之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化。全國博碩士論文網,092NCUE0331001。
江文雄(1982)。國民小學實施教學評鑑之研究。南投:臺灣省政府教育廳。
余榮仁(2000)。學校本位教師評鑑制度之研究-評鑑者與被評鑑者間之反省性合作行動探究。國立臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,088NTNTC576007。
吳和堂(2002)。認識教師評鑑。師友,426,16-19。
吳和堂(2002)。論析美國加州San Bernardino學區教師評鑑的特色。教育學刊,18,113-134。吳和堂、李明堂、李清良(2002)。國小教師評鑑實施之國際比較研究。比較教育,53,29-56。吳政達(1995)。階層分析法(AHP)與模糊評估法(FEM)在學前教育指標系統之應用。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
吳政達(1999)。國民小學教師評鑑指標體系建構之研究-模糊德菲術、模糊層級分析法與模糊綜合評估法之應用。國立政治大學教育系博士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,087NCCU0332004。吳政達(2003)。國民中小學教師評鑑政策之可行性評估。初等教育學刊,15,83-108。吳貞宜(2000)。我國中小學實施教師評鑑制度之探討。教師之友,41(2),2-9。
吳清山(1990)。臨床視導在教育實習上的實用,輯於中華民國師範教育學會主編,師範教育政策與問題。臺北:師大書苑。
吳清山(2004)。提昇教師素質之探究。教育研究月刊,127,5-17。吳清山、林天祐(1994)。全面品質管理及其在教育上的應用。初等教育學刊,3,1-28。吳清山、林天祐(2003)。教育小辭書。臺北:五南。
吳清山、張素偵(2002)。教師評鑑:理念、挑戰與策略。臺北:學富文化。
吳清基(2006)。各師資類科教師專業表現之標準。教育部中教司委託中華民國師範教育學會研究計畫。
呂木琳(2002)。教學視導理論與實務。臺北:五南。
李宗薇、葉興華(2000)。國小法治教育評鑑之研究。國立臺北師範學院學報,13, 1-32。李珀(1999)。有效能的教學。臺北:臺北巿教育局。
李珀(1999)。利用教學視導系統提昇教師之教學品質。課程與教學季刊,2(2),40-70。汪履維(1999)。「中小學教師基本素質」研究與評量上一些「技術面」與「非技術面」的考量。中小學教師素質與評量研討會研討報告。臺北:教育部。
林江河(2003)。高雄市國中教師專業評鑑相關議題之調查研究。國文中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,已出版,高雄。全國博碩士論文網,091NSYS533107。
林幸璇(2004)。社區大學教師成人教學評鑑指標建構與應用之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。全國博碩士論文網,093CCU00142001。
林榮彩(2002)。高雄市國小教師專業評鑑實施意見之研究。國立臺南師範學院教師在職進修學校行政碩士學位班碩士論文,已出版,臺南。全國博碩士論文網,090NTNT1626006。
施樹宏(2004)。國小教師評鑑規準及實施程序之研究。國立臺北師範學院教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,已出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,092NTPTC576044。
柯昕儀(2003)。建構我國中小學教師素質管理機制之研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,已出版,高雄。全國博碩士論文網,091NSYS5331016。
柯嚴賀(2001)。國民小學教師考績制度現況與改進之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,已出版,高雄。全國博碩士論文網,089NKNU0332026。
洪彩雲(2002)。高雄市實施教師專業評鑑之探討─以樹德家商實施自我評鑑為例。中華大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。全國博碩士論文網,090CHPI0457017。
孫志麟(2001)。開放後的省思:提昇教師素質的機制。教育研究月刊,89,43-49。徐美惠(1996)。中等學校學習教師評鑑量表之發展研究。淡江大學教育資料科學學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,084TKU00330008。
徐美惠、高薰芳(1996)。重視教師評鑑落實「教評會」功能。台灣教育,544,11-19。
徐敏榮(2002)。國民小學教師評鑑規準之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,已出版,屏東。全國博碩士論文網,090NPTTC576001。
翁麗芳(2007)。日本的教育改革。教育資料集刊,32,20-41。高強華(1996)。教師評鑑的基本認識。載於中國教育學會主編,師資培育問題研究。臺北:師大書苑。高強華(1998)。論提昇教師專業成長的「教師評鑑」。載於中國教育學會主編,教育評鑑。臺北:師大書苑。高雄市政府教育局(2000)。高雄市高級中等以下學校教師專業評鑑試行要點。高雄教育簡訊,21,8。
張允明(2000)。訂定「高雄市各級學校教師教學評鑑實施要點」說明。港都文教簡訊,38,11-14。
張定貴(1999)。桃園縣國民小學校長、教師、學生評鑑教師教學之研究。國立花蓮師院學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。全國博碩士論文網,087NHLTC576008。
張美雲(1996)。工作價值觀、任教職志與工作環境因素對幼師離職或異動之影響。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,084PCCU0164022。
張新仁(2004)。中小學教師教學評鑑工具之發展編製。發表於國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心主辦之教育評鑑回顧與展望學術研討會,臺北。張德銳(1996a)。國民小學教師評鑑之研究。載於中華民國師範教育學會主編,教育專業。臺北:師大書苑。張德銳(1996b)。如何從「師資培育法」提昇教師專業素質。教師天地,83,27-31。
張德銳(2000)。師資培育與教師評鑑。臺北:師大書苑。張德銳(2002)。臺北市中小學教學輔導教師制度九十學年度實施成效評鑑報告。臺北市政府教育局委託專案研究,臺北市政府。張德銳(2004a)。專業發展導向教師評鑑的規劃與推動策略。教育資料集刊,29,169-193。
張德銳(2004b)。專業發展導向教師評鑑與與教學導師制度芻議。師友月刊,447,6-11。
張豔華(2002)。建構中學教師專業評鑑指標之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文,已出版,高雄。全國博碩士論文網,090NKNU0036014。
教育部(1995)。高級中等以下學校及幼稚園教師資格檢定及教育實習辦法。臺北:教育部。
教育部(2001)。2001年教育改革之檢討與改進會議。2006年12月25日,取自於http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB /EDU_MGT/E0001/EDUION001/menu03/sub02/03020101.htm
教育部(2006a)。教師法。2006年12月25日,取自於http:// law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/NewsDetail.asp?no=1H0020040
教育部(2006b)。教育部補助試辦教師專業發展評鑑實施計畫。2006年12月25日,取自於http://www.edu.tw/EDU _WEB/EDU_MGT/EDURES/EDU5741001/E-publish/001/95061600.doc
教育部(2006c)。公立高級中等以下學校教師成績考核辦法。2006年12月25日,取自於http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts /Query4A.asp?FullDoc=all&Fcode=H0150002
教育部(2006d)。教育部95年度試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑研討會。景文技術學院,臺北。
教育部技術及職業教育司(2000)。技職教育白皮書-追求卓越的技職教育。臺北:行政院。
盛宜俊(2004)。桃園縣國民小學教育人員對實施教師評鑑態度之調查研究。臺北市立師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文,已出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,092TMTC0611010。
莊靜君(2002)。新竹師範學院「教學意見反映調查」實施現況之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。全國博碩士論文網,090NHCTC576004。
許芳梅(2005)。建構臺北市公立高中教師評鑑制度之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,093TKU05631022。
許德便(2004)。南部地區國中教師對教師評鑑制度態度之研究。國立臺南師範學院教師在職進修課程與教學碩士學位班碩士論文,已出版,臺南。全國博碩士論文網,092NTNT1212002。
郭玉霞(1996)。教育專業地位的維護與師資素質的提高。國立臺南師範學院初等教育學報,9,479-486。郭昭佑(2003)。學校本位評鑑。臺北:五南。陳玉鳳(2003)。國民中學教師專業評鑑規準之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,已出版,高雄。全國博碩士論文網,091NKNU0332031。
陳怡君(2003)。國民小學教師評鑑之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,已出版,屏東。全國博碩士論文網,091NPTTC576008。
陳金柳(2005)。教師評鑑指標建構之研究-以臺中縣立高級中學為例。逢甲大學公共政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中。全國博碩士論文網,093FCU05055005。
陳奎憙(1999)。教育社會學研究。台北:師大書苑。
陳美娟(2004)。國民小學教師評鑑與教師自我效能之研究。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中。全國博碩士論文網,093NTCTC576006。
陳富銘(2002)。教師評鑑的六W。屏縣教育季刊,11,24-27。
陳聖謨(1997)。國小教師對教師評鑑制度態度之研究。初等教育學報,10,417-441。傅木龍(1998)。英國中小學教師評鑑制度研究及其對我國之啟示。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,086NCCU0332016。彭春蘭(2003)。新竹縣市國民中學教師評鑑指標建構之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,已出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,091NCCU5331011。
彭森明(1997)。提高師資素質的有效途徑。教育資料與研究,14,62-64。彭森明(1999)。中小學教師基本素質規範與師資培育。中小學教師素質與評量研討會研討報告。臺北,教育部。
湯誌龍(2001)。中小學教師評鑑制度之研究—澳洲維多利亞省的實施經驗。比較教育,51,105-126。馮莉雅(2001)。國中教師教學效能評鑑之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄。全國博碩士論文網,089NKNU0332002。黃坤錦(1998)。從教師專業論教師評鑑。載於中國教育學會主編,教育評鑑。臺北:師大書苑。
黃怡華(2006)。私立高級中學實施教師評鑑策略之研究。 國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化。全國博碩士論文網,094NCUE5037015。
黃欣儀(2002)。影響中小學教師網路進修使用程度相關因素之研究。國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文,已出版,高雄。全國博碩士論文網,090NSYS5396010。
黃政傑(1999)。落實教學評鑑的實施。教師天地,99,39-45。
黃政傑(2004)。學校課程評鑑的概念與方法。課程與教學季刊,6(3),1-20。黃裕城(1983)。國民小學教師成績考核之研究。臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,071NTNU4331011。
黃德祥、薛秀宜(2004)。教師評鑑的模式與發展趨勢。教育研究月刊,127,74-84。黃耀輝(2002)。臺北縣國民中學實施教師教學評鑑制度可行性研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,已出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,090NTNU0331011。
楊文雄(1980)。教育評鑑之理論與實際。臺中:臺灣省政府教育廳。
楊振昇(1999)。我國教學視導制度之困境與因應。課程與教學季刊,2(2),15-30。楊深坑、黃淑玲、楊洲松(2005,11月)。我國中小學教師素質管理機制之研究。載於中興大學師資培育中心主辦之「教師專業發展學術研討會」論文集,臺北。楊筱慈(2000)。國中物理教師教室觀察評鑑工具-效化暨學生評鑑教師教學可行性之研究。國立高雄師範大學物理學系碩士論文,已出版,高雄。全國博碩士論文網,088NKNU0198007。
詹棟樑(1998)。如何對教師進行評鑑。載於中國教育學會主編,教育評鑑。臺北:師大書苑。
廖玉珠(2005)。建構我國中小學教師評鑑規準之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文,已出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,093TKU00631001。
趙志揚(2004)。技職教育的教師品質與教師評鑑。教育研究月刊,127,74-84。趙志揚(2006)。高級工業職業學校專業教師素質、教師評鑑、與專業成長模式之研究(1/3)。(國科會專案報告,計畫編號:94-2516-S-018-013)
劉文輝(2002)。高職教師對教師評鑑態度調查之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,已出版,高雄。全國博碩士論文網,090NKNU0332032。
劉寶貴(2003)。我國高職教師評鑑實施之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文,已出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,091NTNU0037001。
歐陽教(1992)。教師評鑑模式之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心專題研究成果報告。歐陽教、張德銳(1993)。教師評鑑模式之研究。教育研究資訊,1(2),90-100。蔡清華、張麗麗(1997)。教學檔案在國小實習教師專業成長與評鑑上的應用。八十六年度國科會教育革新整合型研究計畫成果分析研討會。高雄師範大學教育學系。86年10月16、17日。
賴清標(2003)。師資培育開放十年回顧與前瞻。現代教育論壇(十一)教師績效評鑑研討會。戴佑全(2000)。臺北縣市國民小學教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」意見調查之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,088TMTC0576009。
謝文全(1999)。教學視導的意義與原則-並以英國教學視導制度為例。課程與教學,2(2),1-14。簡紅珠(1997)。專業導向的教師評鑑。北縣教育,16,18-22。
簡茂發、李虎雄、黃長司、彭森明、吳清山、吳明清、毛連塭、林來發、黃瑞榮、張敏雪(1997)。中小學教師應具備的基本素質。教育研究資訊,5(3),1-13。簡惠閔(2003)。從利害關係人之角度看教師評鑑-Scriven評鑑觀之應用。教育資料與研究,53,38-47。顏國樑(2003)。教師評鑑的基本理念、問題與作法。教育研究,112,62-77。羅清水(1999)。教師專業發展的另一途徑-談教師評鑑制度的建立。研習資訊,16(1),1-10。
蘇秋永(1996)。高中教師評鑑之研究─高中教師自我評鑑量表之發展。淡江大學教育資料科學學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北。全國博碩士論文網,084TKU00330007。
英文部分
Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service. (1986). Teachers dispute ACAS independent panel: Report of the appraisal and training working group. London: ACAS CAI.
Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL). (1993). Appraisal and you. London: ATL.
Beerens, D. R. (1999). Evaluating teachers for professional growth: Creating a culture of motivation and learning.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Black, S. (2000). Evaluation for growth. American School Board Journal, 87 (4), 58-61.
Bollington, R., Hopkins, D., & West, M. (1990). An introduction to teacher appraisal. London : Cassell.
Bridges, E. (1986). Managing the incompetent teacher. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
Burnett, P. C., & Meacham, D. (2002). Measuring the quality of teaching in elementary school classrooms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30 (2), 141-153.
Bush. (2002). No child left behind act of 2001. Retrieved December 15, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/ elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
Calvery, R., Bell, D., & Sheets, G. (1996). A study of selected teacher characteristics valued by Arkansas public school administrators. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Repro-duction Service No. ED 403 646
Cardman, G. (2003). Guide synthesize research on teacher quality issue. Education Daily, 36 (231), l.
Cogan, M. L. (1973). Clinical supervision. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., Mcpartland, J., Mood, A. M.,Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1996). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Cripe, E. J., & Mansfield, R. S. (2002). The value-added employee. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Danielson, C. (2001). New trends in teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership, 58(5), 12-15.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. NY: National Commission on Teaching & America's Future.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Education Research, 53 (3), 285-325.
Deborah, P. G. (2002). Teacher quality. Education Leadership, 60 (1), 85-86.
Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2007). Model performance management policy for school. Retrieved November 10, 2007, from http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/ _doc/11093/PM%20Model%20policy%20FINAL%20Mar%2007.doc
Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2007). Professional standards for teachers. Retrieved November 10, 2007, from http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/ teachingandlearning/professionalstandards/
DEST. (2005). Key policies. Retrieved December 22, 2006, from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/policy_initiatives_reviews/key_issues?vocational_education_in_schools/key_policies.htm
DfES. (2007). 2020 Vision- Report of the Teaching and Learning in 2020 review group. Retrieved December 15, 2007, from http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/_doc/10783/ 6856_DfES_Teaching_and_Learning.pdf
Dressel, P. L. (1977). Evaluation. In A. S. Knowles (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of higher education. CA: Jossey-Bass.
Fwu, B. J., & Wang, H. H. (2002). From uniformity to diversification: Transformation of teacher education in pursuit of teacher quality in Taiwan from 1949 to 2000. International Journal of Educational Development, 22 (2), 155.
Goldhaber, D., & Anthony, E. (2003). Indicators of teacher quality. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478408
Goldhammer, T. (1969). Clinical supervision. NY: Holt, Rinohart and Winston.
Greenwood, G. E., & Ramagli, H. J. (1980). Alternatives to student ratings of college teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 51 (6), 673-682.
Gülseçen, S., & Kubat, A. (2006). Teaching ICT to teacher candidates using PBL: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (2), 96-106.
Harris, B. M., & Hill, J. (1982). The DeTEK handbook. National Educational Laboratory.
Hart, P. D., & Teeter, R. M. (2002). A national priority: Americans speak on teacher quality. Retrieved August 10, 2006, from http://www.ets.org/portal/site/ets/menuitem. c988ba0e5dd572bada20bc47c3921509/?vgnextoid=1facaf5e44df4010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD&vgnextchannel=757a253b164f4010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD
Hess, F. M. (2004). Teacher quality, teacher pay. Policy Review, 124, 15-29.
Holdzkom, D., & Brandt, R. M. (1995). From accountability to professional empowerment in North Carolina. In D. L. Duke(ed.), Teacher evaluation policy from accountability to professional development(13-33). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Hyper Dictionary. (2006). Search dictionary. Retrieved Dec 25, 2006, from http://www.hyperdictionary.com/
IOWA. (2004). Iowa teaching standards and criteria. Retrieved December 25, 2006, from http://www.iowa-braille.k12.ia.us/ standards.html
Iwanicki, E. F. (1990). Teacher evaluation for school improvement. In J. Millman & Darling-Hammond, L. (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers, 158-174. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Iwanicki, E. F. (2001). Focusing teacher evaluations on student learning. Educational Leadership, February, 57-59.
Jarvis, O. T., & Pounds, H. R. (1969). Organizing supervising and administration, the elementary school.West Nyack, NY: Parker.
Kieff, J. (2003). Ensuring teacher quality: A report from MetLife fellows in the teachers network policy institute. Retrieved Dec 24, 2006, from http://www.findarticles.com /p/articles/mi_qa3614/is_200307/ai_n9244981
Kimball, S. M., White, B., Milanowski, A. T., & Borman, G. (2004). Examining the relationship between teacher evaluation and student assessment results in Washoe County. Peabody Journal of Education, 79 (4), 54-78.
Koppich, J. (2005). Addressing teacher quality through induction, professional compensation, and evaluation: The effects on labor-management relations. Education Policy, 19 (1), 90-111.
Krueger, J. M. (2004). A top-down approach for collateral evaluation: Review of teacher peer assistance and review and mentoring programs for new teachers: Models of induction and support. Journal of Teacher Education, 55 (5), 476-479.
Kyriakides, L., Campbell, R. J., & Christofidou, E. (2002). Generating criteria for measuring teacher effectiveness through a self-evaluation approach: A complementary way of measuring teacher effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(3), 291-325.
Kuligowski, B A. T. (1991). A study of teacher evaluation criteria, process, and outcome in North Carolina and Tennessee. The University of North Carolina.
Lewis, A. C. (1996). Teacher quality. The Education Digest, 62 (3), 69-70.
Linde, C. H. (1999). Clinical supervision in teacher evaluation: A pivotal factor in the quality management of education. Education, 119 (2), 328-334.
Loup, K. S., Garland, J. S., Ellett, C. D., & Rugutt, J. K. (1996). Ten years later: Findings from a republication of a study of teacher evaluation practices in our 100 largest school districts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10 (3), 203-226.
Manatt, R. P., & Benway, M. (1998). Teacher and administrator performance evaluation: Benefits of 360-degree feedback. ERS Spectrum, 16 (2), 18-23.
Marshall, K. (2005). It’s time to rethink teacher supervision and evaluation. PHI Delta Kappan, 86 (10), 727-735.
McColskey, W., & Egelson, P. (1993). Designing teacher evaluation systems that support professional growth. Greensboro: University of North Carolina at Greensboro, SouthEastern Regional Vision for Education.
McElroy, E. J. (2005). The highly qualified teacher. Professional Development-Teacher to Teacher Teaching Pre K-8, 36 (2), 8.
McGreal, T. L. (1983). Successful teacher evalutation. Alexandria, VI: ASCD.
Mertler, C. A. (1999). Teacher perceptions of students as stakeholder in teacher evaluation. American Secondary Education, 27 (3), 17-30.
Mississippi State Department of Education. (2003). Mississippi superintendent appraisal system. Retrieved Jan 14, 2007, from http://www.mde.k12.ms.us/sag/sag_doc/ Superintendent_Appraisal.htm
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (1999). Guidelines for performance-based teacher evaluation. MO: Author.
Morton, J. B. (2002). Teacher system evaluation manual-Professional education personnel evaluation program of Alabama. AL: Alabama State Department of Education.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1987). What teachers should know and be able to do. Retrieved 1, 14, 2007, from http://www.nbpts.org/the_standards/the_ five_core_propositio.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matter most: Teaching for America’s future. NY: Teacher College, Columbia University.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. NY: Author, Teachers college, Columbia University.
National Research Council. (2001). Testing teacher candidates: The role of licensure tests in improving teacher quality. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Natriello, G. (1990). Intended and unitended consequences: Purpose and effects of teacher evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing Elementary and secondary school teacher, 34-45. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Nevo, D. (1995). School-based evaluation: A dialogue for school improvement. Tel Aviv, Israel: Masada.
North Carolina State Board of Education. (2007). North Carolina professional teaching standards. Retrieved August 8, 2007, from http://www.ncptsc.org/Final%20 Standards%20Document.pdf.
Odden, A. (2004). Lessons learned about standards-based teacher evaluation systems. Peabody Journal of Education, 79 (4), 126-137.
Ohio Department of Education. (2004). Highly qualified teacher rubric. Retrieved August 26, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/teacherqual/hqtplans/oh.doc.
Olina, Z., & Sulivan, H. J. (2004). Student self-evaluation, teacher evaluation, and learner performance. ETR&D, 52 (3), 5-22.
Pasco, E. A. (1992). Handbook for the evaluation on teachers and foreign language program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of teachers of Spanish and Portuguess. Cancun, Mexico.
Peacock, A., & Rawson, B. (2001). Helping teachers to develop competence criteria for evaluating: Their professional development. International Journal of Educational Development, 21, 79-92.
Phillips, S. M. (2002). Teacher quality in Canada. SAEE research series. Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education. Kelowna (British Columbia).
Poliakoff, A. R. (2002). Teacher preparation: Assessing teacher quality, administrative support, standards-based teacher preparation. Basic Education, 46(10).
Reichardt, R. (2001). Toward a comprehensive approach to teacher quality. Policy Brief. Washington, DC: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning
Ribas, W. B. (2000). Ascending the ELPS to excellence in your district’s teacher evaluation. PHI Delta Kappan, April, 585-589.
Sachs, S. K. (2004). Evaluation of teacher attributes as predictors of success in urban schools. Journal of Teacher Evaluation, 55 (2), 177-187.
Sample Size Formulas (n.d.). Sample Size Calculator. Retrieved March 9, 2007, from http://www.surveysystem.com/ ssformu.htm
Sawyer, L. (2001). Revamping a teacher evaluation system. Educational Leadership, 58(5), 44-47.
Schiller, S. A., Taylor, M. M., & Gates, P. S. (2004). Teacher evaluation within a community of truth: Testing the ideas of Parker Palmer. Innovative Higher Education, 28 (3), 163-186.
Scriven, M. (1973). Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Scriven, M. (1994). Duties of the teacher. Journal of personnel evaluation in education, 8, 151-184.
Scriven, M., Wheeler, P., & Haertel, G. (2004). Teacher evaluation kit: Complete glossary. Retrieved Jan. 14, 2007, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/ess/glossary/ glossary.htm
Seyfarth, J. T. (1991). Personnel management for effective school. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Shinkfield, A. J., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1995). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Sikorski, M. F., Niemiec, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (1994). Best teaching practices: A checklist for observations. Nassp Bulletin, 78(561), 50-54.
Sobel, D. M., Taylor, S. V., & Anderson, R. E. (2003). Teacher evaluation standards in practice: A standards-based assessment tool for diversity-responsive teaching. The Teacher Educator, 38 (4), 285-302.
Spooren, P., & Mortelmans, D. (2006). Teacher professionalism and student evaluation of teacher: Will better teachers receive higher ratings and will better students give higher ratings? Educational Studies, 32 (2), 201-214.
Stake, R. E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68, 523-540.
Stake, R. E. (1975). Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. Columbus, OH: Merrill
Stronge, J. H. (1995). Balancing individual and institutional goals in educational personal evaluation: A conceptual framework. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21, 131-151.
Stronge, J. H. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Stronge, J. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2003). Handbook on teacher evaluation: Assessing and improving performance. Larxhmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Stufflebean, D. L., Foley, W. J., Gephart, W. J., Guba, E. G., Hammond, R. L., Merriman, H. O., & Provus, M. M. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
Texas Education Agency. (1986-1987). Teacher appraisal system-teacher orientation manual. Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency.
The Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (2004). What work requires of schools. U.S. Department Of Labor.
Thomas, J. L., William L B., Berry, B. (2002). Improving teacher quality: Ideological perspectives and policy prescriptions. The Educational Forum West Lafayette, 67 (1), 14.
Thompson, B., & Melancon, J. G. (1982). Concept-scale interactions in teacher evaluation data. Education, 103 (2), 200-203.
U. S. Department of Education. (1998). Promising practices: New ways to improve teacher quality. Retrieved December 15, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/PromPractice/ index.html
U. S. Department of Education. (2003). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge. Retrieved December 15, 2006, From http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/teachprep /2003title-ii-report.pdf
U. S. Department of Education. (2007). Building on results: A blueprint for strengthening the no child left behind act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Valemtine, J. W. (1992). Principles and practices for effective teacher evaluation. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Vivian, I. M. (1990). Teacher appraisal and development-a focus on the teacher. Dissertation, Institute of Education, University of London.
Webster’s Third New International Dictionary. (2006). Merriam-Webste online search. Retrieved Dec 25, 2006, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/
Western Michigain University, The Evaluation Center. (2006). Teacher evaluation kit complete glossary. Retrieved Dec 25, 2006, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/
Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Improving teacher quality. Journal of State Government, June, 12-15.
Winter, R. (1989). Problems in teacher appraisal: An action-research solution? In H. Simons & J. Elliott (Eds.), Rethinking appraisal and assessment, 44-54. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
Wise, A. E., & Gendler, T. (1990). Governance issues in the evaluation of elementary and secondary school teachers. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers, 374-389. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Wise, A., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M. W., & Bernstein, H. (1984). Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
Word Reference. (2006). Online French, Italian and Spanish dictionary. Retrieved Dec 25, 2006, from http://www.wordreference.com/
Wragg, E. C. (1988). Teacher appraisal: A practical guide. London: Macmillan Education.