:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民小學教師文化之理論模式建構
作者:黃彥超
作者(外文):Yen-Chao Huang
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:教育政策與行政學系
指導教授:翁福元 博士
龔心怡 博士
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:混合研究教師文化研究方法論理論模式結構方程模式專業文化承諾mixed-methods researchmethodologyteachers culturethe construction of theoretical modelstructural equation modelingprofessional culture commitment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:49
教師為教育之本,也是教育品質的關鍵,但教師文化之形成因素、特徵與影響層面卻未有人深入探討。本研究從教育社會學之觀點探討教師文化,擬採用混合研究之連續性探究策略,以質性蒐集分析資料開始,接著進行量化資料的蒐集分析,使用量化的資料和結果輔助質性研究的闡述方式,建構出教師文化之理論模式。
本研究首先針對教師文化之研究方法論涉及的議題進行討論,並據以進行研究設計與實施。資料蒐集來源包括文獻資料、半結構訪談、問卷調查等。研究結果發現:(1)國小教師文化之特徵為步調一致、非專業化傾向、獨立自主、配合學校行政、保守性;(2)校長領導風格、家長關注、教師個人特質、工作職務、教學工作情境、人際互動規範、教學職業特質等因素影響國小教師文化;(3)教師文化影響「教師角色知覺」、「工作認同」、「專業承諾」;(4)不同背景變項之教師文化特徵有顯著差異;(5)國小教師文化形成因素、文化特徵與專業文化承諾之間具有顯著的關聯性與影響;(6)結構方程模式建構之教師文化理論模式具有良好的整體適配情形以及頗佳的內在結構適配情形,為本土化之最佳理論模型。
根據研究結果與討論,本研究以教師文化形成因素、教師文化特徵、教師專業文化承諾與模式建構等四個面向,描繪國小教師文化之現象,做為本研究之結論。此外,再分別針對政策推動、學校行政運作,以及教師教學等提出建議。
A teacher is the core of the education and is also the key of education quality. Studies about informing factors of teachers culture, the characteristic of teachers culture, and influencing factors of teachers culture are never explored. This study aims to explore teachers culture by the way of sociology of education. To construct theoretical model of primary school teachers culture, sequential explanatory strategy in mixed research is utilized. The data are collected from qualitative approach in the beginning, and then the data are collected from quantitative approach. In bringing together the benefits of both qualitative and quantitative approaches, the present study constructs theoretical model of primary school teachers culture
This study discussed the issues of methodology in order to organize and apply methods. The main methods applied in this study were literature analysis, semi-structured interview, and questionnaire investigation. As the data analyzed, the conclusions were shown as follows.
(1) The characteristic of teachers culture were “united in action”, “orientation towards”, “non-professional”, “independent”, “in harmony with the school administration”, and “conservatism”.
(2) The informing factors of teachers culture were “leadership style of principal”, “parents follow with interest”, “teachers personality”, “positions”, “working situation of teaching”, “the relationship between teachers and their colleagues”, and “teaching career traits”.
(3) “Perception on teachers role”, “work identity”, and “professional commitment” were influencing factors of teachers culture.
(4) There were significant differences in the characteristic of teachers culture.
(5) There were positive correlations among informing factors of teachers culture, characteristic of teachers culture and professional culture commitment in primary school teachers.
(6) The theoretical model of primary school teachers culture fit data well and indicated a reasonable model fit.
The result of this study described the reformed factors, characteristic, professional culture commitment, and model construction in primary school teachers culture. According to the results, suggestions were provided to improve educational policies school administration and future studies.
王文科(2000)。質的研究的問題與趨勢。載於國立中正大學(主編),質的研究方法(頁1-22)。高雄市:麗文文化。
王文科、王智弘(2012)。教育研究法(增訂第十五版)。臺北市:五南。new window
王仕圖、吳慧敏(2005)。深度訪談與案例演練。載於齊力與林本炫(編),質性研究方法與資料分析(第二版,頁97-115)。嘉義縣:南華大學教育社會學研究所。
王俊斌(2001)。「合理化」概念的困境與教育研究者價值涉入的問題。教育研究集刊,46,81-106。new window
王雅玄、陳幸仁(2007)。離島教師的偏遠論述-教師社會學分析。高雄師大學報,23,67-90。new window
古惠茹(2008)。苗栗縣一所國民小學組織文化之個案研究─以行政文化與教師文化為範圍(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
石之瑜、曾倚萃、郭銘傑(2007)。並非客觀性問題-從文化研究立場回應的一次嘗試。國家發展研究,6(2),1-28。new window
吳和堂(2010)。教育論文寫作與實用技巧。臺北市:高等教育。
吳明隆(2007)。SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。臺北市:五南。
吳明隆(2007)。結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市:五南。
吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式:方法與實務運用。高雄市:麗文文化。
吳明隆(2011)。論文寫作與量化研究(更新三版)。臺北市:五南。
吳明隆、涂金堂(2006)。SPSS與應用統計分析(第二版)。臺北市:五南。
吳芝儀(2011)。以人為主體之社會科學研究倫理議題。人文社會科學研究,5(4),19-39。new window
吳紹歆(2004)。臺北市教學輔導教師制度之研究-一所國小教師文化與制度的對話(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。
吳紹歆、張德銳(2005)。教學輔導教師制度與教師文化的互動-以臺北市一所國小為例。臺北市立教育大學學報,36(2),33-62。new window
宋曜廷、潘佩妤(2010)。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊,55(4),97-130。new window
李安明(2004)。我國國小校長教學領導、教師文化與教組織承諾之研究(I) (NSC 93-2413-H-134-003)。新竹市:國立新竹教育大學。new window
李安明(2005)。我國國小校長教學領導、教師文化與教師專業承諾之研究(II) (NSC 94-2413-H-134-006)。新竹市:國立新竹教育大學。new window
李佛、李潤洲(2010)。論教師文化的重塑。教師教育研究,22(6),26-28。
李茂能(2011)。圖解AMOS在學術研究之應用(第二版)。臺北市:五南。
李惠琪、崔宗良、李敘旭(2008)。教師發展與教師文化建設。黑龍江畜牧獸醫職業學院學報,7(1),67-68。
李新鄉(2010)。教學卓越獲獎團隊表現與學校教師文化關聯性之研究:以大一國小為例。臺灣教育社會學研究,10(2),41-83。new window
李曉蓉(2003)。女性教師文化之探討:女性主義的觀點。幼兒保育學刊,1,39-63。
李霞(2012)。信念、態度、行為:教師文化建構的三個維度。教師教育研究,24(3),17-21。
車麗娜(2007)。教師文化的嬗變與重建(未出版之博士論文)。山東師範大學,山東。
車麗娜(2010)。教師文化功能的多維演視。當代教育科學,5,31-33。
周海玲(2005)。制度下的教師文化(未出版之博士論文)。華東師範大學,上海。
周淑卿(1999)。國小教師次級文化對初任教師專業理論實踐的影響(NSC 88-2413-H-134-008)。新竹市:國立新竹師範學院。
周淑卿(2002)。課程改革與教育革新。臺北市:師大書苑。
周淑卿(2004)。我是課程發展的專業人員?-教師專業身分認同的分析。教育資料與研究,57,9-16。new window
周淑卿(2005)。論教學文化更新為學校課程革新之基礎。課程與教學季刊,8(3),15-25。new window
周德禎(2001)。教育人類學導論:文化觀點。臺北市:五南。new window
林生傳(2002)。教育研究法。臺北市:心理。
林志成(2004)。建構國小教師專業文化圖像的策略。國教世紀,211,5-12。
林信褣(2007)。校長領導與學校文化探究。臺北市:師大書苑。
林家蓉(2005)。桃竹苗四縣市國民小學校長教學領導與教師文化之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
林清江(1981)。教育社會學新論。臺北市:五南。
林新發、王秀玲(2003)。國民中小學教師之行政專業知能成長內涵和策略。教育資料集刊,28,189-210。
邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南。
姜添輝(2000)。論教師專業意識、社會控制與保守文化。教育與社會研究,創刊號,1-24。new window
姜添輝(2010)。影響結構與施為之間互動關係的媒介物:小學教師的專業認同與文化知覺的分析。臺灣教育社會學研究,10(1),1-43。new window
洪培玲(2004)。國小教師文化與性別平等教育實施之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
徐漢儀(1998)。社會研究的倫理。載於嚴祥鸞(主編),危險與秘密-研究倫理(頁1-29)。臺北市:三民。
徐慧真(2003)。桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教師文化之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院,新竹市。
桂海君(2005)。「強價值介入」在社會工作研究和實務中的運用-對哈伯馬斯的批判詮釋學的初淺理解。貴州大學學報(社會科學版),23(3),75-78。
秦夢群、賴文堅(2006)。九年一貫課程實施政策與問題之分析。教育政策論壇,9(2),23-44。new window
翁福元(2007)。教育政策社會學:教育政策與當代社會思潮之對話。臺北市:五南。
馬和民(2002)。新編教育社會學。上海:華東師範大學。
馬和民(2002)。新編教育社會學。上海:華東師範大學。
馬信行(1998)。教育科學研究法。臺北市:五南。
高強華(1992)教師社會化研究及其在師資培育上的意義。載於中華民國師範教育學會(主編),教育專業(頁53-88)。臺北市:師大書苑。
高強華(1992)教師社會化研究及其在師資培育上的意義。載於中華民國師範教育學會(主編),教育專業(頁53-88)。臺北市:師大書苑。
國立教育資料館(2007)。主要國家教育發展資料蒐集與分析。臺北市:作者。
張芬芬、譚光鼎(1990)。調查研究。載於賈馥茗、楊深坑(主編),教育研究法的探討與應用(頁35-66)。臺北市:師大書苑。
張建成(2004)。教育社會學的新視角-動態文化觀。載於張建成(主編),文化、人格與教育(頁153-180)。臺北市:心理。new window
張偉豪、鄭時宜(2012)。與結構方程模型共舞:曙光初現。臺北市:前程文化。
張景哲(2008)。「教學卓越團隊」之國民小學教師文化研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
張鈿富(2006)。學校行政:理念與創新。臺北市:高等教育。new window
張德銳、李俊達、周麗華(2010)。國中實施形成性教師評鑑歷程及影響因素之個案研究。教育實踐與研究,23(2),65-94。new window
張德銳、蘇玲慧、張素偵(2011)。中小學教師文化與教師領導之關係研究—以臺北市98學年度參與教學輔導教師制度學校為例。教育行政與評鑑學刊,12,1-28。new window
梁金都(2010)。國小代課教師文化之研究。屏東教育大學學報-教育類,34,1-34。new window
符碧真(1999)。誰來當老師?--我國教師組成結構變化之研究。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,3,377-397。
許宏儒(2006)。Bourdieu的「實踐」概念及其在教育研究上的啟示。教育研究與發展期刊,2(1),151-172。new window
許育榮(2003)。國民小學教師文化之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
許興華(2011)。臺北市國民小學教師專業學習社群與教師文化關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
連俊智(2012)。學校與家長關係探討:微觀政治學之取向。北市教育學刊,43,63-86。new window
郭丁熒(1995a)。我國國民小學教師角色知覺發展之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window
郭丁熒(1995b)。教師角色知覺發展模式之探討。初等教育學報,8,155-198。new window
郭丁熒(1997)。師院生的社會流動之研究。國科會人文及社會科學研究彙刊,7(2),181-197。
郭丁熒(2004)。教師圖像:教師社會學研究。高雄市:復文。new window
郭玉霞(1996)。教育專業地位的維護與師資素質的提高。初等教育學報,9,479-486。new window
郭生玉(1998)。心理與教育研究法(第十五版)。臺北縣:精華。
陳永明(2012)。教師教育學。北京:北京大學。
陳向明(2002)。教師如何作質的研究。臺北市:洪葉文化。
陳伯璋(1990)。教育研究方法的新取向-質的研究法。臺北市:南宏。
陳志修(2005)。教師文化與課程統整關係之個案研究初探:以一所國中的自然生活科技領域之教師文化為例。國立編譯館館刊,33(2),3-15。
陳佳燕(2009)。桃竹苗四縣市校長轉型領導、教師文化與教師專業承諾之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
陳幸仁(2005)。從全球化教改風潮論校長的因應策略:Giddens「結構—行動」理論之觀點。教育政策論壇,8(2),143-174。new window
陳幸仁(2007)。微觀政治學:一個學校行政的新興研究領域,教育行政與評鑑學刊,3,67-86。new window
陳怡安(2003)。國民小學教師文化與教師專業成長關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院,臺中市。
陳武仁(2008)。臺北縣國民小學校長領導取向與教師文化關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
陳奕安(2002)。基隆市國民中小學教師文化與教師專業成長態度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。
陳奎憙(1995)。學校組織與學校文化。教育研究所集刊,36,3-29。
陳奎憙(2007)。教育社會學(增訂三版)。臺北市:三民。
陳毓喬(2010)。教師文化之形塑:三位教師的省思與詮釋(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
單文經(2000)。析論抗拒課程改革的原因及其對策-以國民中小學九年一貫課程為例。教育研究集刊,45,15-34。new window
曾火城(1993)。教育研究主觀性與客觀性之析論。輯於賈馥茗、楊深坑(主編),教育學方法論(頁143-157)。臺北市:五南。
階美玲(2012)。苗栗縣國民小學教師領導與教師文化關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
馮朝霖(1998)。教師文化的轉化。社教雙月刊,87,5-7。
黃永和(2005)。教學文化的概念探討。課程與教學季刊,8(3),27-40。new window
黃怡絜(2007)。高雄市國民小學教師之教師專業發展評鑑知覺與教師文化之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北市。
黃芳銘(2009)。結構方程模式理論與應用(第五版)。臺北市:五南。
黃彥超、翁福元(2009)。臺灣中部地區國民小學教師社會地位知覺與專業認同之研究。臺灣教育社會學研究,9(2),37-78。new window
黃政傑(1995)。教育研究亟需擺脫量化的支配。載於中國教育學會(主編),教育研究方法論(頁134-140)。臺北市:師大書苑。
黃毅志(2003)。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估-社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊,49(4),1-31。new window
楊才立(2010)。臺北市國民小學教師文化與教師專業發展評鑑知覺之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
楊巧玲(2007)。學校中的性別政權:學生校園生活與教師工作文化之性別分析。臺北市:高等教育。new window
楊泮池(2002)。常務委員序。載於戴正德、李明濱(主編),人體試驗-研究倫理的理念與實踐(頁i-ii)。臺北市:教育部。
楊深坑、黃嘉莉、姚佳雯(2011,5月)。教師素質及其改革措施之國際比較。論文發表於2011 臺灣教育社會學國際學術研討會-社會變遷與教師地位之轉變,臺東縣。new window
楊陳傑(2005)。國小女性校長領導特質與教師文化之研究-以桃竹苗四縣市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
楊雅妃(2012)。偏鄉小學教師文化樣貌之研究─新北市一所偏鄉學校個案(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
楊龍立(2003)。九年一貫課程的歷史文化意義-科學理性不足的教育及課程改革。載於楊龍立(主編),九年一貫課程與文化(145-216頁)。臺北市:五南。
葉重新(2004)。教育研究法(第二版)。臺北市:心理出版社。
葉淑花(1998)。國民小學教師文化之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
詹棟樑(1992)。教育專業人員的道德責任與專業精神。載於中華民國師範教育學會(主編),教育專業(頁101-128)。臺北市:師大書苑。
廖傳結(2008)。國民小學學校創新經營與教師文化關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
甄曉蘭(2000)。批判俗民誌及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學(主編),質的研究方法(頁369-393)。高雄市:麗文。
劉世閔(2005)。市場化下臺灣師資培育制度的轉型與前瞻之研究。臺灣教育社會學論壇:教育市場化、高等教育擴張與教育社會學理論反省,11,246-272。
劉冬生、楊伶(2010)。論教師文化與教師專業發展。吉林省教育學院學報,26,55-56。
劉仲冬(2008)。量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向及出路。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究-理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁101-116)。臺北市:巨流。
劉春榮(1998)。教師專業自主。教育資料集刊,23,25-38。new window
劉智忠(2006)。桃竹苗四縣市國民小學校長轉型領導與教師文化之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
潘慧玲(2003)。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊,11(1),115-143。new window
鄭世仁(1996)。我國國民小學教師次級文化之研究。行政院國科會專題研究(報告編號:NSC85-2418-H-134-001)。新竹市:國立新竹師範學院。
鄭世仁(2000)。教育社會學導論。臺北市:五南。
鄭金洲(2011)。教育文化學(第六版)。北京:人民教育。
鄭添壽(2005)。桃園縣國民小學校長課程領導與教師文化關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
錢撲(2001)。教育社會學的理論與實踐。南寧:廣西教育。
薛天祥,閻光才(1998)。臺灣中學教師社會地位的現狀分析。教育發展研究,10,49-54。
謝明俸(2004)。國民小學教師文化與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
簡良平、甄曉蘭(2001)。學校自主地發展課程的因素分析。教育研究集刊,46,53-79。
簡紅珠(2005)。對臺灣中小學教學文化的幾點思考。課程與教學季刊,8(3),1-13。new window
譚光鼎(2004)。圍牆裡的世界-學校文化與革新的討論。載於張建成(主編),文化、人格與教育(頁303-338)。臺北市:心理。new window
Neuman, W. L. (2011)。基礎社會研究法(鈕則謙,譯)。臺北市:臺灣培生教育。
Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (1995)。研究方法(趙碧華、朱美珍編譯)。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
Acker, S. (1990). Teachers' culture in an English primary school: Continuity and change. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(3), 257-273.
Acker, S. (1994). Gendered education: Sociological reflections on women, teaching and feminism. Buckingham, England: Open University.
Acker, S. (1995/1996). Gender and teachers’work. Review of research in education, 21, 99-162.
Acker, S. (1999). The realities of teachers’ work: Never a dull moment. London, England: Cassell.
Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. ( 2007) . Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369-387.
Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Belment, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Babbie, E., Mouton, J., Payze, C., Boshoff, N., & Prozesky, H. (2001). The practice of social research. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Bajunid, I. (2000). Rethinking the work of teachers and school leaders in an age of change. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. E. Hauge, & J. Mollerb (Eds.), The life and work of teachers: International perspectives in changing times (pp. 1375-194). London, England: Falmer.
Bank, B. J. (1997). Peer cultures and their challenge for teaching. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International Handbook of Teachers and Teaching (pp. 879-937). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Barone, T. E. (1992). On the demise of subjectivity in educational inquiry. Curric- ulum Inquiry, 22(1), 25-38.
Baskas, R. S. (2011). Applying knowledge of quantitative design and analysis. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED523700)
Bazeley, P. (2004). Issues in mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. In R. Buber, J. Gadner, & L. Richards (Eds.), Applying qualitative methods to marketing management research (pp. 141-156). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Becker, H. S. (1970). Sociological work: Method and substance. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Bendegem, J. P., François K., & Coessens, K. (2010). The good, the beautiful and the literate: Making statistics accessible for action. Educational Research 5, 145-160. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9873-3_10
Block, L. (2003). The leadership-culture connection: an exploratory investigation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(6), 318-334.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Bolster, A. (1983). Toward a more effective model of research on teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 294-308.
Bottery, M. (2000). Education, policy and ethics. London, England: Continuum.
Brousseau, B. A., Book, C., & Byers, J. L. (1998). Teacher beliefs and the culture of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 33-39.
Byme, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, application, and programming. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chenail, R. J. (2011). Interviewing the investigator: Strategies for addressing instrumentation and researcher bias concerns in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 255-262.
Clark, J. A. (1994). Objectivity, subjectivity, and relativism in educational research. Curriculum Inquiry, 24(1), 81-94.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1992). Communities for teacher research: Fringe or forefront? American Journal of Education, l(3), 298-324.
Coffey, A. & Delamont, S. (2000). Feminism and the classroom teacher: Research, praxis, pedagody. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Connell, R. W. (1985). Teachers’ work. Sydney, Australia: George Allen and Unwin.
Cooper, H. M. (1982). Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 291-302.
Cox, S. (2004). Teachers’ values and professional practice in primary schools. In A. Browne & D. Haylock (Eds.), Professional issues for primary teachers (pp. 31-43). London, England: A Sage.
Crandall et al. (1982). People, policies and practice: Examining the claim of school improvement. Andover, MA: The Network.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cutshall, S. (2003). Is smaller better? When it comes to schools, size does matter. Techniques, 3, 22-25.
Dalin, P., Rolff, H., & Kleekamp, B. (1993). Changing the school culture. London, England: Cassell.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Sclan, E. M. (1996). Who teaches and why: Dilemmas of buliding a profession for twenty-first century schools. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the association of teacher educators (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). The landscape of qualitative reaearch: Theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Eisner, E. (1992). Objectivity in educational research. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(1), 9-15.
Esteve, J. M. (2000). The transformation of the teachers’ role at the end of the twentieth century: New challenges for the future. Educational Review, 52(2), 197-207.
Esworthy, D. G. (2011). Subcultures in a flat organizational structure. The George Washington University. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 337. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/887711870?accountid=12721
Evans, P. M. (2003). A principal’s dilemmas: Theory and reality of school redesign. Phi Delta Kappan, 84 (6), 424-436.
Eyde, L. D. (2000). Other responsibilities to participants. In B. D. Sales, & S. Folkman (Eds.), Ethics in research with human participants (pp. 61-74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Feiman-Nemser, S. & Floden, F. (1986). The culture of teaching. In M. C. Wittrick (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). (pp. 505-526). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Fine, G. A., & Kleinman, S. (1979). Rethinking subculture: An interactionist analysis. The American Journal of Sociology, 85(1), 1-20.
Firestone, W. A. (1987). Meaning in method: The rhetoric of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 16(7), 16-21.
Firestone, W. A., & Louis, K. S. (1999). School as cultures. In J. Murphy, & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed.). (pp. 97-321). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Fischman, M. W. (2000). Informed Consent. In B. D. Sales, & S. Folkman (Eds.), Ethics in research with human participants (pp. 35-48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Folkman, S. (2000). Privacy and confidentiality. In B. D. Sales & S. Folkman (Eds.), Ethics in research with human participants (pp. 49-58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Fowler, F. J. (1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College.
Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London, England: Cassell.
Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1991). What’s worth fighting for in your school ? New York, NY: Teacher College.
Fuw, B. J., & Wang , H . H. (2002). The social status of teachers in Taiwan . Comparative Education, 38(2), 211–224.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. San Franciso, CA: Freeman.
Giddens, A. (1993). New rules of sociological method (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Giordano, J., O’Reilly, M., Taylor, H., & Dogra, N. (2007). Confidentiality and autonomy: The challenge(s) of offering research participants a choice of disclosing their identity. Qualitative Health Research, 17(2), 264-275.
Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: A introduction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Goodlad, W. (1973). The elementary school in the United States. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
Goodson, I (2000). Professional knowledge and the teacher’s life and work. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. E. Hauge, & J. Mollerb (Eds.), The life and work of teachers: International perspectives in changing times (pp. 13-25). London, England: Falmer.
Gratch, A. (2001). The culture of teaching and beginning teacher development. Teacher Education Quarterly; 28(4), 121-136.
Greene, J. C. (2006). Toward a methodology of mixed methods social inquiry. Research In The Schools, 13(1), 93-98.
Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7-22. doi: 10.1177/1558689807309969
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Guzman, I. R., Stam K. R., & Stanton, J. M. (2008). The occupational culture of IS/IT personnel within organizations. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 39(1), 33-50.
Hamilton, M. L. (1996). Tacit messages: Teachers’ cultural models of the classroom. In F. A. Rios(Ed.), Teacher thinking in cultural contexts (pp. 185–209). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Hammersley, M. (1980). Classroom ethnography. Educational Analysis, 2, 47-74.
Hammersley, M. (1984). Staffroom news. In A. Hargreaves, & P. Woods (Eds.), Classrooms & staffrooms: The sociology of teachers & teaching (pp. 203-214). Milton Keynes, England:Open University.
Hansen, C. D. (1995). Occupational cultures: Whose frame are we using? The Journal for Quality and Participation, 18(3), 60-67.
Hansen, D. T. (2001). Exploring the moral heart of teaching: Toward a teacher’s creed. New York, NY: Teacher college.
Hanson, E. M. (2003). Educational administration and organizational behavior (5th ed.). Need Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Hargreaves , D. H. (1972). Interpersonal relations and education. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hargreaves, A. (1984). Experience counts, theory doesn't: How teachers talk about their work. Sociology of Education, 57, 244-254.
Hargreaves, A. (1992). Cultures of teaching: A focus for change. In A. Hargreaves, & M. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development (pp. 216-240). New York, NY: Teachers College.
Hargreaves, A. (1993). Individualism and individuality: Reinterpreting the teacher culture. In J. W. Little & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 51-76). New York, NY: Teachers College.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London, England: Cassell.
Hargreaves, A. (1995). Realities of teaching. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 80-87). Cambridge, UK: Pergamon.
Hargreaves, A. (1997). Cultures of teaching and educational change. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International Handbook of Teachers and Teaching (pp. 1297-1319). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 835-854.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1972). Interpersonal relations and education. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1975). Interpersonal relations and education (student ed.). London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1980). The occupational culture of teachers, In P. Woods (Ed.), Teacher strategies: Explorations in the sociology of the school (pp. 125-148), London, England: Croom Helm.
Harris, K. (1982). Teacher and classes. London, England: Routedge and Kegan Paul.
Hartman, J. M., Forsen, J. W., Wallace, M. S., & Neely, J. G. (2002). Tutorials in clinical research: Part IV: Recognizing and controlling bias. Laryngoscope, 112, 23-31.
Hasegawa, U., & Kudomi, Y. (2006). Teachers’ professional identities and their occupational culture: Based on the findings of a comparative survey on teachers among five countries. Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies, 38(1), 1-22.
Helsby, G. (1999). Changing teachers’ work: The reform of secondary schooling. Philadelphia, PA: Open University.
Hiebert, J., & Morris, A. K. (2012). Teaching, rather than teachers, as a path toward improving classroom instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 92-102.
Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G., & James, D. (2008). Understanding learning culturally: overcoming the dualism between social and individual views of learning.Vocations and Learning, 1, 27–47.
Howsam.R. B., Corrigan, D. C., & Denemark, G. W. (1985). Educating a profession. Washington, DC: American Association of College for Teacher Education.
Ihantola, Eeva-Mari & Kihn, Lili-Anne (2011). Threats to validity and reliability in mixed methods accounting research. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 8(1), 39-58. doi: 10.1108/11766091111124694
Inoue, W., & Mizoue, Y. (1993). Reforming teacher education to increase teacher competence and improve entry to the profession. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(3), 21-37.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. dio: 10.1177/1558689806298224
Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jurasaite-Harbison, E. & Rex, L. A. (2010). School cultures as contexts for informal teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 267–277.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark Iv. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111-117.
Kardos, S. M., Johnson, S. M., Peske, H. G., Kauffman, D., & Liu, E. (2001). Counting on colleagues: New teachers encounter the professional cultures of their schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 250-290.
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundation of behavioral research (4th ed.). New York, NY: Harcourt College.
Kimura, H. (2007). Status, virtue and duty: A historical perspective on the occupational culture of teachers in Japan. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 15(2), 175–184.
Lam, S., Yim, P., & Lam, T. W. (2002). Transforming school culture: Can true collaboration be initiated? Educational Research, 44(2), 181-195.
Lauder, H., Brown, P., & Halsey, A. H. (2009). Sociology of education: A critical history and prospects for the future. Oxford Review of Education, 35(5), 569–585.
LeCompte, M. D. (1987). Bias in the Biography: bias and subjectivity in ethnographic research. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 18(1), 43-52.
Lee, O., & Yarger, S. J. (1996). Modes of inquiry in research on teacher education. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the association of teacher educators (2nd ed.) (pp. 14-37). New York, NY: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
Lichtman, M.(2006). Qualitative Research in Education: A user´s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lin, J. (2008). Ethical challenges in participant observation: A reflection on ethnographic fieldwork. The Qualitative Report, 13(1), 100-115.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Littledyke, M. (1997). Managerial style, the National Curriculum and teachers’ culture: Responses to educational change in a primary school. Educational Research, 39(3), 243-262.
Lok, P., Westwood, R., & Crawford, J. (2005). Perceptions of organisational subculture and their significance for organisational commitment. Applied Psychology, 54(4), 490 - 514.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicag.
Lortie, D. C. (1984). Teacher career and work rewards. In A. Hargreaves & P. Woods (Eds.), Classrooms & staffrooms: The sociology of teachers & teaching (pp. 175-189). Milton Keynes, England:Open University.
Lortie, Dan C. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Sab Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Metz, M. H. (1993). Teachers’ ultimate dependence on their students. In J. W. Little & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp137-163). New York, NY: Teachers College.
Metz, M. H.(1989). Teachers’ pride in craft, school subcultures, and societal pressures. In L. Weis, P. G. Altbach, G. P. Kelly, H. G. Petire, & S. Slaughter (Eds.), Crisis in Teaching : Perspectives on current reforms (pp. 205-225). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Miller, A. (1996). Pupil behaviour and teacher culture. London, England: Cassell.
Morrow, R. A. (1994). Critical theory and methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nesbit, T. (2000, June). Cultures of Teaching. Paper presented at Adult Education and Research Convention (AERC) in 2000 at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317-328.
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Nias, J. (1989). Primary teachers talking: A study of teaching as work. London; England: Routledge.
OECD (2005) . School factors related to quality and equity. Retrived from h ttp://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/20/34668095.pdf
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in The Schools, 13(1), 48-63.
Ost , D. H. (1989). The culture of teaching: stability and change. The Educational Forum, 53(2), 163-181.
Osunde, A U., & Izevbigie, A. I. (2006). An assessment of teachers’ attitude toward teaching profession in Midwestern Nigeria. Education, 126(3), 462-467.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3 rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Poggenpoel, M., & Myburgh, C. (2003). The researcher as research instrument in educational research: A possible threat to trustworthiness? Education, 124(2), 418-421.
Pugh, D., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & MacDonald, K. M. (1969). An empirical taxonomy of structure of work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 115-126.
Ravitz, J. (2010). Beyond changing culture in small high schools: Reform models and changing instruction with project-based learning. Peabody Journal of Education, 85, 290-312.
Razak, N. A., Darmawan, I. G. N., & Keeves, J. P. (2010). The influence of culture on teacher commitment. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 185-205. doi: 10.1007/s11218-009-9109-z
Resaon, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324-339). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Reyes, P. (1990). Organizational commitment of teachers. In P. Reyes(Ed.), Teachers and their workplace: Commitment, performance, and productivity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Roby, D. E. (2011). Teacher leaders impacting school culture. Education, 131(4), 782-790.
Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of school. New York, NY: Longman.
Rust, V. D. (2003). Method and methodology in comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 47(3), iii-vi.
Sachs, J., & Smith, R. (1998). Constructing teacher culture. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(4), 423-436.
Sackett, D. (1979). Bias in analytic research. J Chron Dis, 32, 51–63.
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Seidman, I. (2006). Interview as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and social sciences. New York, NY: Teacher College.
Shepard, M. (2008). From a culture of isolation to collegiality: Professional development using evidence of student learning to increase teacher efficacy and student achievement. (Doctoral’s thesis). Available ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3330668)
Shielsd, J. M. (2008). Critical hermeneutics as a paradigm for comparativism: Insights from Japanese thought. Retrived from http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/jms089/Z-Unpublished%20Work/Comparativism.pdf
Shimahara, N. K. (1992). Teacher internship and the culture of teaching in Japan. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 13(2), 147-162.
Sieber, J. E. (2000). Planning research: Basic ethical decision-making. In B. D. Sales, & S. Folkman (Eds.), Ethics in research with human participants (pp. 13-26). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Sike, P. J. , Measor, L., & Woods, P. (1985). Teacher careers crises and continuities. Philadelphia: PA: The Falmer.
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data : Methods for analyzing talk, text, and interaction (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Singelis, T. M., & Brown, W. J. (1995). Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 21(3), 354–389.
Smeyers, P., & Depaepe, M. (2010). Representation or hard evidence? The use of statistics in education and educational. Educational Research 5, 1-11. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9873-3_1
Sonnenstuhl, W. J. & Trice, H. M. (1991). Organization and type of occupational communities: Grid-group analysis in the linkage of organizational and occupational theory. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 9, 295-318.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Supovitz, J. A., & Christman, J. B. (2005). Small learning communities that actually learn: Lessons for school leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 86 (9), 649-651.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining the qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Epilogue: Current development and emerging trends in integrated research methodology. In C.Teddlie, & A. Tashakkori (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.) (pp. 803-826). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2010). Overview of contemporary issue in mixed methods research. In C. Teddlie, & A. Tashakkori (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.) (pp. 1-41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Timperley, H., & Robinson, V. (2000). Workload and the professional culture of teachers. Educational Management & Administration, 28(1) 47–62.
Triandis, H. C. (2001). The study of cross cultural management and organization: The future. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 1(1), 17–20.
Trice, H. M. & Beyer, J. M. (1984). Studying organizational cultures through rites and ceremonials. Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 653-669.
Trice, H. M. (1993). Occupational subcultures in the workplace. Ithaca, NY: ILR.
Tsui, A. S., Zhang, Z. X., Wang, H., Xin K. R., & Wu, J. B. (2006). Unpacking the relationship between CEO leadership behavior and organizational culture. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(2), 113-137.
Tushman, M. L. (1997). A political approach to organizations: A review and rational. Academy of Management Review, 2, 206-216.
UNESCO (2010, October 5). Recover Begins with Teachers. Retrieved from http://download.ei-ie.org/Docs/WebDepot/WTD%202010%20message%20English%20with%20logos%20sig.pdf
van Zanten, A. (2002). Educational change and new cleavage between headteachers, teachers and parents: Global and local perspectives on the French case. Journal of Educational Policy, 17(3), 289-304.
Verhoeven, J. C., Aelterma, A., Rots I., & Buvens, I. (2006). Public perceptions of teachers’ status in Flanders. Teachers And Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(4), 479-500.
Walford, G. (2001). Doing qualitative educational research: A personal guide to the research process. New York, NY: Continuum.
Waller, D. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York, NY: Russell and Russell.
Waller, W. (1984). What teaching does to teachers: Determinats of the occupational type. In A. Hargreaves & P. Woods (Eds.), Classrooms & staffrooms: The sociology of teachers & teaching (pp. 160-173). Milton Keynes, England:Open University.
Walsh, K. (2004). Interpreting the impact of culture on structure: The role of change processes. The Journal of applied behavioral science, 40(3), 302-322.
Weaver,P. E. (2004). The culture of teaching and mentoring for compliance. Childhood Education, 80(5), 258-260.
Webb, R. B. & Ashton, P. T. (1987). Teacher motivation and the conditions of teaching: A call for ecological reform. In S. Walker & L. Barton (Eds), Changing policies, changing teachers: New directions for schooling (pp.22-40). Milton Keynes, England: Open University.
Weisberg, H. F., Krosnick, J. A., & Bowen, B. D. (1996). An introduction to survey research, polling, and data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wellman, B. (1983). Network analysis: Some basic principles. Sociological Theory, 1, 155-200.
Willerman, M., McNeely, S. L., & Koffman, E. C. (1991). Teachers helping teachers: Peer observation and assistance. New York, NY: Praeger.
Williams, A., Prestage, S., & Bedward, J. (2001). Individualism to collaboration: The significance of teacher culture to the induction of newly qualified teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27(3), 253-267. doi:10.1080/02607470120091588
Wolcott, H. (2005). The art of fieldwork (2nd ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
Wolstenholme, E. F. (1999). Qualitative vs quantitative modelling: The evolving balance. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(4), 422-428.
Woods, P. (1990). Cold eyes and warm hearts: Changing perspectives on teachers' work and careers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(1), 101-117.
Yarger, S. J., & Smith, p. L. (1990). Issue in research on teacher education. In W. R. Houston & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the association of teacher educators (pp. 25-41). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. London, England: Sage.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE