:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從幾堂好課,談素養導向自然科學教科書編寫設計
書刊名:教育研究月刊
作者:黃茂在吳敏而
作者(外文):Huang, Mao-tsaiWu, Rosalind J.
出版日期:2019
卷期:303
頁次:頁81-100
主題關鍵詞:自然科學領域教科書素養導向教學探究式教學學習進程Science textbookLiteracy-oriented teachingInquiry-based teachingLearning progression
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:234
  • 點閱點閱:11
本文以教科書做為支援教師實踐素養導向教學,以及做為協助學生自學之文本工具概念,探討教科書編寫設計四個挑戰方向:平衡科學素養面向、「明示」科學學習表現、自由探索引發好奇與提問、學習進程規劃。並依此提出「幾堂好課」協助教師搭「鷹架」營造學生經歷科學家的思維與行動歷程:案例一:自主探索─以情境設計引發學生好奇、想像與提問;案例二:鷹架式探索─以POE模式引導學生模仿/經歷科學家探究思考模式;案例三:結構式探究─「明示」科學思考(推理、論證);案例四:引導式探究─練習科學家實驗設計、認識因果關係。結語討論四個思考點:從活動、單元主題及課程,教科書需有系統地規劃,提出素養導向課程實踐的路徑;教科書做為教學一種資源,教師彈性地掌握學習進程與教、學、評的結合;反思解構教科書的結構與應用之客可能;建立長期研發教科書的機制。
This paper considers how to design and write competency-based natural science textbooks that could provide teachers with inquiry instruction materials, and analyzes how textbook writing can be improved in terms of 4 challenges: balancing science literacy dimensions, clear descriptions of science conduct, posing questions and conceptualizations, considerations of learning progression. Examples are given of how the textbook could be written to lead students through their inquiry, and to help teachers develop scaffolds for the acquisition of science literacy using reasoning processes scientists employ in conducting research. Example 1 uses free exploration to stimulate curiosity, imagination, and questioning. Example 2 uses scaffolded exploration to show how scientists think using the POE process. Example 3 uses structured inquiry to demonstrate scientific reasoning and argumentation. Example 4 uses guided inquiry to enable practicing experimental design as a scientist, and reading for cause-effect. The 4 examples demonstrate how learning progression in the textbook needs to support inquiry skills development. The paper ends with 4 discussion points: a systematic pathway leading from curriculum to classroom; a consideration of learning progression that combines teaching, learning and assessment in a flexible way; restructuring the function and format of the textbook; the need for a mechanism to conduct long term research and development for textbooks.
期刊論文
1.Laugksch, R. C.(2000)。Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual Overview。Science Education,84(1),71-94。  new window
2.吳俊憲(2009)。教科書編輯與設計的運作與內涵。靜宜大學師培實習輔導通訊,8,4-11。  延伸查詢new window
3.周淑卿(20031200)。今是昨非,抑或昨是今非?--教科書一綱多本爭議之分析。國立編譯館館刊,31,12-21。  延伸查詢new window
4.周淑卿(20080600)。豈是「一本」能了?--教科書概念的重建。教科書研究,1(1),29-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.鄧鈞文(20030100)。教科書自由化及其問題分析。課程與教學,6(1),27-41+165。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.周淑卿(20130700)。課程綱要與教科書的差距--問題與成因。課程與教學,16(3),31-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.周珮儀(20051000)。我國教科書研究的分析:1979-2004。課程與教學,8(4),91-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Miller, J. D.(1983)。Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review。Daedalus,112(2),29-48。  new window
9.Choi, K.、Lee, H.、Shin, N.、Kim, S.-W.、Krajcik, J.(2011)。Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,48(6),670-697。  new window
10.林裕仁、洪振方、高慧蓮(20090300)。科學本質明示教學中的契機與困惑。屏東教大科學教育,29,17-29。  延伸查詢new window
11.DeBoer, G. E.(2000)。Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(6),582-601。  new window
12.Berland, L. K.、McNeill, K. L.(2010)。A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts。Science Education,94(5),765-793。  new window
13.Runco, M. A.、Nemiro, J.(1994)。Problem finding, creativity, and giftedness。Roeper Review,16,235-241。  new window
14.黃茂在、吳敏而(20160800)。探索十二年國教自然科學教科書的設計原則--以「熱傳播」單元為例。教科書研究,9(2),69-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳麗華(20081200)。評介「為學習而設計的教科書」及其對我國中小學教科書設計與研究的啟示。教科書研究,1(2),137-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.黃茂在、吳敏而(20170300)。探索十二年國民基本教育自然科學素養導向教學設計。教育研究月刊,275,81-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Hurd, P. D.(1958)。Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools。Educational Leadership,16(1),13-16。  new window
18.歐用生(20100900)。建構「三峽」課程發展機制。課程研究,5(2),27-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.陳美如、彭煥勝(20160400)。探尋一段臺灣課程發展史--板橋模式的回顧與前瞻。教科書研究,9(1),1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Alexiou, N.、Skoumios, M.(2016)。A framework for evaluating dimensions of scientific literacy in science textbooks: The case of a Greek middle school physics textbook。International Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Learning,23(1),1-18。  new window
21.Ardianto, D.、Pursitasari, I. D.(2017)。Do middle school science textbook enclose an entity of science literacy?。Journal of Humanities and Social Studies,1(1),24-27。  new window
22.Cakici, Y.(2012)。Exploring Turkish upper primary level science textbooks' coverage of scientific literacy themes。Eurasian Journal of Educational Research,49,81-102。  new window
23.Chiappetta, E. L.、Fillman, D. A.、Sethna, G. H.(1991)。A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,28(8),713-725。  new window
24.Davis, J. D.(2009)。Understanding the influence of two mathematics textbooks on prospective secondary teachers, knowledge。Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,12(5),365-389。  new window
25.LaBanca, F.、Ritchie, K. C.(2011)。The art of scientific ideas: Teaching and learning strategies that promote effective problem finding。The Science Teacher,78(8),48-51。  new window
26.Lehrer, R.、Schauble, L.(2009)。Images of learning, images of progress。Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,46(6),731-735。  new window
27.Overman, M.、Vermunt, J. D.、Meijer, P. C.、Bulte, A. M.、Brekelmans, M.(2013)。Textbook questions in context-based and traditional chemistry curricula analysed from a content perspective and a learning activities perspective。International Journal of Science Education,35(17),2954-2978。  new window
28.Roni R. P.(2017)。The role of problem construction in creative production。The Journal of Creative Behavior,51,323-326。  new window
29.Slough, S. W.、Rupiey, W. H.(2010)。Re-creating a recipe for science instructional programs: Adding learning progressions, scaffolding, and a dash of reading variety。School Science and Mathematics,110(7),352-362。  new window
30.Smith, C. L.、Wiser, M.、Anderson, C. W.、Krajcik, J.(2006)。Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: Matter and atomic-molecular theory。Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspective,4(1/2),1-98。  new window
31.Stevens, S. Y.、Shin, N.、Peek-Brown, D.(2013)。Learning progressions as a guide for developing meaningful science learning: A new framework for old ideas。Educación Química,24(4),381-390。  new window
32.Udeani, U.(2013)。Quantitative analysis of secondary school biology textbooks for scientific literacy themes。Research Journal in Organizational Psychology and Educational Studies (RJOPES),2(1)。  new window
33.范信賢(2016)。核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要:導讀《國民核心素養:十二年國教課程改革的DNA》。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊,5,1-7。  延伸查詢new window
34.Abdulla, Ahmed M.、Paek, Sue Hyeon、Cramond, Bonnie、Runco, Mark A.(2020)。Problem finding and creativity: A meta-analytic review。Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,14(1),3-14。  new window
35.Edwards, Clifford H.(1997)。Promoting Student Inquiry。The Science Teacher,64(7),18-21。  new window
會議論文
1.Hsieh, H.-Y.、Huang, M. T.、Lieu, S.-C.、Lin, S.-F.、Chen, S.、Chang, W.-H.(2008)。Developing nature of science-explicit professional development program。The 2008 ASERA。Brisbane。  new window
圖書
1.Runco, M. A.(1994)。Problem finding, problem solving and creativity。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。  new window
2.Duschl, R. A.、Schweingruber, H. A.、Shouse, A. W.(2007)。Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8。National Academies Press。  new window
3.Chambliss, M. J.、Calfee, R. C.(1998)。Textbooks for learning: Nurturing children's minds。Malden, MA:Blackwell。  new window
4.Einstein, A.、Infeld, L.(1938)。The evolution of physics。New York:Simon and Schuster。  new window
5.林佩璇(2007)。國民中學「一綱多本」教科書政策實施之研究。臺北縣:中華民國教材研究發展學會。  延伸查詢new window
6.周祝瑛(20030000)。誰捉弄了臺灣教改?。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Shamos, Morris H.(1995)。The Myth of Scientific Literacy。Rutgers University Press。  new window
8.歐用生(20030800)。歐用生教授--教科書之旅。臺北:中華民國教材研究發展協會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Next Generation Science Standards(2013)。Trademark and copyright,https://www.nextgenscience.org/trademark-and-copyright。  new window
2.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2006)。Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006,http://www.oecd.org/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Roberts, D. A.(2007)。Scientific literacy/Science literacy。Handbook of research on science education。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
2.Shen, B. S. P.(1975)。Science literacy and the public understanding of science。Communication of scientific information。Karger Publishers。  new window
3.高鴻怡(2017)。素養導向教科書開發的專業支持。課程協作與實踐。臺北市:教育部中小學師資課程教學與評量協作中心。  延伸查詢new window
4.Yeo, J.(2015)。Promoting students' ability to problem-find。Motivation, leadership and curriculum design。Springer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE