:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:專業學習社群在教師專業發展評鑑中介下的發展:一所國中個案研究
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:潘慧玲 引用關係張素貞沈靜濤
作者(外文):Pan, Hui-lingChang, Su-chenShen, Ching-tao
出版日期:2013
卷期:9:2
頁次:頁145-173
主題關鍵詞:專業學習社群教師專業發展評鑑個案研究Professional learning communityTeacher evaluation for professional developmentCase study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(7) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:1740
  • 點閱點閱:103
本研究以一所國中為個案,探討專業學習社群(professional learning communities)在教師專業發展評鑑此項人造物(artifact)結構的中介下,所歷經的發展歷程及其展現的特徵。透過觀察、訪談及文件分析,研究發現教師專業發展評鑑提供了累積社會資本及進行任務導向協同學習的機制,促發學習社群的生成。在個案學校中,有五個學習領域以積極行動者角色,呈顯學習社群特徵,進入「對話與分享資訊」的初始階段或進而達臻「行動與實現願景」的執行階段。在兩階段中,均可看到分享性領導、共同價值與願景、以及集體學習與實務分享,只是隨著階段之發展而愈趨成熟。另行政支持、信任與合作夥伴關係是跨越不同階段,社群得以運作的支持性條件,而行動者的積極性,累積學習社群形構所需之社會資本,亦是關鍵。歸結本研究所得,除可提供吾人瞭解專業學習社群在教師專業發展評鑑實施歷程中的運作情形,對於社群在有效推動教師專業發展評鑑中的重要性,亦具啟示作用。
A case study was conducted, using one junior high school, to explore the development of professional learning communities (PLC) mediated by Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development (TEPD). Through the methods of observation, interview and document analysis, it was indicated that TEPD, as a school artifact, propelled the development of PLC through the accumulation of social capital and the task-oriented collaborative learning. In the case school, five learning areas as active actors exhibited characteristics of PLC. Two stages can be distinguished, including the initiating dialogue and information sharing as well as the implementing action and vision materialization. Shared leadership, common values and vision, and collective learning and practices sharing were observed in the two stages, with higher maturity when PLC proceeding from stage one to stage two. Besides, supportive conditions of administrative support and the partnership of trust and collaboration among teachers were found across the stages. Actors’ agency to accumulate needed social capital for learning community also plays a significant role. The study brings us the understanding with regard to how PLC operates while launching TEPD and pinpoints the significance of PLC for the success of TEPD policy.
期刊論文
1.Ackerman, D.(2008)。Continuity of care, professional community, and the policy context: Potential benefits for infant and toddler teachers' professional development。Early Education and Development,19(5),753-772。  new window
2.Graham, P.(2007)。Improving teacher effectiveness through structured collaboration: A case study of a professional learning community。Research in Middle Level Education Online,31(1),1-17。  new window
3.Huffman, J. B.、Pankake, A.、Munoz, A.(2006)。The tri-level model in action: Site, district, and state plans for school accountability in increasing student success。Journal of School Leadership,16(5),569-582。  new window
4.Kaplan, J.(2008)。The national writing project: Creating a professional learning community that supports the teaching of writing。Theory into Practice,47(4),336-344。  new window
5.Preskill, H.、Torres, R.(2000)。The learning dimension of evaluation use。New Directions for Evaluation,88,25-37。  new window
6.Thornton, B.、Shepperson, T.、Canavero, S.(2007)。A systems approach to school improvement: Program evaluation and organizational。learning, Education,128(1),48-55。  new window
7.Hargreaves, A.(2000)。Four ages of professionalism and professional learning。Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,6(2),151-182。  new window
8.Forss, K.、Cracknell, B.、Samset, K.(1994)。Can evaluation help an organization to learn。Evaluation Review,18(5),574-591。  new window
9.高博銓(20090600)。學校教師學習社群發展的個案研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,2(1),61-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張素貞、吳俊憲(20120300)。大學與學校專業夥伴合作之個案研究--以專業學習社群為焦點。教育研究與發展期刊,8(1),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.潘慧玲、陳文彥(20100900)。教師專業發展評鑑促進組織學習之個案研究。教育研究集刊,56(3),29-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.丁一顧、張德銳(20101200)。臺北市教學導師教師領導與專業學習社群關係之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,10,55-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.張德銳、李俊達、周麗華(20101200)。國中實施形成性教師評鑑歷程及影響因素之個案研究。教育實踐與研究,23(2),65-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳佩英、焦傳金(20090300)。分散式領導與專業學習社群之建構:一所高中教學創新計畫的個案研究。教育科學研究期刊,54(1),55-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳佩英、曾正宜(20110600)。探析專業學習社群的展化學習經驗與課程創新行動--活動理論取徑。教育研究集刊,57(2),39-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.張德銳、王淑珍(20100500)。教師專業學習社群在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與實踐。臺北市立教育大學學報. 教育類,41(1),61-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.孫志麟(20100900)。專業學習社群:促進教師專業發展的平臺。學校行政,69,138-158。  延伸查詢new window
18.陳佩英(20090900)。一起學習、一起領導:專業學習社群的建構與實踐。中等教育,60(3),68-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.陳佳萍、王瑞壎(20110800)。教師專業學習社群之探究:以學校文化發展為例。教育研究月刊,208,53-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.張新仁、馮莉雅、潘道仁、王瓊珠(20110100)。臺灣教師專業學習社群的啟動。教育研究月刊,201,5-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.丁一顧(20110900)。教師專業學習社群與教師集體效能感關係模式驗證之研究。屏東教育大學學報. 教育類,37,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Halverson, R.(2003)。Systems of practice: How leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools。Education Policy Analysis Archives,11,(37)1-(37)35。  new window
23.周麗華(20101200)。臺北市國小教師專業發展評鑑實施效應之研究。市北教育學刊,37,103-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Spillane, J. P.、Halverson, R.、Diamond, J. B.(2004)。Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective。Journal of Curriculum Studies,36(1),3-34。  new window
25.馮莉雅、徐昌慧(20101200)。教師專業發展評鑑與專業學習社群發展之研究:以高雄市國小為例。國民教育學報,7,139-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology,94(suppl.),S95-S120。  new window
會議論文
1.馮莉雅(2010)。教師專業學習社群發展之研究:以高雄市國小為例。創新、教育學術研討會--創新教學與教師專業發展,新竹教育大學主辦 。國立新竹教育大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Howley, C.、Brown, P.(2001)。Four eyes on the prize: Case studies of four schools of continuous improvement。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。Seattle, WA。  new window
學位論文
1.李美葺(2010)。國民小學專業學習社群之推動與成效分析(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊智驛(2012)。臺北市公立小學教師專業學習社群現況調查(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.童新峯(2012)。專業學習社群運作及其促進學校文化改變之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Croasmun, J.(2007)。The impact of a professional learning community on student achievement gains: A case study(博士論文)。University of North Carolina,North Carolina。  new window
5.林忠仁(2010)。國民小學校長分佈領導、灰猩猩效應與教師專業學習社群關係之研究(博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.丁琴芳(2008)。國民小學教師專業學習社群發展之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hipp, K. K.、Huffman, J. B.(2009)。Professional learning communities: Purposeful actions, positive results。Lanham, MD:Rowman and Littlefield。  new window
2.Kruse, S.、Louis, K. S.、Bryk, A. S.(1994)。Building professional community in schools: Issues in restructuring schools。Madison, WI:Wisconsin Center for Education Research。  new window
3.Stronge, J. H.(1997)。Improving schools through teacher evaluation。Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
4.教育部(2011)。教育部補助辦理教師專業發展評鑑實施要點。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.張新仁、王瓊珠、馮莉雅、陳美丞、林淑華(2009)。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Preskill, H.、Torres, R. T.(1999)。Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
7.Danielson, C.、McGreal, T. L.(2000)。Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice。Alexandria, Virginia:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)。  new window
8.Fullan, M.(2001)。The new meaning of educational change。Toronto。  new window
9.Deal, T. E.、Peterson, K. D.(1994)。The principal's paradox: balancing logic and artistry in schools。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
10.Huffman, J. B.、Hipp, K. K.(2003)。Reculturing schools as professional learning communities。Scarecrow Education。  new window
11.DuFour, R.、Eaker, R. E.(1998)。Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement。National Educational Service。  new window
12.Hord, S. M.(1997)。Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement。Southwest Educational Development Laboratory。  new window
13.Roberts, M. S.、Pruitt, Z. E.(2003)。School as professional learning communities: Collaborative activities and strategies for professional development。Corwin Press Inc.。  new window
14.DuFour, Richard、DuFour, Rebecca、Eaker, Robert、Many, Thomas W.(2006)。Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work。Solution Tree。  new window
15.王文科(1995)。教育研究法。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Yin, Robert K.(2001)。Case Study Research: Design and Methods。Sage。  new window
其他
1.Supovitz, J. A.,Christman, J. B.(2003)。Developing communities of instructional practice: Lessons from Cincinnati and Philadelphia,http://www.cpre.org/images/stories/cpre_pdfs/rb39.pdf。  new window
2.教育部(2008)。教育部補助試辦教師專業發展評鑑實施計畫,臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Creed, W. E.、Miles, R. E.(1996)。Trust in organization: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of control。Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
2.Fullan, M. G.(1990)。Staff development, innovation and institutional development。Changing school culture through staff development。Alexandria, VA:Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
3.Annunziata, J.(1997)。Linking teacher evaluation and professional development。Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
4.Kruse, S. D.、Louis, K. S.、Bryk, A. S.(1995)。An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community。Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools。Corwin。  new window
5.Duke, D. L.、Stiggins, R. J.(1990)。Beyond minimum competence: Evaluation for professional development。The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation--Assessing elementary and。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
6.Hord, S. M.(2004)。Professional learning communities: An overview。Learning Together, Leading Together: Changing Schools Through Professional Learning Communities。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE