中文文獻
王文科（2000）。質的教育研究法。臺北市：師大書苑。
王秀槐（2008）。課程改革中的教師專業成長。中等教育，59(3)，28-41。王素芸（2009）。協同教學的意義、特質與類型。教育研究與發展期，5(2)，55-80。王國華、段曉林、張惠博（1998）。學生對教師之學科教學知覺問卷之發展。科學教育學刊，2 (6)，129-147。王敏祝（2004）。以探究導向教學提昇國中學生學習成效之研究－以「光學」單元為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
余安順（2012）。以教師自我反思、同儕教室觀察與學生知覺提升中學科學教師教學專業發展之個案研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。余安順、施昆易、王國華、劉世雄（2009）。在職中學科學教師教學專業發展現況、需求與困境調查之初探。科學教育研究與發展季刊，55，21-48。
余安順、郭雅婷、何信權、施昆易、王國華（2011）。同儕教師課室觀察回饋提升學生知覺教師教學之研究。徐燕（主持人），兩岸三地科學教育暨師資培育。2011兩岸三地科學教育暨師資培育學術研討會，國立彰化師範大學。
李子建、尹弘飈、周曉燕（2008）。以「4-P 模式」促進教師專業發展：香港「優化教學協作計畫」的經驗。教育研究與發展期刊，4(2)，17-45。李源順、林福來（2000）。數學教師的專業成長：教學多元化。師大學報，45(1)，1-25。
李源順、林福來（2003）。實習教師的學習：動機、身份與反思互動下的成長。科學教育學刊，11(1)，1-25。李俊湖（2007）。從教師評鑑談教師專業發展評鑑。研習資訊，24(1)，139-148。
李嘉祥（1999）。合作學習對國中學生生物學習動機之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
沈中偉（2004）。科技與學習：理論與實務。臺北市：心理。林志忠（2001）。九年一貫課程與協同教學。載於國立暨南國際大學教育學程中心（主編），教育改革的微觀工程一小班教學與九年一貫課程（179-202頁）。高雄市：復文。
林志宜（2009）。建構小五學生Google 地球地圖學習情境：以活動理論為架構之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。私立淡江大學，臺北市。
林宏展（2006）。以數位教室環境增進同步遠距教學之臨場感（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中央大學，桃園縣。
林素卿（2007）。從課程與教學改革趨勢談教師專業發展評鑑。教育資料與研究雙月刊，76，29-46。林思伶、蔡進雄（2005）。論凝聚教師學習社群的有效途徑。教育研究，132，99-109。林劭仁（2006）。專業學習社群運用於師資培育自我評鑑之探究。中正教育研究，5(2)，79-111。林國棟（2009）。日本的Lesson Study 如何引發教師專業發展之探究。教育研究與發展期刊，5(1)，165-184。
林凱胤、王國華（2007）。實習教師經由觀摩與反思途徑擷取輔導教師內隱知識之研究。屏東教育大學學報，27，31-50。林凱胤、王國華、蔡維真（2007）。部落格在師資培育課程應用之研究。科學教育學刊，15(4)，461-490。林凱胤、王國華、余安順、何信權（2006）。實習教師透過觀摩與反思策略獲得內隱知識之研究。王國華（主持人），科學教師專業成長。第二十二屆科學教育學術研討會，國立臺灣師範大學。
林凱胤、王國華、葉辰楨、黃士傑、林素華、李淑雯、王瑋龍、溫媺純、林忠毅、蔡顯章（2006）。應用知識轉移策略建構實習教師專業成長輔導模式。課程與教學季刊，9(3)，65-81。洪志成、廖梅花譯（2003）。焦點團體訪談（原作者：Krueger, Richard A.）。嘉義縣：濤石。
姚如芬（2006）。成長團體之「成長」－小學教師數學教學專業之探究。科學教育學刊，14(3)，309-331。柯啟瑤（1999）。協同教學的初步認識。翰林文教雜誌，5，1-2。
胡幼慧（1996）。質性的研究與寫成：質性研究理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市：巨流。
卓亦甄（2004）。實施網路案例教學法輔導生物實習教師教學專業知能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
高紅瑛（2000）。協同教學的理念與實踐。教育研究月刊，77，57-62。陸美靜（2002）。一位國小三年級較自然老師實施建構教學的歷程與反思（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。
吳清山（2006）。師資培育的理念與實踐。教育研究與發展期刊，2(1)，1-32。吳玲梅（2003）。高職教師專業成長現況與需求之研究－以國立羅東高級商業職業學校為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立東華大學，花蓮縣。
何英奇、毛國楠、張景媛、周文欽（2001）。學習輔導。臺北市：心理。
周崇儒（2000）。促進教師專業成長策略之分析。中等教育，51(5)，74-84。施昆易、王國華、張惠博（2009）。融合遠距視訊系統之共同教學模式促進師資生教學專業成長之研究。王國華（主持人），科學教師專業成長。第二十五屆科學教育學術研討會，國立臺灣師範大學。
施昆易、張惠博、王國華、劉世雄（2009）。運用遠距視訊系統進行職前科學教師實習輔導之個案研究。王國華（主持人），職前科學師資輔導與培育。2009精緻化師資培育研討會，國立彰化師範大學。
莊雪芳、鄭湧涇（2003）。國中學生對生物學的態度與習環境之研究。科學教育學刊，11(2)，171-194。黃光雄（1998）。教學原理。臺北市：師大書苑。
黃台珠、Aldridge, J. M.、Fraser, B.（1998）。台灣和西澳科學教室環境的跨國研究:結合質性與量的研究方法。科學教育學刊，6(4)，343-362。黃志賢、林福來（2008）。利用活動理論分析臺灣泰雅族國中生的數學學習並設計教學活動。科學教育學刊，16 (2)，147-169 。黃再鴻、羅希哲、陳文進、溫敬和（2007）。生活科技遠距協同教學之實錄探討。生活科技教育月刊，40(1)，70-94。
黃坤錦（2004）。教師在職進修與教師專業發展。教育資料集刊，28，241-258。
黃國安、楊家豪（2006）。情意注意與反應目標之同步遠距教學機制研製。科學教育學刊，14(2)，189-208。葉蓉樺（2009）。以探究式學習觀點促進教師在科學博物館進行教學之研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，53，1-23。
楊榮祥、Fraser, B. J.（1998）。臺灣和西澳科學教室環境的合作研究---研究架構、方法及對臺灣科學教育的啟思。科學教育學刊，6(4)，325-342。陳玉蘭（2003）。論協同教學的實施與師資培育因應之道。教育科學期刊，3(1)，57-78。陳美玉（1999）。教師專業學習與發展。臺北市：師大書苑。
陳美玉（2006）。從內隱知識的觀點論教師學習與專業發展。課程與教學季刊，9(3)，1-13。陳美如（2002）。當教師遇見課程評鑑：轉變與成長。師大學報，47(1)，17-38。陳英娥、林來福（2004）。行動研究促進初任數學教師的教學成長。科學教育學刊，12(1)，83-105。陳伯璋（1995）。我國中小學課程統整與連貫問題之檢視。臺灣教育月刊，540， 11-15。
陳均伊、張惠博（2006）。一位化學老師實施探究教學的歷程與省思之個案研究－以「火山爆發」教學活動為例。師大學報，53(2)，91-123。
陳佩英（2008）。教師領導之興起與發展。教育研究月刊，171，41-57陳佩英、曾正宜（2011）。探析專業學習社群的展化學習經驗與課程創新行動-活動理論取徑。教育研究集刊，57(2)，39-84。張世忠（2005）。網路融入協同教學之研究：以國中「自然與生活科技」領域為例。中原學報，33(4)，725-743.張世忠（2001）。多元智慧與協同教學。教育實習輔導季刊，6(3)，77-85。
張世忠、羅慧英（2009）。協同教學對國中學生所知覺的科學教師PCK之影響。科學教育學刊，17(1)，1-20。張景媛、呂玉琴、何緼琪、吳青蓉、林弈宏（2002）。多元思考教學策略對國小教師數學教學之影響暨教師專業成長模式之建構。教育心理學報，33(2)，1-22。張清濱（1999）。怎樣實施協同教學?。師友月刊，387，43-47。張新仁、王瓊珠、馮莉雅（主編）（2009）。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊。臺北市：教育部。
張惠博（2001）。九年一貫課程實施與教師專業成長。科學教育月刊，239，13-25。
張德銳、丘惜玄、高紅瑛、陳淑茗、管淑華、蕭福生（2002）。協同教學-理論與實務。臺北市：五南。
張德勝（2002）。學生評鑑教師教學:理論、實務與態度。臺北市：揚智文化。
教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市：教育部。教育部（2005）。師資培育素質提升方案。臺北市：教育部。
資策會（2004）。數位學習最佳指引。臺北市：資策會。
曾志華、張靜嚳（2006）。一位高職數學教師的教學專業成長歷程。師大學報，51(2)，55-82。
賴美娟（2004）。協同教學與教師的專業成長：個案研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
葉重新（1987）。臺灣地區九所大學教師對學生評鑑教師教學期望之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。甄曉蘭（2007）。偏遠國中教育機會不均等問題與相關教育政策初探。教育研究集刊，53(3)，1-35。孫志麟（2009）。師資教育的未來政策與實踐。臺北市：學富。孫志麟（2010）。專業學習社群：促進教師專業發展的平臺。學校行政雙月刊，60，138-158。
陳諭葳（2010）。國民小學教育夥伴關係之個案研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
劉宜汶（2010）。部落格為中介行為之教師發展（未出版之碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹市。
劉小鳳（2006）。活動理論應用於企業教育訓練品質的提升。品質月刊，42 (1)，54-55。
謝佩倩、許民陽（2007）。臺北縣市國小自然與生活科技領域教師背景差異對學童天文概念學習成效的影響。科學教育研究與發展季刊，46，15-48。
蔡清田（2000）。教育行動研究。臺北市：五南。
簡茂發（2003）。國民中小學教師教學專業發展之研究。新北市：財團法人李連教育基金會。
饒見維（1996）。教師專業發展-理論與實務。臺北市：五南。
英文文獻
Abdal-Haqq, I. (1998). Professional development schools: Weighing the evidence. Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press.
American Association for Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy, project 2061. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, T., &; Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education. (pp. 97-112). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
Annetta, L. A., &; Shymansky, J. A. (2006). Investigating science learning for rural elementary school teachers in a professional-development project through three distance-education strategies. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 43(10), 1019-1039.
Annetta, L. A., &; Shymansky, J. A. (2008). A comparison of rural elementary school teacher attitudes toward three modes of distance education for science professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(3), 255-267.
Bacharach, N., Heck, T.W. &; Dahlberg, K. (2010). Researching the use of coteaching in the student teaching experience. In C. Murphy &; K. Scantlebury (Eds.), Coteaching in international contexts: Research and practice (pp. 35-55). New York, NY: Springer.
Barab, S. A., Evans, M. A., &; Baek, E. U. (2004). Activity theory as a lens for characterizing the participatory unit. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communication and technology (pp. 199-214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Barab, S. A., Schatz, S., &; Scheckler, R. (2004). Using activity theory to conceptualize online community and using online community to conceptualize activity theory. Mind, Culture and Activity, 11(1), 25–47.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
Borko, H., &; Putnam, R. T. (1995). Expanding a teacher’s knowledge base. In T. R. Guskey &; M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 35-65). New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
Branham, L. A. (1992). An update on staff development evaluation. Journal of Staff Development, 13, 24-28.
Briscoe, C., &; Peters, J. (1997). Teacher collaboration across and within schools: Supporting individual change in elementary science teaching. Science Teacher Education, 81(1), 51-64.
Carambo, C., &; Stickney, C. T. (2009). Coteaching praxis and professional service: Facilitating the transition of beliefs and practices. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(2), 433-441.
Carlisle, K. (2010). Enactment of coteaching in primary schools: Moving towards a shared responsibility. In C. Murphy &; K. Scantlebury (Eds.), Coteaching in international contexts: Research and practice (pp. 125-146). New York, NY: Springer.
Cobb, P., McClain, K., Lamberg, T. S., &; Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers' instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13-24.
Cohen, D. K., &; Hill, H. C. (1998). State policy and classroom performance: Mathematics reform in California. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Cochran, K. E., DeRuiter, J. A., &; King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263-272.
Cole, M., &; Engeström, Y. (1993). A culturalhistorical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Cook, J., &; Oliver, M. (2002). Designing a toolkit to support dialogue in learning. Computers and Education, 38(1-3), 151-164.
Crippen, K. J., Archambault, L. M., &; Kern, C. L. (2013). The nature of laboratory learning experiences in secondary science online. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1029-1050.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The quiet revolution: Rethinking teacher development. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 4-10.
Davis-Wiley, P. &; Cozart, A.C. (1998) Are two instructors better than one? Planning, teaching and evaluating a deux. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED428038.)
Demeer, S. A. (2004). Using a achievement goal theory to translate psychological principles into practice in the secondary classroom. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 4-15.
Dixon, N. M. (1996). New routes to evaluation. Training and Development, 50(5), 82-86.
DuFour, R., &; Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.
Eick, C. J., Ware, F.N., &; Jones, M.T. (2004). Coteaching in a secondary science methods course-learning through a coteaching model that supports early teacher practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(3), 197-209.
Eick, C., &; Dias, M. (2005). Building the authority of experience in communities of practice: The development of preservice teachers' practical knowledge through coteaching in inquiry classrooms. Science Education, 89(3), 470-491.
Elliott, J. (1990). Teachers as researchers: Implications for supervision and for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6, 280-298.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding:An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen &; R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960-974.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
Engeström, Y. &; Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1-24.
Ertl, B., Fischer, F. &; Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers &; Education, 47, 298-315.
Even, R., Tirosh, D., &; Markovits, Z. (1996). Teacher subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. Research and Development, 20(1), 119-134.
Fetters, M. K., &; Vellom, P. (2001). Linking schools and universities in partnership for science teacher preparation. In D. R. Lavoie &; W. M. Roth (Eds.), Models of science teacher preparation (pp. 67-88). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Feng, S. L., &; Tuan, H. L. (2005). Using ARCS model to promote 11th graders’ motivation and achievement in learning about acid and bases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 463-484.
Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Furlong, V. J., Hirst, P. H., Pocklington, K., &; Miles, S. (1988). Initial teacher training and the role of the school. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
Furlong, J., Whitty, G., Whiting, C., Miles, S., Barton, L., &; Barrett, E. (1996). Re-defining partnership: Revolution or reform in initial teacher education? Journal of Education for Teaching, 22(1), 39-55.
Furst-Bowie, J. (l997). Comparison of student reactions in traditional and video Conferencing course in training and development. International Journal of Instructional Media, 24(3), 197-205.
Garet, M. S., Birman, B. E., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., &; Herman, R. (1999). Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the eisenhower program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., &; Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Goodlad, J. I. (1995). School-university partnerships and partner schools. In H. G. Petrie (Ed.), Professionalization, partnerships, and power: Building professional development schools (pp.7-22). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Guskey, T. R. (1996). To transmit or to “construct"? The lure of trend infatuation in teacher professional development (Commentary). Education Week, 16, 1-3.
Hall, G. E., &; Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 47-63.
Hein, G. E. (1998). Learning in the museum. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hingant,B., &; Albeb, V. (2010). Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: A review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 121-152.
Hord, S. M. (2004). Professional learning communities: An overview. In S. M. Hord (Ed.), Learning together, leading together: Changing school through professional learning communities (pp. 5-14). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Holmes Group. (1986) Tomorrow's Teacher: A report of the holmes group. East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group, Inc.
Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow’s schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools. East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group, Inc.
Holly, M. L. H., &; Walley, C. (1989). Teachers as professionals. In M. L. Holly &; C. S. McLoughlin (Eds.), Perspectives on the teacher professional development (pp. 14-27). New York, NY: The Falmer Press.
Holt, G. R., &; Morris, A. W. (1993). Activity theory and the analysis of organizations. Human Organization, 52(1), 97–109.
Hong, J. C., Chen, M. Y. &; Hwang, M. Y. (2013). Vitalizing creative learning inscience and technology through an extracurricular club: A perspective based on activity theory. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 45-55.
Hyde, A. A., &; Pink, W. T. (1992). Thinking about effective staff development. In W.T. Pink &; A. A. Hyde (Eds.), Effective staff development for school change (pp. 3-29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Jang, S.J. (2007). Innovations in science teacher education: Effects of integrating technology and team-teaching strategies. Computers &; Education, 51, 646-659.
Johnson, D. W., &; Johnson, R. T. (1995). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129-169.
Kodama, M. (2001). Distance learning using video terminals: An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, 21(3), 227-243.
Kneller, G. F. (1984). Movements of thought in modern education. New York, NY: John Wiley &; Sons.
Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., &; Bryk, A. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis &; S. D. Kruse (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp.23-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lederman, N. G., Gess-Newsome, J., &; Latz, M. S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 129-146.
Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37-71). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., &; Cheng, G. D. (2007). An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners’ factor toward e-learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1906-1920.
Licklider, B. L. (1997). Breaking ranks: Changing the in-service. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ36868.)
Lim,,C. P., Hang, D. (2003). An activity theory approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools. Computers &; Education, 41(1), 49-63.
Liu, S. H. &; Wang, K. H. (2009). Establishing a remote control observation model in teacher education. In G. Siemens &; C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009 (pp. 2443-2447). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Luft, J. A. ( 2001 ). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development program on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517-534.
Loughran, J. (2007). Science teacher as learner. In N. Lederman &; S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of science education (pp. 1043-1066). Philadelphia, PA: Erlbaum.
Machtmes, K., Asher, J. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of telecourses in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 27-46.
Marom-Beth, R., Chajut, E., Roccas, S., &; Sagiv, L. (2003). Internet-assisted versus traditional distance learning environments: factors affecting students’ preferences. The Internet &; Higher Education, 41, 65-76.
Martin, M. (2005), Seeing is believing: the role of videoconferencing in distance learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36 (3), 397-405.
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., &; Urdan, T. C. (1993). Patterns of adaptivelearning survey. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Miettinen, R. (1999). Transcending traditional school leaming: Teachers' work and networks of learning. In Y. Engestrom, R. Mittinen, &; R. Punamliki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 325-344). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, M. G. ,Cookson, P., &; Donaldson, J. (1990). Contemporary issues in American distance education. New York, NY: Pregamom Press.
Murphy, C., Beggs, J., Carlisle, K., &; Greenwood, J. (2004). Students as ‘catalysts’ in the classroom: The impact of co-teaching between science student teachers and primary classroom teachers on children’s enjoyment and learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(8), 1023-1036.
Murphy, C., &; Beggs, J. (2010). A five-year systematic study of coteaching science in 120 primary schools. In C. Murphy &; K. Scantlebury (Eds.), Coteaching in international contexts: Research and practice (pp. 11-34). New York, NY: Springer.
Nardi, B.A.(1998). Concepts of cognition and consciousness: Four voices. Journal of Computer Documentation, 22(1), 31-48.
National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nonaka, I. &; Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Oja, S. N., &; Smulyan, L. (1989). Collaborative action research: A developmental approach. London, England: Falmer.
Pancsofar, N., &; Petroff, J. G. (2013). Professional development experiences in co-teaching associations with teacher confidence, interests, and attitudes. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(2), 83-96.
Peterson, K. D. (1995). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Pintrich, P. R., &; Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Putnam, R. T., &; Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
Rich, D. (1988). Bridging the parent gap in education reform. Educational Horizons, 66, 90-92.
Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Ross, J. A., &; Regan, E. M. (1993). Sharing professional experience: Its impact on professional development. Teaching and Teacher Eduaction, 9(1), 91-106.
Roth, W. M., Tobin, K., Carambo, C. &; Dalland, C. (2004). Coteaching: Creating resources for learning and learning to teach chemistry in urban high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 882-904.
Rytivaara, A. &; Kershner, R. (2012). Co-teaching as a context for teachers' professional learning and joint knowledge construction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 999-1008.
Schank, P., Krajcik, J., &; Yunker, M. (2007). Can nanoscience be a catalyst for educational reform? In F. Allhoff, P. Lin, J. Moor, &; J. Weckert (Eds.), Nanoethics: The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology (pp. 277-290). New Jersey, NJ: Wiley.
Sellers, K., Mackay, C., Bergeson, L. L., Clough, S. R., Hoyt, M., Chen, J., et al. (2009). Nanotechnology and the environment. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Shapter, J., Ford, M., Waclawik, E., &; Maddox, L. M. (2002). Teaching undergraduates nanotechnology. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18, 512–518.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
Stevens, S. Y., Sutherland, L. M., &; Krajcik, J. S. (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering: A guidebook for secondary teachers. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Teitel, L. (1997). Changing teacher education through professional development school partnerships: A five-year follow-up study. Teachers College Record, 99(2), 311-334.
Teitel, L. (2003). The professional development schools handbook: Starting, sustaining, and assessing partnerships that improve student learning. Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press.
Teng, T. L., &; Taveras, M. (2005). Combining live video and audio broadcasting, synchronous chat, and asynchronous open forum discussions in distance education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33(2), 121-129.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., &; Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45-93). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Tuan, H. L., Wang, K. H. , Chang, H. P. , &; Treagust, D. (2000). The development of an instrument for assessing students’ perceptions of teachers’ knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 4(22), 385-398.
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., &; Shieh, S. H. (2005).The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654.
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., Tsai, C. C., &; Cheng, S. F. ( 2005 ). Investigating theeffectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 541-566.
Uden, L. (2007).Activity theory for designing mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 1(1), 81-102.
Upadhyay, B.&; Gifford, A. (2010). Changing lives: Coteaching immigrant students in a middle school science classroom. In C. Murphy &; K. Scantlebury (Eds), Coteaching in international contexts: Research and practice. (pp. 263–278). New York, NY: Springer.
Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54, 143-178.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
Westbrook, T. (l997). Changes in students’ attitudes toward graduate business instruction via interactive television. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(1), 55-69.
Willis, L-D., &; Ritchie, S. M.(2010). Parents as coteachers of science and technology in a middle school classroom. In C. Murphy &; K. Scantlebury (Eds), Coteaching in international contexts: Research and practice. (pp. 281–303). New York, NY: Springer.
Wolf, S. J., &; Fraser, B. J.( 2008 ). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in science education, 38, 321-441.
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C., &; Haudenschild, M. T. (2009). Using activity systems analysis to identify inner contradictions in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 507-517.