臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：高級中學教師對教師評鑑認知之研究
書刊名：教育政策論壇
作者：趙志揚 引用關係／楊寶琴／鄭郁霖／黃新發
作者(外文)：Chao, Chih-yang／Yang, Pao-chin／Cheng, Yu-lin／Huang, Chin-fa
出版日期：2010
卷期：13:2
頁次：頁77-128
主題關鍵詞：高級中學；教師評鑑；德懷術；Delphi technique；Senior high school；Teacher evaluation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:441
  • 點閱點閱:59
摘 要 本研究旨在瞭解高級中等學校教師對實施教師評鑑的看法，與可能發生之困 難，以提供學校在推展教師評鑑工作時的參考。本研究首先以Delphi技術，確立問 卷之內容項目，然後再使用問卷調查為資料蒐集方法，以全國320所高級中學教師 共34,581人為母群，透過分層叢集與隨機的方式，抽取其中86所學校，每校15名教 師，共1,290人進行調查。每校包含教師兼行政人員、學科召集人以及專任教師各 五名。結果共回收有效問卷1,035份，有效回收率為80.23%。經資料分析與整理之 後發現，高級中學教師認為，評鑑的目的主要應以提供教師自我省思，瞭解自己教 學之優缺點為考量；且教師評鑑的結果應用應以書面個別通知教師，並予以保密， 非經教師本人同意不得公開；多數教師認為，教師評鑑實施方式宜以自我評鑑為 主，其次為同儕評鑑；在評鑑資料蒐集的方式上，則以教室觀察法被接受的程度最 高，其次為專家晤談法（專業對話）；在擔任教師評鑑之人員的看法上，以校內任 教同一學科的教師最被接受，其次為專家學者；而評鑑人員應具備的重要素養中， 以能適切地展現教學熱忱為優先考量，其次為能有效地進行教學。在不同背景變項 之高級中學教師對評鑑目的、評鑑結果應用、評鑑實施適當方式、評鑑資料蒐集方 式及評鑑人員來源，以及評鑑人員重要素養各構面的看法上，其中，兼任行政職之 教師、私立學校教師，以及較小規模的學校教師對於評鑑目的、評鑑結果應用、評 鑑實施適當方式、評鑑資料蒐集方式、評鑑人員來源各構面與未兼行政職務、公立 學校及規模較大學校之教師之看法（認同程度）有顯著差異，顯見參與行政工作教 師對教師評鑑的認知程度較高，私立學校因為競爭的關係，較能認知教師評鑑的重要，而學校規模較小的教師因為溝通協調較為容易，對教師評鑑的意涵也較為瞭 解，這些現象與進行其他相關教育政策或改革時的情況相當一致。
Abstract This study aims to investigate senior high school teachers’ perceptions of Teacher Evaluation and the possible difficulties in implementing Teacher Evaluation. In order to accomplish the purposes, the Delphi Technique was used. Opinions regarding the evaluation purposes, methods of data collection, applications of evaluation results, etc. were solicited from 17 experts. A questionnaire survey was also carried out to collect data. 1290 teachers were randomly selected from senior high schools in Taiwan. 1035 responded, yielding a return rate of 80.23%. The main findings of the study were as follows. The main purpose of teacher evaluation was to provide teachers with a means of improving themselves. Evaluation results, which should be sent to individual teachers in written form, should be kept confidential and should not be made public without prior consent of the teachers. Evaluation should be carried out by teachers themselves or by their peers. Evaluation should be based on class observation, preferably, or face-to-face interviews with specialists, less preferably. An ideal evaluator should be a peer teacher or a specialist or researcher in a related field. Essential qualities of an ideal evaluatorincluded first, enthusiasm for teaching, and second, ability to teach effectively. The results of the questionnaire survey were found to vary according to the backgrounds of the respondents, specifically in terms of whether they had administrative duties, attended more training courses on teacher evaluation, taught at a private school, or taught at a small school, which were all found to contribute to a better understanding of Teacher Evaluation. These results accorded with those found in studies on other educational reforms.
期刊論文
1.湯誌龍(20011200)。中小學教師評鑑制度之研究--澳洲維多利亞省的實施經驗。比較教育，51，105-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Olina, Z.、Sulivan, H. J.(2004)。Student self-evaluation, teacher evaluation, and learner performance。Educational Technology Research and Development，52(3)，5-22。  new window
3.Young, I. P.、Delli, D. A.、Johnson, L.(1999)。Student evaluation of faculty: Effects of purpose on pattern。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education，13(2)，179-190。  new window
4.Krueger, J. M.(2004)。A top-down approach for collateral evaluation: Review of teacher peer assistance and review and mentoring programs for new teachers: Models of induction and support。Journal of Teacher Education，55(5)，476-479。  new window
5.Ribas, W. B.(2000)。Ascending the ELPS to excellence in your district’s teacher evaluation。Phi Delta Kappan，81，585-593。  new window
6.Linde, C. H.(1999)。Clinical supervision in teacher evaluation: A pivotal factor in the quality management of education。Education，119(2)，328-334。  new window
7.Desander, M. K.(2002)。Teacher evaluation and merit pay: Legal considerations, practical concerns。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education，14(4)，307-317。  new window
8.陳富銘(2002)。教師評鑑的六W。屏縣教育季刊，11，24-27。  延伸查詢new window
9.Schiller, S. A.、Taylor,M. M.、Gates, P. S.(2004)。Teacher evaluation within a community of truth:Testing the ideas of Parker Palmer。Innovative Higher Eduation，28(3)，163-186。  new window
10.Odden, A.(2004)。Lessons leaned about standards-based teacher evaluation systems。Peabody Journal of Education，79(4)，126-137。  new window
11.張德銳(2004)。專業發展導向教師評鑑與與教學導師制度芻議。師友月刊，447，6-11。  延伸查詢new window
12.Loup, K. S.、Garland, J. S.、Ellett, C. D.、Rugutt, J. K.(1996)。Ten years later: Findings from a republication of a study of teacher evaluation practices in our 100 largest school districts。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education，10(3)，203-226。  new window
13.吳和堂(20021200)。認識教師評鑑。師友月刊，426，16-19。  延伸查詢new window
14.吳和堂(20020600)。論析美國加州San Bernardino學區教師評鑑的特色。教育學刊，18，113-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.謝文全(19990400)。教學視導的意義與原則--並以英國教學視導制為例。課程與教學，2(2)，1-14+137。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.張德銳(2004)。專業發展導向教師評鑑的規範與推動策略。教育資料集刊，29，169-193。  延伸查詢new window
17.吳和堂、李明堂、李清良(20021200)。國小教師評鑑實施之國際比較研究。比較教育，53，29-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.陳聖謨(19980600)。美國教師評鑑制度的發展及其對我國的啟示。教育研究(高師)，6，175-189。  延伸查詢new window
19.Danielson, C.(2001)。New Trends in teacher evaluation。Educational Leadership，58(5)，12-15。  new window
20.Greenwood, G. E.、Ramagli, H. J.(1980)。Alternatives to student ratings of college teaching。Journal of Higher Education，51(6)，673-682。  new window
21.羅清水(19990200)。教師專業發展的另一途徑--談教師評鑑制度的建立。研習資訊，16(1)，1-10。  延伸查詢new window
22.張德銳(20060400)。形成性教師評鑑系統的研發、推廣、研究與實施展望。初等教育學刊，23，1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Darling-Hammond, L.、Wise, A. E.、Pease, S. R.(1983)。Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature。Review of Educational Research，53(3)，285-328。  new window
24.歐陽教、張德銳(19930300)。教師評鑑模式之研究。教育研究資訊，1(2)，90-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.簡紅珠(19970100)。專業導向的教師評鑑。北縣教育，16，19-22。  延伸查詢new window
26.徐美惠、高熏芳(19960400)。重視教師評鑑落實「教評會」功能。臺灣教育，544，11-19。  延伸查詢new window
27.黃政傑(20030700)。學校課程評鑑的概念與方法。課程與教學，6(3)，1-20+174。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.翁麗芳(20061200)。日本的教育改革。教育資料集刊，32，41-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.顏國樑(20030800)。教師評鑑的基本理念、問題及作法。教育研究月刊，112，62-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Stake, R. E.(1967)。The countenance of educational evaluation。Teachers College Record，68(7)，523-540。  new window
31.吳政達(20030800)。國民中小學教師評鑑政策之可行性評估。初等教育學刊，15，頁83-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.湯誌龍(2001)。中小學教師評鑑制度之研究：澳洲維多利亞省的實施經驗。比較教育，51，105-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Haynes, G., Wragg, T., Wragg, C.,、Chamberlin, R.(2003)。Performance management for teachers: Headteachers' perspectives。School Leadership & Management，23(1)，75-89。  new window
34.Manatt, R. P.、Benway, M.(1998)。Teacher and administrator performance evaluation: Benefits of 360-degree feedback。ERS Spectrum，16(2)，18-23。  new window
35.Spooren, P.、Mortelmans, D.(2006)。Teacher professionalism and student evaluation of teacher: Will better teachers receive higher ratings and will better students give higher ratings?。Educational Studies，32(2)，201-214。  new window
36.Haynes, G.、Wragg, T.、Wragg, C.、Chamberlin, R.(2003)。Performance management for teachers: Headteachers' perspectives。School Leadership & Management，23(1)，75-89。  new window
37.Spooren, P.、Mortelmans, D.(2006)。Teacher professionalism and student evaluation of teacher: Will better teachers receive higher ratings and will better students give higher ratings?。Educational Studies，32(2)，201-214。  new window
38.Manatt, R. P.、Benway, M.(1998)。Teacher and administrator performance evaluation: Benefits of 360-degree feedback。ERS Spectrum，16(2)，18-23。  new window
會議論文
1.蔡清華、張麗麗(1997)。「教學檔案」在國小實習教師專業成長與評鑑上的應用。「八十六年度國科會教育革新整合型研究計畫成果分析」研討會，行政院國家科學委員會 (會議日期: 1997/10/14-10/17)。高雄：國立高雄師範大學教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
2.張新仁(2004)。中小學教師教學評鑑工具之發展編製。教育評鑑回顧與展望學術研討會，國立台灣師範大學教育研究中心主辦 。台北市：國立台灣師範大學。41-55。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃新發(2007)。我國高級中等學校辦理教師專業發展評鑑初探：新制度論觀點。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊深坑、黃淑玲與楊洲松(2005)。我國中小學教師素質管理機制之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃新發(2007)。我國高級中等學校辦理教師專業發展評鑑初探：新制度論觀點。台北。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊深坑、黃淑玲、楊洲松(2005)。我國中小學教師素質管理機制之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.張德銳、張芬芬、邱錦昌、張明輝、熊曣、萬家春、鄭玉卿、葉興華、張嘉育、高紅瑛、李俊達(2002)。臺北市中小學教學輔導教師制度九十學年度實施成效評鑑報告。臺北市：臺北市教育局。  延伸查詢new window
2.歐陽教、高強華、王秋絨、李春芳、張德銳(1992)。教師評鑑模式之研究。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.江文雄(1982)。國民小學實施教學評鑑之研究。南投。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.沈宜純(2007)。身心障礙類特殊教育教師評鑑指標意見調查及其應用之研究：以高雄縣市為例(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學，台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱傳森(2008)。國民中學教師評鑑制度之研究─以台中縣為例(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊筱慈(2000)。「國中物理教師教室觀察評鑑工具」效化暨學生評鑑教師教學可行性之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃怡萍(2008)。台中市國民中學教師對教師評鑑與教師自我效能之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.李明怡(2006)。宜蘭縣國民小學實施學校本位教師評鑑之研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學，花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳佳鋐(2008)。彰化縣國小教師對教師評鑑看法之研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳金柳(2005)。教師評鑑指標建構之研究-以臺中縣立高級中學為例(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.許芯瑜(2007)。臺灣與中國大陸中小學教師評鑑制度之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃怡華(2006)。私立高級中學實施教師評鑑策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.謝麗貞(2007)。國小教師參與教師評鑑態度與教學效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.戴佑全(20000000)。台北縣市國民小學教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」意見調查之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉寶貴(2002)。我國高職教師評鑑實施之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.蘇秋永(1996)。高中教師評鑑之研究：高中教師自我評鑑量表之發展(碩士論文)。淡江大學，臺北縣。  延伸查詢new window
14.徐敏榮(2002)。國民小學教師評鑑規準之研究(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院，屏東。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳玉鳳(2003)。國民中學教師專業評鑑規準之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
16.林江河(2003)。高雄市國中教師對教師專業評鑑相關議題之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
17.許芳梅(2005)。建構臺北市公立高中教師評鑑制度之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
18.劉文輝(2002)。高職教師對教師評鑑態度調查之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
19.廖玉珠(2005)。建構我國中小學教師評鑑規準之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
20.林雪美(2007)。屏東縣國中教師對教師評鑑態度之研究(碩士論文)。高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
21.吳政達(1999)。國民小學教師評鑑指標體系建構之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Kuligowski, B. A. T.(1991)。A study of teacher evaluation criteria, process, and outcome in North Carolina and Tennessee。The University of North Carolina，Chapel Hill。  new window
圖書
1.Department for Education and Employment(2000)。Performance management in schools: Performance management framework。London, England：Department for Education and Employment。  new window
2.台北縣政府教育局(2006)。教學精進、專業昇華--台北縣試辦教師專業發展評鑑實施計畫。台北縣：台北縣政府教育局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service(1986)。Teachers dispute AC AS independent panel: Report of the appraisal and training working group。London：ACAS CAI。  new window
4.Department for Education and Skills(2006)。2020 Vision: Report of the teaching and learning in 2020 review group。London：Department for Education and Skills。  new window
5.Scriven, M.(1973)。Educational Evolution: Theory and Practice。Belmont, C.A：Wadsworth。  new window
6.趙志揚、黃曙東、楊寶琴與江惠真(2009)。規劃普通高中各學科教師專業發展評鑑規準。台北：黎明技術學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.Arreola, R. A.(2000)。Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A handbook for college faculty and administrators on designing and operating a comprehensive faculty evaluation system。Bolton, MA：Anker Publishing Company。  new window
8.Tucker, P. D.、Stronge, J. H.(2005)。Linking Teacher Evaluation and Student Learning。Alexandria, VA：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development(ASCD)。  new window
9.Training and Development Agency for Schools(2007)。Professional standards for teachers qualified teacher status.。London, UK：Training and Development Agency for Schools。  new window
10.Scriven, M.(1991)。The evaluation thesaurus。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
11.Cogan, Morris L.(1973)。Clinical Supervision。Boston, MA：Houghton Mifflin。  new window
12.郭昭佑(2003)。學校本位評鑑。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Beerens, D. R.(1999)。Evaluating teachers for professional growth: Creating a culture of motivation and learning。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin。  new window
14.呂木琳(2002)。教學視導--理論與實務。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Stake, R. E.(1975)。Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach。Columbus, OH：Merrill。  new window
16.吳清山、林天祐(2003)。教育小辭書。臺北市：國立教育資料館。  延伸查詢new window
17.Wise, A. E.、Darling-Hammond, L.、McLaughlin, M. W.、Bernstein, H. T.(1984)。Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices。Santa Monica, CA：Rand。  new window
18.Nevo, David(1995)。School-based evaluation: A dialogue for school improvement。Tel Aviv：Masada。  new window
19.Seyfarth, J. T.(1991)。Personnel management for effective school。Boston：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
20.Stufflebeam, D. L.、Foley, W. J.、Guba, E. G.、Hammond, R. L.、Merriman, H. O.、Provus, M. M.、Gephart, W. J.(1971)。Educational evaluation and decision making。Illinois：P.E., peacock Publishing。  new window
21.Harris, B. M.、Hill, J.(1982)。The DeTEK handbook。National Educational Laboratory publishers, Inc。  new window
22.Wragg, E. C.(1988)。Teacher appraisal: A practical guide。London：Macmillan Education。  new window
23.Bollington, Rob、Hopkins, David、West, Mel(1990)。An introduction to teacher appraisal: A professional development approach。Cassell educational Ltd.。  new window
24.McColskey, W.、Egelson, P.(1993)。Designing teacher evaluation systems that support professional growth。Washington, DC：Office of Educational Research and Improvement。  new window
25.Shinkfield, A. J.、Stufflebeam, D. L.(1995)。Teacher Evaluation: Guide to Effective Practice。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
26.Goldhammer, R.(1969)。Clinical supervision。New York：Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
27.楊文雄(1980)。教育評鑑之理論與實際。台中縣：台灣省政府教育廳。  延伸查詢new window
28.McGreal, T. L.(1983)。Successful teacher evalutation。Alexandria, Virginia：ASCD。  new window
29.McGreal, Thomas L.(1983)。Successful teacher evaluation。Alexandria, Virginia：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
30.高強華(1996)。教師評鑑的基本認識。師資培育問題研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
31.Kuligowski, B. A. T.(1991)。A study of teacher evaluation criteria, process, and outcome in North Carolina and Tennessee。unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina。Chapel Hill。  new window
32.Natriello, G(1990)。Intended and uniitended consequences: Purpose and effects of teacher evaluation。The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teacher。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
33.江文雄(1982)。國民小學實施教學評鑑之研究。南投。  延伸查詢new window
34.高強華(1996)。教師評鑑的基本認識。師資培育問題研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
35.Dressel, P. L.(1977)。Evaluation。The international encyclopedia of higher education, 1480。San Francisco, CA。  new window
36.Natriello, G.(1990)。Intended and unintended consequences:Purpose and effects of teacher evaluation。The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teacher。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2001)。2001年教育改革之檢討與改進會議，http://www.edu.tw/content.aspx?site_content_sn=1360， 20090328。  延伸查詢new window
2.U. S. Department of Education(2007)。Building on results: A blueprint for strengthening the no child left behind act，Washington, DC：U. S. Department of Education。，http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/nclb/buildingonresults.pdf， 2012/09/04。  new window
3.教育部(2009)。教育部補助辦理教師專業發展評鑑實施計畫，http://www.edu.tw/files_temp/regulation/B0043/980204-1%a5%fe%a4%e5%ad%d7%a5%bf%alq%a9w%ae%d7%a4%bd%a5%ac%alr.doc， 20061225。  new window
4.教育部(2009)。教師專業發展評鑑網：參與學校人數統計，http://tpde.nhcue.edu.tw/censusfile.jsp， 20090912。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bush, G.(2002)。No Child Left Behind Act of 2001，http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf， 20061215。  new window
6.Creative Research Systems(2007)。Sample size calculator，http://www.surveysystem.com/ssformu.htm， 20070309。  new window
7.Commission on Teacher Credentialing(2009)。Teaching performance assessment in California，http://www.pacttpa.org/_files/Main/CalTPAPromo-Parent.pdf， 20090909。  new window
8.Department for Children, Schools and Families(2007)。Model performance management policy for school，http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/_doc/11093/PM%20Model%20policy%20FINAL%20Mar%2007.doc， 20090610。  new window
9.Department of Education, Science and Training(2005)。Key policies，http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/policy_initiatives_reviews/key_issues/vocational_education_in_schools/key_policies.htm， 20061222。  new window
10.National Board for Professional Teaching Standards(1987)。What teachers should know and be able to do?，http://www.nbpts.org/UserFiles/File/what_teachers.pdf， 20081214。  new window
11.Scriven, M.，Wheeler, P.，Haertel, G.(2004)。Teacher evaluation kit: Complete glossary，http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/ess/glossary/glossary.htm， 20070114。  new window
12.Western Michigan University, The Evaluation Center(2006)。Teacher evaluation kit complete glossary，http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/， 20061225。  new window
13.Department for Education and Skills(2001)。Performance management in schools: Model performance management policy，http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/DfES%200051%20200MIG1841.pdf， 20071110。  new window
圖書論文
1.Iwanicki, E. F.(1990)。Teacher evaluation for school improvement。The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers。Newbury Park, California：Sage Publications。  new window
2.Wise, A. E.、Gendler, T.(1990)。Governance issues in the evaluation of elementary and secondary school teachers。The new handbook of teacher evaluation : Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers。Newbury Park：Sage。  new window
3.Winter, R.(1989)。Problems in teacher appraisal: An action-research solution。Rethinking Appraisal and Assessment。Bristol, PA：Open University Press。  new window
4.吳清山(1990)。臨床視導在教育實習上的應用。師範教育政策與問題。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
5.傅木龍(1995)。英國中小學教師評鑑制度研究。教育評鑑。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃坤錦(1995)。從教師專業論教師評鑑。教育評鑑。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
7.張德銳(1992)。國民小學教師評鑑之研究。教育專業。臺北：師大師苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Dressel, P. L.(1977)。Evaluation。The international encyclopedia of higher education, 1480。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：985（臺灣：972，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67661664
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上