:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民小學學習領域課程領導之研究
作者:蔡宗河
作者(外文):Tsai Tsung Ho
校院名稱:國立新竹教育大學
系所名稱:教育學系博士班
指導教授:陳惠邦
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2008
主題關鍵詞:教育領導課程領導學習領域課程領導學科領導中層領導分散式領導微觀政治educational leadershipcurriculum leadershipcurriculum leadership within learning areassubject leadershipmiddle leadershipdistributed leadershipmicro-political
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:73
本研究旨在瞭解國民小學學習領域課程領導的內容與功能、領域召集人在課程領導過程中所扮演的角色、領域過程所出現的微觀過程,以及國內現階段領域課程領導所面臨的困難。為瞭解上述問題,本研究採取文獻分析,瞭解國內外的相關論述或研究,並且訪談領域召集人、校長與部分的教師,以瞭解領域課程領導的應然與實然,及其間可能的落差。
經由本研究發現,學習領域課程領導的內涵豐富、層面廣泛;學習領域課程領導功能兼顧效能與關係取向;學習領域召集人的角色雖多元但並未完全落實;領域課程領導過程中,校長與領域召集人均有其意識型態或利益的考量;領域課程領導過程中,相關人員運用不同的策略以影響彼此;領域召集人推動課程領導時所遭遇的問題包含結構、人與文化三個層面。最後,本研究對相關教育機關或人士,提出具體的建議,希望有助於實踐學習領域課程領導。
The purposes of this study are to understand the curriculum leadership within learning areas in elementary schools, including the content and functions of the curriculum leadership within learning areas, the roles played by the learning areas conveners, as well as the micro-political and the confronted difficulties in the process of the curriculum leadership. In order to project insight into these questions, this study not only draws on the analysis of literature with a view to portraying its genuine image of both domestic and foreign areas at this issue, but also interviews lots of experienced conveners, principals, and teachers in the hope to discover the being, should-be and the gaps between both in terms of the curriculum leadership within learning areas.
There are several findings in this study. First of all, the content of curriculum leadership within learning areas is comprehensive and multi-dimensional. Secondly, the functions of curriculum leadership within learning areas are both effective-oriented and relations-directed. Thirdly, the roles of the conveners are indeed multiple by name but are not entirely fulfilled in reality. Fourthly, individual ideologies or considerations about interests play an important role on both principals and conveners during the process of curriculum leadership. Fifthly, principals and conveners appeal to a lot of strategies to influence each other. Finally, the confronted difficulties mainly focus on three categorical dimensions such as structure, a people, and culture, during the time when conveners carry out the curriculum leadership. In conclusion, the study recommends some significant suggestions for both institutions and people concerned to realize the curriculum leadership within learning areas in elementary schools.
丁金松(2001)。國小「自然與生活科技」學習領域課程決定之行動研究。國 立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
王永進(2003)。學校領域教學研究會的運作及其功能。台灣師範大學物理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
方德隆(2001)。學校本位課程發展的理論基礎。課程與教學季刊,4(2),1-24。new window
王麗雲、潘慧玲(2000)。教師彰權益能的概念與實施策略。教育研究集刊,44,173-199。new window
李定國(2002)。國小校長領導課程發展之行動研究:以三年級社會學習領域為例。花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
李安明(譯)(2003)。W. K. Hoy, & C. G.. Miskel著。學校領導。輯於林明地等(譯),教育行政學:理論、研究與實際 (頁491-538)(Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice)(6th ed.)。台北:麥格羅希爾。
李旭民(2007)。教務組長課程領導的行動研究,輯於蔡清田(編著),學校本位課程發展的新猷與教務課程領導 (頁1271-195)。台北:五南。new window
李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬(譯)(2002)。S. P. Robbins著。組織行政學(第二版修訂)(Organizational behavior (9th ed.))。台北:華泰文化。
李隆盛(2003)。學習領域召集人的教學領導。師友,427,1-3。
吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(1995)。M. Q. Patton著。質的評鑑與研究(Qualitative evaluation and research methods)。台北,桂冠。
吳明清(1991)。教育研究:基本觀念及方法分析。台北,五南。
吳清山、林天祐(2004)。教育新辭書。台北:高等教育。
吳靖國(2005)。從海德格Einspringen與Vorausspringen的區別論師生關係。師大學報,50(2),33-54。new window
何泰昇(2003)。校長課程領導之個案研究-以桃園縣一所國中為例。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林天祐(2005)。教育倫理準則。教育研究月刊,132,70-86。new window
林君齡(2001)。國民中學學校教師會運作之微觀政治個案研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
林明地(2000)。校長教學領導實際:一所國小的參與觀察。教育研究集刊,44,143-172。new window
林佩璇(2000)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。輯於中正大學教育學研究所(主編),質的研究方法 (頁199-221)。高雄:麗文。
林逸青(2002)。國中校長權力運作策略、衝突管理策略與學校效能之關係:微觀政治分析。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所博士論文,未出版。new window
林曜聖(2003)。權力運作與衝突處理中的學校政治行為:校園微觀政治之概念、分析架構與方法。學校行政雙月刊,25,64-76。
周曉葶(2002)。學校課程發展委員會組織與運作之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
胡士琳(2003)。學校行政體系之微觀政治現象研究:以一所國民中學為例。台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
范振倫(2004)。國小教師參與學校課程發展委員會決定的角色研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
夏林清(譯)(2000)。C. Argyris, R. Putnam, & D. M. Smith著。行動科學(Action science)。臺北市:遠流。
徐超聖(1997)。校長的課程與教學領導與教師專業自主性之發展。發表於國立台北師範學院主辦之「開放社會中的學校教育」學術研討會 (頁17-26)。台北:國立台北師範學院。
徐超聖(1998)。發揮校長的課程領導落實九年一貫課程的實施。發表於國立台北師範學院主辦之「自主與卓越:九年一貫課程的變革與展望」學術研討會 (頁27-56)。台北:國立台北師範學院。
高敬文(1999)。質化研究方法論。台北:師大書苑。
高新建、游家政、蔡清田、張明輝、王麗雲(譯)(2000)。J. G. Henderson & R. D. Hawthorne著。革新的課程領導(transformative curriculum leadership)(2nd ed.)。台北:學富文化。new window
秦夢群、吳勁甫、濮世緯(2007)。校長轉型、交易領導與教師工作滿意關係之後設分析。教育與心理研究,30(4),27-55。new window
席榮維(2005)。以微觀政治觀點分析校長的教學視導。學校行政雙月刊,36,17-25。
郭丁熒(2003)。教師的多維影像:教師角色之社會學論述。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(2),161-182。new window
郭進隆(譯)(1994)。P. Senge著。第五項修練:學習型組織的藝術與實務(The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization)。台北:天下文化。
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北:教育部。new window
張乃文(2005)。台北縣國小教育人員情緒勞務負荷與工作倦怠關係之研究。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文,未出版。
張乃文、蔡宗河(2007)。分散式領導:以教師領導為例。發表於2007年華人社會的教育發展系列研討會:教師教育。澳門:澳門大學。2007年3月30日~4月1日。
張志豪(2004)。國中自然與生活科技學習領域召集人角色與職責之研究。台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
張春興(1991)。現代心理學。台北:東華。
張建成(2002)。批判的教育社會學研究。台北:學富文化。
張嘉育(2001,12月)。課程領導概念內涵分析。發表於「課程領導理論與實務」國際學術研討會論文集 (頁141-154)。台北:市立台北師範學院,12月12-13日。
陳文彥(2002)。教師與家長之微觀政治學分析。教育研究資訊,10(2),183-198。new window
陳向明(2002)。教師如何作質的研究。台北:洪葉文化。
陳幸仁(2007)。微觀政治學:一個學校行政的新興研究領域。教育行政與評鑑學刊,3,67-86。new window
陳昇飛(2005)。社會建構主義在國小語文教學之實踐:社會互動教學與語文能力建構歷程之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。new window
陳美如、郭昭佑(2003)。課程評鑑者角色之研究:併論內外部課程評鑑功能最大化途徑。南師學報,37(2),129-148。new window
陳美伶(2002)。教務主任的課程領導之個案研究:以一個國小教務主任推動學校本位課程發展為例。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陳惠邦(1998)。教育行動研究。台北:師大書苑。
陳惠邦(2004)。行動研究在台灣教育研究場域中的發展與反思,輯於潘慧玲(主編),教育研究方法論:觀點與方法 (頁433-451)。台北:心理。
陳榮昌(2004)。國民小學教務主任課程領導行為之調查研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陳慕賢(2003)。國民小學校長課程領導與教師教學效能關係之研究:以臺北縣為例。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
陳靜宜(2006)。如履薄冰或大步邁進:一位國小教務主任課程領導的自我敘說探究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
黃乃熒(2005)。學校組織變革之意識型態研究:以一所國民中學為例。師大學報:教育類,50(1),101-121。new window
黃光雄(1988)。教學的一般模式。輯於黃光雄(主編),教學原理 (頁 71-79)。台北:師大書苑。
黃旭鈞(2003)。課程領導:理論與實務。台北:心理。
黃宗顯(1999)。學校行政對話研究:組織中影響力行為的微觀探討。台北:五南。new window
黃宗顯、湯堯、林明地(譯)(2003)。W. K. Hoy, & C. G.. Miskel著。學校的權力與政治學。輯於林明地等(譯),教育行政學:理論、研究與實際 (頁271-318)(Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice)(6th ed.)。台北:麥格羅希爾。
黃政傑(1987)。課程評鑑。台北:師大書苑。
黃瑞琴(1991)。質的教育研究方法。台北,心理。
彭國楨(2003)。九年一貫課程變革行動研究:一所國小課程發展委員會運作的探究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
黃超陽(2003)。國小校長課程領導行為之研究-以花蓮縣實施九年一貫課程為例。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
黃善美(2002)。自然與生活科技學習領域課程小組的任務與運作初探。教師之友,43(5),26-32。
黃嘉雄(2002)。九年一貫課程改革的省司與實踐。台北:心理。
葉淑儀(譯)(1999)。L. Lambert, D. Walker, D. P. Zimmerman, J. E. Cooper, M. D. Lambert, M. E. Gardner, & P. J. F. Slack著。教育領導:建構論的觀點(The constructivist leader)。台北:桂冠。
葉興華(2001,12月)。從課程領導者的角色期望談我國國小校長課程領導之困境與展望。發表於「課程領導理論與實務」國際學術研討會論文集 (頁155-178)。台北:市立台北師範學院,12月12-13日。new window
甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務:解構與重建。台北:高等教育。
甄曉蘭、簡良平(2002)。學校本位課程發展權力重整問題之批判分析。教育研究集刊,48(1),65-93。new window
臺北縣政府(2001)。臺北縣公私立國民中小學課程發展委員會設置要點。九十北府教學字第185130號函,90年5月20日。
歐用生(1989)。質的研究。台北:師大書苑。
歐用生(2004)。課程領導:議題與展望。台北:高等教育。
歐自偉(2003)。國小社會學習領域課程小組課程決定之個案研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
鄭伯壎(1995)。家長權威與領導行為之關係:一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,79期,119-173。new window
蔡宗河(2003)。國民中小學基本能力檢定之探討。中等教育,54(2),130-140。new window
蔡宗河(2005a)。英國學科領導人標準對我國教師專業發展的啟示。教育研究集刊,51(3),101-133。new window
蔡宗河(2005b,5月)。英國學科領導人標準對我國課程領導的啟示。發表於第12屆課程與教學論壇,社會重建課程的理念與實踐:覺醒、增能與行動國際學術研討會。台北市:台北市立師範學院。2005年5月13、14日。new window
蔡宗河(2005c,11月)。從校長角色的改變析論校長領導的培育:以英國新國家校長標準為例。發表於第4屆台灣博士生教育行政學術論文研討會 (頁21-44)。台南市:國立台南大學。2005年11月19日。new window
蔡宗河(2006a)。學校組織之中層管理:以英國學科層級之課程領導為例。教育政策論壇,9(3),99-127。new window
蔡宗河(2006b)。教師課程立論初探。課程與教學季刊,9(4),79-99。new window
蔡宗河(2007)。英國學科領導人標準的分析:脈絡課程的觀點。課程研究,2(2),65-89。new window
蔡宗河(2008)。後結構文本的課程論述、批判及跨越。課程與教學季刊,11(2),127-154。new window
蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。台北:五南。
蔡清田(2004)。校長課程領導的理念、角色與策略。輯於單文經(主編),課程與教學新論 (頁187-209)。台北:心理。
蔡清田(編著)(2005)。課程領導與學校本位課程發展。台北:五南。new window
蔡清田(編著)(2005)。學校本位課程發展的新猷與教務課程領導。台北:五南。new window
蔡清田、蘇美麗(2005)。校長課程領導角色之理念與實際。輯於蔡清田(編著),課程領導與學校本位課程發展 (頁115-159)。台北:五南。new window
蔡清田、陳美伶(2004)。教務主任課程領導之理論探究與實際發展。輯於教育部(主編),國民中小學九年一貫課程理論基礎 (頁340-356)。台北:教育部。
蔡進雄(2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、交易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。new window
蔡進雄(2004)。揮別英雄式領導:論後英雄式領導在學校行政上之應用。教育研究月刊,117,90-100。new window
蔡進雄(2005)。學校領導理論研究。台北:師大書苑。
潘慧貞(2001)。國民小學校長課程領導角色與任務之研究-以盛世國小為例。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
賴志峰(2007)。學校領導的因素、實踐與效果:以一所特許學校的經驗為例。當代教育研究,15(4),93-28。new window
賴志峰(2008)。一所公辦民營國民中小學課程領導之研究:課程領導者的基本信念、實際作為與具體效果。教育政策論壇,11(1),107-145。new window
盧周杏珠(2005)。國民中學教務主任課程領導之研究。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文,未出版。
錢俊(譯)(1995)。Hubert L Dreyfus & Paul Rabinow(編)。傅柯:超越結構主義與詮釋學(Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics)。台北:桂冠。
簡紅珠(1988)。教學研究的趨勢。輯於黃光雄(主編),教學原理 (頁423-449)。台北:師大書苑。new window
簡紅珠(1992)。教學研究的主要派典及其啟示之探析。高雄:復文。new window
簡紅珠、蔡宗河(2006)。從全球化的觀點省思教學效能的研究。輯於中華民國課程與教學學會(主編),課程教學的本土化與全球化 (頁159-192)。高雄:復文。
顏惠君(2005)。學習領域課程小組課程決定之個案研究--以國中語文領域國,文科為例。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
謝文全(1985)。教育行政:理論與實務。台北:文景。
譚彩鳳(2007)。學科領導在課程改革中的角色:香港個案研究。課程研究,3(1),109-138。
羅虞村(1999)。領導理論研究(第五版)。台北:文景。
蘇永明(2006)。主體的爭議與教育:以現代和後現代哲學為範圍。台北市:心理。new window
蘇美麗(2003)。國小校長課程領導角色與策略之研究。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
顧為元(2008)。轉型領導對組織公民行為影響之研究:以組織承諾為中介變項。教育與心理研究,31(1),205-231。new window
龔素丹(2002)。台北縣國民小學校長課程領導行為及困難之調查研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
Achinstein, B. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 421-455.
Achinstein, B. (2006). New teacher and mentor political literacy: Reading, navigating and transforming induction context. Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(2), 123-138.
Agrawal, M. (2004). Curricular reform in schools: the importance of evaluation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(3), 367-379.
Anderson, G. L. (1991). Cognitive politics of principals and teachers. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict and cooperation (pp. 120-138). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Angus, L. (1989). New leadership and possibility of educational reform. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Critical perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 63-92). London: Falmer Press.
Appleby, R. (1997). A middle management course: Professional development or manipulation? Teacher Development, 1(2), 293-306.
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. M. (1985). Action science. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
Aubrey-Hopkins, J., & James, C. (2002). Improving practice in subject departments: The experience of secondary school subject leaders in Wales. School Leadership & Management, 22(3), 305-320.
Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
Ball, S. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school. London: Metheun.
Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in policy sociology. London: Routledge.
Bell, D., & Ritchie, R. (1999). Toward effective subject leadership in the primary school. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bennet, C., & Downes, P. (1998). Leading parents to fuller involvement. Managing in Education., 12(5), 12-14.
Bennett, N. (1999). Middle management in secondary school: Introduction. School Leadership & Management, 19(3), 289-292.
Bennett, N., Newton, W., Wise, C., Woods, P. A., & Economou, A. (2003). The rule and purpose of middle leaders in school. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P., & Harvey, J. A. (2003). Distributed leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Bennett, N., Woods, P., Wise, C., & Newton, W. (2007). Understandings of middle leadership in secondary schools: A review of empirical research. School Leadership & Management, 27(5), 453-470.
Bishop, P., & Mulford, B. (1999). When will they ever learn?: Another failure of centrally-imposed change. School Leadership & Management, 19(2), 179-187.
Blandford, S. (1997). Middle management in school: How to harmonise managing and teaching for and effective school. London: Financial Times Pitman.
Blandford, S. (2006). Middle leadership in school: Harmonising leadership and learning (2nd ed.). London: Person Education.
Blase, J. (1988). The politics of favoritism: A qualitative analysis of the teachers’ perspective. Educational administration Quarterly, 24(2), 152-177.
Blase, J. (1989). The micropolitical of the school: the everyday political orientation of teachers toward open school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(4), 377-407.
Blase, J. (Ed.) (1991). The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict and cooperation. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Blase, J., & Anderson, G. L. (1995). The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment. London: Cassell.
Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2002). The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 6-44.
Blenkin, G. M., Edwards, G., & Kelly, A. V. (1997). Perspectives on educational change. In A. Harris, N. Bennett & M. Preedy (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness and improvement in education (pp. 216-230). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Borich, Gary. D. (1996). Effective teaching methods (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Bradley, M. K., Kallick, B. & Regan, H. B. (1991). The staff development manager: A guide to professional growth. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Brandes, D., & Ginnis, P. (1990). The student centred school: Ideas for practical visionaries. Oxford: Blackwell.
Briggs, A., & Burton, N. (2001). The management of resources for learing. In D. Middlewood & N. Burton (Eds.), Managing the curriculum (pp. 204-216). London: Paul Chapman.
Brown, M. Rutherford, D. (1998). Changing roles and raising standards: New challenges for heads of department. School Leadership & Management, 18(1), 75-88.
Brown, M., Rutherford, D., & Boyle, B. (2000). Leadership for school improvement: The role of the head of department in UK secondary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(2), 237-258.
Burch, P. (2007). School leadership practice and the school subject: The Baxter case. In J. P. Spillane & J. B.Diamond (Eds.), Distributed leadership in practice (pp 129-145). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Bruner, J. (1985). Narrative and paradigmatic modes of thought. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching: The ways of knowing (pp. 97-115). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Burns, T. (1961). Micropolitics: Mechanisms of institutional change. Administration Science Quarterly, 6, 257-281.
Burton, N. (2004). Financial resource management. In M. Brundrett & I. Terrell (Eds.), Learning to lead in the secondary school: Becoming an effective head of department (pp. 169-181). London: Routledgefalmer.
Burton, N., & Brundrett, M. (2005). Leading the curriculum in the primary school. London: Paul Chapman.
Bush, T. (1997). Collegial models. In A. Harris, N. Bennett & M. Preedy (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness and improvement in education (pp. 68-79). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bush, T. (2003). Theories of educational leadership and management (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Bush, T., Bell, L., Bolam, R., Glatter, R., & Ribbins, P. (Eds.). (1999). Educational management: Redefining theory, policy and practice. London: Paul Chapman.
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2003). School leadership: Concepts and evidence. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Busher, H. (2001). The micro-politics of change, improvement and effectiveness in schools. In A. Harris & N. Bennett (Eds.), School effectiveness and school improvement (pp. 75-97). London: Continuum.
Busher, H. (2005). Being a middle leader: Exploring professional identities. School Leadership & Management, 25(1), 137-154.
Busher, H. (2006). Understanding educational leadership: People, power and culture. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Busher, H., Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Turner, C. (2007). Making sense of middle leadership: Community, power and practice. School Leadership & Management, 27(5), 405-422.
Busher, H., & Harris, A. (1999). Leadership of school subject areas: Tensions and dilemmas of managing in the middle. School Leadership & Management, 19(3), 305-317.
Busher, H., Harris, A., & Wise, C. (2000). Subject leadership and school improvement. London: Paul Chapman.
Caldwell, B. J. (1997). The impact of self-management and self-government on professional cultures of teaching: A strategic analysis for the twenty-first century. In A. Hargreaves & R. Evans (Eds.), Beyond educational reform: Bringing Teachers back in (pp. 62-76). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Campbell, J., & Neill, S. R. (1997). Managing teachers’ time under systemic reform. In T. Bush & D. Middlewood (Eds.), Managing people in education (pp. 93-112). London: Paul Chapman.
Chapman, C. (2003). Building the leadership capacity for school improvement: A case study. In A. Harris, C. Day, M. Hadfield, D. Hopkins, A. Hargreaves & C. Chapman (Eds.), Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 137-153). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Chen, H-J. (2005). Routines and micro-politics in a Taiwanese primary school: A qualitative analysis of the dialectical relationship between structure and agency. International Journal of Educational Development, 25, 580-581.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-967.
Coldren, A. F. (2007). Spanning the boundary between school leadership and classroom instruction at Hillside elementary school. In J. P. Spillane & J. B.Diamond (Eds.), Distributed leadership in practice (pp 16-34). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Coulby, D. (2000). Beyond the national curriculum. London: Falmer Press.
Cranston, N., & Enrich, L. (2005). Enhancing the effectiveness of senior management teams in schools. International Studies in Educational Administration, 33(1), 79-91.
Crawford, M. (1997). Managing stress in education. In T. Bush & D. Middlewood (Eds.), Managing people in education (pp. 113-122). London: Paul Chapman.
Crawford, M. (2003). Challenging circumstance: The role of distributed and intensified leadership. In N. Bennett & L. Anderson (Eds.), Rethinking educational leadership: Challenging the conventions (pp. 77-88). London: Sage.
Crawford, M. (2005). Distributed leadership and headship: A paradoxical relationship? School Leadership & Management, 25(3), 213-215.
Crowther, F., Kaagan, S. S., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2002). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Davies, B. (Ed.). (2005). The essentials of school leadership. London: Paul Chapman.
Davies, B. (2006). Leading the strategically focus school: Success and sustainability. London: Paul Chapman.
Davies, B. (2007). Sustainable leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), Developing sustainable leadership (11-25). London: Paul Chapman.
Davies, B., Ellison, L., & Bowring-Carr, C. (2005). School leadership in the 21st century (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Day, C. (1997). Teachers in the twenty-first century: Time to renew the vision. In A. Hargreaves & R. Evans (Eds.), Beyond educational reform: Bringing Teachers back in (pp. 43-61). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Day, C. (1998). Developing teachers: The challenge of lifelong learning. London: Falmer Press.
Day, C. (2003). Successful leadership in the twenty-first century. In A. Harris, C. Day, M. Hadfield, D. Hopkins, A. Hargreaves & C. Chapman (Eds.), Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 157-179). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Day, C., Hall, C., & Whitaker, P. (1998). Developing leadership in primary schools. London: Paul Chapman.
Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Leithwood, K., & Kington, A. (2008). Research into the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: Policy and research contexts. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 5-25.
Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity of teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857-880.
DfES(2002). Securing improvement: The role of subject leaders. London: DfES.
Dinham, S. (2007). The secondary Head of Department and achievement of exceptiional student outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(1), 62-79.
Dimmock, C., Walker, A. (2005). Educational leadership: Culture and diversity. London: Sage.
Duncan, D. (2004). Subject leader accountability. In M. Brundrett & I. Terell (Eds.), Learning to lead in the secondary school: Becoming an effective head of department (pp. 30-38). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Durrant, J., & Holden, G. (2006). Teacher leading change: Doing research for school improvement. London: Paul Chapman.
Earley, P., & Weindling, D. (2004). Understanding school leadership. London: Paul Chapman.
Easton, C., Golightly, J., Oyston, M., & Waters, M. (1999). Coordinating the curriculum in the smaller primary school. London: Falmer Press.
Everard, K. B., Morris, G., & Wilson, I. (2004). Effective school management (4th ed.). London: Paul Chapman.
Featherstone, S. (1996). An inspector calls: The role of the curriculum co-ordinator in inspection. In J. O’Neill & K. Kitson (Eds.), Effective curriculum management (pp. 41-51). London: Routledge.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Floden, R. F. (1986). The culture of teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp.505-526). New York: Macmillan.
Field, K. (2004). Subject leadership: principles and practice, The cross-curriculum management. London: Optimus.
Field, K., Holden, P., & Lawlor, H. (2000). Effective subject leadership. London: Routledge.
Fincham, R., & Rhodes, P. (2005). Principles of organizational behavior (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Firestone, W. A., & Martinez, M. C. (2007). Districts, teacher leaders, and distributed leadership: Changing instructional practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 3-35.
Fleer, M., & Geace, T. (2003). Building a community of science learners through legitimate collegial participation. In J. Wallace & J. Loughran (Eds.), Leadership and professional development in science education: New possibilities for enhancing teacher learning (pp. 116-133). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Fleming, P. (2000). The art of middle management in secondary schools: A guide to effective subject and team leadership. London: David Fulton.
Fleming, P., & Amesburv, M. (2001). The art of middle management in primary schools: A guide to effective subject, year and team leadership. London: David Fulton.
Fletcher-Campbell, F. (2003). Promotion to middle management: Some practitioner’s perceptions. Educational Research, 45(1), 1-15.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 645-672) (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Foreman, K. (1997). Managing individual performance. In T. Bush & D. Middlewood (Eds.), Managing people in education (pp. 203-219). London: Paul Chapman.
Foster, W. (1989). Toward a critical practice of leadership. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Critical perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 39-62). London: Falmer Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of prison. London: Routledge.
Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Fullan, M. (2002). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Furlong, J., Barton, L., Miles, S., Whiting, G.., & Whitty, G.. (2000). Teacher education in transition: Re-forming professionalism? Buckingham: Open University Press.
Galton, M. (1996). Teaching, learning and co-ordinator. In J. O’Neill & K. Kitson (Eds.), Effective curriculum management (pp. 11-19). London: Routledge.
Giancola, J. M., & Hutchison, J. K. (2005). Transforming the culture of school leadership: Humanizing our practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gipps, C. (1992). Developing assessment for the National Curriculum. London: Kogan Page.
Glanz, J. (2006). Cultural leadership. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Glanz, J., & Neville, R. F. (1997). Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues and controversies. Norwood, Massachusetts: Christopher-Gordon.
Glatter, R. (2003). Governance, autonomy and accountability in education. In M. Preedy, R. Glatter & C. Wise (Eds.), Strategic leadership and educational improvement (pp. 44-59). London: Paul Chapman.
Glatter, R., & Harvey, J. A. (2006). Varieties of shared headship: A preliminary exploration. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Glover, D., Bennett, N., Crawford, M., & Levacic, R. (1997). Strategic and resource management in primary schools: Evidence from OfSTED inspection reports. School Leadership & Management, 17(3), 357-374.
Glover, D., Gleeson, D., Gough, G., & Johnson, M. (1998). The meaning of management: The development needs of middle manager in secondary schools. Educational Management and Administration, 26(3), 279-292.
Glover, D., & Miller, D. (1999). The working day of the subject leader and the impact of interruption on teaching and learning in second school. Reaearch in education, 62, 55-65.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Gambling, M., Gough, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). As others see us: Senior management and subject stall perceptions of the work effectiveness of subject leaders in secondary schools. School Leadership & Management, 19(3), 331-344.
Goodson, I. F. (1997). ‘Trendy theory’ and teacher professionalism. In A. Hargreaves & R. Evans (Eds.), Beyond educational reform: Bringing Teachers back in (pp. 29-42). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Gorard, S. (2008). The value-added of primary schools: What is it really measuring? Educational Review, 60(2), 179-185.
Gordon, P., & Lawton, D. (2003). Dictionary of British education. London: Woburn Press.
Grace, G. (1995). School leadership: Beyond education management. London: Falmer Press.
Graham, C., & Neu, D. (2004). Standardized testing and the construction of governable persons. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(3), 295-319.
Green, J. E. (2001). Education in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Indiana: Bloomington
Greenfield, W. D. (1991). The micropolitics of leadership in an urban elementary school. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict and cooperation (pp. 161-184). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed leadership: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317-338.
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451.
Gronn, P. (2003a). The new work of educational leaders: Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. London: Paul Chapman.
Gronn, P. (2003b). Distributed and intensifying school leadership. In N. Bennett & L. Anderson (Eds.), Rethinking educational leadership: Challenging the conventions (pp. 60-73). London: Sage.
Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of educational administration, 28(3), 141-158.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 8 (3), 381-391.
Hadfield, M. (2007). Co-leaders and middle leaders: The dynamic between leaders and followers in networks of schools. School Leadership & Management, 27(3), 259-283.
Hales, C. (1997). Power, authority and influence. In A. Harris, N. Bennett & M. Preedy (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness and improvement in education (pp. 22-30). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hall, V., & Southworth, G. (1997). Headship. School Leadership & Management, 17(2), 151-170.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1999). Can leadership enhance school effectiveness? In T. Bush, L. Bell, Bolam, r. Glatter & P. Ribbins (Eds.), Educational management: Redefining theory, policy and practice (pp178-190). London: Paul Chapman.
Halverson, R. R. (2007). Systems of practice and professional community: The Adams case. In J. P. Spillane & J. B.Diamond (Eds.), Distributed leadership in practice (pp 35-62). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Hammersley-Fletcher, L. (2002). Becoming a subject leader: What’s in a name? Subject leadership in English primary schools. School Leadership & Management, 22(4), 407-420.
Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Brundrett, M. (2005). Leaders on leadership: The impression of primary school head teachers and subject leaders. School Leadership & Management, 25(1), 59-75.
Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Kirkham, G. (2007). Middle leadership in primary scjool communities of practice: Distribution or deception. School Leadership & Management, 27(5), 423-435.
Hardie, B. (2001). Managing monitoring of the curriculum. In D. Middlewood & N. Burton (Eds.), Managing the curriculum (pp. 70-88). London: Paul Chapman.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Hargreaves, A. (1991). Contrived collegiality: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict and cooperation (pp. 46-72). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Hargreaves, A. (1992). Culture of teaching: A focus for change. In A. Hargreaves & M. G. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development (pp. 216-240). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Hargreaves, A. (1995). Development and desire: A postmodern perspective. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 9-34). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hargreaves, A. (1997). From reform to renewal: A new deal for a new age. In A. Hargreaves & R. Evans (Eds.), Beyond educational reform: Bringing Teachers back in (pp. 105-125). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hargreaves, A., & Evans R. (1997). Beyond educational reform: Bringing Teachers back in. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hargreaves, D. (1995). School culture, school effectiveness and school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6(1), 23-46.
Harold, B. (1998). Head’-ing into the future: The changing role of New Zealand principals. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 347-357.
Harris, A. (1998). Improving ineffective departments in secondary schools. Educational Management and Administration, 26(3), 269-278.
Harris, A. (1999a). Effective subject leadership in secondary school. London: David Fulton.
Harris, A. (1999b). Teaching and learning in the effective school. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Harris, A. (2000). Effective leadership and departmental improvement. Westminster Studies in Education, 23, 81-90.
Harris, A. (2002). Distributed leadership in school: Leading or misleading? Management in Education, 16(5), 10-13.
Harris, A. (2003a). Introduction. In A. Harris, C. Day, M. Hadfield, D. Hopkins, A. Hargreaves & C. Chapman (Eds.), Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 1-5). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Harris, A. (2003b). Teacher leadership and school improvement. In A. Harris, C. Day, M. Hadfield, D. Hopkins, A. Hargreaves & C. Chapman (Eds.), Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 72-83). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Harris, A. (2005). Reflection on Distributed leadership. Management in Education, 19(2), 10-12.
Harris, A. (2006a). Opening up the ‘black box’ of leadership practice: Taking a distributed leadership perspective. International Studies in Educational Administration, 34(2), 37-45.
Harris, A. (2006b). Leading change in school in difficulty. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 9-18.
Harris, A., Busher, H., & Wise, C. (2001). Effective training for subject leaders. Journal of In-Service Education, 27(1), 83-94.
Harris, A., & Day, C. (2003). From singular to plural? Challenging the orthodoxy of school leadership. In N. Bennett & L. Anderson (Eds.), Rethinking educational leadership: Challenging the conventions (pp. 89-99). London: Sage.
Harris, A., Jamieson, I. M., & Russ, J. (1997). A study of effective departments in secondary school. In A. Harris, N. Bennett & M. Preedy (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness and improvement in education (pp. 147-161). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Harris, A., & Lambert, L. (2003). Building leadership capacity for school improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2003). Teacher leadership: A review of the research. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Heck, R. H., Larsen, T. J., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 94-125.
Hobbs, K. (2006). Rethinking middle leadership roles in secondary schools. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California.
Hollingsworth, A. (2004). The school as a professional learning community: Perspectives from Tasmanian and English schools on the essentials for creating a community of learning in a school. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Hopkins, D. (2003). Instructional leadership and school improvement. In A. Harris, C. Day, M. Hadfield, D. Hopkins, A. Hargreaves & C. Chapman (Eds.), Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 55-71). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Hopkins, D., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (1997). School improvement: Propositions for actions. In A. Harris, N. Bennett, & M. Preedy (Eds.), Organisational Effectiveness and improvement in education (pp. 261-270). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Hoyle, E. (1986). The politics of school management. London: Hodder and Stroughton.
Hoyle, E. (1999). The two faces of micropolitics. School Leadership & Management, 19(2), 213-222.
Hoult, E. (2002). Learning to lead: The implications of the standards for subject leaders in England. Journal of In-Service Education, 28(3), 475-494.
Hoult, E. (2004). Subject leadership: principles and practice, Policy implementation. London: Optimus.
Hughes, S. (2004). Subject leadership: principles and practice, Resource management. London: Optimus.
James, C., Aubrey-Hopkins, J. (2003). The leadership authority of educational 'Middle Mangers': The case of subject leaders in secondary schools in Wales. International Studies in Educational Administration, 31(1), 50-64.
Johnson, B. (2003). Teacher collaboration: Good for some, not so good for others. Educational Studies, 29(4). 337-350.
Jones, J. (2005). Management skills in schools. London: Sage.
Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002). The micropolitics of teacher induction: A narrative-biographical study on teacher socialisation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 105-120.
Kelly, A. V. (1999). The curriculum: Theory and practice (4th ed.). London: Paul Chapman.
Kerry, T. (2005). The evolving role of the head of department. London Review of Education, 3(1), 65-80.
Kirkham, G. (2004). Subject leadership: Principles and practice, The role of the subject leader. London: Optimus.
Lambert, L. (1998). How to build leadership capacity. Educational Leadership, 55(7), 17-19.
Lambert, L. (2002). Toward a deepened theory of constructivist leadership. In L. Lambert, D. Walker, D. P. Zimmerman, J. E. Cooper, M. D. Lambert, M. E. Gardner & M. Szabo (Eds.). The constructivist leader (2nd ed.) (pp. 34-62). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership redefined: An evocative context for teacher leadership. School Leadership & Management, 23(4), 421-430.
Lambert, L., Walker, D., Zimmerman, D. P., Cooper, J. E., Lambert, M. D., Gardner, M. E., & Szabo, M. (Eds.). (2002). The constructivist leader (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Lawton, D. (2005). Education and Labour Party ideologies: 1900-2001 and beyond. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Leithwood, K., & Day, C. (2008). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 1-4.
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006a). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006b). Successful school leadership: What it is and how it influences pupil learning. Research Report 800. London: DfES.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27-42.
Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N., & Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37-67.
Leithwood, K., Tomlinson, D., & Genge, M. (1996). Transformational school leadership. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, H, Hallinger & A, Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 785-840). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Levacic, R. (1995). Local management of schools: Analysis and practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Lewis, P., & Murphy, R. (2008). New directions in school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(2), 127-146.
Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2004). Teacher leadership. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
Lima, J. A. (2008). Department networks and distributed leadership in schools. School Leadership & Management, 28(2), 159-187.
Lindle, J. C. (1999). What can the study of micropolitics contribute to the practice of leadership in reforming schools? School Leadership & Management, 19(2), 171-178.
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2004). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (4th ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
Lunn, P., & Bishop, A. (2002). Subject leader and class teacher: Exploring the conflict of a dual role in a primary school. Research in Education, 68, 64-76.
MacBeath, J. (2005). Leadership as distributed: A matter of practice. School Leadership & Management, 25(4), 349-366.
Malen, B. (1994). The micropolitics of education: Mapping the multiple dimensions of power relations in school polities. Journal of Education policy, 9, 147-167.
Mangin, M. M. (2007). Facilitating elementary principal’s support for instructional teacher leadership. Education Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 319-357.
Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformation and instructional leadership. Education Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.
Marshall, C. (1991). The chasm between administrator and teacher cultures. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp.139-160). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Maslach, C. (2001). A multidimensional theory of burnout. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theory of organizational stress (pp. 68-85). London: Oxford University Press.
Mawhinney, H. B. (1999). Reappraisal: The problems and prospects of studying the micropolictics of leadership in reforming schools. School Leadership & Management, 19(2), 159-170.
Mayer-Smith, J. (2003). The experience and challenges of teacher leadership in learning technology reform for science education: A tale of TESSI. In J. Wallace & J. Loughran (Eds.), Leadership and professional development in science education (pp. 81-98). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Mayrowetz, D., Murphy, J., Louis, K. S., & Smylie, M. A. (2007). Distributed leadership as work redesign: retrofitting the job characteristics model. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 69-101.
McGregor, J. (2003). Collaboration in communities of practice. In N. Bennett & L. Anderson (Eds.), Rethinking educational leadership: Challenge the conventions (pp. 113-130). London: Sage.
McLaughlin, M. W. (1997). Rebuilding teacher professionalism in the United Stated. In A. Hargreaves & R. Evans (Eds.), Beyond educational reform: Bringing Teachers back in (pp. 77-93). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Middlewood, D., & Burton, N. (Eds.). (2001). Managing the curriculum. London: Paul Chapman.
Morrison, K. (2002). School leadership and complexity theory. London: Routledge
Mullen, C., Gordon, S., Greenlee, B., & Anderson, R. (2002). Capacities for school leadership: Emerging trends in the literature. International Journal of Educational Reform, 11(2), 158-198.
Murphy, J. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. In R. S. Lotto & P. W. Thurston (Eds.). Advances in educational administration: Changing perspectives on the school (pp. 163-200). Greenwich, Connecticut: Jai Press.
Murphy, J. (1991). Restructuring school: Capturing and assessing the phenomena. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
NCSL. (2003). Too busy to learn? An instruction to collaborative leadership learning. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
NCSL. (2007). What we know about school leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Nichols, S. E., & Tippins, D. J. (2003). Community-based science education leadership enacted in a Filipino barangay. In J. Wallace & J. Loughran (Eds.), Leadership and professional development in science education: New possibilities for enhancing teacher learning (pp. 134-151). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
OfSTED. (2002). Good teaching, effective developments: Findings from a HMI of survey of subject teaching in secondary schools, 2000/01. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
OfSTED. (2005). The national literacy and numeracy strategies and the primary curriculum. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Oliva, P. F. (2001). Developing the curriculum (5 ed.). New York: Longman.
O’Neill, J. (1996). The role of the co-ordinator. In J. O’Neill & K. Kitson (Eds.), Effective curriculum management (pp. 20-31). London: Routledge.
O’Neill, J. (2003). Understanding curriculum leadership in the secondary school. In N. Bennett & L. Anderson (Eds.), Rethinking educational leadership: Challenge the conventions (pp. 143-156). London: Sage.
Ornstein, A. C. (1995). Beyond effective teaching. In A. C. Ornstein (Ed.), Teaching: Theory into practice (pp. 274-291). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Owens, R. G. (2001). Organizational behavior in education: Instructional leadership and school reform (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Parkay, F. W., & Hass, G. (2000). Curriculum planning: A contemporary approach (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Pavlou, D. (2004). Teachers leaders and reflective practitioners: Building the capacity of a school to improve by promoting research and reflection. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Penlington, C., Kington, A., & Day, C. (2008). Leadership in improving schools: A qualitative perspective. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 65-82.
Poole, W. (1995). Reconstructing the teacher-administrator relation to achieve systemic change. Journal of School Leadership, 5, 565-596.
Preedy, M. (2001). Curriculum evaluation: Measuring what we value. In D. Middlewood & N. Burton (Eds.), Managing the curriculum (pp. 89-103). London: Paul Chapman.
Printy, S. M. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Education Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187-226.
Reid, I., Brain, K., & Boys, L. C. (2004). Teacher or learning leaders? Where have all the teachers gone? Gone to be leaders, everyone. Educational Studies, 30(3), 251-264.
Reinhartz, J., & Beach, D. M. (2004). Educational leadership: Changing schools, changing roles. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Reitzug, U. C. (1997). Images of principal instructional leadership: From supervision to collaborative inquiry. Journal of Curriculum Supervision, 12, 356-366.
Reynolds, D., Sammons., P., Stoll., L., Barber, M., & Hillman, J. (1997). School effectiveness improvement in the United Kingdom. In A. Harris, N. Bennett & M. Preedy (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness and improvement in education (pp. 124-137). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Riley, D., Mulford, B. (2007). England’s National College for School Leadership: A model for leadership education? Journal of Educational Administration, 45(1), 80-98.
Ritchie, S. M., Tobin, K., Roth, W. M., & Carambo, C. (2007). Transforming an academy through the enactment of collective curriculum leadership. Journal Curriculum Studies, 39(2), 151-175.
Robinson, V. M. J. (2008). Forging the links between distributed leadership and educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 241-256.
Ross, A. (2000). Curriculum: Construction and critique. London: Falmer Press.
Rubin, L. (1985). Artistry and teaching. New York: Random House.
Ruding, E. (2000). Middle management in action. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Ryan, G. E., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 769-802) (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Sammons, P., Thomas, S., & Mortimore, P. (1997). Forging link: Effective schools and effective departments. London: Paul Chapman.
Schein, E. (1992). Organisational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Schmidt, M. (2000). Role theory, emotions, and identity in the department headship of secondary schooling. Teaching and Teacher Tducation, 16, 827-842.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Scribner, J. P., Sawyer, R. K., Watson, S. T., & Myer, V. L. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration. Education Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 67-100.
Sergiovanni, T. (1991). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Sherer, J. Z. (2007). The practice of leadership in mathematics and language arts: The Adam case. In J. P. Spillane & J. B.Diamond (Eds.), Distributed leadership in practice (pp 106-128). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: a contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. (3rd ed.) (pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
Silcock, P., & Brundrett, M. (2001). The management consequences of different models of teaching and learning. In D. Middlewood & N. Burton (Eds.), Managing the curriculum (pp. 35-51). London: Paul Chapman.
Silins, H., & Mulford, B. (2004). Schools as learning organisations: Effects on teacher leadership and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(3-4), 443-466.
Silva, D. Y., Gimbert, B., & Nolan, J. (2000). Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teacher College Record, 102(4), 779-804.
Simon, S., Osborne, J., & Erduran, S. (2003). Systemic teacher development to enhance the use of argumentation in school science activities. In J. Wallace & J. Loughran (Eds.), Leadership and professional development in science education: New possibilities for enhancing teacher learning (pp. 198-217). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Siskin, L. S. (1994). Realms of knowledge: Academic departments in secondary schools. London: Falmer Press.
Siskin, L. S. (1997). The challenge of leadershipin compressive high school: school vision and department divisions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33, 604-623.
Smith, B. (2004). Development planning in the secondary school. In M. Brundrett & I. Terrell (Eds.), Learning to lead in the secondary school: Becoming an effective head of department (pp. 131-143). London: Routledgefalmer.
Smylie, M. A., & Denny, J. W. (1990). Teacher leadership: Tensions and ambiguities in organizational perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 235-259.
Southworth, G. (1999). Primary school leadership in England: Policy, practice and theory. School Leadership & Management, 19(1), 49-65.
Southworth, G. (2004). Primary school leadership in context. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Southworth, G. (2005). Learning-centred leadership. In B. Davies, (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp.75-92). London: Paul Chapman.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
Spillane, J. P. (2008). Distributed leadership. In J. H. Munro (Eds.), Roundtable viewpoints: Educational leadership (pp. 36-43). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., & Pareja, A. S. (2007). Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal’s workday. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 103-125.
Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B. (Eds.). (2007). Distribution leadership in Practice. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., & Jita, L. (2003). Leading instruction: The distribution of leadership for instruction. Curriculum Studies, 35(5), 533-543.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage
Stevenson, H. (2004). The recruitment and selection of staff. In M. Brundrett & I. Terrell (Eds.), Learning to lead in the secondary school: Becoming an effective head of department (pp. 193-203). London: Routledgefalmer.
Storey, A. (2004). The problem of distributed leadership in school. School Leadership & Management, 24(3), 249-265.
Szwed, C. (2007). Managing from the middle? Tensions and dilemmas in the role of the primary school special educational needs coordinator. School Leadership & Management, 27(5), 437-451.
Terrell, K. (2004). Performance management for middle managers. In M. Brundrett & I. Terrell (Eds.), Learning to lead in the secondary school: Becoming an effective head of department (pp. 108-112). London: Routledgefalmer.
Terrell, I., & Powell, E. (2004). Leading effective teaching and learning. In M. Brundrett & I. Terrell (Eds.), Learning to lead in the secondary school: Becoming an effective head of department (pp. 41-53). London: Routledgefalmer.
Terrell, I., & Terrell, K. (2004). Self management for the subject leader. In M. Brundrett & I. Terrell (Eds.), Learning to lead in the secondary school: Becoming an effective head of department (pp. 217-223). London: Routledgefalmer.
Timperley, H. S. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395-420
Tomlinson, H. (2004). Educational leadership: Personal growth for professional development. London: Sage.
Tranter, S. (2000). From teacher to middle manager: Making the next step. London: Person Education.
TTA. (1998). National standards for subject leaders. London: TTA.
Turner, C. (1996). The roles and tasks of a subject head of department in secondary schools in England and Wales: A neglected area of research? School organization, 16(2), 203-217.
Turner, C. (2007). Leading from the middle: Dealing with diversity and complexity. School Leadership & Management, 27(5), 401-403.
Turner, C., & Bolam, R. (1998). Analysing the role of the subject head of department in secondary schools in England and Wales: Towards a theoretical framework. School Leadership & Management, 18(3), 373-388.
Vann, B. J. (1999). Micropolitics in the United Kingdom: Can a principal ever be expected to be ‘one of us’? School Leadership & Management, 19(2), 201-204.
Walker, D. (2002). Constructivist leadership: Standards, equity, and learning- Weaving whole cloth from multiple strands. In L. Lambert, D. Walker, D. P. Zimmerman, J. E. Cooper, M. D. Lambert, M. E. Gardner & M. Szabo (Eds.), The constructivist leader (2nd ed.) (pp. 1-33). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Wallace, M. (2002). Modeling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: Primary school senior management teams in England and Wales. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(2), 163-186.
Wallace, R., Engel, D., & Mooney, J. (1997). The learning school: A guide to vision based leadership. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Wallace, M., & Huckman, L. (1999). Senior management teams in primary schools. London: Routledge
Wallace, J., & Loughran, J. (Eds.). (2003). Leadership and professional development in science education: New possibilities for enhancing teacher learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Wasley, P. A. (1991). Working together: Teacher leadership and collaboration. In C. Livingston (Ed.), Teacher leaders: Evolving roles (pp. 21-55). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Watkins, P. (1989). Leadership, power, and symbols in the educational administration. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Critical perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 9-37). London: Falmer Press.
West, N. (1998). Middle management in the primary school: A development guide for curriculum leaders, subject managers and senior staff (2nd ed.). London: David Fulton.
West-Burnham, J. (2004). Building leadership capacity: Helping leaders learn. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Whitaker, K. S. (2003). Principal role changes and influence on principal recruitment and selection: An international perspective. Journal of Educational Administration. 41(1), 37-54.
Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution & choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Williams, J. (2002). Professional leadership in school: Effective middle management and subject leadership. London: Kogan Page.
Williams, V. (1995). Toward self-managing school. London: Cassell.
Wise, C. (2001). The monitoring role of the academic middle manager in secondary schools. Educational Management and Administration, 29(3), 333-342.
Wise, C. (2003). Leaders of subject communities. In N. Bennett & L. Anderson (Eds.), Rethinking educational leadership: Challenge the conventions (pp. 131-142).
Wise, C., & Busher, H. (2001). The subject leader. In D. Middlewood & N. Burton (Eds.), Managing the curriculum (pp. 122-134). London: Paul Chapman.
Witziers, B., & Bosker, R. J., & Kruger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Education Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398-425.
Woods, P. A. (2004). Democratic leadership: Drawing distinctions with distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7(1), 3-26.
Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in the transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.
Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Zepeda, S. J. (1999). Staff development: Practices that promote leadership in learning communities. New York: Eye On Education.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE